Chapter 173-424 WAC and WAC 173-455-150, Clean Fuel Standard Rulemaking, Informal Comments on CI Reduction Schedule

23 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Promus Energy (Alex Banbury)

10/01/26 @ 8:54 AM
reuploaded final version (emailed)
Attachments:

Comment From: Coalition for Renewable Natura... (Yanni Psareas)

9/30/26 @ 10:58 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Seattle City Light (Landon Bosisio)

9/30/26 @ 7:37 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: King County Metro Transit (David Eldred)

9/30/26 @ 4:48 PM
Please contact Peter Heffernan Peter.Heffernan@kingcounty.gov and/or Carrie Lee carrie.lee@kingcounty.gov for questions regarding submitted comments.
Attachments:

Comment From: Mercuria Energy America, LLC (Denton Apple)

9/30/26 @ 3:33 PM
Mercuria Energy America, LLC comments in attached file.
Attachments:

Comment From: Maas Energy Works (Dallas Spiecker)

9/30/26 @ 1:46 PM
Please see attached file for comments.
Attachments:

Comment From: Colleen Lamothe (Colleen Lamothe)

9/30/26 @ 1:35 PM

September 30th, 2026

Lauren Sanner
Washington Clean Fuels Standard Climate Rulemaking Planner
300 Desmond Drive SE
Lacey, WA 98503

Re: Comments on the CI Reduction Schedule
Submitted electronically: https://ecology.commentinput.com/?id=pDR9UNjH...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Antora Energy (Sasha Stashwick)

9/30/26 @ 1:01 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Clean Energy (Ryan Kenny)

9/30/26 @ 11:44 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Renewable Hydrogen Alliance (Rebecca Smith)

9/30/26 @ 11:25 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Western States Petroleum Assoc... (Antonio Machado)

9/30/26 @ 9:50 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Clean Air Task Force (Rachel Starr)

9/30/26 @ 9:20 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: POET, LLC (Paul Townsend)

9/30/26 @ 8:12 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Kerri Macomber

9/29/26 @ 3:02 PM
1. Which scenario do you prefer: A, B, or C? Why?

I prefer Scenario C.

All three scenarios reach the same 45% carbon intensity reduction by 2038. The difference is how quickly the reductions happen in the earlier years. Scenario C is the most grad...↓
No attachments

Comment From: American Soybean Association

9/29/26 @ 10:24 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Montana Renewables (Corey Lavinsky)

9/29/26 @ 9:23 AM
Montana Renewables respectfully submits the attached comments regarding this rulemaking.
Attachments:

Comment From: SkyNRG (Amy Malaki)

9/29/26 @ 9:07 AM
See attached comments from SkyNRG Americas on the CI Reduction Schedule.
Attachments:

Comment From: Earthjustice (Sara Gersen)

9/28/26 @ 3:53 PM
Please see attached Comments on Discussion Paper: Carbon Intensity Targets 2028–2038 (Ecology Publication 26-14-083), submitted by Sara Gersen and Victor Zertuche, Earthjustice.
Attachments:

Comment From: SRECTrade Inc dba Xpansiv Mana... (Becca Teigen)

9/28/26 @ 1:48 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Energy Northwest (Allison Krienke)

9/28/26 @ 11:30 AM
Support for Scenario C Carbon Intensity Reduction Schedule

Energy Northwest supports Scenario C for the carbon intensity reduction schedule. The consistent annual reductions from 2028 through 2031 provide greater market stability and predictabilit...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Altura Capital Partners (Tanner Probst)

9/27/26 @ 10:43 AM
Dear Clean Fuel Standard team,

Altura Capital Partners (ACP) is an institutional investment firm focused on environmental and carbon markets, including the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Oregon's Clean Fuels Program, Washington's cap-and-inves...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Clean Fuels Alliance America (Cory-Ann Wind)

9/25/26 @ 2:53 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Neste (Oscar Garcia)

9/25/26 @ 1:28 PM
Attachments: