Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility Second Supplemental EIS

4777 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Teresa Flynn

9/17/20 @ 3:03 PM
My family lives in Kalama, Washington.We are against the proposed Methanol Refinery. we have been fighting this for five years. Next time could you just tell them At the beginning of the process that it is not acceptable and be done with it.Thank you...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

9/17/20 @ 2:32 PM
Hello, I'm Don Steinke, retired science teacher, 43 years mostly at Fort Vancouver High School.
NEPA was signed by Nixon 50 years ago, because it had been difficult to get all the facts related to a project. NEPA requires you to prepare an EIS that t...↓
You gave us part of truth and a lot of speculation. I'm not even sure you read your own EIS. Did you write it? Were the remarks about displacement potential your own or did they come from the proponent?
The natural gas industry is the absolute master of deceit and lies. They persuaded us that most plastic is recycled when it is not. They are advertising on TV and FB right now about being the pathway to a clean and sustainable future. When all the emissions are accounted for, gas is nearly as bad as coal and methanol is worse.
Methanol is the opposite of a value-added product. It's a pollution added product. Better to use the fuel at the source than to add the pollution generated by a methanol plant.
The gas industry has known about climate change for decades but are engaged in a "campaign of deception" to help sell their products. They have fooled most of the public and the elected officials. They fooled the green groups as well, until we learned about methane leaks in 2014. And they are trying to fool you with their displacement theory.
Don't believe anything they say!
Get rid of the speculation in the EIS. Protect our children's future and say NO to our destruction.

No attachments

Comment From: Danny Percich

9/17/20 @ 2:23 PM
Don't allow the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
Washington should reject Northwest Innovation Works' (NWIW) proposal to build and operate the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery in Kalama. ...↓
For the community of Kalama and for our climate, the risk is simply too big. Please keep our communities safe, and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution. We are counting on you to do the right thing and stop this dirty, dangerous fossil fuel export project.

In this moment of a top down attack against science, we need to stand up for science and look hard at how a this refinery will pollute and effect our communities. As a father of 3 and owner of a small farm, we need to protect our future.

Sincerely,
Danny Percich
No attachments

Comment From: Nancy McMahon

9/17/20 @ 1:55 PM
The science is in and we have very little time left to transfer our world from fossil fuel dependence to renewable sources of energy. We have begun to make headway in this direction, but this facility would be a giant step backwards.

The project woul...↓

No attachments

Comment From: John Flynn

9/17/20 @ 12:37 PM
I am a resident of Kalama, WA. I frequently fish the Columbia River both upstream and downstream of Kalama, as well as the Kalama River.
I oppose the proposed construction and operation of a fracked gas to methanol refinery on the shore of the Columbi...↓
This refinery would emit 4.6 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually into our already polluted atmosphere. In addition this petrochemical refinery would emit 53 tons of toxic and hazardous chemical pollutants into our air per year along with 62 tons of fine particulate matter per year. It is imperative upon us that we reduce greenhouse gas emissions and toxic air pollutants rather than increase them.
The vapor cloud from the cooling towers of this refinery from which millions of gallons of water will be evaporated would reach between one half to three quarters of a mile high and one quarter to one half mile wide. I cannot see myself, in my boat, fishing with family and friends in the shadow of the worlds largest fracked methane gas to methanol refinery.
I sincerely urge the Department of Ecology to deny any and all permits for this refinery project.
Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Julie Glover

9/17/20 @ 11:21 AM
I am very upset that Northwest Innovation Works, LLC. proposes to develop and operate a natural gas-to-methanol production plant and storage facilities on approximately 90 acres at the Port of Kalama. THIS IS CRAZY! Methanol will be loaded on to ship...↓

The Second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement focused on fully analyzing greenhouse gas emissions from the proposed Kalama methanol facility, looking at impacts from upstream emissions, such as the greenhouse gases that escape from natural gas wells and pipelines, direct and indirect emissions produced at the facility, and downstream emissions from transporting the methanol to its intended destination in China. IT MAKES NO SENSE TO ME THAT WE WOULD WILLINGLY UNDERGO ALL THIS POLLUTION FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW MONEYMAKERS, BUT NOT FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHOSE HABITAT IS BEING ENDANGERED!
No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Walsh

9/17/20 @ 11:20 AM
Thank you for your work to protect Washingtons environment and acknowledgement that previous environmental analysis of Northwest Innovation Works (NWIW) Methanol refinery proposal in Kalama, Washington have been inaccurate and inadequate.

This new Dra...↓

Despite these marginal improvements, the evaluation of potential mitigation and displacement contained in this analysis is misleading and concerning in its reliance on speculative and unenforceable assumptions. One can simply look to the impacts of this pandemic to see evidence of incredible uncertainty and volatility in energy market dynamics. It is dangerous to presume this analysis can accurately predict global fuel markets, technology developments, consumer behavior, or regulations for the coming four decades. Furthermore, the SEIS provides too little detail on the actual mitigation that would be accomplished within the voluntary mitigation framework, nor does this mitigation address the full impacts of NWIWs emissions that will occur overseas. The mitigation framework is too vague for Ecology to conclude that this projects impacts will be mitigated, and the urgency of climate change demands that mitigation should be the last option (after all other impacts are reduced) in order to address unavoidable impacts, not simply to maintain the status quo as we continue to build out the fossil fuel industry.

Even with all of its flaws, this analysis confirms that NWIWs proposed facility would become one of the greatest sources of climate pollution in Washington. It is simply unacceptable for Washington to build an unequivocally and enormously polluting facility based on speculative analysis and a faint hope of theoretical emission reductions. Ecology should dismiss the speculative basis that this project could displace even more polluting facilities, and instead should base its permitting decision on what is reasonably foreseeable and indeed, assured, about this project--that it would cause millions of tons of greenhouse gas pollution each year, for 40 years, and is profoundly inconsistent with achieving Washingtons climate goals.

The evidence in this draft SEIS demonstrates that Washington should deny NWIWs proposal to build and operate this dangerous methanol refinery in Kalama. We cannot keep building fossil fuel export infrastructure and expect to address the dangers of climate change.

Please keep our communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution.
No attachments

Comment From: Lori Howell

9/17/20 @ 10:27 AM
Washington Department Of Ecology,
I assume you wrote your mission statement,
your core purpose and values.
Let me remind you what you wrote.
PROTECT
PRESERVE
ENHANCE
Washington's
LAND
AIR
WATER
for current and future generations.

Based on YOUR Mission Statement ...↓
you will deny NWIW the permit they seek
for their proposed methanol refinery in
Kalama, Washington.
No attachments

Comment From: Mason Evans

9/17/20 @ 10:11 AM
My name is Mason Evans

I am the President of JH Kelly – a proud union construction firm headquartered in Longview WA

I value the environment and support actions that reduce global greenhouse gases - particularly the use of transitional feedstocks...↓

I support the Kalama Methanol Project because:
• It brings much needed jobs to Cowlitz County

• The project incorporates important features that benefit the local environment such as zero liquid discharge, ultra low emissions technology, and a commitment to mitigate for WA air emissions

• Most importantly, the project reduces global greenhouse gases

After reviewing the supplemental EIS, I find it to be comprehensive and utilize a valid methodology to evaluate the project.

For these reasons, I encourage the Department of Ecology to accept the conclusion of the EIS and issue the Shoreline and other necessary permits for the Kalama Methanol Facility.

Thank you

No attachments

Comment From: Julie Martinson

9/17/20 @ 9:47 AM
Washington State must reject this proposal that would build and operate the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery in Kalama.

I have lived here my whole life as a 4th generation Washingtonian. I grew up camping and exploring the mountains, r...↓

If this plant were approved, it would necessitate expanding the capacity of pipelines to the refinery, while we are committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, instead. This is a Chinese-owned company, which wants US to bear all the suffering from the pollution and dangers, while using OUR resources of water and electricity (and fracked gas) for their methanol, to be shipped back to China. This is like a sad cartoon: 'What's wrong with this picture?'

Washington State has committed to cutting our fossil-fuel emissions, so we must stop this project NOW, to protect our lives and health and the future of our beautiful natural world for all of its precious living creatures.

I'm fighting to protect what is sacred and beautiful. We need to keep our communities safe and healthy. We have to take a stand against fossil fuels now, and reject this project entirely, once and for all.
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Ashford

9/17/20 @ 9:47 AM
Dear Concerned ( I hope)
I have lived here in Portland, and now own a home along the Little Kalama River Rd. I have asthma, and will be DIRECTLY impacted if this plant is built. I wonder if you have been updated about the plastic in our food, bodies...↓
WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE AIR AND WATER POLLUTION IN WASHINGTON STATE!

Heaven help us, Karen Ashford

No attachments

Comment From: Regan Fisher

9/17/20 @ 9:04 AM
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed methanol refinery in Kalama.

This project would cause millions of tons of greenhouse gases to be emitted and pose a danger of pollution of the Columbia River. I am especially concerned about...↓

This refinery would use more fracked gas than all the gas-fired power plants in Washington combined. This stark increase is appalling, especially considering Governor Inslee has strongly positioned himself and the state of Washington as needing to urgently address climate change and move away from reliance on fossil fuels. This project would obviously be a move in the wrong direction.

I am also concerned about the gas pipeline that would be necessary for this project. It brings with it a huge risk of spills along the way, as well as damage to the communities along its path.

The EIS that was completed for this project is incomplete. It does not sufficiently address the environmental impacts of the project. The supplemental EIS was also inadequate. It is clear that there is bias involved in this project (with the stakeholders and backers), and it is unconscionable that the decision makers have not been presented with the accurate evidence of what sort of environmental damage this project would cause.

I request that the Department of Ecology deny the permit for the refinery.
No attachments

Comment From: carolyn atkinson

9/17/20 @ 8:41 AM
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-climate-change-report-human-civilization-at-risk-extinction-by-2050-new-australian-climate/

The SEISS does not account at all for the projected global political instability within this project's lifespan and the impact...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Smith

9/17/20 @ 8:30 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Jennifer Vinnard

9/17/20 @ 8:29 AM
Speculations about this proposed methanol plant supposedly displacing coal burning plants is absolutely ludicrous and unfounded! Not one single coal to methanol plant has agreed to reduce or stop production, and with China's high demand, it's foolish...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Cynthia Thornton-Tang

9/17/20 @ 8:23 AM
I would like to urge the panel to deny the permit for the refinery.

I am a mother and a grandmother and a lifelong resident of the Pacific Northwest. I am concerned that there will be pollution and environmentally harmful effects at every stage of th...↓

This project, if approved, would give short-term financial benefit to Northwest Innovation Works and its investors, with the long-term costs passed on to citizens of this planet, a burden that would be borne most particularly by those who have the least. There will be leakage, there will be accidents, there will be clean up costs, there will be pollution either by methane gas or micro-plastics.

In our current year of trauma with COVID, economic upheaval, and heightened awareness of social and racial inequities, it is clear how morally wrong and economically short-sighted it is to approve fossil fuel projects that allow corporations and investors to reap the profit and walk away from the costs.

We need to make choices now that will give us all a better future.

I urge the panel to reject the permit request.

Thank you,
Cynthia Thornton-Tang
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Uhart

9/17/20 @ 8:22 AM
My name is Mark Uhart and I am a retired US Army career officer. My wife and I live near Kalama in the foothills overlooking the Columbia River. We are against this project. We purchased this property so we could enjoy the unobstructed view of the ...↓

Most importantly, I am concerned about the future of my children and grandchildren. It's hard for me to comprehend why anyone in this area would support a project that will adversely impact their health, safety, and long-term quality of life. The short-term economic gain will be offset by 40 years of dirty air and water, noise and landscape pollution, depletion of the Columbia River-Kalama River aquifer, and a definite impact on our climate. I grew up in southern California next to oil fields and refineries. I've lived in Texas and observed the stinky and noisy refineries along the coastline. Trust me, we don't want the smell, the noise, the air and water, and landscape pollution of this facility.

I served 21 years as an active duty officer in the Army from battery to Corps Artillery level, and an assignment in special weapons quality assurance. The strategic objective of our adversaries, Russia and China, were always part of our professional development. I was, and still am, very aware of the strategic implications of foreign countries' attempts to get deeply embedded into our financial system in order to influence both economic and military outcomes. One author says it best, "The signs that China is gearing up to contest America's global leadership are unmistakable, and they are ubiquitous." They are doing it with our money and our natural resources. When will the average Washington resident wake up and smell the coffee?

It really bothers us that the US citizens of Northwest Innovation Works (NWIW), the Port of Kalama and the Cowlitz County commissioners, would support a project that is owned by the Chinese government; that will be financed primarily by US Government and Washington taxpayers; that will pollute our air and water; and only add to the devastating effects of anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change. We will bear most of the financial and environmental risks associated with this project while they take in the profits and improve their position toward world financial, economic, Southeast Asia maritime and political dominance. Money talks and the Chinese government are throwing a lot of money into marketing this project in its quest to control much of the world's technology and energy natural resources by 2030.

An assumption that was not stated, but can be inferred from these EISs, is that the international community will choose not to address climate change and regulate GHGs. If every country that wants to improve their energy position and economy, like China and the US, took the same approach purported in this report, then the earth is doomed. The assumption is that if this plant is not built herein Kalama, it will be built elsewhere. The law of supply and demand shows that if there is a shortage of a commodity, and prices increase, people will use it less and seek alternate technologies. We saw this before the fracking boom when gas prices went up. That drove better fuel efficiency and new technology (all electric cars, hybrid vehicles, and now fuel-cell vehicles.) Denying these projects will constrain these fossil fuel supply channels and force countries to develop clean, non-fossil fuel, energy alternatives.

I read the SSEIS and the voluntary mitigation framework presented in Appendix D is laughable. By using the term "in-state", NWIW is not willing to mitigate GHGs outside the state of Washington. This includes the upstream fugitive methane and CO2 from the methanol burned in transport to China, and as a fuel or in olefin production. I will address this further in another comment.

This project is a climate killer and the only responsible decision is for Ecology to deny the shoreline permit.

Mark Uhart
LTC, USA Ret.
Kalama, WA

No attachments

Comment From: Eric Haskins

9/17/20 @ 8:12 AM
Thank you for your work to protect Washingtons environment and acknowledgement that previous environmental analysis of Northwest Innovation Works (NWIW) Methanol refinery proposal in Kalama, Washington have been inaccurate and inadequate.

This new Dra...↓

Despite these marginal improvements, the evaluation of potential mitigation and displacement contained in this analysis is misleading and concerning in its reliance on speculative and unenforceable assumptions. One can simply look to the impacts of this pandemic to see evidence of incredible uncertainty and volatility in energy market dynamics. It is dangerous to presume this analysis can accurately predict global fuel markets, technology developments, consumer behavior, or regulations for the coming four decades. Furthermore, the SEIS provides too little detail on the actual mitigation that would be accomplished within the voluntary mitigation framework, nor does this mitigation address the full impacts of NWIWs emissions that will occur overseas. The mitigation framework is too vague for Ecology to conclude that this projects impacts will be mitigated, and the urgency of climate change demands that mitigation should be the last option (after all other impacts are reduced) in order to address unavoidable impacts, not simply to maintain the status quo as we continue to build out the fossil fuel industry.

Even with all of its flaws, this analysis confirms that NWIWs proposed facility would become one of the greatest sources of climate pollution in Washington. It is simply unacceptable for Washington to build an unequivocally and enormously polluting facility based on speculative analysis and a faint hope of theoretical emission reductions. Ecology should dismiss the speculative basis that this project could displace even more polluting facilities, and instead should base its permitting decision on what is reasonably foreseeable and indeed, assured, about this project--that it would cause millions of tons of greenhouse gas pollution each year, for 40 years, and is profoundly inconsistent with achieving Washingtons climate goals.

The evidence in this draft SEIS demonstrates that Washington should deny NWIWs proposal to build and operate this dangerous methanol refinery in Kalama. We cannot keep building fossil fuel export infrastructure and expect to address the dangers of climate change.

Please keep our communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution.
No attachments

Comment From: Richard Schoonover

9/17/20 @ 8:01 AM
Thank you for your work to protect Washingtons environment and acknowledgement that previous environmental analysis of Northwest Innovation Works (NWIW) Methanol refinery proposal in Kalama, Washington have been inaccurate and inadequate.

This new Dra...↓

Despite these marginal improvements, the evaluation of potential mitigation and displacement contained in this analysis is misleading and concerning in its reliance on speculative and unenforceable assumptions. One can simply look to the impacts of this pandemic to see evidence of incredible uncertainty and volatility in energy market dynamics. It is dangerous to presume this analysis can accurately predict global fuel markets, technology developments, consumer behavior, or regulations for the coming four decades. Furthermore, the SEIS provides too little detail on the actual mitigation that would be accomplished within the voluntary mitigation framework, nor does this mitigation address the full impacts of NWIWs emissions that will occur overseas. The mitigation framework is too vague for Ecology to conclude that this projects impacts will be mitigated, and the urgency of climate change demands that mitigation should be the last option (after all other impacts are reduced) in order to address unavoidable impacts, not simply to maintain the status quo as we continue to build out the fossil fuel industry.

Even with all of its flaws, this analysis confirms that NWIWs proposed facility would become one of the greatest sources of climate pollution in Washington. It is simply unacceptable for Washington to build an unequivocally and enormously polluting facility based on speculative analysis and a faint hope of theoretical emission reductions. Ecology should dismiss the speculative basis that this project could displace even more polluting facilities, and instead should base its permitting decision on what is reasonably foreseeable and indeed, assured, about this project--that it would cause millions of tons of greenhouse gas pollution each year, for 40 years, and is profoundly inconsistent with achieving Washingtons climate goals.

The evidence in this draft SEIS demonstrates that Washington should deny NWIWs proposal to build and operate this dangerous methanol refinery in Kalama. We cannot keep building fossil fuel export infrastructure and expect to address the dangers of climate change.

Please keep our communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution.
No attachments

Comment From: kate lunceford

9/17/20 @ 7:55 AM
I oppose the construction of Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility. The mining, transport and use of natural gas is destroying out planet. We must stop using fossil fuels immediately to have any hope of reversing climate change. It the plan...↓
No attachments

Comment From: DEREK DEXHEIMER

9/17/20 @ 7:54 AM
The Kalama ethanol plant should not be built. Ecology's own analysis shows the plant would emit a minimum of 4.6 million tons of GHGs annually for 40 years. This level of climate pollution is inconsistent with a livable climate.

In addition, the plant...↓

Due to its inherently destructive nature, this plant cannot go forward.
No attachments

Comment From: Joseph Hiss

9/17/20 @ 7:44 AM
Please do not approve the Second Supplemental Draft EIS for SEPA on this project. Any proposed action that locks WA and China into 40 years of fossil fuel mining, transportation, burning, or other industrial use, is unacceptable to me. I base this ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Priscilla Martinez

9/17/20 @ 7:35 AM
We need to take better care of what is left of our environment, for people, wildlife, and marine life.
No attachments

Comment From: John Harris

9/17/20 @ 7:25 AM
Please do not approve this. In time of global warming and unprecedented fires, we do not need to add more methane into the atmosphere.

Also, we do not want to give the Chinese any foothold in our area. They are not our friends.
No attachments

Comment From: Deirdre Gabbay

9/17/20 @ 7:02 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

Twenty years ago would have been the correct time to phase out the burning of fossil fuels to protect our c...↓

If we fail to act again today, when the devastating effects of last year's poor choices are upon us, then what is the point of ever educating another child to study science, of ever teaching another human being to care about the future, or giving any governing body the responsibility to set policy that will affect the future health of the planet?

The answer is: there will be no point to your very existence as a Department of Ecology if you approve construction of this disastrous project.

We the people have given you the authority to say "no" to this fatal industry. You must use it.

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Deirdre Gabbay
120 W Smith St Seattle, WA 98119-2319
deirdre@gabbay.org
No attachments

Comment From: Judith Wood

9/17/20 @ 7:00 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

Inherent in this moral imperative is investing in a livable future that is safe for all to thrive. We have...↓

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Judith Wood
6523 1st Ave NW Seattle, WA 98117-4826
judith.drake.wood@gmail.com
No attachments

Comment From: Cal Van Zee

9/17/20 @ 6:58 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

This project will use more fracked natural gas than all of the gas power plants in the state, combined.

This...↓

And we the taxpayers of Washington state will subsidize those contract holders for a few dirty industry jobs.

We should tax those companies to pay the full cost of gas extraction and carbon released, starting at $20/ton.

Will investors still want to build this project if they have to pay the full costs to us?

Hire those workers as the new green economy by charging coal, gas and oil a true carbon tax. Consumers will switch quickly to sustainable power and the products and services needed will be ready.

Please deny this permit for me and my grandchildren

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Cal Van Zee
6523 1st Ave NW Seattle, WA 98117-4826
calvanzee@yahoo.com
No attachments

Comment From: Tina Brakefield

9/17/20 @ 6:55 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Fred Suter

9/17/20 @ 6:47 AM
My name is Fred Suter. I live in Vancouver, WA.

We are being told that the Kalama Methanol Refinery will produce over 4.5 million tons of GHG emissions every year and this will make it one of the largest polluters in the State of Washington.

We have s...↓

If you look on a map of the United States, the entire west coast appears to be on fire. We have seen over 40 large fires burn across CA, OR, and WA - destroying over 475,000 acres (so far). Thousands of our neighbors have been forced to evacuate from their houses and thousands have returned to the charred remains of what was once their homes. Dozens of towns have been destroyed.

We are told that hotter summers, dryer weather, and longer wildfire seasons contribute to the conditions that cause these monster wildfires. Hotter summers, dryer weather, and longer wildfire seasons come to us as a result of the impact that manmade GHG emissions have on the climate.

There is a connection between our quality of life as residents of the State of Washington and the construction of this methanol refinery. Yet wildfires are considered an extranality in the economic analysis of this methanol refinery.

The wildfires that are presently burning out of control have already caused billions dollars of damage. The economic analysis presented in the EIS doesn't take any of these costs into account. The economic analysis presented in the EIS grossly under-estimates the actual costs of constructing this refinery. The economic analysis does not allow decision makers the opportunity to evaluate the true costs of this refinery.

I urge you to include the costs of ALL GHG emissions in the EIS. It is clear to me that the construction of the Kalama Methanol Refinery runs counter to every future objective that the State of Washington has stated to combat climate change and preserve our quality of life.

Just say NO to fossil fuel expansion.

Sincerely - Fred Suter
No attachments

Comment From: Kristen Meston

9/17/20 @ 6:42 AM
Thank you for your work to protect Washingtons environment and acknowledgement that previous environmental analysis of Northwest Innovation Works (NWIW) Methanol refinery proposal in Kalama, Washington have been inaccurate and inadequate.

This new Dra...↓

Despite these marginal improvements, the evaluation of potential mitigation and displacement contained in this analysis is misleading and concerning in its reliance on speculative and unenforceable assumptions. One can simply look to the impacts of this pandemic to see evidence of incredible uncertainty and volatility in energy market dynamics. It is dangerous to presume this analysis can accurately predict global fuel markets, technology developments, consumer behavior, or regulations for the coming four decades. Furthermore, the SEIS provides too little detail on the actual mitigation that would be accomplished within the voluntary mitigation framework, nor does this mitigation address the full impacts of NWIWs emissions that will occur overseas. The mitigation framework is too vague for Ecology to conclude that this projects impacts will be mitigated, and the urgency of climate change demands that mitigation should be the last option (after all other impacts are reduced) in order to address unavoidable impacts, not simply to maintain the status quo as we continue to build out the fossil fuel industry.

Even with all of its flaws, this analysis confirms that NWIWs proposed facility would become one of the greatest sources of climate pollution in Washington. It is simply unacceptable for Washington to build an unequivocally and enormously polluting facility based on speculative analysis and a faint hope of theoretical emission reductions. Ecology should dismiss the speculative basis that this project could displace even more polluting facilities, and instead should base its permitting decision on what is reasonably foreseeable and indeed, assured, about this project--that it would cause millions of tons of greenhouse gas pollution each year, for 40 years, and is profoundly inconsistent with achieving Washingtons climate goals.

The evidence in this draft SEIS demonstrates that Washington should deny NWIWs proposal to build and operate this dangerous methanol refinery in Kalama. We cannot keep building fossil fuel export infrastructure and expect to address the dangers of climate change.

There is no reason to create new polluting facilities rather than working to eliminate them. Please keep our communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution.
No attachments

Comment From: Joel Carlson

9/17/20 @ 6:15 AM
Fracked gas or methane is extremely harmful to our environment and must be banned. New construction must be electric only with heat pumps, etc. We must also ban the fracked gas LNG projects in Tacoma and Kalama. It is vital that we get this done now!
No attachments

Comment From: Brian Davern

9/17/20 @ 6:13 AM
There are many reasons to oppose this project and deny the permit applied for. Conversely, there are few and weak reasons to approve it. I'll only list some important objections there are to this project and concentrate on the most important reason...↓

The Port of Kalama (POK) site is far too small for the size of the intended plant size and product volume. No other in operation elsewhere matches its size or uses such a small parcel. This site is directly downstream and very close to the mouth of the Kalama River, host stream to ESA listed salmon and steelhead. The shoreline disruption caused by pier construction, then large ship movement, as well as river contamination from both the product spills and the ships would be a constant threat to rearing, outmigrant and adult fish. Plant operation will create a micro climate due to the injection of heated gas release, condensation and precipitation that will lower visibility, pollute water, shoreline and local landscapes downwind (meaning, to the north in winter, to the south in summer). The removal of 5M gallons of water/day beneath the Columbia streambed, assumes that it's surplus water... it is not. The supply of liquid gas used to produce methanol must course through steep, private residential properties that must shoulder the risk of leak and fire without benefit or consent. The price and supply consequences to regional users of liquid gas again provides no benefit in trade for reduced supply and higher prices. An additional assumption with this application is that the area's industrial past is also its future. The rejuvenation of the city of Kalama and the arrival of McMenamin's hotel and restaurant, is tangible proof that it is not. The proximity of the proposed plant to both the townsite and the residential community (primarily now there for the natural, rural character of living conditions) makes a future of heavy, around the clock, industrial activity much more than objectionable.

Finally, the main and by far the largest objection to this project is the very real specter of a changing climate that we've been warned of, been taught its human contributions and are now living in its effects (as numerous and widespread wildfires in the Northwest ravage the land and the plants and animals, including humans, that have made it their homes).

So there is a choice to consider, one of which is smart: POK can get in front of the climate reality we are living in and invite industry that HELPS moderate climate change... or sadly, make a huge contribution to accelerating the harmful effects a hotter planet imposes on all of earth's inhabitants. I beseech DOE to select smart and reject this proposed plant.
No attachments

Comment From: Diana Richardson

9/17/20 @ 5:57 AM
My name is Diana Richardson. I live in part of the territory stolen from the Chinook and Multnomah Peoples upon which their descendants live today.

"To protect, preserve and enhance the environment for future generations." Mission of Washington Depta...↓

I write to question your assumptions, your basic assumptions, about what is at stake in the decision to permit or not permit this or any project known to contribute to the havoc being rained down on our communities at this very moment.
With catastrophic climate destabilization undeniably linked to fossil fuels, you who are appointed or elected to make choices regarding the health and welfare of the people you are responsible to must accept your moral responsibility to act in a ways that do NO harm, that only protect the ENTIRE environment--from air and water on which we all depend-- to every animal and human on earth. Anything less is blind obedience to cultural biases to which you are accustomed. I refer to the notion that there have to be losses to life in any or all of its forms, justified by allegiance to a habit of accepting there is some value higher than that of preserving and enhancing life. For that is the only way anyone could even entertain the thought of permitting a project which will unquestionably have devastating effects on our lives now and on the generations to succeed us, if indeed, they will even be able to survive.

Your mission states : to "protect, preserve and enhance the environment for future generations"! You must take into account all of the beings who are affected by your actions.

When you think about the "pros and cons" of permitting this methanol project, a calamity for all the people of Kalama, of Washington, Oregon, and far beyond our homes, do you think about the First Nations' People, the people whose humanity has been denied by the continuing colonization the dominating culture imposes, against government law, against moral law, against spiritual law? Or are these lives ignored in the calculations of decision-makers who see the issues from the point of view of What-do-we-need-and-how-do-we-get-it? The point of view of the conquering nation.

We need to acknowledge the truth we do not want to see. Are you not charged with protecting, preserving and enhancing the environment for future generations?

As a woman familiar with the violence perpetrated upon the women of the communities through which the pipelines are laid, I must tell you this, though you will not want to hear it:
There are always the men who are not part of the communities where they are hired to build infrastructure for the substances illegally and immorally ripped from the entrails of our Mother Earth to be extracted for personal profit at the expense of the people.
Numb or dead to their feelings for the life that beats in every human heart, these men act out the brutal rape and pillage of the Earth upon the innocent, unprotected women they can so easily take for their own sad, brutal despair. Do not turn away from this truth: This is what you accept and authorize if you permit this project.

I implore you to find some human feeling in your own heart...a feeling which recognizes the hurt and pain, the terror and shame of sexual violence from which we women never do recover if our lives are not taken outright.

What is the true price of agreeing to the realization of this project?

I ask you to get out of your head and into your heart. To respond and to act as a real human being. What would that mean for the community you are sworn to serve? What would that mean for you?

No attachments

Comment From: carolyn atkinson

9/17/20 @ 5:53 AM
China is now considering going carbon neutral.

https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/china-considers-going-carbon-neutral-peaking-emissions/

This move demonstrates the volatility of the fossil fuel markets and how foolish and dangerous it would ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Ellen McCann

9/17/20 @ 5:51 AM
Heck yeah we deserve a second EIR. Why wouldn't a project of this magnitude that have a more thorough review after we are witnessing all the devastation of climate change this year...super storms, hurricanes, fires!!! We the people deserve a safe, ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Vossler

9/17/20 @ 5:47 AM
I oppose the Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility. The latest EIS did not account for the full environmental impact on all affected communities.
No attachments

Comment From: Laura Baumgartner

9/17/20 @ 5:19 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

Inherent in this moral imperative is investing in a livable future that is safe for all to thrive.

Building ...↓

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Rev. Laura Baumgartner
2201 NE 4th St Renton, WA 98056-4073
associatepastor@rfumc.org
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

9/17/20 @ 5:17 AM
Regarding the Northwest Innovation Works – Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility SSEIS, I am submitting the following comments:

The SSEIS states that "The project would increase greenhouse gas emissions within Washington state by almos...↓

In conclusion, I see no demonstrative proof that the Kalama facility would reduce worldwide net greenhouse gas emissions and I believe that the risks to the environment and the health and well being of local residents far outweigh any benefits.

No attachments

Comment From: Paul Spindel

9/17/20 @ 4:26 AM
The timing of these catastrophic fires and their link to climate change is a perfect example of why we must do better. We must do things differently. We cannot support a gigantic methanol plant and the damage it will cause locally and globally. Wheth...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Frank Marre

9/17/20 @ 4:21 AM
Northwest Innovation Works Proposal Kalama gas to methanol production and storage facility
Dear Department of Ecology
I oppose the proposal for human health and ecological reasons. I am a physician and public health specialist. The impact of pollutio...↓
No attachments

Comment From: S Jacky

9/17/20 @ 4:16 AM
Thank you for your work to protect Washingtons environment and for acknowledging that previous environmental analysis of Northwest Innovation Works (NWIW) Methanol refinery proposal in Kalama, Washington have been inaccurate and inadequate.

This new D...↓

Despite these marginal improvements, the evaluation of potential mitigation and displacement contained in this analysis is misleading and concerning in its reliance on speculative and unenforceable assumptions. Look to the impacts of this pandemic to see evidence of incredible uncertainty and volatility in energy market dynamics. It is dangerous to presume this analysis can accurately predict global fuel markets, technology developments, consumer behavior, or regulations for the coming four decades.

Furthermore, the SEIS provides too little detail on the actual mitigation that would be accomplished within the voluntary mitigation framework, nor does this mitigation address the full impacts of NWIWs emissions that will occur overseas. The mitigation framework is too vague for Ecology to conclude that this projects impacts will be mitigated. The urgency of climate change demands that mitigation should be the last option (after all other impacts are reduced) in order to address unavoidable impacts, not simply to maintain the status quo as we continue to build out the fossil fuel industry.

Even with all of its flaws, this analysis confirms that NWIWs proposed facility would become one of the greatest sources of climate pollution in Washington. It is simply unacceptable for Washington to build an unequivocally and enormously polluting facility based on speculative analysis and a faint hope of theoretical emission reductions.

I urge Ecology to dismiss the speculative basis that this project could displace even more polluting facilities. Instead, base the permitting decision on what is reasonably foreseeable and indeed, assured, about this project--that it would cause millions of tons of greenhouse gas pollution each year, for 40 years, and is profoundly inconsistent with achieving Washingtons climate goals.

The evidence in this draft SEIS demonstrates that Washington must deny NWIWs proposal to build and operate this dangerous methanol refinery in Kalama. We cannot keep building fossil fuel export infrastructure and expect to address the dangers of climate change.

Please keep our communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution.
No attachments

Comment From: Robin Donahue

9/17/20 @ 3:57 AM
NO. Please listen to those living in the community. we do not want this hazard in our city.
No attachments

Comment From: Karis Cooper

9/17/20 @ 3:50 AM
No Way !!!!
No attachments

Comment From: Merna Baker Blagg

9/17/20 @ 3:50 AM
Our world, country and state does not need an increase in hazardous pollutants. Healthy and clean air is what we all strive for and KMMEF would extremely increase the air quality to a devastating and toxic level. We are at a critical point in the c...↓
Please, as a concerned Gramma, born in Kelso, living in Vancouver, with 2 sons and their families living in Longview, I implore you to deny the permit for this project to move forward.

Merna Baker Blagg
No attachments

Comment From: Kathleeen Patton

9/17/20 @ 3:42 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

Smoke signals. Obvious and tragic evidence of climate change is ravaging our state. Why would we want to ...↓

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Kathleeen Patton
1645 24th Ave Longview, WA 98632-3623
mok.patton@gmail.com
No attachments

Comment From: Lehman Holder

9/17/20 @ 3:22 AM
My wife and I are very strongly opposed to this proposed methanol plant, as are large numbers of Kalama, WA, residents. If the plant is built, we believe increased and unacceptable levels of greenhouse gases will be the result. We also oppose the hug...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Nancy Harrison

9/17/20 @ 2:58 AM
Dear Director Watson and Department of Ecology,

I oppose this proposal to build a methanol plant in Kalama and urge you to deny the permit to build it. This would be the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery, and would clearly substantiall...↓

NWIW misled your agency, and the public, about the purpose and impacts of the refinery. I am counting on Ecology to dismiss NWIW's misleading claims and accurately account for the project's upstream and downstream climate pollution.

For the community of Kalama and for our climate, the risk is simply too big. Please keep our communities safe, and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution. I am counting on you to do the right thing and stop this dirty, dangerous fossil fuel export project.

Thank you,
Nancy Harrison
No attachments

Comment From: Emily Herbert

9/17/20 @ 2:51 AM
Thoughtful holders of the Common Good for Washington's Environment,
I appeal to your care for the well-being of all earth's creatures. Yes you have mandates for specific regulations. But there is a larger more essential duty in this time of climacti...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Andrew Harris

9/17/20 @ 2:51 AM
W. Andrew Harris, MD
3969A N. Overlook Blvd
Portland, OR 97227

Sept. 17, 2020

To: Washington Department of Ecology
Re: Kalama Methanol Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

I am writing on behalf of my seven grandchildren who are too young to speak f...↓

If 40 percent of the methanol produced at the proposed Kalama facility is burned, as indicated by NWIW, it will yield 2 million tons of carbon pollution each year. The remainder of the methanol would become plastics in a world already overrun with discarded plastic waste. Methane gas along the supply chain to Kalama Methanol would be released into the atmosphere, increasing the carbon footprint of the project. Each methane molecule has 84 25 times the 20-year global warming potential of a carbon dioxide molecule, meaning that even small amounts of methane emissions have an enormous impact. If Washington State is to achieve its climate goal of keeping global warming "well below 2 degrees Celsius", it must deny the conversion of fracked gas to methanol.

Future energy needs must no longer be met by fossil fuels, including so-called "natural" gas, two-thirds of which in America is derived from fracking. Cleaner energy technologies are readily available, and battery storage capacity is rapidly improving. In the SEIS, NWIW identifies no specific projects or measures that will mitigate the release of methane from wellheads, from transmission pipes, and from the proposed refinery itself.

Washington's Department of Ecology needs to take a proactive position on behalf of our grandchildren and the survival of our planet. It should reject the proposed methanol refinery and deny NWIW a Shorelines Permit.

Thank you.

W. Andrew Harris, MD
andyharrismd@comcast.net
503-871-2011

No attachments

Comment From: Richard Marshall

9/17/20 @ 2:46 AM
This methanol proposal is extraordinarily pessimistic. The economic analysis behind the tired fossil fuel argument of "better than the alternative" is both shoddy and speculative. There is no possible progress in this type of analysis, no faith in ...↓

From a policy standpoint, it is crazy to believe that societies across the globe will not demand cleaner economic processes and less pollution. Look at our own situation -- earlier this year we had an example of much cleaner air. I heard a number of people comment about how amazing it was to spy Mt Jefferson on a regular basis. And this past week, we literally have had a taste of some of the worst air pollution in the world. People everywhere want cleaner air and are going to demand of their governments less pollution.

From a technology standpoint, we can and will do better. Right now renewable energy is the cheapest form of new energy in most places in the world. What we've done with renewables is an amazing achievement of human ingenuity and hard work applied to process improvement. This methanol proposal on the other hand, is a last gasp effort of a declining industry to take advantage of excess North American fracked gas and dump it on the world markets before stricter emissions policies can be put in place. The only thing clean about this methanol proposal would be the use of our federally subsidized clean renewable electricity to run the plant. That is our energy and we have better uses including heating and cooling our homes and hopefully reducing the emissions from our cars so we can have cleaner air.

Please analyze this proposal for what it is -- an unmitigated fossil fuel export proposal with no hope of captured or sequestered emissions. Please don't rely on pessimistic speculation that lacks analytic rigor, ignores recent technical achievements in renewable energy, and dramatically discounts the basic human desire for clean air and a livable planet. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Art Maki

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Jessica Willis

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Esther Hatton

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Brayden Day

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Jackie Keele

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Sheri Staley

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Emily Moon

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Mariya Starichenok

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Aldora Perez

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Melissa Stalp

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Coleen Anderson

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Grant and

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Amy Henson

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Bradley Barton

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Shannon Lynn

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Aleks Kosowicz

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Joel Manglass

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Nielsen

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Lee Chebert

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: julie reed

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Ann Littlewood

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Teresa Tonnemaker

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Heinen

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Andrea Ptak

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Denise Banker

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Yonit Yogev

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Holderman

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Matt O?LAUGHLIN

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Julie Stone

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Michelle Allen

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Michelle Wilson

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Genjo Marinello

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Tom Lowe

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Geoff Browning

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Rob Schnelle

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: John B

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Judy Fitzpatrick

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Claire Aiello

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Maureen Brul?

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Patti Brent

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: James DeCorsey

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Charlene Finn

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Tanya Lasuk

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: VelindaDawn Ohrt

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: James Mulcare

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Tracy Wang

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Janet Riordan

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Vere Guthrie

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Morse

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

Comment From: SHERRY GLASS

9/16/20 @ 5:00 PM
Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]