Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility Second Supplemental EIS

4777 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Teresa Flynn

9/08/20 @ 1:58 PM
Department Of Ecology State of Wa. Needs to protect the citizens of Washington From this proposal from NWIW of the speculative theories that this would be good for the world and will cut Green House Gas emissions.This has gone on long enough and nee...
No attachments

Comment From: Tika Bordelon

9/08/20 @ 10:47 AM
please respect the environment and other species that call this area their homes. humans need to learn how to exist with nature rather than try to control it. please stop polluting our fragile earth.
No attachments

Comment From: Bill Kirkland

9/08/20 @ 10:37 AM
Please reject the Kalama methanol refinery project. It makes no sense to increase GHG pollution when scientists have been warning us for years about the current climate crisis.

Greed and profit should not win out over responsible stewarding of our pr...
No attachments

Comment From: Gary Wallace

9/08/20 @ 7:09 AM
To consider permitting this facility at this time of extreme climatological change, as evidenced by the massive wildfires (smell and breathe the smoke--it will shorten your life), the extreme weather in both major oceans as demonstrated by the number...
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Johnson

9/08/20 @ 6:22 AM
I have worked on the Columbia River for much of my adult life and feel that NWIW and their shipping partners will be positive and responsible members of the business community on the river speaking forcefully for the best safety practices.
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Horst

9/08/20 @ 4:12 AM
As a lifetime resident of this beautiful, evergreen state, I trust that Ecology will honor their mission statement..."to protect, preserve and enhance Washington's environment for current and future generations".

Adherence to Ecology's mission stateme...
No attachments

Comment From: Dylan Wheeler

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Cynthia Cannon

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Jules Moritz

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Ann Turner

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Torie Baldwin

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Jennifer Wagner

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Jim Byrne

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: DAvid Gloger

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: wayne robinson

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Ilene Silver

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: ANN TIBBOT

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Derek Benedict

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Steven Woolpert

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Howard Wilson

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Marian Roh

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Anita Das

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Janet Swihart

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: WA State Senate (John Braun)

9/07/20 @ 5:00 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Janet Kirkland

9/07/20 @ 2:17 PM
Woodsy Owl says "GIVE A HOOT, DON'T POLLUTE."

I oppose the Kalama Fracked Gas to Methanol Refinery Project and request the permit be denied.

The SSEIS clearly shows this project will be a major greenhouse gas polluter. We already know methanol is a fas...

The clock is ticking for our planet and we need to invest in renewable energy NOW. We just saw record breaking temperatures in California and another raging fire season is starting early. The CLIMATE CRISIS cannot wait. Let's lead the way in creative investment in renewable energy jobs and infrastructure that will benefit everyone for generations to come.
No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

9/07/20 @ 12:01 PM

The standard operating procedure for a regulated gas monopoly, such as Williams Pipeline, is to created demand for their gas until the system reaches maximum capacity.

In that light, they view the Kalama Methanol plant as an anchor project similar to ...

Then they go to the Utilities Commission asking permission to raise rates on existing customers to pay for added capacity needed to prevent shortages during peak load.

The Kalama methanol plant could cause shortages for some existing business depending on their preferential allocation.

That's probably why the Williams Pipeline Company is advertising heavily on FB about gas being a climate solution, which is a lie.

Does your EIS evaluate the possibility of a second pipeline and the associated emissions?

No attachments

Comment From: Sandra Davis

9/07/20 @ 11:00 AM
The Dept of Ecology seems to be relying on speculation that this proposed methanol project in Kalama, Washington would displace existing methanol plants in China currently using coal in their production. This speculation theory could also assume oth...

The natural gas needed for NWIW's project would exceed the limits of Williams' Northwest Pipeline and would require an expansion of an additional line to accommodate the methanol facility. Why has the expanded pipeline not been taken into consideration in this analysis? The expansion of this pipeline will have many negative impacts to the citizens of Washington state as well as the many, many landowners.

If NWIW obtains all of the needed permits, their plan could be to sell the permits. What would prevent this new owner from using 100% of the produced methanol for fuel, thereby increasing GHG substantially.

In reading the Voluntary Mitigation Program proposed by NWIW, the language leaves the reader to feel uncertain what role the Department of Ecology will play in this mitigation. I have never heard of a "voluntary" mitigation proposal for such a large industrial project. As you know, self-reporting does not always work. What recourse will the Department of Ecology have if a voluntary program fails? Why hasn't the Department of Ecology required their own Mandatory Mitigation Plan?

NWIW is proposing to distribute an Emergency Response Plan "before" the first production of methanol. Emergency Response Plans and Hazard Mitigation must be a part of the permit process. Our state and local officials have a right to review and/or change any Plan that would involve their services and impact citizens. This is totally unacceptable. The safety of the public must be foremost in permitting any industrial project which will involve hazardous materials.

Thank you for accepting my public comments.

No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

9/07/20 @ 10:52 AM
Here's another reason to rejects this proposal.
In 2016, Inslee issued an executive order that requires polluters to reduce their emissions 5% every three years.

In January of 2020, The Washington State Supreme Court reaffirmed Ecology's authority to r...
But for now, Kalama methanol will need to comply. How will they do that?

No attachments

Comment From: Mike Reuter

9/07/20 @ 10:32 AM
I am speaking here as an individual and not as the Mayor of Kalama.

I believe that there will never be a second train constructed for methanol production based on some articles.

Crowd Gathers For Methanol Presentation by Deborah Steele Hazen
The Clatska...

In addition to the two phases planned for Port Westward, the company has announced the third phase to be built in Kalama - another $1 billion investment.

In the 2017 PSE Integrated Resource Plan on pg. 273/384 it shows the gas capacity needed for this refinery would be 180 Dth/d and not the 320 Dth/d required to run two trains at 100%

The footprint is too small for the two train refinery along with the ULE and the ZLD infrastructure. If you look at the refinery layout, these major additions are no-where to be found. It would be interesting to have the model and type of each of these two new additions with the dimensions needed to implement. I would also like to know if there is any additional space needed for the accompanying support structures, like cooling ponds or storage facilities for chemicals or waste.

That means half the taxes and half the employment
No attachments

Comment From: Jennifer Vinnard

9/07/20 @ 10:11 AM
Too much speculation surrounds this proposed refinery, and adding nearly a Million metric tons of ghg emissions to our atmosphere, purely for China's benefit is not worth the $30-$40 million a year in taxes...the state makes more from cannabis taxes....
No attachments

Comment From: John Flynn

9/07/20 @ 10:02 AM
In April of 2019 Oregon Public Broadcasting released an article that revealed that Northwest Innovation Works had been misleading the public and state regulators for years regarding the planned use of the methanol that they hoped to produce at their ...
Further clouding this discrepancy is the fact that Wu Lebin, the Chairman of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Holdings Company (CASH) has publicly stated on several occasions that the methanol produced at the Kalama refinery would be used as fuel for both marine and ground transportation as well as power generation and industrial boilers.
In addition to these glaring discrepancies NWIW sponsored a two day workshop in 2017 at Stanford University where there was no mention whatsoever about using the methanol for creating olefins for the plastics industry.
This false narrative has been used by NWIW for years to mislead the public and state regulators regarding the true intentions for the end use of their methanol.
The question remains; who are we to believe, the Chairman of the Academy of Sciences Holdings (CASH) or a paid spokesperson of the wholly owned subsidiary.
I encourage the Department of Ecology to see through this obfuscation and categorically deny any and all permits for this polluting proposal.
Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Mike Reuter

9/07/20 @ 9:05 AM
I am speaking here as an individual and not as the Mayor of Kalama.

Local employment being 200 permanent jobs and 1000 construction jobs and salaries of $109,000? Depends-

For emissions and safety, it is less than 115 permanent jobs and 560 constructio...

Kalama SEPA documentation for emissions estimates. Table A.3, pg. 193/241 states there will be less than 100 jobs

In the FEIS App. GI. PDF pg. 45/84. For onsite populations and building categories;

(These numbers look like the actual employment numbers for a methanol refinery of this size)

Control room
Day 8.3
Night 12

Fire Station/administration
Day 16
Night 3

Maintenance
Day 19.5
Night 10.8

Main Security
Day 2
Night 2

Process area
Day 24.3
Night 4.9

Wharf
Day 6
Night 6

Total employment 114.8

In the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, November 2018 Table 3.1 Pg. 124/241
Construction jobs 560

However, In the local newspapers, there are going to be 240 permanent and 1000 construction employed.

President of methanol firm talks permits, jobs at EDC meeting Feb 27, 2014
Northwest Innovation says each plant would eventually employ 240 full-time workers and create more than 2,000 construction jobs. The city of Dalian is planning to build an 8 million metric ton storage tank for the product. The lowest-paid jobs would have salaries in the $40,000 to $50,000 range.

Northwest Innovation Works moving headquarters to Port of Kalama.
Marissa Luck Jan 29, 2015
Northwest Innovation says it expects to employ nearly 1,000 construction workers to build the Kalama plant and 240 permanent workers at full capacity.

And at Port Westward- the sister refinery of the Kalama refinery being proposed by the same company, and based on the same information, there are different numbers.

Crowd Gathers For Methanol Presentation by Deborah Steele Hazen
The Clatskanie Chief of Clatskanie, Oregon

In their interview last week with The Chief, the developers said that approximately 30 to 40 percent of the total 240 employees (120 per phase) would-be managers, chemists, and engineers, most of whom would be moving to the area. The rest would be hired locally. All of the jobs would be "good, family-wage jobs," meeting the state's definition of that term, Godley said.

Methanol company switches land options at Port Westward. Anna Del Savio Friday, May 10, 2019

The option agreement allows NWIW to produce methanol but prohibits the manufacturing of Liquid Natural Gas. The initial project "is expected to generate a minimum of 100 full-time equivalent jobs, but no less than 70 jobs," according to the amended option to lease agreement.

Other methanol refineries numbers prove the lower numbers, not the higher ones.

Natgasoline LLC is a green world-scale methanol production complex in Beaumont, Texas
108 permanent jobs.

Methanex plans up to $1.4 billion methanol plant in Geismar -- it's third there JUL 19, 2019 -
Through the project, Methanex will create 62 new direct jobs,
No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

9/07/20 @ 8:35 AM
Say no to Kalama methanol for the following reasons:
If approved, Kalama methanol, would contradict two pieces of legislation that were signed into law last April.
1. HB 2311 establishing the state goal of reducing ghg emissions in our state 45% by 203...
Kalama methanol would increase ghg emissions at least 1 million tons per year according to this SEIS. The law does not allow for mitigation out of state, real or pretended.
Kalama methanol would create an extra burden on existing business to reduce emissions even more to compensate for Kalama methanol.

2. Also SB 5323 Bans certain plastic bags by 2022. The world needs more use of reusable bags, not more plastic bags.
This proposal violates the intent of the legislature. Say no.

No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

9/07/20 @ 7:07 AM
Ecology used the 100-year time frame for the climate impacts for fugitive methane, but the next 20 years matter most. The CO2 equivalent of fugitive methane for the first 20 years is much higher than the100-year time frame. I believe the EPA admitt...
That first twenty years matter most because feedback loops are not included in the IPCC models and if we don't reduce emissions ASAP, feedback loops could kick in soon and then we could have abrupt climate change.
Then it is game over.
Don't gamble with your future. Say no to Kalama methanol.

No attachments

Comment From: Linda Horst

9/07/20 @ 6:11 AM
In reviewing the DSSEIS, two things have become very apparent:

1. Anything that is SUPPORTIVE of the Kalama methanol refinery is based upon SPECULATION.

2. Anything that is NOT SUPPORTIVE of the Kalama methanol refinery is based upon FACTS.

The myriad...
No attachments

Comment From: John Flynn

9/07/20 @ 3:14 AM
The Washington Department of Ecology needs to be reminded that their ultimate responsibility is to the residents and citizens of the State of Washington and not to a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chinese government.
Department of Ecology needs to foc...
In addition the Department of Ecology needs to be reminded that the state legislature has passed an aggressive goal of reducing green house gas emissions in the state to 1990 levels by 2020. Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 70.235, Limiting GHG Emissions, establishes these goals as well as stipulating that the state would:
1) limit and reduce GHG emissions
2) minimize the potential to export pollution
3) reduce emissions at the lowest cost.
Currently the states GHG emission levels are 7.0 million metric tons higher than the states 2020 target. The state is not meeting their goals. If allowed to become operational the proposed methanol refinery would add an additional 4.6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide pollution per year. That would be equal to around 5 percent of the States total climate emissions and would rank the methanol refinery among the top 10 polluters in the state.
Again, the Department of Ecology needs to focus their attention and efforts on what they can control within the state and not enable a corporation that is a wholly owned subsidiary of a foreign government to use up our resources, namely gas, water and electricity to export their product for the benefit of a foreign government leaving SW Washington with the environmental impacts.
In my opinion this would equate to environmental piracy.
I encourage the Department of Ecology to deny the permit.
Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Sigrid Asmus

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Lawrence Magliola

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Allison Ostrer

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Satya Vayu

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Cheryl Trosper

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Lisa Lybarger

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Bradley

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Cornelia Teed

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Donna Nickerson

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Shirley Collins

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: G T

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Jeanne Taylor

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Doug Swanson

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Ronald DiGiacomo

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Adina Parsley

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: nancy corr

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Studley

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: jon iverson

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Kersten

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: ElsaMarie Butler

9/06/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Reuter Anonymous

9/06/20 @ 3:44 PM
I am speaking here as an individual and not as the Mayor of Kalama.

When would this refinery start contributing to SW Washington?

From the Final Economic Impact Analysis of the Proposed Kalama Manufacturing & Marine Export Facility

Methanol plant constr...

Since it is a manufacturing facility in an official high unemployment county, the state exempts some construction components, notably new machinery and equipment, from sales tax.

This refinery is exempt from collecting taxes on the methanol it exports. Washington does not impose sales & use taxes on goods manufactured in the state and exported to other states or countries.

Because Washington recognizes Cowlitz County as a high unemployment county, qualified machinery, equipment, and buildings are also exempt.

As for the land, NWIW will lease, not own the property on which the plant would be erected, so there is no property tax on the land itself.

Washington law requires county assessors to appraise industrial properties at 100 percent of their true and fair market value.

The Kalama methanol refinery's assessed value falls per the Washington Department of Revenue schedules
1st Year Property Tax $ 16,469,425
10th Year Property Tax $ 9,287,676

The businesses at the port pay no state corporate or personal income taxes.

They will get $100 million in sales tax breaks through 2021 and $43 million in local tax breaks. (We need to know if there will be an extension of these tax breaks)

They have applied for $11 million in federal money for their dock and a $15 million low-interest loan for the groundwater well.
No attachments

Comment From: Carol Marier

9/06/20 @ 8:59 AM
Please reject the proposed methanol plant in its entirety. The Kalama area is too beautiful to turn it into a top 10 polluter site in WA state.
Bad for health, too many risks! Again, please, NO METHANOL!
Sincerely, Ms. Marier and family
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Leonard

9/06/20 @ 8:33 AM
Northwest Innovation Works' cannot be trusted. They have deliberately misled the public and the state of Washington about the environmental, health and safety impacts of this project. They expect us to trust them after they lied about plans to burn...

The new SEIS analysis released what NWIW has denied, the refinery would use more methanol to be burned as fuel in China which would cause significantly more greenhouse gas emissions.

The proposed largest fracked gas to methanol refinery in the world would become one of Washington state's most significant sources of climate changing pollution and use more fracked gas than all of Washington's gas-fired power plants combined.

The draft study shows the refinery would cause a staggering 4.6 million tons of climate pollution every year for 40 years. The climate consequences are enormous.

I live in Kalama and oppose this dirty project.
No attachments

Comment From: Teresa Flynn

9/06/20 @ 7:39 AM
This Methanol Refinery will pollute our town and State of Wa. This location is a Migratory Bird route We dont need the fracked gas, The pipeline, and damage to our environment. It also a glutonous use of gas
No attachments

Comment From: John Flynn

9/06/20 @ 6:35 AM
The main purpose of this proposed project is to provide the Chinese government with a source of methanol that they can use as either a source of olefins for the plastic industry or as a fuel for transportation and industry. NWIW has stated that the ...
The speculative theory that methanol produced by NWIW would result in a net reduction of global green house gas emissions due to global methanol market displacement is ludicrous. Fracking gas, transporting it through pipelines, refining the gas into methanol, transporting the methanol via tanker ship and ultimately burning the methanol all add to the global climate change crisis.
Department of Ecology needs to focus on what they can control within the State of Washington and not buy into the speculative theories that the proposed project would be "good" for the global environment. The fact of the matter is that reliance on fossil fuels is what got us to where we are now in the first place; global warming, ocean warming, sea level rise, shrinking sea ice and ocean acidification.
I encourage the Department of Ecology to adhere to the facts that this project would add a total of 3.6 million metric tonnes of green house gas emissions per year and deny the project on that basis.
Than you for your consideration
No attachments

Comment From: Reuter Anonymous

9/06/20 @ 1:15 AM
I am the mayor of Kalama, but speaking here as an individual.

This refinery, I believe, is a regional energy security risk.

Having this methanol consuming more than � of all available gas capacity or 320 Dth/d out of 500 Dth/d from the only pipe...

We will be at the mercy of the Chinese if we want to move out of coal and oil. The refinery owners will be able to sell gas capacity and hydro to trade for carbon credits or to lower GHG emissions requirements.

How vital natural gas is to Governor Inslee's legislation.

According to the 2018 Pacific Northwest Gas Market Outlook information brochure:
The forecast step increase in gas for generation (2021-2022) coincides with the retirement of several coal-fired generation units that currently serve the region, including Boardman in Oregon (end of 2020), Centralia Boiler 1 in Washington (end of 2020), and Colstrip Units 1 & 2 in Montana (mid-2022). This forecast demonstrates the expectation that natural gas will play an increasingly important role in maintaining system reliability and affordability as policymakers drive the region toward a cleaner energy future.
"Companies often choose both in parallel. Investments in gas dilutes the shift to renewables", stated Galina Alova of the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment at the University of Oxford.
If you look at every utility company's IRP future energy requirements, they include large amounts of natural gas capacity to achieve the goals set by Governor Inslee's legislation. It requires power companies to reduce emissions by at least 25% below 1990 levels by 2035.
That's why NWIWs biggest partner Stonepeak Infrastructure Partners are heavily involved in this refinery. Stonepeak Infrastructure Partners focuses on investment in the energy, power and renewables, transportation, utilities, water, and communications sectors. Nothing in its portfolio about plastics and olefins.

Cowlitz County PUD E3 reliability study states:

Resource Adequacy in the Pacific Northwest-Serving Load Reliably under a Changing Resource Mix
Significant greenhouse gas emission reductions leading to a deeply decarbonized grid can be achieved as long as sufficient firm capacity is available during periods of low wind, solar and hydro production to maintain adequate Resource Adequacy
Also, what are the key findings of the E3 reliability study?
The key findings are:
1. It is possible to maintain Resource Adequacy for a deeply decarbonized Northwest electricity grid, as long as sufficient firm capacity is available during periods of low wind, solar and hydro production;
2. It would be extremely costly and impractical to replace all carbon-emitting firm generation capacity with solar, wind, and storage, due to the very large quantities of these resources and the associated transmission construction that would be required;
3. The Northwest is anticipated to need new capacity in the near-term in order to maintain an acceptable level of Resource Adequacy after planned coal retirements; and
4. Current planning practices risk underinvestment in new capacity required to ensure Resource Adequacy at acceptable levels.

We need to electrify all energy requirements and to move out of any long term fossil fuel infrastructure. We also require all available resources to move into a carbon-free future. It is not right for us to use all of the non-renewable resources now. The 100 years of the gas ability myth, even if it is true, is a short time for humankind. Just because we can-doesn't mean we should.
No attachments

Comment From: Amanda Niles

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Tina McKim

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: billie ambrose

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Stefan Lewis

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Kathy Albert

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Elizabeth Grant

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Rebecca Clark

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Denis Martynowych

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Lisa Barnes

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Anna Johnson

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Katherine Nelson

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Laura Skelton

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Tara Ohta

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Bonnie Miller

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Asphodel Denning

9/05/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Leonard

9/05/20 @ 11:11 AM
If built, the Kalama methanol refinery would create a huge increase in greenhouse gas emissions for the state of Washington and would move us far away from achieving our climate goals. Kalama needs to invest in a clean future, not more dirty fossil ...
No attachments

Comment From: Esther Kronenberg

9/05/20 @ 10:46 AM
I write in strong opposition to the Kalama Methanol Refinery. The SEIS has failed to consider vital information about the impacts of fracking, pipeline transportation and the air and water pollution associated with these activities.

Further, the reas...

What WILL happen is that this plant will generate enormous amounts of climate pollution, lock us into fossil fuel production for decades, and emit dangerous levels of air pollutants.

How the "green" Governor can allow this to go forward is confounding. Our State deserves better, our country deserves better, as does the planet. Do not proceed with this destructive project.

Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

9/05/20 @ 10:30 AM
1. Did NWIW, or the Port of Kalama, or Cowlitz County help write the SSEIS?
No attachments

Comment From: Mike Reuter

9/05/20 @ 10:26 AM
I am the mayor of Kalama, but speaking here as an individual.

Storage redelivery discount and the benefits of gas storage

During the wintertime, there is excess gas capacity on the pipeline that supplies the NW due to not having to heat homes and busin...

If this methanol refinery goes in,China now having a natural gas export terminal will now be able to compete with American utilities at Trading Point 2 located in Canada for long term gas capacity contracts. The remaining gas will make it challenging to fill the storage tanks, and the gas purchased will be at a much higher rate, thereby causing higher prices for businesses and consumers. The law of supply and demand goes into effect.

Example of just one utility discount:

Cascade's IRP appendix a

The storage redelivery discount saves Cascade ~$750,000 annually compared to year-round max rate capacity.

According to Factsheet: Jackson Prairie Natural Gas Storage Facility:

Benefits of storage- Natural gas held in storage supplements the interstate pipeline system to help meet the region's energy requirements during the coldest days and weeks of winter when consumer demand spikes significantly. Jackson Prairie's storage ensures that natural gas supplies are available during the year to meet the public's needs. In addition, Jackson Prairie helps to stabilize utility customers' energy costs and soften the impacts of price volatility in the wholesale natural gas market. Jackson Prairie allows PSE and other utilities to buy and store significant amounts of natural gas during the lower-priced summer months, and then tap the reserves in winter when customers' natural gas requirements—and wholesale natural gas prices—are highest.
No attachments

Comment From: Mike Reuter

9/05/20 @ 8:15 AM
I am the mayor of Kalama but am speaking here as an individual.

This refinery is not feasible without a new pipeline.

The Kalama methanol refinery needs 320 million cubic feet of natural gas per day, the equivalent gas consumption of almost every major...

SEPA Final Environmental Impact Statement
On page 7-2, section 7.3.2 of Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility September 2016
At this time, NWIW has not entered into contracts for the supply of natural gas to the proposed project.

The Power & Natural Gas Planning Taskforce July 2015

Westcoast pipeline is now fully contracted as N.E. B.C. producers have sought a market outlet for their growing production. In the last two years, Westcoast has run at its maximum available capacity nearly year-round (limited by maintenance restrictions).

N.W. Natural 2016 Integrated Resource Plan Chapter 1
Executive Summary 1.7
The case shows a resource deficiency of 30,000 Dth/day for the 2019–2020 winter, which grows to 270,000 Dth/day by 2035–2036. This resource deficiency is due to load growth, changes in peak day demand, and changes in the near-term resource stack while being partially offset by an increase in demand-side resources.

Pipelines remain at capacity.

While decontracting might be an issue for other pipelines, the situation is different in the Pacific Northwest. Capacity on Northwest Pipeline, which provides most of N.W. Natural's interstate capacity is fully contracted northbound through the Roosevelt Compressor station and fully contracted southbound through the Chehalis Compressor station.14 It is also anticipated that, as more electricity is generated using natural gas, existing pipelines will become even more constrained.15

The development of any high-pressure transmission pipeline on which the Company could acquire capacity will be primarily driven by one of these large load projects and secondarily by N.W. Natural and other regional loads.

Avista Corp 2016 Natural Gas IRP

Adding additional pressure to existing pipeline resources is the announcement of three proposed methanol plants in the region. The plants use large amounts of natural gas as a feedstock for creating methanol, which is used to make other chemicals and as a fuel. To date, the Port of Kalama is gaining ground in its approval process and is looking like the most probable of the three methanol plants and will take around 300,000 Dth/day in a region already constrained by pipeline deliverability. LDCs will have to compete with power generators, LNG exporters, and other large end-users for limited pipeline capacity. The new mix could alter current pipeline operations and the potential availability of infrastructure to the region.

Pipeline capacity is the link between natural gas and power.

nwnatural.com/AboutNWNatural/TheCompany/PipelineAndNewGasSupply/NeedForANewPipeline

Currently, N.W. Natural relies on a single transmission pipeline for about two-thirds of its natural gas supplies. That pipeline is nearly 60 years old and cannot be expanded easily. It frequently operates at its maximum capacity. The other pipeline serving our service territory is fully contracted out.

Inexpensive natural gas is attracting new manufacturing to the U.S. One enterprise has announced its intention to build two methanol plants at Columbia River ports and a third in Tacoma. Anyone of these would substantially add to regional gas demand; two or three would only be possible with the construction of more pipeline capacity.
Regional projections indicate demand for gas in the I-5 corridor will exceed capacity by 2020. If a significant petrochemical facility or other significantly large gas user starts up, this could occur even earlier.

The Power & Natural Gas Planning Taskforce July 2015

However, a large enough project, roughly over 150,000 Dth/day of demand (Kalama Methanol refinery would be 320,000 Dth/day), would likely need new infrastructure regardless of their preferred gas transportation type simply due to the high utilization of the existing pipeline systems.
New load developments between Sumas and the Company's service territory might undermine the reliability of this service, especially if not accompanied by an equivalent capacity expansion of NWP's system and upstream infrastructure to get more gas supplies to Sumas
No attachments

Comment From: Pamela Tennant

9/05/20 @ 6:54 AM
I received a postcard regarding the Draft Second Supplemental....The postcard is addressed to Ethel Ann Riper, I am her daughter. Mom used to own property in the area but sold a couple of years ago. She also passed away on June 16, 2019. The postcard...
No attachments

Comment From: Sue Rutherford

9/05/20 @ 12:24 AM
Putting 5% more carbon emissions into the air? Aren't we supposed to be reducing the amount? How can putting more into earth's atmosphere mitigate the effects? Say no! https://www.sightline.org/2020/09/03/new-analysis-proves-kalama-methanol-project-i...
No attachments

Comment From: Bill Adams

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Heath

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Kiplinger

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Stuart Winnie

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: ROBERT CORPUS

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Megan McCoy

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Frances Blair

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Cameron Hubbe

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Patricia Coffey

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: David Hunt

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Thomas Blume

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Ben Rall

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: JJ L.

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Jane Lindley

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: JJ L.

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Cynthia Caster

9/04/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]