Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility Second Supplemental EIS

4777 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Carrie Parks

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>> Thank you my name is Carrie parks MA third generation  Washington and I have hiked, camped and then in all parts of the state. The smoke reaching an uncontrolled forest fires, lungs burning, though it's scratchy, eyes an unusual event. ...

Is your dream that great? Ten percent of or God z entire population has had to evacuate from their homes. Millions of acres have been scorched in Washington. If you allow this methanol went to go into this is the future you are locking your children and grandchildren into forever. This is not mitigatable. Deny the shoreline for this plant. Don't let them build it.
No attachments

Comment From: Camilo Marquez

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>> Hello I lived in a pristine area that was part of the watershed of New York City and I came out here believing that those kinds of conditions would be available to me. Right in the heart of the metropolitan area. In Portland. But since I hav...
No attachments

Comment From: Oregon Conservancy Foundation (Cathryn Chudy)

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>> I name is Catherine Xavi I'm speaking for the Oregon Conservancy foundation. We are experiencing immediate devastating impact of catastrophic climate change right now where we live, work and play. It is ironic that public hearings on this pr...
No attachments

Comment From: Craig Heverly

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>> My name is Craig have really, I am 82, however you decide this, probably not affect me very much. My time is short. But I have three young grandchildren living in Tacoma, Dixon and-- speaking with them on my mind and on my heart.

They are jus...

The damage will be done to the town, to the river, to the water table, to the land, to the environment, to the air into the planet. And who is going to pay to clean up? Certainly not Northwest innovation. No. It  it will fall to all the rest of us.

Were a criminal diversion of tax dollars that would be when we could have stopped it right here. In the name of Viola, Dixon and Eula, I am asking you all to turn down this.
No attachments

Comment From: Bob Gregory

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>>  My name is Bob Gregory I'm a resident of--  County, government counsel, I've seen and been involved with many different job creating projects close to-- County. The findings with the another project, it concludes it is time to per...
No attachments

Comment From: Columbia River Keeper (Daniel Serres)

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Hello my name is Dan Sears and the conservation director with Columbia River keeper. I want to make three per main points today. First the climate methanol refinery would be a main source of rain house gas pollution. It mistreats the project would pr...

If all of it is combusted for fuel the number is higher. If ecology uses more numbers for methane leakage is higher. Regardless the impact would be staggering at a step from the worst impacts of lemon change.

On this basis ecology should deny the project. Secondly, every fossil fuel company has tried to claim that is other than coal or some other fossil fuel. This is a false standard.

Millennium coal try to claim cleaner coal but no one Sears I thinks shipping 44 million tons of coal would help the claimant. And trying to ship lower carbon oil but no one actually believed that shipping printer safety thousand barrels of oil a day would help the climate. Ecology will be setting a terrible precedent by allowing Northwest innovation works to claim that it would be doing anyone a favor by using shocking 320,000,000 ft. ³ of Frak aspirate date and belching millions of tons of climate pollution into the atmosphere and dumping methanol into a global arc it for decades. Third, the green economic appendix does not support conclusion that Northwest innovation works methanol would direct late displacement coal based methanol. Stating within China there is likely a preference for expanding domestic production were feasible, expanding low-cost ethanol is excited to make up the largest share of the methanol supplies in the coming years. We cannot control the decisions of other nations or predict 40 years of market shifts, technology improvements, payment policy or trade wars. The only reasonable, foreseeable impact of this project is massive pollution. Thank you and we will submit our comments in writing. 
No attachments

Comment From: Washington Environmental Counc... (Anna Doty)

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>>  Thank you for taking comments today. My name is Anna Doty and speaking on behalf of Washington environmental Council-- today to reject the speculative analysis as a basis of evaluating to Clement impacts and deny the shoreline permit f...
No attachments

Comment From: Bill Sampson

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>> Hello my name is Bill Samson and I'm calling in from Seattle and thank you for the opportunity to testify today. I have a lot of concerns about this project and I want to say first but I would like to everyone to have access to a good job an...
No attachments

Comment From: Adam Davis

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>> Good afternoon everyone my name is Adam, I lived in-- County and reside in Castle Rock with my wife and three children. I served the Western side of the state as a union rep for the local-- vendors, I have been involved and interested in thi...
No attachments

Comment From: Cameron Wilkinson

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>>  I'm taking this to menace to talk about my support of this project. And my disappointment in the constant change in expectations of these companies that are bringing transitional fuel to the state of Washington. And it seems like every...

For manufacturing up things we all use every day. Plastic, it's in everything, our clothing, a goes down medical supplies, everything. So I am just more or less as a citizen of Calais County I'm getting very frustrated with setting the bar constantly and the other issues of the production of methanol for the forest fires, things like that. This has nothing to do with this project for forest fires are happening because we have changed regulations on the forest to clean them up. And mother nature is taking care of the problem. I just want to end with that, I support this project. Thank you. 
No attachments

Comment From: Deena Grossman

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>> Thank you very much I am Dena speaking from Portland Oregon, less than 35 miles from Kalama,  Washington. Thank you for taking public comments. We can't breathe. This week, the letter to President Trump saying is time to abandon the dis...
No attachments

Comment From: Diane Dick

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
>> Thank you I am Diane Dick  and a resident and setting the project for years. This would be one of the largest in the world. And told me personally it was because many pollution control centers would be too costly with CR and cheaper to ...

Information in the air discharge permit, this refinery has the capacity to admit over 1 million metric tons of GhD's every year just on the process site. And NWIW states they will mitigate all in-state emissions and first priority will be given to projects in Tellis County, please give us specific examples of the mitigation projects and their ability to sequester read house gases from the atmosphere. The only viable way to remove CO2 from the atmosphere is bike growing trees or crops. According to the EPA greenhouse gas calculator it would take 1,306,000 acres of forest land to remove 1 million tons of this in a year. It only comprises of about seven harm forty six,000 acres. There is no way I and the NWIW will be able to mitigate the infractions and this county or all of Southwest Washington. Demand accountability for a real plan now because you surely won't get voluntary compliance later. Let NWIW one more company that tries to buy its way out of-- 
No attachments

Comment From: Bob Zeigler

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Port of Woodland (Robert Wile)

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Tylor Hankins

9/16/20 @ 4:44 PM
First, I live in Kalama, so I'll be the first to admit that I don't want to be staring at this thing in my backyard, or be smoked out by chemicals during a weather inversion.

But I think some of us are missing the bigger picture. All these numbers, ch...

Of course Communist China has your best interests in mind. Never forget Tiananmen.

The joke's on us...
No attachments

Comment From: Bill Adams

9/16/20 @ 3:56 PM
Please reject the proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny the Shorelines Permit for the project. Why? Its voracious appetite of 130m cu. ft. of mostly fracked so-called natural gas daily, more than all commercial gas users in our state combined...
No attachments

Comment From: Howard Shapiro

9/16/20 @ 3:10 PM
The Pacific Northwest has been experiencing a debilitating smoke episode for the last week caused by forest fires,exacerbated by global warming, contributed to by fossil fuel extraction, processing and shipping. Northwest Innovation's application for...

Their claim that they will be shipping the methane for use in manufacturing plastics can not be believed. There will be no way to control how they use their product once the plant is built.

It seems coincidental that a large shipping company whose ships use methane as fuel, is investing $10 million in this methanol manufacturing venture and they claim that they will not use this methanol as fuel for their ships. Again, if they get their necessary permits and the plant is built there is almost no way that the use of their product can be controlled short if illegal usage.

Since the plastics market for their product has all but dried up, it would seem logical to deduct that the methane produced by the Kalama plant will be used as ship fuel and their claim that it won't be, is false.

Innovation works seems to again be attempting to hoodwink you and you would be within your rights to be highly offended at their supposition that you are that gullible. The fossil fuel pollution and global warming contribution of this plant would seem to be a large contributing factor for not granting your approval for this venture.
No attachments

Comment From: Sharon Abreu

9/16/20 @ 2:54 PM
I am a 19-year resident of Washington State, and I've been a climate change educator for over 20 years. I am of the strong opinion that the Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility is a danger to our local waters and marine life in northwest W...
No attachments

Comment From: Mike Reuter

9/16/20 @ 2:53 PM
I am speaking here as an individual and not as the Mayor of Kalama.

Why would the Chinese government ask American taxpayers to underwrite their refinery?

NW Innovation Works is applying for a loan guarantee from the Department of Energy to cover the en...

NWIW is renting office space at the port. The company doesn't have any assets to attach a lien or impose a hefty fine if there was an incident. The company has less than 20 employees and is a multi-layered limited liability company. It wouldn't take much for them to leave us with broken promises and lost jobs and tax revenue.

The Department of Energy loan that they have applied for exposes taxpayers to unnecessary risk. Two out of the three NW INNOVATIONS Global Advisory Team members had close connections with people at the Department of Energy. I have concerns that they were hired to help facilitate the loan process.

GARY LOCHE is the president of NWIW's global advisory team. He served as the Department of Commerce Secretary, and the Department of Energy's Secretary Steven Chu were both fellow members of Obama's cabinet.

DAVID SANDALOW, another NWIW advisory team member, served in senior positions at the U.S. Department of Energy, including Under Secretary of Energy (acting) and Assistant Secretary for Policy & International Affairs.

The Department of Energy loan application needs to be thoroughly investigated to determine what NWIW's information provided matches the information they have provided to the investors and the state regulators.

The Department of Ecology and taxpayers have the right to ultimately see this entire document and fact check information provided by the applicant.

The inability of high-risk projects to get private backing is a feature of a free market system, so why do we have to take the risk?
No attachments

Comment From: Kathy Ruhl

9/16/20 @ 12:21 PM
Thank you for your work to protect Washingtons environment and acknowledgement that previous environmental analysis of Northwest Innovation Works (NWIW) Methanol refinery proposal in Kalama, Washington have been inaccurate and inadequate.

This new Dra...

Despite these marginal improvements, the evaluation of potential mitigation and displacement contained in this analysis is misleading and concerning in its reliance on speculative and unenforceable assumptions. One can simply look to the impacts of this pandemic to see evidence of incredible uncertainty and volatility in energy market dynamics. It is dangerous to presume this analysis can accurately predict global fuel markets, technology developments, consumer behavior, or regulations for the coming four decades. Furthermore, the SEIS provides too little detail on the actual mitigation that would be accomplished within the voluntary mitigation framework, nor does this mitigation address the full impacts of NWIWs emissions that will occur overseas. The mitigation framework is too vague for Ecology to conclude that this projects impacts will be mitigated, and the urgency of climate change demands that mitigation should be the last option (after all other impacts are reduced) in order to address unavoidable impacts, not simply to maintain the status quo as we continue to build out the fossil fuel industry.

Even with all of its flaws, this analysis confirms that NWIWs proposed facility would become one of the greatest sources of climate pollution in Washington. It is simply unacceptable for Washington to build an unequivocally and enormously polluting facility based on speculative analysis and a faint hope of theoretical emission reductions. Ecology should dismiss the speculative basis that this project could displace even more polluting facilities, and instead should base its permitting decision on what is reasonably foreseeable and indeed, assured, about this project--that it would cause millions of tons of greenhouse gas pollution each year, for 40 years, and is profoundly inconsistent with achieving Washingtons climate goals.

The evidence in this draft SEIS demonstrates that Washington should deny NWIWs proposal to build and operate this dangerous methanol refinery in Kalama. We cannot keep building fossil fuel export infrastructure and expect to address the dangers of climate change.

As I sit here looking at a darkened sky, surrounded by smoke and ash, I ask you to please, keep our communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution. These fires, all over the world, were caused by climate change, brought on by pollution. Right now, they are to adding their pollution created by the fires world wide and increasing climate pollution. Please don't let our thirst for fossil fuels destroy our way of life and, eventually, our planet. Deny NWIWs proposal for this dangerous methanol refinery in Kalama.
No attachments

Comment From: carolyn atkinson

9/16/20 @ 10:14 AM
Kalama is currently under orders for residents to restrict water usage. The proposed facility would use millions of gallons of water from an aquifer that is already seeing such stress that it matters who waters a garden. This makes the residents of K...

Kalama doesn't have the water, and nobody has the air to absorb the negative effects of this project. Are strict 5 minute showers and dead crops across the region supposed to mitigate millions of gallons of water wasted by this facility?

Cancel the Kalama Methanol project.
No attachments

Comment From: carolyn atkinson

9/16/20 @ 9:54 AM
I write as a young person terrified about the prospect of living on this Earth in 2070, given its current catastrophic trajectory driven by projects like these.

It is irresponsible and dishonest to pretend that speculation about the hypothetical worse...

Furthermore, even the "high" estimate in the SEIS is only 1.46%, far below the potential upper bound of leakage rates possible for under-studied and under-reported methane leaks in Canada. The SEIS should be revised to include a "medium" scenario of 2% leakage, and a "high" scenario of 3% leakage to capture a reasonable range of potential impacts from the upstream portion of the Kalama project's emissions.

The analysis fails to account for the long-term impact of plastics. While most or all of the methanol may end up being burned directly for fuel, some of it may be converted to olefin to make plastic. The SEIS does not assess the end fate of the plastic, which may itself become a fuel in China via waste to energy incineration. Waste to energy incineration is rapidly growing and has tremendous potential carbon pollution and negative public health impacts. Further, emerging research continues to show that plastics pollution is a ubiquitous, long-lasting problem globally and within Washington state.

The reason that this analysis has had to see so many revisions so far is because NWIW has demonstrated a commitment to dishonesty that puts the health and safety of the region, its other industries, the country, and their workers at serious risk of bodily harm. This commitment to undermining the public good and the good of their workers should disqualify this project alone.

"We'd do it cleaner than someone else might" is a lie that has been repeated by those clinging to fossil fuel relevancy for years. It wasn't true for Appalachian coal, and it isn't true for NWIW methanol. We deserve, and we will receive, a better and cleaner future.

There are other ways to expand the economy. We are in need of investment in truly sustainable infrastructure backed by facts other than speculation about worse actors. Northwest Innovation Works should innovate some of those and use accurate facts in their first proposal if they want to win back the trust of the community.
No attachments

Comment From: Rosemary Siipola

9/16/20 @ 8:21 AM
201 Elm Street
PO Box 373
Kalama, Washington 98625
16 Sept 2020
Washington State Department of Ecology
Attn: Rich Doenges
NWIW SSEIS
PO Box 47775
Olympia, Washington 98504-7775

Dear Mr. Doenges,

This is a letter for all of the folks in our state who believe...

Northwest Innovation Works Kalama has consistently claimed that its facility, upon completion, will reduce harmful global greenhouse gas emissions. The first two environmental impact studies, completed for the project, validated that thesis. However, environmental groups took issue with the findings and sued for a more comprehensive study. That study, now released by the Washington Department of Ecology, confirms that Northwest Innovation Works Kalama does, indeed, reduce harmful global greenhouse gas emissions. Three studies now confirm this fact. At this point, the science is clear and solid on this issue.

For every year the plant isn't operating, we lose a chance to reduce millions of tonnes of greenhouse gases from our atmosphere. This project cannot wait. If, as Washingtonians, we truly care about the environment, and believe in science, then the three independent environmental impact studies, conducted over the past six years lead to two conclusions:
1. The State of Washington's robust environmental permitting regulations support this project, upholding its high standards and opening the way for additional, modern, environmentally sound projects to be permitted and built in Washington, revitalizing and transitioning our economy, while promoting our state's standards for environmentally safe and sound industry, and,
2. Taking all of this into account, it's time to put people to work in Cowlitz County in the new, modern, green economy.

As a proud Cowlitz County citizen, and a member of the Lower Columbia College Foundation Board of Directors, I can honestly say that Cowlitz County is ready, willing and able to meet the opportunities and challenges this new economy will bring to our region.

Sincerely,
Rosemary Siipola
Kalama, Washington

No attachments

Comment From: Kimberly Jarvis

9/16/20 @ 8:18 AM
Hello!

I write to you as I sit and watch the smoke clogged skies in Portland, OR. It's too toxic to be outside which just a taste of things to come as our planet heats up. Yes, the fires were caused by a freak wind event, but also due to our forests...

The Kalama plant is one more step in the wrong direction, feeding our addiction to fossil fuels. There are no good reasons for this plant to go on-line. NONE! Clean, green, renewable, alternative energy sources exist and we should be pumping all of our resources into utilizing them. Pan Pacific Energy's assertion that this is good for the planet because it will stop China from burning coal is pure speculation and bunk. We have no idea how these markets will act in years to come. Do what is good for the planet today with the information that we are certain of, namely that this plant would pump more greenhouse gases into the environment, hastening climate change. Reject this ill-conceived, foolhardy project.

Sincerely,
Kim Jarvis
No attachments

Comment From: Matt Hohensee

9/16/20 @ 7:48 AM
It is short-sighted to approve projects like the Kalama NWIW methanol refinery when it is clear that pollution and fossil fuel consumption are unsustainable. We should be encouraging projects that address the problems they present, rather than increa...

No attachments

Comment From: Diane Dick

9/16/20 @ 7:40 AM
2020 09 16 Comment #3

Washington State Department of Ecology
Olympia, Washington

Re: Formal Comments on Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility Draft Second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, September 2020

Please deny Kalama Manufact...

Greenhouse gas emissions are insufficiently explained in the draft second supplemental environmental impact statement (SSEIS) and the data contains errors and omissions.

In reviewing 3.7 Significant impacts and mitigation, p. 105, there is the statement, "GHG emissions occurring within Washington State from the sources listed above are estimated to be between 786,117 and 1,421,748 MT CO2e per year." This range of in state GHG emissions is patently incorrect.

For on site process emissions alone, current air discharge permit, ADP 16-3204, issued by Southwest Clean Air Agency June 2017, states on p. 3,
"2.1 Emission Limits
No. 1 Combined greenhouse gas emissions from approved emission units shall not exceed 1,076,000 tons of C02e per calendar year. Annual emissions shall be calculated using procedures consistent with the provisions of 40 CFR 98."
In metric units this is equal to 976,131 metric tons of CO2e.

This would be a very minimum NWIW Kalama methanol refinery would emit annually. The technical support document, p. 18, states the facility-wide potential to emit is 1,119,890 tons per year (1,015,947 metric tons). The permit states NWIW agreed to a voluntary limit of less than potential capacity to emit.

The range for in state emissions should begin at no less that 1 million metric tons annually. This alone is a significant increase in Washington state emissions. Adding other in state emissions, including over 250,000 metric tons annually for power purchases, would make KMMEF Kalama methanol refinery one of the top three GHG emitters in the state, excluding TransAlta. Note, this makes data in SSEIS Figure 3-1 also invalid.

When the stated legislative goal in Washington state is to reduce current GHG emissions, there is no rational environmental reasoning to allow shoreline permits for KMMEF Kalama methanol refinery.

Thank you,

Diane L. Dick
Longview

No attachments

Comment From: Craig Heverly

9/16/20 @ 7:34 AM
I am 82. I probably wouldn't live to see this project completed nor the destruction it would cause if allowed to go ahead. But I have three young grandchildren who will certainly be victims for most of their lives should you approve this project. Th...
No attachments

Comment From: Alice Shapiro

9/16/20 @ 6:23 AM
We are already in the midst of catastrophic climate change with fires, hurricanes, floods, etc. I have not been able to breathe without pain for several days now due to heavy smoke from enormous Oregon wildfires nearby exacerbated by the use of fossi...
Attachments:

Comment From: Hamboyan Harrison

9/16/20 @ 5:15 AM
Thank you for your work to protect Washingtons environment and acknowledgement that previous environmental analysis of Northwest Innovation Works (NWIW) Methanol refinery proposal in Kalama, Washington have been inaccurate and inadequate.

This new Dra...

Despite these marginal improvements, the evaluation of potential mitigation and displacement contained in this analysis is misleading and concerning in its reliance on speculative and unenforceable assumptions. One can simply look to the impacts of this pandemic to see evidence of incredible uncertainty and volatility in energy market dynamics. It is dangerous to presume this analysis can accurately predict global fuel markets, technology developments, consumer behavior, or regulations for the coming four decades. Furthermore, the SEIS provides too little detail on the actual mitigation that would be accomplished within the voluntary mitigation framework, nor does this mitigation address the full impacts of NWIWs emissions that will occur overseas. The mitigation framework is too vague for Ecology to conclude that this projects impacts will be mitigated, and the urgency of climate change demands that mitigation should be the last option (after all other impacts are reduced) in order to address unavoidable impacts, not simply to maintain the status quo as we continue to build out the fossil fuel industry.

Even with all of its flaws, this analysis confirms that NWIWs proposed facility would become one of the greatest sources of climate pollution in Washington. It is simply unacceptable for Washington to build an unequivocally and enormously polluting facility based on speculative analysis and a faint hope of theoretical emission reductions. Ecology should dismiss the speculative basis that this project could displace even more polluting facilities, and instead should base its permitting decision on what is reasonably foreseeable and indeed, assured, about this project--that it would cause millions of tons of greenhouse gas pollution each year, for 40 years, and is profoundly inconsistent with achieving Washingtons climate goals.

The evidence in this draft SEIS demonstrates that Washington should deny NWIWs proposal to build and operate this dangerous methanol refinery in Kalama. We cannot keep building fossil fuel export infrastructure and expect to address the dangers of climate change.

Please keep our communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution.
No attachments

Comment From: carolyn atkinson

9/16/20 @ 5:15 AM
Kalama is already burning. It will burn again. It is burning because of the destruction to our atmosphere caused by fossil fuel and manufacturing projects like this one. Fossil fuels are flammable. Why on Earth are we even considering building a faci...
No attachments

Comment From: carolyn atkinson

9/16/20 @ 5:12 AM
Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with ou...

Why are we even considering trusting the health and safety of our state to an organization that has demonstrated such a history of dangerous lies for profit? Cancel the project. With a project of this scale, they would be a massive drain on state regulatory resources just to keep them within the dangerously-permissive pollution regulations that they've admitted to. It's foolhardy. Their greed will kill people like so many other projects before if they are allowed to build this facility.
No attachments

Comment From: Jeff Ament

9/16/20 @ 4:46 AM
Save the whales!
No attachments

Comment From: JOANA KIRCHHOFF

9/16/20 @ 4:33 AM
There are many reasons to stop the Kalama Export Facility. As Washington and Oregon burn, often on the proposed pathways for LNG pipelines the dangers of new pipelines and explosive facility is more obvious than ever before. The climate fires and ...
Attachments:

Comment From: Kurt Cobain

9/16/20 @ 4:28 AM
Save the evironment!
No attachments

Comment From: Debbie Stempf

9/16/20 @ 4:15 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: John Flynn

9/16/20 @ 3:58 AM
The cataclysmic wildfires we are currently experiencing in Washington, Oregon and California, with the associated loss of life and property, have a direct correlation to climate change. Even those of us without advanced scientific degrees can see the...
Other significant effects of climate change and global warming that are not as glaringly obvious are:
~ global temperature increases
~ rise in sea levels affecting coastal areas and cities
~ increased ocean acidification with its associated negative impacts on the marine ecosystem
~ reduction in annual snowpack
~ reduced runoff from less snowpack with reduced stream and river flows, with associated increases in water temperature, less water for irrigation, summertime hydropower production and negative impacts on fish migration and reproduction
~ more intense and frequent heatwaves, tropical cycles (hurricanes) and heavy precipitation (increased flooding events)
~ negative impacts to biodiversity, drinking water and food supplies.
The proposed fracked gas to methanol refinery would add an additional 4.6 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions per year into this equation. We, as a species, are currently at a tipping point where we desperately need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions for our survival, not add more.
I urge the Department of Ecology to deny any and all permits for this proposed project.
Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Jonah Snyder

9/16/20 @ 3:17 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

It is not responsible in the long term to aid further extractive practice - we must live in a way that is s...

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Jonah Snyder
11155 Railroad Creek FS8301 Rd Chelan, WA 98816
jonahmorksnyder@gmail.com
No attachments

Comment From: Callie Mabry

9/16/20 @ 3:13 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

Inherent in this moral imperative is investing in a livable future that is safe for all to thrive.

Building ...

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ms. Callie Mabry
11155 Railroad Creek Rd Chelan, WA 98816
calmabry@gmail.com
No attachments

Comment From: Lorraine Heller

9/16/20 @ 3:11 AM
The present fires should be a wake-up call that we need to stop causing emissions that effect our greenhouse gas emissions. Climate change is here and if we fail to address it we will be at its mercy. I ask you to reject this methanol refinery plan...
No attachments

Comment From: Kris Freeman

9/16/20 @ 3:04 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

This type of energy is unsustainably dirty, and economically unsustainable. The Kalama methonal refinery wo...

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Kris Freeman
833 NW 53rd St Seattle, WA 98107-3644
freeman.ks@gmail.com
No attachments

Comment From: liza Michaelson

9/16/20 @ 2:10 AM
The Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility Second Supplemental EIS Is a chilling example of valuing a temporary economic boon over generations of environmental harm. It would be a terrible mistake; and it should NEVER HAPPEN. I don't have an...
"NO NO NO, Not in Washington!" Department of Ecology, PLEASE do the job we trust you to do. Stop this idea now. Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Winston Smith

9/16/20 @ 1:34 AM
I care deeply about this issue.
No attachments

Comment From: Winston Smyth

9/16/20 @ 1:08 AM
You may attach up to five 30 MB
No attachments

Comment From: Chris Chaplin

9/16/20 @ 12:57 AM
Washington should reject Northwest Innovation Works' (NWIW) proposal to build and operate the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery in Kalama.

NWIW misled your agency, and the public, about the purpose and impacts of the refinery. I am coun...

For the community of Kalama and for our climate, the risk is simply too big. Please keep our communities safe, and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution. I am counting on you to do the right thing and stop this dirty, dangerous fossil fuel export project. Thank you,
Chris Chaplin
No attachments

Comment From: Paula Hamilton

9/15/20 @ 5:59 PM
Dear Department of Ecology,

I'm writing to oppose the Kalama methanol facility at the Port of Kalama, Washington. Northwest Innovation Works (NWIW), the company behind the project, indicates its reason to build the methanol plant will generate 1000 f...

NWIW also said the plant would contribute between $30 million to $40 million in tax revenue annually. While the analysis show the facility will consume up to 320 million cubic feet of methane per day. The results of that totals up to 4.6 million tons of pollution every year for 40 years.

NWIW has stated the methanol would be used for plastics production in China, but more than likely, methanol will also be used as fuel, regardless of the what they claim. They will say whatever it takes to convince authorities to approve and allow the project to go forward. Just because NWIW "promised" methanol will only be used for plastic products and not fuel would be difficult to police once it's out of their control and the property of China. Once NWIW is operational, their customers will use the methanol for whatever they choose, including fuel.

We don't need another plant polluting our air, harming our wildlife, fish, water, vegetation, and food supply. We're currently combating global warming incident right now with the western states tragically on fire along with our air quality index indicators in the hazardous zones. How much more do we have to suffer for a few more folks to get rich? Can you imagine telling your grandchild 20 years from now, it was safe to play outside and breathe the air?

Please do not approve and allow to build a methanol plant in Kalama, Washington.

Thank you,
Paula Hamilton
No attachments

Comment From: Marshall Piotrowski

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Merry Moore

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Anne-Marie Oliver

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Bonnie Singman

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: LeBrie Rich

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: James Neu

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Vance Kimball

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: katy mcfadden

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Erin Newman

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Mona McNeil

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Rebecca Pelton

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Diana Bright

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Amber J

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Lucy Kennedy-Wong

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Rae Waterman

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Noah Rott

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Rosemary Siipola

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
NWIW comments
No attachments

Comment From: Evelyn Sizer

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Dr. Marre

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Kimberly Jarvis

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Patricia Atkinson

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Kathrine Kofoed

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Ruth Cortez

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Lars Olson

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Mirabai Peart

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: liza Michaelson

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Liza Michaelson

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Chris Chaplin

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Carol White

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Walter Pistor

9/15/20 @ 5:00 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: G. P.

9/15/20 @ 4:27 PM
This is horrible and goes against what we have been proclaiming on both sides of the fence

Seems extremely un-environmental and unAmerican Putting our land , generations of Americans health and well being at risk
No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

9/15/20 @ 2:23 PM
House Bill 2311 passed in 2020. It establishes the goal of reducing state wide emissions to 50MMT CO2e by 2030. The latest figure is 97.4 MMT CO2e

To reach that goal, we must reduce emissions about 6.4% per year starting in 2021. That may not comput...
Rate = 93.6% of remaining, or annual reductions of 6.4%

Start year Beginning Balance Ending Balance
2021 97.4 91.2
2022 91.2 85.3
2023 85.3 79.9
2024 79.9 74.8
2025 74.8 70.0
2026 70.0 65.5
2027 65.5 61.3
2028 61.3 57.4
2029 57.4 53.7
2030 53.7 50.3

The speculation in the latest SEIS for Kalama Methanol imagines possible reductions overseas, but that doesn't count with HB 2311.
Furthermore, HB2311 does not allow for local carbon offsets, such as are proposed by NWIW. The limit is 50MMT CO2e, period.

SB 5116 requires gas plants to be net zero by 2030, and Trans Alta will shut down in 2025, but which other businesses will be need to compensate for the increases from Kalama Methanol?

No attachments

Comment From: Mike Reuter

9/15/20 @ 2:21 PM
I am speaking here as an individual and not as the Mayor of Kalama.

The proposed methanol refinery will be the third attempt to put a speculative fossil fuel facility at that site. The two previous facilities that failed there should be a warning to c...

The first attempt was a coal-gasification facility in 2006 called the Pacific Mountain Energy Center.

Environmental sales pitch-

"Clean alternative to conventional coal plants. 20 to 25% less CO2."

"Clean, base-load generation to the Pacific Northwest."

"Environmentally friendly alternative to conventional coal-burning power plants and says the region will need the plant's energy."- Energy Plant Soar Costs from Estimate-

"By stripping out soot and other regulated pollutants, Energy Northwest bills the plant as a clean alternative to conventional coal plants -Proposed Kalama Coal Plant to Receive First Public Hearing-

Unlike conventional coal plants that burn coal, Energy Northwest says the facility would produce "a clean-burning, hydrogen-rich synthesis gas from petroleum coke, coal or other solid feedstocks." The technology allows for the reduction or removal of carbon dioxide and pollutants often associated with power plant emissions."- Coal-"a 19th-century answer to a 21st-century problem-

According to Energy Northwest, regulated emissions from the complex are expected to rival, and potentially outperform, those of a natural gas plant. The clean-burning synthesis gas will be produced by gasifying, rather than burning, coal, pet coke (a byproduct of crude oil refining), and potentially other carbon-based feedstocks in a fully enclosed process. Shipping out - Vancouver Business Journal-

Energy Northwest officials say the new power plant, called the Pacific Mountain Energy Center, "will be a valuable tool in advancing nationwide efforts to develop permanent in-ground carbon storage."-Enviros Challenge Proposed Coal Gasification-

The utility is part of the Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership, an effort funded by the U.S. Department of Energy to develop and promote permanent, large-scale carbon dioxide sequestration.- Enviros Challenge Proposed Coal Gasification Power Plant-

Energy Northwest Project Manager Ted Beatty said the new facility would have a beneficial impact on wind power development. "Adding additional full-time power from a facility like Pacific Mountain Energy Center will allow the integration of more wind, solar, and other intermittent power.-Enviros Challenge Proposed Coal Gasification Power Plant-

Spend $10 million to offset the emissions at other plants in the state

Spend $50 million to research possible ways to sequester the carbon dioxide into the ground, such as injecting the gas into a saline aquifer in Cowlitz County. If they couldn't do so, then they might have to consider buying and shutting down a conventional Western coal plant.

A lot of these points are the new norm when it comes to fossil fuel infrastructure, better here than somewhere else.

In November 2007, EFSEC voted unanimously to reject the plant because they had concerns that if they actually would follow through on the promise of carbon sequestration. Kalama project, stating the applicant's statements about carbon sequestration, amounted to "a plan to make a plan."

The state attorney general's office called the plan "deficient" and "vague,"

The second endeavor in 2007 was to put a gas-fired gasification facility called the Kalama Energy Center.

Promises:
The power can be a good backup to wind energy.

The project was listed as a bright spot in Cowlitz County Commissioner George Raiter's 2012 "State of the County" address -TDN- Kalama natural gas power plant plans in jeopardy-

Why it failed:
Veresen announced it was pulling out of the project due to "market conditions,"-TDN- Kalama natural gas power plant plans in jeopardy-

Paoli said. He noted that natural gas prices are volatile, possibly undercutting the viability of the project.- TDN- Kalama natural gas plant power plans in jeopardy-

The two previous projects by energy companies should be a wake-up call to either look at our energy future needs or to make sure we don't get trapped into another speculative fossil fuel endeavor. We need to make sure we have the power to our local public utilities and to supply growth needs in the region and provide reliable backup service to renewable energy generation in the Pacific Northwest.
No attachments

Comment From: M Huljev

9/15/20 @ 2:16 PM
Please do not let this facility to be built. Providing some jobs is not enough justification for short and lasting negative impact on the environment. Perhaps this is a lesser evil to coal, but it is still an evil option.
No attachments

Comment From: Teresa Flynn

9/15/20 @ 12:46 PM
My husband and I live in Kalama and are against the proposed Methanol Refinery This would be a out of control use of our resources. The pollution left behind would be enormous. The select few that would get rich ,from this never before built design ...
No attachments

Comment From: Dena Turner

9/15/20 @ 12:43 PM
My name is Dena Turner. I live in Portland, Oregon. I am writing to address my concern about how the Kalama Methanol Refinery exacerbates climate change and climate catastrophe.
The entire West coast has been wracked by statistically large and destr...
I write this letter because I am extremely concerned that climate change is a risk to future life on planet earth. Science tells us that already one million species are at risk of extinction. We know that the likelihood of droughts, fires, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, crop failures, famines are all increased with climate change. As I write this Hurricane Sally is impacting Gulf States. There are so many hurricanes this season that the naming system is challenged, soon requiring the use of the Greek alphabet to name hurricanes. This is not normal.
I am concerned that fracked gas is not clean and not natural. Methane is 86 times more potent as a warming gas than carbon dioxide. The methanol refinery would increase Washington State's contribution to global warming by nearly 10%.
I ask you, I beg of you to take a stand against the Kalama methanol refinery. I ask you, I beg of you to consider the future of planet earth. I ask you, I beg of you to consider the one million species of risk of extinction caused by pollutants in their environments and loss of habitat. I ask you, I beg of you to consider respiratory illnesses, particularly in neighborhoods where poor and people of color reside. I ask you to take into consideration that NWIW provides very vague language related to mitigation. This is unacceptable. The future of planet earth cannot be put at risk with increasing fossil fuel use promoted through vague language that risks our future.
Because of my concern, I call on the Washington Department of Ecology to reject the Kalama methanol refinery and to deny the Shorelines Permit for this project. Take a stand for the future of planet earth, my grandchildren, and your grandchildren, that they may have a livable planet.
Thank you for your consideration.
Dena Turner
No attachments

Comment From: Martha Bishop

9/15/20 @ 11:48 AM
I see the effects of climate change all around. I grew up on Fidalgo Island where crossing a sandbar meant getting squirted multiple times by clams. We would fish for little fish, and find tiny pink shells smaller that my finger nail. The number ...
No attachments

Comment From: Gary Akizuki

9/15/20 @ 11:17 AM
The Kalama Methanol Plant being proposed by Northwest Innovations Works (NWIW) will be the largest fracked gas refinery in the world. It will spew 4.6 million tons of greenhouse gases each year for 40 years, use millions of gallons of water from a C...

NWIW is promoting their plant by saying that it will produce less pollution than that of coal, but that is a misleading argument. All high-carbon paths are unacceptable and inconsistent with Washington's clean energy and climate goals. Adding more pollution of any kind will only increase the effects of climate change that we are already experiencing—out of control wildfires, Covid-19, monstrous hurricanes, droughts, heat emergencies and floods. Millions of people's lives are being harmed by this fossil fuel pollution and millions of jobs are being lost. If it wasn't clear before, it is abundantly clear now that we have to take immediate steps to reduce all fossil fuel use if we are going to survive.

I ask that Ecology deny NWIW's permit for this plant.

No attachments

Comment From: Linda Bridges

9/15/20 @ 11:02 AM
I support this project. It has been proven safe and will provide much needed jobs to this area.I have lived here all my life.The economy in our area has been going steadily downhill. We desperately need family wage jobs.

No attachments

Comment From: C Parks

9/15/20 @ 10:03 AM
Northwest Innovation Works says its methanol will be used to produce plastic. Has ecology given any consideration to the damage this plastic pollution will create? Research estimates that across its lifecycle, plastics account for 3.8 percent of g...
In the United States alone, extracting and transporting natural gas for plastic production generates an estimated 12.5 to 13.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year – that's the same as driving nearly 3 million cars for a year. On its present trajectory, emissions attributed to plastic would exceed the entire remaining carbon budget for all industrial greenhouse gas emissions under a 2°C scenario. Plastic refining is among the most greenhouse gas-intensive industries in the manufacturing sector — and the fastest growing.
Finally, global emissions from incineration of plastic waste totaled 16 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent in 2015 representing about 40 percent of plastic demand.
The ongoing pollution upstream and downstream from this plant is outrageous. I ask Ecology to deny the Kalama Methanol Plant Permit.

Attachments:

Comment From: Carol Goodall

9/15/20 @ 9:42 AM
My husband and I are opposed to the Kalama methanol facility. It might provide some jobs in construction, but those will not be long-lasting. It will just add to pollution and global warming and aggravate our already deteriorating environmental con...
No attachments

Comment From: Janine Roth

9/15/20 @ 9:20 AM
I'm continually AMAZED that a state that brags so often about how green it is seems to think these projects, that benefit foreign companies , at the cost of the health of the citizens of WA are OK. I am against it . WA does not need one more pollutio...
No attachments

Comment From: Melissa Moonves

9/15/20 @ 9:07 AM
Please don't do this. As a mother & grandmother, I worry about the future. Climate change is real & adding more pollution in our state to help China doesn't make sense for the long term.
Stop fossil fuel use, promote renewable resources & help make a ...
Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: sue corcoran

9/15/20 @ 8:55 AM
We do not need this in this state or in our world anymore. Plastic should go away. Fracking should not be allowed. We have so many environmental problems. Why add to them? For a few jobs? It's not worth it. The impacts to our health is beyond ...
No attachments

Comment From: carolyn atkinson

9/15/20 @ 8:49 AM
Suicide is on the rise in young people all over the country. Why? We see our government agencies taking a sledgehammer to the possibility of a habitable future for us because of projects like the disastrous proposed Kalama methanol facility. The alte...

What exactly will Northwest Innovations spend their blood money on in the ashes of the state and country? They are stoking the terrifying flames of disaster with this project. This is a stupid, suicidal, ecocidal, genocidal choice. The science has been clear for 50 years. Keep it in the ground. No new oil, gas, or coal facilities. No new CO2 megapollutor projects. Keep it in the ground.
No attachments

Comment From: Nancy Johnson

9/15/20 @ 7:36 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

Inherent in this moral imperative is investing in a livable future that is safe for all to thrive.
As a reti...

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ms. Nancy Johnson
9411 216th St SW Edmonds, WA 98020-3936
najohnso@operamail.com
No attachments

Comment From: John Flynn

9/15/20 @ 6:41 AM
The mission statement of the Washington Department of Ecology is to "protect, preserve and enhance Washington's environment for current and future generations." It is the responsibility of the Department of Ecology to protect the residents of the sta...
The proposal by Northwest Innovation Works to build a fracked gas to methanol refinery on the shore of the Columbia River for shipment to China is in direct juxtaposition to that responsibility.
Even the Governor of Washington, Jay Inslee, who was originally a supporter of the project, has come to the realization that this proposed fossil fuel project is not supportable.
I encourage the Department of Ecology to follow the governors lead and deny any and all permits for this unsustainable project.
Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Larry Hamilton

9/15/20 @ 6:07 AM
In efforts to keep things simple and brief based on the information I've currently received, I think NW Innovation Works (NWIW) should seek a place outside of our country to build their methanol plant.

It seems like a foregone conclusion that the use ...

In my opinion, by the time the NWIW executives realize the impact of their damage to the environment barring any potential catastrophic accidents, they'll have passed on into the afterlife and the children of Kalama and the state of Washington as a whole will have to carry the unhealthy burden.

At this point, given the current events that are occurring right now as I write this (west coast fires), it's also foregone conclusion that the effects of global warming is destroying our environment and killing us. Given that recent example, why would Ecology sign up for yet another pollutant that's going to accelerate the process? I know all of you at the Department of Ecology are sitting in your home right now because you can't go outside on your regular summer day walk, knowing the smoke outside will make you sick.

No matter what occurs here in Kalama with this NWIW methanol plant, the world will easily be supplied with enough methanol for what ever purpose. So let us not skew folks into thinking we're doing the world a favor. This is purely about some key NWIW folks looking for a way to get rich(er) at the expense of our safety, health and wellbeing.

Don't allow NWIW to build a methanol plant in Kalama or the state of Washington. We already know how this story will end and no matter how you spin this, it won't end well for us or the defenseless wildlife!

No attachments

Comment From: MCBLAINE BOYLE

9/15/20 @ 5:22 AM
Please don't go ahead with this. It is just the kind of project which is more damaging in the long run.
No attachments

Comment From: Scott Starbuck

9/15/20 @ 5:12 AM
Director Watson and Dept. of Ecology:

I have fished the Columbia River and her tributaries for 50 years, and I'm concerned about impacts on salmon. I worked the Pacific Ocean as a commercial salmon troller and charter captain, and now I mainly fish t...

In addition to climate impacts, I understand the proposed gas-to-methanol site is unstable as noted in the draft EIS explaining soil at the plant site has a "moderate to high liquefaction susceptibility" in the event of an earthquake.

I saw a July 13, 2015, New Yorker article by Kathryn Schulz noting "In fact, the science is robust, and one of the chief scientists behind it is Chris Goldfinger. Thanks to work done by him and his colleagues, we now know that the odds of the big Cascadia earthquake happening in the next fifty years are roughly one in three." The article continues "In the Pacific Northwest, the area of impact will cover some hundred and forty thousand square miles, including Seattle, Tacoma, Portland, Eugene, Salem (the capital city of Oregon), Olympia (the capital of Washington), and some seven million people. When the next full-margin rupture happens [odds are 'are roughly one in ten'], that region will suffer the worst natural disaster in the history of North America, outside of the 2010 Haiti earthquake, which killed upward of a hundred thousand people."

Therefore, I imagine building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery in Kalama is about as smart as building the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Ōkuma, Fukushima Prefecture, near the Pacific Ocean about 33 feet above sea level partly to reduce operating costs of seawater pumps. You know the result of that. Charles Perrow wrote in the April 1, 2011 issue of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists "Currently our approach to risk is 'probabilistic,' and the probability of a tsunami seriously damaging the Fukushima Daiichi plant was extremely small. But we should also consider a worst-case approach to risk: the 'possibilistic' approach, as Rutgers University sociologist Lee Clarke calls it in his 2005 book Worst Cases: Terror and Catastrophe in the Popular Imagination. In this approach, things that never happened before are possible. Indeed, they happen all the time."

In short, in addition to the obvious climate impacts, a one in three chance of a big earthquake hitting Kalama in the " next fifty years" should be enough risk to say "No."

Sincerely,

Scott T. Starbuck
No attachments

Comment From: Rejean Idzerda

9/15/20 @ 5:05 AM
As I review the Second Supplemental EIS for the Kalama methanol refinery, the wildfire smoke outside my window lies denser than fog. All my doors and windows have been kept shut for days, and the air quality makes it dangerous to venture outside. Unf...
No attachments

Comment From: John Flynn

9/15/20 @ 4:04 AM
We are currently experiencing a wildfire disaster not seen in recent memory. The cataclysmic wildfires in Washington, Oregon and California, with the associated loss of life and property, should be a wake up call that we cannot continue to ignore.
If ...
Green and renewable energy is our only future, not the climate changing consumption of fossil fuels. This one project alone would add 4.6 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions per year into our already overburdened atmosphere.
Department of Ecology needs to ask themselves what benefit would this project have for the citizens of Washington who they are supposed to protect. What benefit would there be with the production of more plastic to pollute our oceans and landfills? Of what benefit would the burning of methanol for transportation and industry in China have? The answer is NO benefit whatsoever for the citizens of Washington.
The Department of Ecology should accept their responsibility to protect the health and welfare of the citizens of Washington State and as well as our environment and categorically deny this project.
Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Kathy Dawson

9/15/20 @ 3:56 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

Inherent in this moral imperative is investing in a livable future that is safe for all to thrive. This is ...

The recent, still current, west coast wildfires and gulf coast hurricanes are eloquent reminders that we must stop putting carbon dioxide and other climate pollutants into the atmosphere. We must start reducing human impacts now, not after the next climate warming project designed for corporate short term profits, or the one after that.

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ms. Kathy Dawson
5806 Greenwood Ave N Seattle, WA 98103-5823
kathy.dawson@gmail.com
No attachments

Comment From: Anna Johnson

9/15/20 @ 3:54 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

Creation has been given to us to take care of, and respecting it and treating it well is a moral imperative...

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ms. Anna Johnson
4237 S Bozeman St Seattle, WA 98118-4158
annapatrice.clarke@gmail.com
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Bray

9/15/20 @ 3:52 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

How can we ,with fires raging in Oregon and Washington, even consider a methanol refinery in our state. W...

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Karen Bray
1307 E Bay Dr NE Olympia, WA 98506-3960
gkbbray@gmail.com
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]