Rulemaking - Outstanding Resource Waters, Chapter 173-201A WAC

Submitted By

2231 Results

Search Type

Sort:

Sort Results By

Comment From: Hisham Anonymous

9/26/23 @ 1:54 PM

All I want is for the animals, plants, and fungi that live in these waters to be protected and kept healthy so that we humans can be healthy too.

No attachments

Comment From: Sierra Pacific Industries (John Gold)

9/26/23 @ 1:47 PM

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Definitely Mabie Consulting (Penny Mabie)

9/26/23 @ 1:26 PM

I commend Ecology for considering the Green River (Mt St Helens) for uber protection under the new Outstanding Resource Waters WAC. The Green River is a treasure for us, in the shadows of this state's most famous geologic feature. With the proximity ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Ryan Haight

9/26/23 @ 1:16 PM

This is an absolutely critical body of water and should be protected as such.

No attachments

Comment From: Mark Osborne

9/26/23 @ 1:16 PM

SUPPORT: New Ecology plan for state waters.

Ecology,

I live in Whatcom County and our resovoir has been used as a playgorund for combustion engines. I support the Tier III Designations of waters!

No attachments

Comment From: Citizen Action Defense Fund (Jackson Maynard)

9/26/23 @ 1:06 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Robert Edwards

9/26/23 @ 1:06 PM

I support Soap Lake's Tier III (B) Outstanding Resource Water designation
Soap Lake, a highly mineralized lake formed in the wake of the last Ice Age, is renowned for its exceptional healing properties--something I can personally attest to and is the...↓ reason I moved to the Soap Lake area. Since ancient times the lake has been an essential destination for indigenous culture and gatherings in what is now Eastern Washington State. Following WWI and until the development of more modern drugs, the VA determined the lake's waters and its underlying mud to be an an important treatment for former soldiers suffering from Berger's disease, brought on by gas warfare in the trenches. Soap Lake continues to attract people from around the world, who are drawn to the lake's unique and healing mineral composition and to the relief they find in its waters.
However, the mineral content of Soap Lake has steadily lessened in concentrations over time due to environment challenges such as agricultural and logging pollution and such related activities that have viewed the lake as an expendable casualty in the cost of doing business. Some of this is the legacy of a lingering frontier mindset that sees Native history and cultural traditions as irrelevant and irreplaceable treasures of the western American landscape as something to be either exploited or as an obstacle. Also, unfortunate additions of fresh water over the years and Climate Change are also having an effect on the lake and its fragile biome.
Soap Lake is exceptional because:
1. of its unique habitat, which is not only regionally rare but rare on planet Earth, and offers statewide ecological significance.
2. of its value as a recreational destination and presents opportunities for eco-tourism as a way of diversying the local rural economy.
3. of the distinct mineral content of Soap Lake, which presents one of the highest mineral concentrations of its kind in the world and offers relief to sufferers of a variety of skin conditions and other aliments.
Soap Lake is not merely just another lake. It is a rare treasure of this Earth and an often overlooked wonder in our State that cries out for acknowledgement and protection. Therefore, I stand firmly with the Soap Lake Conservancy and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation in urging decisive action to safeguard Soap Lake against any further degradation or incroachments. Working together, we have this window of opportunity to save the lake for our children and generations to come.

No attachments

Comment From: Hanne Thiede

9/26/23 @ 1:06 PM

I urge Ecology to designate the Cascade, Green, and Napeequa river systems as the state's first Outstanding Resource Waters so that Washingtonians can enjoy these waters now and for generations to come.

No attachments

Comment From: Whatcom County Democrats (Andrew Reding)

9/26/23 @ 1:05 PM

Please advance with your plans for greater stream protection. With climate change causing rapid loss of our glaciers and drier summer conditions, it is essential that the headwaters of our streams benefit from undisturbed forest cover that helps reta...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Hansen James

9/26/23 @ 1:01 PM

I strongly support new rules to better protect our Type III waters. Although they may seem insignificant to some,they are the foundation of our entire aquatic system. We are spending millions of tax money to improve physical habitat. This money wil...↓

No attachments

Comment From: terry felts

9/26/23 @ 12:59 PM

The time is now!!
Washington's rivers, streams, and wetlands supply drinking water to residents across the state, sustain wildlife habitat, and provide an economic boost to local communities.
As a Washingtonian, I want to see the state's precious fr...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Amy Carlson

9/26/23 @ 12:49 PM

I am writing to urge you to protect the Green, Cascade, and Napeequa river systems as Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW).

As a resident of Pacific Northwest, and a person who cares about our region's ecosystem health, our water quality, and our recr...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Lois Diane Lobb

9/26/23 @ 12:44 PM

NO designation of Type III waters without full transparency concerning the impacts.

No attachments

Comment From: Eric Strom

9/26/23 @ 12:41 PM

No attachments

Comment From: Todd Simmler

9/26/23 @ 12:38 PM

Please protect the Green River watershed. It is truly a unique place worthy of protection from both mining and timber extraction. We have far too few places sufficiently protected from industry. You have the opportunity to do the right thing here. Pl...↓

No attachments

Comment From: H. Lehman Holder Jr.

9/26/23 @ 12:35 PM

I very strongly believe that the Green River just north of Mt. St. Helens should be designated by Ecology as an Outstanding Resource River.

No attachments

Comment From: Gary Webster

9/26/23 @ 12:26 PM

Having grown up near the Green River, I'd love to see this valuable natural resource protect for all to enjoy as I have fishing and hiking when I lived near by. I still try to come and enjoy this pristine river drainage area and Mt St. Helen's when e...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Indra Finch

9/26/23 @ 12:22 PM

Please postpone any designations of Tier III waters. I am an avid kayaker who enjoys exploring Puget Sound and many other areas along the Cascadia Marine Trails which supports respectful use with the Leave No Trace perspective and it would be a shame...↓ to be restricted from our waterways. I am merely asking for transparency and honesty in conveying why and how Ecology is considering moving forward.

Until clear transparency has been met. Given that this is the first time ever that Ecology is designating these waters, a very high standard and clear and specific information should be available so we can have both meaningful public participation and transparent analysis. Right now there is a lack of sufficient water quality data to support the designations and the benefits of this proposal are unclear since many of the waters already have protection. There will be significant economic impacts, the environmental impact on land and shoreline use is undisclosed, and the potential restriction of human activities without adequate public and legislative approval is troubling. We urge the Department of Ecology to pause the rulemaking, conduct a thorough and transparent analysis of site-specific data, and consider public input to ensure benefits outweigh costs and regain public confidence in the rule-making process.

Ecology is not being transparent.
Please pause this proposed rulemaking until transparent, objective, and robust analysis is conducted. Ecology should not designate these waters without giving the public clear and direct information about how it is making these designations, the costs of designation, and the implications for local communities.
Ecology has not demonstrated a clear benefit.
We encourage you to stop this rulemaking as Ecology has not identified a quantitative benefit for designating the waters. Ecology water quality standards are purportedly already being met in these waters although there is no site-specific data to demonstrate it. In any case, they are already subject to state and federal protection. Ecology's Preliminary Regulatory Analyses could not quantify the degree to which designation would improve water quality, increase recreational visits, or increase fish and wildlife populations.
Ecology has not revealed economic costs.
Please halt this rulemaking until Ecology has established a high standard for designations which will have significant economic impacts that have not been disclosed. Ecology's Tier III rulemaking acknowledges that Tier III designation would significantly impact current and future human activities adjacent to protected waters in public spaces, potentially preventing public use and access for recreation or other uses. Ecology also acknowledges that Tier III protection potentially has major implications on the economies of the state, acknowledging that designation will prevent large-scale development and may increase costs for small-scale development. But Ecology's Regulatory Analyses does not discuss economic impacts on adjacent communities of permanent protection. It does not acknowledge the square miles affected. Ecology will require activities to use "all applicable structural and nonstructural best management practices," but has not identified what those are or what they will cost.
Ecology has not disclosed environmental impacts – good or bad.
Please wait on the rulemaking until the environmental impacts of these designations are disclosed. Ecology is required by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) to disclose impacts on land and shoreline use. Yet its SEPA decision does not acknowledge that the designation would likely prevent roads and public access for human activities adjacent to these waters. It also does not discuss potential impacts on forest management practices to prevent or fight catastrophic wildfires.
Ecology's action would be unprecedented and poorly defined.
This is the first time Ecology has designated waters since its rules were adopted 20 years ago. Failure here to identify a quantitative need and identify the cost of designation sets a precedent for overreaching in other waters. This is mainly a concern because Ecology's standards for designating waters as Tier III are vague and subjective.
Ecology's recent history of misapplying regulatory standards casts a shadow over this new action.
Ecology has recently been misusing its "Tier II" regulation to prevent measurable change in waters that are meeting state standards. Ecology's expanded use of Tier III designations could essentially prevent human activity in large portions of the state from headwaters to the ocean without any express approval by the Legislature, demonstrable benefit for water quality, and demonstrated support in affected communities.

No attachments

Comment From: Angela Brown

9/26/23 @ 12:06 PM

Please postpone any designations of Tier III waters until clear transparency has been met. Given that this is the first time ever that Ecology is designating these waters, a very high standard and clear and specific information should be available so...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Western Washington Agricultura... (Kara Rowe)

9/26/23 @ 10:56 AM

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Deborah KB Eidsness

9/26/23 @ 10:39 AM

Please postpone any designations of Tier III waters.

Until clear transparency has been met. Given that this is the first time ever that Ecology is designating these waters, a very high standard and clear and specific information should be available ...↓so we can have both meaningful public participation and transparent analysis. Right now there is a lack of sufficient water quality data to support the designations and the benefits of this proposal are unclear since many of the waters already have protection. There will be significant economic impacts, the environmental impact on land and shoreline use is undisclosed, and the potential restriction of human activities without adequate public and legislative approval is troubling. We urge the Department of Ecology to pause the rulemaking, conduct a thorough and transparent analysis of site-specific data, and consider public input to ensure benefits outweigh costs and regain public confidence in the rule-making process.

Ecology is not being transparent.
Please pause this proposed rulemaking until transparent, objective, and robust analysis is conducted. Ecology should not designate these waters without giving the public clear and direct information about how it is making these designations, the costs of designation, and the implications for local communities.
Ecology has not demonstrated a clear benefit.
We encourage you to stop this rulemaking as Ecology has not identified a quantitative benefit for designating the waters. Ecology water quality standards are purportedly already being met in these waters although there is no site-specific data to demonstrate it. In any case, they are already subject to state and federal protection. Ecology's Preliminary Regulatory Analyses could not quantify the degree to which designation would improve water quality, increase recreational visits, or increase fish and wildlife populations.
Ecology has not revealed economic costs.
Please halt this rulemaking until Ecology has established a high standard for designations which will have significant economic impacts that have not been disclosed. Ecology's Tier III rulemaking acknowledges that Tier III designation would significantly impact current and future human activities adjacent to protected waters in public spaces, potentially preventing public use and access for recreation or other uses. Ecology also acknowledges that Tier III protection potentially has major implications on the economies of the state, acknowledging that designation will prevent large-scale development and may increase costs for small-scale development. But Ecology's Regulatory Analyses does not discuss economic impacts on adjacent communities of permanent protection. It does not acknowledge the square miles affected. Ecology will require activities to use "all applicable structural and nonstructural best management practices," but has not identified what those are or what they will cost.
Ecology has not disclosed environmental impacts – good or bad.
Please wait on the rulemaking until the environmental impacts of these designations are disclosed. Ecology is required by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) to disclose impacts on land and shoreline use. Yet its SEPA decision does not acknowledge that the designation would likely prevent roads and public access for human activities adjacent to these waters. It also does not discuss potential impacts on forest management practices to prevent or fight catastrophic wildfires.
Ecology's action would be unprecedented and poorly defined.
This is the first time Ecology has designated waters since its rules were adopted 20 years ago. Failure here to identify a quantitative need and identify the cost of designation sets a precedent for overreaching in other waters. This is mainly a concern because Ecology's standards for designating waters as Tier III are vague and subjective.
Ecology's recent history of misapplying regulatory standards casts a shadow over this new action.
Ecology has recently been misusing its "Tier II" regulation to prevent measurable change in waters that are meeting state standards. Ecology's expanded use of Tier III designations could essentially prevent human activity in large portions of the state from headwaters to the ocean without any express approval by the Legislature, demonstrable benefit for water quality, and demonstrated support in affected communities.

No attachments

Comment From: Aubrey Stargell

9/26/23 @ 10:35 AM

Designation of the Cascade River as a Tier 3 water is redundant and unnecessary. This river is already a Shoreline of Statewide Significance with those according protections. It has not been clearly demonstrated that this river is of exceptional wa...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Robert Janicki

9/26/23 @ 10:29 AM

Dear Marla Koberstein:
I am writing in opposition to the proposal for Tier III designation of the Cascade River.
I have read the proposal and participated in the informational meetings and do not believe the proponent has adequately met the qualifica...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Leslie taylor

9/26/23 @ 10:26 AM

As an outdoor enthusiast, I support Soap Lake's Tier III(B) Outstanding Resource Water designation.

This lake is like no other I have encountered. All aspects - entering from the shore, standing or floating in the shallows, 'mudding up', paddling al...↓

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Teresa M Long

9/26/23 @ 10:22 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Nancy Zahn

9/26/23 @ 9:59 AM

I have lived in Toutle Washington for 30 years, and have spent a lot of time at the Green River. I raised my children here, and we have often gone to the Green River for swimming, picnicking, and hiking. We have seen salmon in the river, and have enj...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Leslie taylor

9/26/23 @ 9:47 AM

As a resident and council member of the city of Soap Lake, I support Soap Lake's Tier III(B) Outstanding Resource Water designation.

The lake has always been the cornerstone for the city. Early sanitariums catered to travelers suffering from a varie...↓

No attachments

Comment From: tom shields shields

9/26/23 @ 9:43 AM

NO designation of Type III waters without full transparency concerning the impacts.

No attachments

Comment From: Robert Winslow

9/26/23 @ 9:35 AM

This rule should not be passed as the process has not been as transparent as needed, the pro and con effects have not been adequately analyzed, the costs to landowners are likely to be significant without a demonstrated significant benefit.

No attachments

Comment From: Dave Roberts

9/26/23 @ 9:33 AM

Greetings,
I am writing to request the department of ecology NOT designate any type 3 waters without revealing how the designations have been made and all of the costs and implications that might occur as a result. the implications could trickle dow...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Rebecca Gromlich

9/26/23 @ 9:32 AM

Please postpone any designation of Tier lll Waters, until clear transparency has been met. Given that this is the first time ever that Ecology is designating these waters, a very high standard and clear and specific information should be available so...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Peter Janicki

9/26/23 @ 9:31 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Jeff Mcgrath

9/26/23 @ 9:21 AM

My name is Jeff McGrath, I have been coming to Soap Lake for over 20 years to swim in the mineral waters and enjoy the amazing scenery. I am alarmed at the changes happening to degrade the lake and its unique ecosystem and hope the ORW will help kick...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Randy Good and Aileen Good Good

9/26/23 @ 9:04 AM

Department of Ecology must not designate Type 111 waters on the Cascade River without a public process that addresses economic impacts, costs and impacts on wildfires and local communities. The map presented to the public is inaccurate and fails to s...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Josh Meek

9/26/23 @ 8:47 AM

Please postpone any decision making on this rule change until a more thorough analysis has been completed. Though the maps of each river proposal area appear to be mostly confined to Federal lands and the preliminary regulatory analyses mostly implie...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Terry W. Ketcham

9/26/23 @ 8:18 AM

Greetings:

I strongly oppose the proposed changes to Type III waters, especially the Cascade River. As a resident of Skagit County with property along the upper Skagit River I believe the rules proposed are overly broad and do not take into account ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: LORI COWDREY

9/26/23 @ 8:07 AM

Please postpone any designations of Tier III waters. The residents of this state deserve to know what is being proposed, foreseeable impact, both positively and negatively until clear transparency has been met.

Given that this is the first time eve...↓r that Ecology is designating these waters, a very high standard and clear and specific information should be available so we can have both meaningful public participation and transparent analysis. Right now there is a lack of sufficient water quality data to support the designations and the benefits of this proposal are unclear since many of the waters already have protection. There will be significant economic impacts, the environmental impact on land and shoreline use is undisclosed, and the potential restriction of human activities without adequate public and legislative approval is troubling. We urge the Department of Ecology to pause the rulemaking, conduct a thorough and transparent analysis of site-specific data, and consider public input to ensure benefits outweigh costs and regain public confidence in the rule-making process.

Ecology is not being transparent.
Please pause this proposed rulemaking until transparent, objective, and robust analysis is conducted. Ecology should not designate these waters without giving the public clear and direct information about how it is making these designations, the costs of designation, and the implications for local communities.
Ecology has not demonstrated a clear benefit.
We encourage you to stop this rulemaking as Ecology has not identified a quantitative benefit for designating the waters. Ecology water quality standards are purportedly already being met in these waters although there is no site-specific data to demonstrate it. In any case, they are already subject to state and federal protection. Ecology's Preliminary Regulatory Analyses could not quantify the degree to which designation would improve water quality, increase recreational visits, or increase fish and wildlife populations.
Ecology has not revealed economic costs.
Please halt this rulemaking until Ecology has established a high standard for designations which will have significant economic impacts that have not been disclosed. Ecology's Tier III rulemaking acknowledges that Tier III designation would significantly impact current and future human activities adjacent to protected waters in public spaces, potentially preventing public use and access for recreation or other uses. Ecology also acknowledges that Tier III protection potentially has major implications on the economies of the state, acknowledging that designation will prevent large-scale development and may increase costs for small-scale development. But Ecology's Regulatory Analyses does not discuss economic impacts on adjacent communities of permanent protection. It does not acknowledge the square miles affected. Ecology will require activities to use "all applicable structural and nonstructural best management practices," but has not identified what those are or what they will cost.
Ecology has not disclosed environmental impacts – good or bad.
Please wait on the rulemaking until the environmental impacts of these designations are disclosed. Ecology is required by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) to disclose impacts on land and shoreline use. Yet its SEPA decision does not acknowledge that the designation would likely prevent roads and public access for human activities adjacent to these waters. It also does not discuss potential impacts on forest management practices to prevent or fight catastrophic wildfires.
Ecology's action would be unprecedented and poorly defined.
This is the first time Ecology has designated waters since its rules were adopted 20 years ago. Failure here to identify a quantitative need and identify the cost of designation sets a precedent for overreaching in other waters. This is mainly a concern because Ecology's standards for designating waters as Tier III are vague and subjective.
Ecology's recent history of misapplying regulatory standards casts a shadow over this new action.
Ecology has recently been misusing its "Tier II" regulation to prevent measurable change in waters that are meeting state standards. Ecology's expanded use of Tier III designations could essentially prevent human activity in large portions of the state from headwaters to the ocean without any express approval by the Legislature, demonstrable benefit for water quality, and demonstrated support in affected communities.

No attachments

Comment From: janet ebaugh

9/26/23 @ 7:55 AM

I support Soap Lake's Tier III(B) Outstanding Resource Water designation.

Soap Lake, a highly mineralized lake formed following the Ice Age, is renowned for its exceptional healing properties. The lake has always been an essential destination for ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Robert Meier

9/26/23 @ 7:49 AM

To Rule Makers

Ecology's recent history of misapplying regulatory standards casts a shadow over this new action.
Ecology has recently been misusing its "Tier II" regulation to prevent measurable change in waters that are meeting state standards. Ec...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Jamie HIllery

9/26/23 @ 7:05 AM

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Washington Forest Protection A... (Darin Cramer)

9/26/23 @ 7:00 AM

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Kris McCall

9/26/23 @ 6:52 AM

Ecology has not disclosed environmental impacts – good or bad.
Please wait on the rulemaking until the environmental impacts of these designations are disclosed. Ecology is required by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) to disclose impacts on ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Brian Sweeney

9/26/23 @ 6:23 AM

I ask that the decisions to be made on type lll water bodies and the processes that come with the decisions be made public. The public has a right to know how and why these changes are being made and what effect they have on timber communities. This ...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Deb Jones

9/26/23 @ 6:05 AM

The Department of Ecology should not designate Type iii waters without full transparency to the public regarding economic, recreational and environmental impacts especially regarding the effects on forest management practices.

No attachments

Comment From: Lindsay Schuelke

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

My name is Lindsay Schuelke and I"m a resident of Portland. My background is in healthcare, childcare, and nonprofits. I care deeply about the wellbeing of people and of the environment; which are fundamentally interconnected. The topic of water qual...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Cornelia Teed

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

"Dear Washington Department of Ecology, Washington’s rivers, streams, and wetlands supply drinking water to residents across the state, sustain wildlife habitat, and provide an economic boost to local communities. As a Washingtonian, I want to see th...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Holger Mathews

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: David Grelock-Yusem

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Sarah Hafer

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Lela Perkins

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Kim Seater

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Marie Weis

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Barbara Lamb

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Gloria McClintock

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Sarah Bauman

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Eleanor Dowson

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Erik LaRue

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Meryle A. Korn

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Tina Brown

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Steve Laing

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Stephen Bailey

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Kaylee Andrews

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Susan Harmon

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: George Beasley

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Brad Thompson

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Debbi Pratt

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Julieann Palumbo

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: sunday kraushaar

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Tracy Ouellette

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Mackenzie Berg

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Karen Leifker

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Steve Wilson

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: William Bartley

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Richard Curtis

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

"Dear Washington Department of Ecology, As an avid fisherman, hiker, kayaker, naturalist and steward of our streams and rivers I personally know the importance of protecting rivers like the Green, the Cascade and the Napeequa from threats like mining...↓

No attachments

Comment From: John Alder

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Daniel Henling

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Marty Crowley

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Steven Carlsen

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: J W Gordon

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Jessica Galbraith

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Lauren Swift

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Jo Turpin

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Glenn Eklund

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Liam Gallagher

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Susan Heywood

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Craig Geiger

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Phyllis Elmendorf

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Donald J Starkin

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Austin Gamsjager

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: John Corso

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

"Dear Washington Department of Ecology, There’s nothing more valuable than abundant, clean, fresh water in an ecosystem than a paucity of it. Rivers, from their headwaters to the sea, are the foundation of ecosystems. Please protect these rivers in...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Fay Payton

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Sally Bartow

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Eileen Stauss

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Kenneth Zontek

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Colin Wiseman

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Paul Potts

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Michael Hartley

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: ELISIA DALLUGE

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

"HI LAURA AND EVERYONE. I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE MY ECY!!! THANK YOU.Dear Washington Department of Ecology, Washington’s rivers, streams, and wetlands supply drinking water to residents across the state, sustain wildlife habitat, and provide an economic bo...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Mike O'Shea

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

Comment From: Anita Scheunemann

9/26/23 @ 12:00 AM

No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]