Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) General Permits Reissuance Public Comment Period

408 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Shirley Owens

8/16/22 @ 9:43 AM
Dear Miss Morris, I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima Farm bureaus. We need to work with those who raise livestock on small scales providing locally sourced food. Applying CAFO standards t...↓

Regards,
Shirley Owens
Oly., WA
No attachments

Comment From: Katie Medel

8/16/22 @ 8:53 AM
This is simply another way for the state to increase our reliance on large companies and state assistance. This will eliminate backyard growers, providing food resources to our families. It will create a painful permitting process, leaving is little ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/16/22 @ 8:47 AM
I do not approve of the CAFO rules. Encouraging partcipation in self sovereingty is part ones life and dreams, when owning a small plot of land. Thank you for supporting our farmers.
No attachments

Comment From: Sara Foster

8/16/22 @ 8:45 AM
I totally oppose the Cafo rules as drafted. Applying those standards to we small farmers is ridiculous. It will impact our locally sourced foods. The Voluntary Stewardship Program must be recognized.

Sincerely,
Sara Foster August 17, 202...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Powell

8/16/22 @ 8:32 AM
I strongly oppose these draft CAFO rules as written.
Permits and fines for smallholders (of farm animals) are wrong, egregious and unnecessary.
Your definition of a CAFO is grossly broad and over-reaching.
Please educate yourselves as to the distinction...↓
The VSP already addresses this issue. Encourage participation in that plan and stop creating busywork for yourselves.
No attachments

Comment From: Vicki Marks

8/16/22 @ 7:37 AM
Just stop already. Our farmers are already struggling. More fees and regulations are in my view, designed to bankrupt them to push the political green agenda. Just stop. Leave them alone.
No attachments

Comment From: Gabriel Sims

8/16/22 @ 7:26 AM
This terrible regulation is written in a manner that is too general. This encompasses so many small operations that is onerous to rural Washington and suburban residents that source some food outside of a grocery store. It has the appearance to allow...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Rakes

8/16/22 @ 7:24 AM
Good morning,
I'm writing as a concerned citizen over this piece of legislation that appears to be an egregious overreach. With concerns worldwide about food shortages, we should be actively in support of our farmers, yes, with guidelines related to e...↓
How can one horse, cow, goat, chicken or duck be deemed "concentrated" and now subject to this?
Further, to propose a $10K/day fine, a $300 annual license to have a small country farm (as we do) in our beautiful state?
The language is far too broad, not well defined and appears to be a full on power grab by DOE.
As Holland's farmers are reminding the world, no farmers, no food.
Our government is there by we, the people. You do work for us...friendly reminder.
This bill comes across as heavy handed, dictatorial and without long vision for food stability and prosperity in our state.
Scrap this effort, put some new people on this team with fresh, open minded ideas and rethink this entire plan. Could we include some farmers in the discussion? This is not approved by this citizen.
Respectfully,
Sue Rakes
No attachments

Comment From: Sharon Moysiuk

8/16/22 @ 7:15 AM
Chelsea Morris, Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696
Olympia, WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

We oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston, and Yakima County Farm Bureaus. We need to work with those who r...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security. Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts.

Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality. There are a lot of people in our rural and urban circles who believe in protecting water quality and do so to the best of their ability.

Ecology needs to spend some of their resources on cleaning up waterways that are being used illegally by people without homes and are unregulated. These water sources are being used as toilets, have drug paraphernalia floating in them, and these people have no regard for protecting water quality. If Ecology is going to fine farms (big or small), then they need to fix the problem with people without homes who are very destructive to our water resources. The Dept. of Ecology should quit putting people in silos and making certain groups pay their fines while others go unregulated. This also puts citizens who use waterways and government employees who service culverts near waterways at high risk for health hazards.

Kids in FFA and 4-H stay busy caring for their animals and going to fairs and it keeps them out of a lot of trouble out there in our world today. Do you want to take that away from hard working communities too? Farming is and should remain a respected profession whether that is a backyard farm or a farm on a larger scale.

Sincerely,

Dale and Sharon Moysiuk
No attachments

Comment From: Lindsy Hubby

8/16/22 @ 6:53 AM
Please modify your CAFO law to not include any private citizen, homesteader etc that has a handful of livestock or less. This is a clear violation of 4th Ammendment rights.
No attachments

Comment From: Terry Long

8/16/22 @ 6:48 AM
I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus. We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food. Applying CAFO standards to small ope...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Cooke

8/16/22 @ 6:29 AM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Mary Cooke
August 16, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/16/22 @ 4:15 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Catherine Alexandria

8/16/22 @ 12:55 AM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,
Catherine Alexandria
August 16th, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Kelly Meyer

8/16/22 @ 12:00 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Jim Giannunzio

8/16/22 @ 12:00 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/15/22 @ 10:07 PM
I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.

Applying CAFO standards to small opera...↓

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Justin Boardman

August 17, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Robert Gordon

8/15/22 @ 9:46 PM
The agricultural community is the backbone of this nation along with the trucks that get the products moved.to incorporate small land owners and hobby farmers into the CAFO program would destroy the ability of these people to be profitable. The fact ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Patrick McCarty

8/15/22 @ 9:45 PM
I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of the Thurston County Farm Bureau. We need to work with small scale livestock producers who provide locally sourced food. Applying the CAFO standards to small operations will be devast...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Eva Lester

8/15/22 @ 9:31 PM
I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.

Applying CAFO standards to small opera...↓

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.
No attachments

Comment From: Elizabeth Turnbow

8/15/22 @ 9:26 PM
Dear Chelsea Morris: I oppose the CAFO rules as ddrafted and concur with the comment of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus. We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.

Applying CAFO s...↓

Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to enccourage participation in voluntary programs which have proven to protect water quality.

As a land owner in Washington State I feel education and voluntary participation in protection of our water is much more powerful and sustainable than punitive enforcement.

Thank you for your time

Elizabeth Turnbow
No attachments

Comment From: Leiloni Schulz

8/15/22 @ 9:17 PM
Big government needs to stay out of small family backyards. Youth can learn so much about responsibility through raising animals and participating in youth organizations like 4H and FFA. Such organizations keep kids off the street and out of trouble ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Katie Anonymous

8/15/22 @ 9:07 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,
Katie
No attachments

Comment From: Erika Nelson

8/15/22 @ 9:06 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Erika Nelson
No attachments

Comment From: Sarah Cordova

8/15/22 @ 8:59 PM
Please don't require farmers or homesteader to be required to submit permits to keep livestock. Instead educate people about how to properly manage livestock waste. Education people on rotational grazing and allowing the land to rest from livestock p...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Corrine Marson

8/15/22 @ 8:51 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Corrine Marson

8/17/22
No attachments

Comment From: Jenna Aiello

8/15/22 @ 8:49 PM
This permit process is absolutely unfair and unnecessarily restricting for many in this community who have minimal acreage. While I understand the necessity to monitor waste output from small concentrated facilities, this permitting process will over...↓
Jenna Aiello MS CCC-SLP
971.266.7209
No attachments

Comment From: Audra Distifeno

8/15/22 @ 8:48 PM
August 15, 2022

Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

As a long-time rural resident, farmer's daughter and connoisseur of fresh local farm products, I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur w...↓

We need to work with, not punish, people who raise livestock on a small scale and who provide essential, locally-sourced food.

CAFO standards would be crippling for small operations and ultimately, local food supplies, which are directly related to our food security.

The Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts' work should be recognized by Ecology. Ecology must encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality, instead of regulating. Doing so is in the best interest of all of us living in rural areas and those who depend on high-quality, locally-sourced food.

I vehemently oppose the drafted CAFO rules and regulations.

Sincerely,

Audra Distifeno
No attachments

Comment From: Erika and Charles Grace

8/15/22 @ 8:44 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Erika and Charles Grace

August 15, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Jeff Merryman

8/15/22 @ 8:10 PM
I really do like what you guys are trying to do and I totally support this but there needs to be a no permit required level. I feel that if we take table 2 in your draft rules and we take all the numbers that you have listed and we take a zero off th...↓

I believe if you were to do that a lot of small farmers would accept what you're trying to do and they would probably support you.

If you can't have a no permit level then maybe everything needs to be scrapped because government overreach is ridiculous on small farms.

It's sad to think that a small farm has the same fine as a multinational conglomerate farm has.
No attachments

Comment From: Angela Gilman

8/15/22 @ 8:07 PM
This rule of law that is trying to be passed needs to be stopped. We the people have the right to raise our own food. We the people have the right to buy local from our farmers. It lets us know who takes care of the meat and where our meat is coming ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jack and Wendy Schoepfer

8/15/22 @ 7:45 PM
We oppose the CAFO rules drafted and concur with the Thurston County Farm Bureau. We need to work with those who raise livestock. Applying these proposed regulations will be devastating to local food production and everyone who owns animals, horses,...↓
No attachments

Comment From: S O'Hara

8/15/22 @ 7:36 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

My two children belong to a poultry 4-H group and have done so for the last 6 years. We have 5 chickens/pets that have taught my children a lot about life. These cluckers lay an egg each day that support our family and a few other families in our neighborhood. It is a crying shame that the Government again is ripping apart an educational tool just to have more money in their pockets, cheat/tax We The People, and act like a Tyrant...Do this Or be fined or jailed! This is �� America for goodness sakes!!! How dare Ecology take away something that a child holds so dear to her heart... 5 laying 4-H hens whose droppings get picked up and put in a garbage bag each day. Shameful...absolutely shameful what you are trying to enforce!

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.


Sincerely,

S O'Hara

August 15,2022
No attachments

Comment From: Jordan O

8/15/22 @ 7:32 PM
Chelsea Morris, WA Dept. of Ecology
PO Box 47696, Olympia WA 98504

Dear Chelsea

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus. We need to work with those who raise livestock on a sma...↓

Sincerely,

JMO
No attachments

Comment From: Clay Whipple

8/15/22 @ 7:29 PM
I am totally against your (CAFO). This can easily be weaponized against anyone and everyone. ESPECIALLY HERE IN WA.
No attachments

Comment From: Bob Lee

8/15/22 @ 7:29 PM
Fewer and fewer people have the knowledge on how to successfully raise animals. The last thing this state needs is to create obstacles to people growing their own chickens, horses, cattle, sheep or other farm animals. Ecology does not have statutor...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jay Johnson

8/15/22 @ 6:54 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696
Olympia, WA. 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and
Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations will be devastating to local food production and
our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of Voluntary Stewardship and local conservation
districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary
programs, proven to protect water quality.

Best regards,

Jay Johnson

August 15, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Jason Locke

8/15/22 @ 6:03 PM
Chelsea Morris,
As a small hobby farmer who farms for personal use and is a member of the Washington Farm Bureau, I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and agree with the sentiments of local farm bureaus.
No attachments

Comment From: Derek Nelson

8/15/22 @ 5:43 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,
Derek Nelson

August 17, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Olivia Raine

8/15/22 @ 5:22 PM
The extremely broad language puts anyone keeping livestock at risk of loosing the rights to farm, feed ourselves and our communities and take part in ecological restoration via responsible livestock management. Extreme government oversight puts anyon...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Brian Preza

8/15/22 @ 4:27 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.


Applying CAFO standards to small operati...↓

Large government organizations are largely inefficient in dealing with the needs of the individual, and this is no different. Only large farm and produce operations will be able to effectively comply with CAFO rules, and small farms as well as homesteaders who try to live off the land and not be a burden on government infrastructure will suffer. Please consider the impact you will have on thousands of responsible citizens and farmers who do their best to support their community.




Sincerely,

Brian Preza

August 17, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Brandon DeHart

8/15/22 @ 4:21 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Brandon DeHart

August 15, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Joseph Granger

8/15/22 @ 4:05 PM
I am against this proposed CAFO regulation because it will be used to prevent the reasonable use of private property without just compensation being paid to the private property owner for public use of they property. Such actions are against both the...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Paulette Alaena

8/15/22 @ 3:38 PM
I OPPOSE ABSOLUTELY - concentrate your focus upon, Violating Feed Lots,Corporations & Large businesses. NOT on citizen small farmers, individuals who act to be sovereign at home on their land. WE the People are NOT "Concentrated Animal Feeding Opera...↓

We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Paulette Alaena

August 17, 2022

Furthermore:
This CAFO proposed permit itself is a ridiculous inappropriate unacceptable proposal/ rule.
It should NOT be allowed - at all.
Recently an attendee of your committee meeting reported that upon asking if anyone on this committee personally had farm animals, had experience in raising them — they did NOT.
Who are you and by what reasonable authority are you to place Permits and Penalties upon citizens
Who do so for their own sovereignty and pleasure and do so ecologically.
This is another invasion of personal rights and sovereignty upon citizenry who choose to provide their own food sources as food pricing escalates daily.
Your concerns ecologically are misdirected.
WHY do you allow the toxicity levels in City, Tap water by the chemicals in them, how about turning your attention and Focus to that in Washington State! - where these levels are some of the highest in the nation.
Consider rearranging your priorities elsewhere and not upon WE THE PEOPLE.
No attachments

Comment From: James Benson

8/15/22 @ 3:29 PM
As a rural citizen who has raised livestock in the past, I fully support the CAFO water quality standards and think they should be applied to everyone. I have witnessed first hand what sloppy and irresponsible agricultural practices can do to riparia...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Robert Margulies

8/15/22 @ 3:24 PM
How many animals? Two dogs? four cats? three rabbits?
This bill is nonsense and a criminal waste of taxpayer money.
No attachments

Comment From: Jon McAninch

8/15/22 @ 3:09 PM
Your CAFO rule changes are overreaching and threatening especially to small producers, and illustrate no specific scientific justification for the need or how violations will be determined. There are no limits or parameters as to the broad discretio...↓
Jon B. McAninch
Cedarville Farms
No attachments

Comment From: Gabe Diede

8/15/22 @ 3:04 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696


Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Gabe Diede

August 15, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: claudia Henricks

8/15/22 @ 2:58 PM
It us my right to raise animals for eating and eggs, milking. I live in the country and not in town for that very specific reason,
No attachments

Comment From: thomas wall

8/15/22 @ 2:55 PM
I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments Okanagan, Thurston and Yakima county Farm Bereaus. we need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food. Applying CAFO standards to small ope...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Beverley Hallett

8/15/22 @ 2:49 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Dan DeGroot

8/15/22 @ 2:47 PM
Comments on: S4.J.3. Three foot samples after an arbitrary date do not provide any useful data. I would suggest that it reads that 0-12" and 12"-24" samples be taken after harvest is completed and before any application is done, whether nutrients or ...↓

S4.K.1. g. Estimated plant date. Weather can easily change this and the growing season seems to be shifting. To what end is this required? h. Same with estimated harvest date. To what end is this required or necessary? m. Estimate volume of N & P from multiple sources including precipitation make this requirement incredibly difficult to comply with. This type of reporting does little to aid the environment. A couple of pounds of N or P will not make a major difference to pollution and will be captured in the soil samples. Making this permit difficult to comply with will prevent some farms from even considering this permit and that is not a desired effect.

I would like to encourage the Department of Ecology to continue to strive to create a usable permit that protects the environment but also encourages the use of animal nutrients, the primary source of nutrients for cultivated agriculture for thousands of years. As study after study shows the use of animals nutrients, in a responsible manner, increases the value of agricultural soil. This permit does indeed protect the waters of the state, let us also use it to encourage all farmers to utilize this valuable resource in a way that can benefit all of us.
No attachments

Comment From: Josephine Gwilliam

8/15/22 @ 1:52 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Josephine Gwilliam

August 17, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Amber Bowden

8/15/22 @ 1:50 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Amber Bowden

August 17, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Sandy Braden

8/15/22 @ 1:38 PM
Dr. Morris:

I am a life long resident of the Yakima Valley who was raised in White Swan which is the heart of the Yakama reservation. We raised beef cattle, hay, corn, pigs and barley. So basically, I am a farm girl at heart.

However, I am deeply conce...↓

My parents' farm was the last one on the Wapato Irrigation line southwest of White Swan. I received a phone call from the new owner asking what did we do for irrigation water for the property. I told him my father bought irrigation water that came down the side of the Hawk Road and the Pine Cone road in a ditch from the irrigation company.

The new farm owner said, not any more. The last four farms or so on that ditch had no access to that water any more. Fortunately for him, we told him about an old shallow well that was on the back forty, which was the original well when the house was built in 1917.
We encouraged him to deepen it so he could irrigate the back 40. The south 40 was another matter.

My second example comes from my experience teaching in Saudi Arabia for ARAMCO oil. Every house in Abqaiq, which is in the eastern province, had two water faucets. One was the raw water faucet which had reddish ground water coming from it. The second faucet was the sweet water faucet which was our drinking water. It was the de-salted sea water.

Now, there is no raw water faucet anymore on sinks because the ground water no longer exists. The Saudi leaders decided they wanted their country to become a wheat producing entity in the late 1980s, early 1990s. That decision caused them to use up the ground water. I did not believe that could actually happen until I heard a water expert, Dr. Rachel Cardone, talk about this occurrence. I verified it with a contractor friend who still works in Saudi. He said there is only one faucet on the sinks now.

With your extensive environmental, educational and professional background, you must be aware that water resources are not limitless. The Yakima Valley, is after all, irrigated desert. Without access to enough water, we go back to sagebrush, jack rabbits and coyotes instead of rich farm land. This valley could be the next version of what is now happening in California, Nevada and Arizona.
Ecology needs to step up by actively gathering the necessary data and requiring every dairy to have and implement their dairy management plan. And more than anything, that plan must be aggressively enforced by Ecology.
As an educator, I have found that without the proper enforcement, rules don't mean much.

I respectfully ask that you as an environmentally aware member of the WA State Department of Ecology seriously consider my above statements. Your new CAFO permit must recognize that our climate, our water supply and our water quality is changing dramatically right now. Ecology must fulfill its mission statement and be more than a puppet of the dairy industry.

Thank you.
Sandy Braden-FOTC
No attachments

Comment From: Cindy Mclemore

8/15/22 @ 1:37 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

As President of Benton County Farm Bureau I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureau...↓

We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Cindy Mclemore

August 17, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: L Deck

8/15/22 @ 1:23 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696


Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus. IT IS EXTREMELY UNREASONABLE to apply...↓

We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.
Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

L Deck
No attachments

Comment From: Marisa Terrazas

8/15/22 @ 1:11 PM
Dear Chelsea,

I disapree with the drafted CAFO rules. My concerns are that the new drafted regulations will have a negative impact on residences who raise animals for personal and small scale community purposes.

Applying CAFO standards to small operati...↓

Sincerely,

Marisa Terrazas
No attachments

Comment From: Steven Thonney

8/15/22 @ 1:07 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

As President of Benton County Farm Bureau I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureau...↓

We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Steve Thonney

August 17, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: William Vogel

8/15/22 @ 1:02 PM
I oppose categorizing small, noncommercial operations as CAFOs (of any kind) even if products are occassionally sold.
No attachments

Comment From: Patrick A Fleege

8/15/22 @ 12:54 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,
Patrick A. Fleege
August 15, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Scott Mangum

8/15/22 @ 12:50 PM
Please see attached file. thank you
Attachments:

Comment From: Stuart Scott

8/15/22 @ 12:35 PM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,

Stuart Scott

August 17, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: W Thomas Soeldner

8/15/22 @ 12:34 PM
I am a retired educator, consultant, and clergyman. For the past fifteen years, I have worked with communities and organizations to help them address environmental issues. I have training in natural systems and in helping human beings and their org...↓

SEPA recognizes that "each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment and ... each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment." Under SEPA Ecology must "fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations" and assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive, and aesthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings." Furthermore, under SEPA, Ecology must complete an EIS for the draft CAFO general permit.

In fact, Ecology issued a DNS without sufficient information in the face of clear probably significant adverse impacts to the environment, and Ecology violated SEPA's mandate and the requirement to complete an EIS. Ecology's violation of SEPA in the context of the draft CAFO permit harms our environment and violates Ecology's fundamental duty as an agency tasked with protecting our air and water for current and future generations. I urge Ecology to withdraw the DNS, issue a DS, and complete the mandated EIS.

Over the last ten years, I have spoken with small Eastern Washington farming families living near CAFOs or heard about them from others. In some cases, they have experienced a serious drop in water levels that have made it necessary for them to drill new or deeper wells, and several of them have experienced wells contaminated with the toxins CAFOs produce. Ecology has not regulated CAFOs as defined by the Clean Water Act nor has it followed the Washington State Court of Appeals' order to rewrite the Washington CAFO water pollution permit to protect Washington's waters from contamination and to take the climate crisis into account. Ecology must enact provisions requiring the use of modern pollution control technologies and practices in order to protect our communities.

As an eastern Washington State resident as well as a parent and grandparent of Washington State citizens, I call upon the Department of Ecology to rewrite and champion the necessary updates to the CAFO permits to improve the livability of our rural communities for all residents.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on both the draft CAFO general permit and the associated SEPA DNS.

With hope for a Department of Ecology that practices and carries out its charge from the citizens of the state, I remain

Sincerely,
W. Thomas Soeldner
Upper Columbia River Group – Sierra Club
Valleyford, WA
No attachments

Comment From: logsdon robyn

8/15/22 @ 12:24 PM
We di not need any changes at all
No attachments

Comment From: Steven Frost

8/15/22 @ 12:17 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: SEVE KELTY

8/15/22 @ 12:11 PM
I Oppose rules as drafted and I agree with different farm bureau's around the state. The CAFO should not be regulating small farmers and individuals. The state should not have that kind of power over small operations. Are they really going to try and...↓

Thanks Steve Kelty
No attachments

Comment From: Randy & Aileen Good

8/15/22 @ 11:40 AM
Randy & Aileen Good, Sedro Woolley Wa. 98284 We have a small cattle ranch. This CAFO proposed Draft changes contains no field tested science to justify these proposed changes. We see only assumptions and political science used in this draft. For 1...↓

This Draft CAFO will put many organic and fresh market ag producers out of business. Since that seems to be the goal of the Dept. of Ecology please think twice about where the food you eat day comes from.
For these essential reasons please do not burden the citizens of Washington State with this senseless non-scientific proposal. Randy & Aileen Good
No attachments

Comment From: Cortney Morton

8/15/22 @ 11:39 AM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

This set of regulation is much too broad and ambiguous. Rural residents in county locations with
just a few animals for local production, 200 animals or less, shouldn't even need a permit, especially
if it is simply a homeowner having a few dozen chickens or a few dozen head of livestock (cattle,
pigs, sheep, goats, emus, horses, etc.) to supply the homeowner's basic needs and the needs of a few
neighbors. Also for those who own these animals simply for the pleasure of owning them. This will negatively impact many people and should not be allowed to become a state regulation. This is more government overreach placing onerous requirements on law abiding citizens simply supplying the
food needs of themselves and a few other families and for those whom just want to have farm animals.

Once again I oppose these new rules and know several others are with me!
No attachments

Comment From: Hannah Deck

8/15/22 @ 11:31 AM
Please set a reasonable lower limit on what defines a "small CAFO." The language as written says "less than 150 horses, 300 beef, 1500 ducks" etc. This vague definition puts small homesteads and family farms on the hook, instead of targeting CAFOs as...↓
Include clear parameters which allow homesteaders to continue to work in voluntary stewardship with the conservation districts instead of subjecting them to disproportionate regulation.
No attachments

Comment From: Robert Mensonides

8/15/22 @ 11:30 AM
This proposal & rule is detrimental to our family and way of life as well as the customers we support in our local community.

Its very simple, we have a small herd of beef cattle of 10-25 animals. We also support out local youth with FFA and 4-H club...↓
Thank you!

Rob Mensonides
Vice President Grant County Farm Bureau

Thank you,

Rob and Kami and Family Mensonides.
K-n-R Farms Organics / PNW AG Sales
Moses Lake, WA. 98837
No attachments

Comment From: Bethany Berndt

8/15/22 @ 11:26 AM
Bethany Betndt
I have lived in and raised animals in Thurston County since 1963. We did not need commercial fertilizer as our animals provided it.So I concur with Okanogan,Thurston, and Yakima counties that CAFO is not beneficial except maybe in very ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kaley Deffinbaugh

8/15/22 @ 11:22 AM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I vehemently oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of the Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

Small farms do not need m...↓

We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.

Applying CAFO standards to small operations, will be devastating to local food production and our overall food security.

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,
Kaley Deffinbaugh
August 15, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Albert E Robbins

8/15/22 @ 11:12 AM
I have lived in and raised animals in Thurston County since 1946. We did not need commercial fertilizer as our animals provided it.So I concur with Okanogan,Thurston, and Yakima counties that CAFO is not beneficial except maybe in very large animal o...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Paul Chenvert

8/15/22 @ 11:11 AM
This can make sense for large commercial factory farming but not for the small family farm. All this will do is put people out of business or not even allow for people to have a few chickens on their property. This is too much of a large over reachin...↓

Please reject this proposal and make it more small/family farm friendly.
No attachments

Comment From: Friends of Toppenish Creek (Sandy Braden)

8/15/22 @ 10:43 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Haynes Mary

8/15/22 @ 10:17 AM
I have 3 horses, 15 chickens, two goats, two dogs and one cat. Am I considered a CAFO under this draft???? I do not see minimums. Please clarify.
No attachments

Comment From: Daren Hopkins

8/15/22 @ 10:13 AM
I live in Thurston County and have always had animals for 30 years. What controls does the Dept. of Ecology want to impose on small farms? I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Thurston, Yakima and Okanogan County Farm Bu...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Lynda Trumpour

8/15/22 @ 10:07 AM
This proposal needs to be stopped. It is just another way to tax our citizens who provide food for themselves and others. They have enough of a tax burden already.
No attachments

Comment From: Karla Wade

8/15/22 @ 10:06 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Erin R

8/15/22 @ 9:55 AM
I'm for some of this as far as large commercial farms. Small hobby farms not so much. However, I believe there needs to be some sort of code that would determine the amount of animals allowed on acreage. I see way too many animals on a postage stamp ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Joe Cotta

8/15/22 @ 9:23 AM
I oppose The Washington State Department of Ecology proposing new rules for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO). The threshold for being considered a CAFO is far too low, as only having one cow, horse, or goat (or chickens and ducks) puts ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Patricia Baker

8/15/22 @ 9:20 AM
I am against the CAFO Ecology huge fines and regulations of small family owned farms. I've been a 4-h leader and horse back riding instructor for 40 years. Animals teach responsibility to young people and build stewardship of our land and neighborhoo...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Ryan Peterson

8/15/22 @ 9:15 AM
Do not confine animals except during inclement weather... Good animal and land husbandry requires an acer per head of cattle and 100 sq ft of grass per bird. Any thing short of this will have consequences that must be considered and then mitigated. ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Wade Anonymous

8/15/22 @ 8:59 AM
As a and local disabled veteran small Farmer who struggles to make ends meet; the potential impacts of this change to the CAFO would Cripple me, my farm and family further.
Please don't cripple me.

Respectfully,
Wade
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Eshleman

8/15/22 @ 8:52 AM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia, WA 98504-7696

Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with comments of Okanogan, Thurston, and Yakima County Farm Bureaus. We need to work with those who raise live...↓

Sincerely,

Mark Eshleman

August 15, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Ramsey Cecil

8/15/22 @ 8:42 AM
Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.

Applying CAFO standards t...↓

Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.

Sincerely,
Cecil Ramsey
Tami Ramsey
Cecilyn Ramsey
No attachments

Comment From: Steven Jahn

8/15/22 @ 8:40 AM
There seems to be a lot of propaganda being distributed about what defines a CAFO. In my opinion small operations of 12 or even 50 hens aren't going to be pursued. It costs too much to go after then and wouldn't be in the spirit of any reasonable law...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Lawrence Kershner

8/15/22 @ 8:09 AM
I oppose the CAFO rules as they are drafted and agree with the comments of the Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus. We need to work with and encourage those who raise livestock on the small scale providing locally sourced food, and enco...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Douglas Sims

8/15/22 @ 7:55 AM
I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and
Yakima County Farm Bureaus.
We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.
Applying CAFO standards to small operat...↓
overall food security.
Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation
districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary
programs, proven to protect water quality
No attachments

Comment From: Debra Mounts

8/15/22 @ 7:47 AM
My husband and I oppose the rules drafted with the comments.We farmers an ranchers follow the rules and regulations and we are proud people of integrity and work hard. We respect the environemnt and want to do the best for the land we love. The gover...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Dustin Jones

8/15/22 @ 7:43 AM
Charging farmers and rural livestock owners is ridiculous. We supply this nation with food! Do you think we farm for the money,no! Margins are so razor thin that this ridiculous tripe may put some of us over the edge.
How about you do something about ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Friends of Toppenish Creek (Jean Mendoza)

8/15/22 @ 7:37 AM
Dear WA State Dept. of Ecology,
Please consider these additional comments from the Friends of Toppenish Creek.
Thank you.
Jean Mendoza
Attachments:

Comment From: Tina Gingrich

8/15/22 @ 7:11 AM
Dear Chelsea,
I oppose the CAFO rules As drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureau. We need to work with those who raise livestock on a small scale providing locally sourced food.
Applying CAFO standards t...↓
Sincerely,
Tina Gingrich
No attachments

Comment From: Emily Hansen

8/15/22 @ 7:09 AM
This CAFO seems to be a forced tax on We the People who keep ANY amount of livestock regardless of whether we have animals to provide food for our families, OR for commercial use. This is big government at it's worst and attacks MANY people in their ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: mark keller

8/15/22 @ 7:04 AM
This is yet another step to keep hard working people from raising their own food without more government red tape. I can see this type of control for large dairy or feedlot but not for small operations designed to feed a family. what next, will we ne...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Rusty Bar Ranch (Kathy Richardson)

8/15/22 @ 6:44 AM
Chelsea Morris
Washington Department of Ecology
PO Box 47696,
Olympia WA 98504-7696





Dear Chelsea,

I oppose the CAFO rules as drafted and concur with the comments of Okanogan, Thurston and Yakima County Farm Bureaus.

We need to work with those who raise liv...↓

My husband and I own a horse boarding, training and lesson facility. We compost our manure in bins, and have been very responsible about managing waste to keep it from leaching into the ground water. This will affect each horse owner. Feed, veterinary, shoeing, and hay prices have already increased. Our insurance and property taxes have increased and this fee, if it passes, may be the end of us, and our boarders, and have a huge impact to the pleasure horse industry.


Ecology must recognize the work of the Voluntary Stewardship Program and local conservation districts. Instead of regulating, Ecology needs to encourage participation in these voluntary programs, proven to protect water quality.


I realize it is very easy to go after the tax payer, because we are responsible, contributing members of society. So, I am going to step away from the livestock issue and address the homeless issue. The homeless, most of whom choose to live on the streets for a variety of reasons, drop their bodily functions anywhere they choose. When provided Sani-cans, they vandalize them, instead of using them because they can. Our parks are full of used heroin, and who knows what drug of the month, needles. Recently, on the news, two homeless people at different camps in Seattle, were interviewed and asked what it would take to get them off the streets. Each one answered, a house and $1500 per month. Well, who would not like that perk? The homeless problem has turned into a multi-million dollar bonus for the people who are benefitting being on committees to address the problem, but no one in government is doing anything about it for fear of becoming unpopular with the bleeding hearts who don't want to take them into their homes, but feel they should have more rights than the rest of us, who get to pay for them in armed robberies, etc. So, until the DOE goes after their filth, which is a MUCH bigger health hazard than where a cow or a horse poops, I am going to fight you every step of the way. This is just another money grab from the pockets of responsible tax payers.




Sincerely,



Kathy Richardson


August 15, 2022
No attachments

Comment From: Ben Stafford

8/15/22 @ 6:24 AM
This method will be expensive, will place a heavy load on administrative staff, and will be full of unnecessary procedures. Tackle suspected wastewater sites by simply testing nearby.
Ground water should be tested in subject areas and proven to be aff...↓
Small CAFOs (e.g. 1-20 cows) should not be placed under the same procedures as larger CAFOs. Taxing or fining small farms or organic families is absurd.
A CAFOs location should also be taken into consideration. Rural CAFOs in large, unused aquifers shouldn't even need to register.
Attachments:

Comment From: Al Anonymous

8/15/22 @ 6:15 AM
Please clarify what a small CAFO is. It would seem obvious that it should not include the non commercial operation by a family with a dozen or so chickens or a family raising a couple of beef or hogs. But it doesn't say that at all, onl "less than" 1...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Natalie Whitten

8/15/22 @ 6:10 AM
Re the CAFO Permitting: Please reject this proposal. People are over policed and permitted throughout their lives already. Please do not start doing this in people homes, in their gardens, and with their animals. This will impede on people ability to...↓
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]