Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility Second Supplemental EIS

Submitted By

4777 Results

Search Type

Sort:

Sort Results By

Comment From: Laura Rogers

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Greetings. I'm Laura Rogers, an attorney who practiced law for more than 30 years. I live in Portland, a mere 40 miles south of the site where the proposed Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility would be located. As a fourth-generation Orego...↓

The proposal to be sited in earthquake country would; one, pollute the air with cancer-causing emissions; two, emit 4.6 million metric tons of greenhouse gas pollution each year for 40 years; and three, each day use millions of gallons of water from an aquifer connected to the Columbia River. I join countless other citizens in standing in fervent opposition to the proposal.

Others have articulated the many flaws in the proposal and the SSEIS. Here, I touch on just one key concern. We must not put the profit of private investors over the inevitable damage this proposal would cause to our environment, which proposal would actually accelerate the use of fossil fuels. Ecology must face the risks of this proposal head-on, and not rely on a speculative market-based analysis that compares the proposal with vague alternatives. All of the high-carbon paths are unacceptable. A low-carbon future demands that we make investments in lower-emitting processes.

I'd like to say that the work of those of you in Ecology are doing on this proposal is vitally important for our region. You have the opportunity to seize the opportunity to make a difference. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Thomas Gordon

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Thank you. The proposed Kalama Methanol Refinery is a bad idea; from being an explosive danger to Kalama, to creating a potentially huge amount of greenhouse gases released. If an earthquake destroyed a filled storage tank or tanks at the completed K...↓

Kalama, Washington and the surrounding area has a huge earthquake risk, with a total of 598 earthquake since 1931 alone. Another USGS database shows that there is a 33% chance of a major earthquake, 5.0 magnitude or above, within 31 miles of Kalama, Washington within the next 50 years. The largest known earthquake within 30 miles of Kalama, Washington was a 4.4 magnitude in 1980. No one knows where all the faults are in the area. In fact, one reason among others, the Trojan Nuclear Reactor, six-tenths of a mile from Kalama, was closed down due to a fault being discovered beneath the reactor.

The refinery would have an incoming feeder gas line, which would provide methane used to create the methanol. An earthquake could rapture this gas line or the main supply line or any of the other gas lines in the area. Together, these gas lines would be another source of greenhouse gases and explosions. The Kalama Methanol Refinery should not be built. My wife would like to comment, too.

No attachments

Comment From: Columbia Riverkeeper (Kate Murphy)

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

My name is Kate Murphy, and I'm a Community Organizer with Columbia Riverkeeper. The irony of meeting virtually to protect public health while discussing this potential disaster should not escape anyone. There are many reasons Ecology should deny the...↓

The SEIS states that the impacts can be mitigated, but offers few details on how they will accomplish its stated goal of fully mitigating all of the in-state pollution from the project. Northwest Innovation Works identifies no specific projects or measures that will address the enormous greenhouse gas pollution impacts of the proposed refinery. You are about to make a critical decision about the future, and to accept such vague promises without evidence from a company that has proven itself to be untrustworthy is a massive disservice to the region and a favor to the fossil fuel industry.

In the face of overwhelming opposition to this project, Ecology must require real, detailed information and enforceable plans before assessing that impacts on this scale could be mitigated. Northwest Innovation Works plan for a plan falls far short of the standard. We can all easily envision a scenario in which Northwest Innovation Works builds the plant with a vague, unsure, and voluntary mitigation framework fails to produce the hope for mitigation, or a scenario in which commitments made by Northwest Innovation Works are not honored by future owners of the facility.

These are just a few examples of why Ecology cannot base its decision on a framework that fails to identify any real projects, and that proposes to set up a Northwest Innovation Work-friendly team for oversight. This is a recipe for failed mitigation. You've been tasked with making this decision about our future. We're calling on you to fulfill your role in assessing this project with an objective eye, one that examines the actual evidence before you, and we're counting on you to make a decision based on what we know and not what we can speculate about.

Someday, you'll have to answer to your grandchildren when they asked you what you did to protect the air, the water in their lives. What will you tell them?

No attachments

Comment From: Margie Van Cleve

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hello, my name is Margie Van Cleve. I live in Seattle, Washington. Why does someone from Yakima County care about the proposed Kalama methanol plant? On August 31st, the Evans Canyon Fire started. By evening of September 1st, I could see the glow fro...↓

We planned to go camping in a national forest after Labor Day, but cancelled due to high fire danger. Instead, we rescheduled for the Central Oregon Coast because, hey, it's always beautiful there in September, right? We made it to Newport, Oregon before deciding camping was a bad idea due to the hazardous air quality from the Beachie Creek Fire. Instead, we went to our friend's home in Springfield, Oregon. Within four hours of arriving, we began getting evacuation alerts from Lane County Emergency Preparedness for the Holiday Farm Fire. The next day, we assisted our friend in preparing for evacuation that luckily never came. We looked at the orange sky and watched the ever-present ash fall the entire time we remained in Springfield. I hope I never have to see anything like that again. We were back in Seattle by September 10th, restricted to indoors for the next eight days due to hazardous air quality from smoke and fires.

What does this have to do with proposed Kalama methanol plant? Everything. Governor Inslee called the fires climate fires, not wildfires. Erica Fleishman, Director of the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute, noted this fits into a many-year Western United States pattern of more large fires and more destructive fires. I don't want best wishes or thoughts and prayers about fires. I want action. Action means a decrease in the burning of hydrocarbons and a decrease in emissions from greenhouse gases.

Instead, the proposed Kalama methanol plant increases by a huge amount the burning of hydrocarbons, and increases by millions of tons per year for 40 years, greenhouse gas emissions that will contribute to still more climate change. I urge the Department of Ecology to reject the refinery. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Diana Gordon

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hi, I'm Diana Gordon. Northwest Innovation Works wants to build a new methanol refinery here. It will emit at least 4.6 million tons of greenhouse gases every year. They're telling us this methanol will be used to produce olefins necessary to produce...↓

China is trying to move away from coal, owing to poor air quality, so they'll probably not be building any new coal plants. As a result, China will produce most of the plastics using something other than methanol, and will likely use at least 40% of the Kalama methanol for fuel. Fuels release more greenhouse gases than olefin production. The end result will likely be an increase in greenhouse gases.

We cannot say for sure what the Chinese will end up doing with this methanol, but we do know for sure what they'll do here. This refinery will pour many tons of greenhouse gases into our atmosphere; thus, endangering Washington's climate goals and possibly acting as an anchor project for a second pipeline from Canada.

The SSEIS provides a link to several IPCC Reports. One report says that as more and more greenhouse gases are emitted, the ocean's carbon sequestration capacity is reduced. Waters become more acidic and harmful to shellfish and coral reefs, rivers warm and deplete salmon runs. The list goes on and on, and all of it is harmful to the quality of life and the health of everyone in our region. This is the time to say no to this project. Please send a clear message to the fossil fuel industry and the rest of the world; deny this Shoreline Permit.

No attachments

Comment From: Tim Baer

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Yes, thank you for doing this. Although as I sit here, I have no prepared comments, I find myself wondering about the use of this venue. It seems to me that I'm hearing two main arguments; one that favors the status quo and the other is a little bit ...↓

I think that's not true, and I would call on all of us, and specifically upon the Department of Ecology, to live up to the promises that we have been given about a cleaner future. That's where it boils down to for me. We can actually change that behavior. I would use our current pandemic as an indication of how easy that actually is with willpower. Worldwide, we've made some staggering choices that no one would have thought were possible.

I think that we are in an environment where more change like that is going to happen more quickly over the next 40 years.

So the ridiculous studies that we can come up with just remind me of that old fibs, lies, and statistics that says the worst of those statistics. I cede my time. Thank you

No attachments

Comment From: Chris Montgomery

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Thank you. My name is Chris Montgomery I work for the Operating Engineers Local 701. Northwest Innovations Works is setting a brave new standard with its commitment to both the community and the environment. This project will build cleaner and with m...↓

This money can be used further to support the environmental and social progress, which the people who oppose this project don't quite understand. If we do not have an alternative, no progress will be made. I just want everyone on here to understand that this is progress. Those jobs and those families need to be taken care of as well to feed their children to sustain their livelihood. It is important not only are we caring about the environment but caring about families that need these good-paying jobs. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Tom Luce

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Thank you. My name is Tom Loose. I am a lifelong Washington State resident. I want to first start off by thanking Ecology for a report and an analysis that I think is sound rigorous and comprehensive. When you take a look at the project here from whe...↓

To put that in perspective, that's twice the amount of emissions the entire city of Seattle emits annually. I think beyond that, it's important to look at what the delay in permitting this project has caused environmentally. Opponents of this project have slowed progress, sued us in court to get the very study that they now say is too speculative. When you think about it, the four-year delay they've caused in this process has had the effect of adding a cumulative total of 24 million tons of GHGs into the atmosphere.

When you think about it in those terms, no one who claims to be an environmentalist, can really support the claim not to build this project on environmental merits. Their merits are simply not in my backyard NIMBY arguments. I just would urge anyone who opposes this project not to try to deny 1,000 jobs $30 to $40 million in new tax revenue, and a clear defensible reduction in greenhouse gas emissions globally.

No attachments

Comment From: Sierra Club (Victoria Leistman)

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hi, my name is Victoria Lissman. I am an organizer at the Sierra Club. I'm also the field director of a regional coalition called power past fracked gas, as well as a member of the Progressive Workers Union. I just want to as we come to the end of th...↓

We can't choose one versus the other and that's a false dichotomy that's being painted here. Sierra Club, we're unionized. We're union staff, we are part of an organization called the Blue-Green Alliance where we work to find solutions together. This project is not one of them. I know that there are tons of pressures and all things that ecology has to weigh in deciding about this permit.

The truth of it is that there aren't going to be able to have these conversations if we continue to perpetuate how dire we know the climate crisis is. We've seen that just so recently but the horrible impacts of the wildfires and it's really sad to see this conversation of what the truth is and what science is. I know that you all at Ecology, understands that this FCIS [inaudible] evaluate the scenarios in which we don't get to two degrees. We need you to make the right decision. Deny this permit, please, for all of us so we can find jobs when we defeat climate change.

No attachments

Comment From: Peter Ullrey

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Thank you and good afternoon. My name is Peter Alright and I'm an operating engineering and cancer survivor with Local 701. I am in support with the department of Ecology on the construction of this Kalama project. I would like to thank those individ...↓

People that have not done the research, I implore them to find out how positive this will affect their communities, and their natural areas for years to come in that zone. This project has been under review for nearly seven years now and I fully stand with the department of Ecology for the progress that this project will create not only for the local people, the workers, the millions of dollars of revenue it will generate in the local communities further.

Also, for the environment and the surrounding ecologies and I'd also like to add before I go Ecology's analysis shows that the Kalama project will reduce global greenhouse gas emissions every year by an estimated six million tons were this project to go through. Thank you for your time.

No attachments

Comment From: Uriah Chipman

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hi, my name is Uriah Chipman, I work for the Operating Engineers Local 701. I live in the center of Washington. I am also a cancer survivor. I want to express my support for this project. My union job provides me the opportunity to support my family ...↓

Without my union job, my union family and my community we would be struggling far more than we already are. Union jobs build America and they ensure that all people have the opportunity to succeed and I definitely approve this project. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Keith Weir

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

This is Keith Weir. I'm sorry Eric forwarded me the invite so I may be popping up as Keith Weir or as Eric Vein. My name is Keith Weir.

Yes ma'am. I'd like to thank you all for your consideration and your diligence in looking over this matter. I'm Ke...↓

We work to build more sustainable and equitable futures for not only our families and our members and our unions but society as a whole. Through the laborious process of this dragging on so long, inaction I would say could equal action. Good or bad, however that falls on that, and for this to have dragged on so long, the amount of metric carbon that has been emitted that could have been mitigated in the past several years of this project has been going through review, that's something that should be taken into consideration in my mind's eye as well.

We either act or we don't and our world is warming, our glaciers are melting and we could sit around and toss stones and do nothing about it or we can work together and have a sustainable and equitable peace to address the things in our very own backyard, starting with our state, the community, the state, and our nation, first and foremost, before we worry about the rest of the world, and tying all that in.

With that being said, I'm in favor of this project. Please let it move forward, let it benefit the community, and those folks who deserve it the most. With that, I'll end my comment. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Rachael Hogan

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Thank you for hearing me. I am opposed to this project. I just wanted to respond to a few things that I heard. There was the comment made about environmental costs and what alternatives do we have? If we want to use less because of the way this analy...↓

I just want to also echo the gentleman who talked about we are very amazingly poised to address change in our culture and in our present with not just information we have about climate change but having really been experiencing it in a massive scale in so many fronts. I think there's hope there, there's also this part of me as a parent that knows that we do have this addiction to things like plastic and our kayaks, our plastic and our clothes are plastic and we do have these awful addictions.

I for one, am willing to say no to this drug that we've been mesmerized by, and that we've been fooled into thinking this is about our way. We could do it in an endless way without any repercussions. Now that we see the damage and we're so young in that frame of mind, we really do need to all work together to change that and I think we can. Anyway, I just wanted to put that out there. I also wanted to say that as far as-- oh, I'm running out of time. Well, see you next time. Thanks.

No attachments

Comment From: Earth Ministry (Maddie Smith)

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hello, my name is Maddie Smith, and I'm part of an organization called Earth Ministry. We organize people of faith throughout the state of Washington for environmental and climate justice. I'm a Unitarian Universalist and one of my faiths key princip...↓

As a person of faith, it's also clear that if 2020 has taught us anything, is that we are in a time of great moral reckoning. Right now we are all called to be prophetic and envision a future that is different from one shown in a model where climate pollution increases no matter what we do. We know that to create a livable future for future generations, we can't continue with business as usual. I'm a young person, and worry about what the world will look like in the 40 year lifespan of this proposed project. It's clear to me that we can't continue with business as usual, and that we can't assume that other similar projects around the world will be built if this project is not built.

As a person of faith it's also really important to me, that we listen to the indigenous folks who have always lived in this land. The person from the [inaudible] tribe who testified earlier. We have to listen to the folks that have stewarded this land and if they're opposed to this project, we must also be. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Marlene Meyer

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

I'm Marlene Meyer, resident of Washington for over 21 years. I'm here personally to talk about the same things that many people have already brought up, the tribal convents, the Sierra Club. By the way, we do have a trans child who is been loved and ...↓

In respect to the project, I'm also in agreement that we are comparing two negatives, and I really am surprised in the state of Washington, with our progressive ideas about reducing carbon emissions that we are even comparing these two negatives. Currently, I am calling you from California. I am staying in a city that was developed around oil refineries with commitments and promises to help the people in the area and to not be polluted. This is a very sad area I'm living in. It's depressing to see what's happened here. They have the ninth worst polluted beach in the state. What was going on in the history of the building of this with a commitment to clean production for the future? Did they not foresee the future? Did they not plan for it? How can we foresee what's going to be coming up here and there is not a commitment on paper for clean up by this company. Even if there is, how do you clean up thousands of marine life?

No attachments

Comment From: Sept Gernez

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hi, my name is Sept Gomez. I'm an organizer with the Sierra Club, and I'm representing our 3.8 million supporters across the country who are counting on you to deny this project. The Sierra Club's mission is to explore, enjoy, and protect the planet....↓

I'd like to remind you of your mission statement. The Department of Ecology's mission is to protect, preserve, and enhance Washington's land, air, and water for current and future generations. Approval of this project would be a counter to your mission. We've given you facts so you don't need facts from me. I'd love to share where I'm coming from personally on this.

I am a transgender non-binary person and many youths in the trans community are unhoused. While the Clean Air Agency has been telling everybody to stay inside with the wildfire smoke fueled by climate change, our youths are out there suffocating. Unhoused individuals cannot stay inside. During this pandemic, my sister has been pregnant. She's due in December. It's a strange time to be welcoming my niece into the world and I'm counting on you to fight for a future where these kids can survive.

Please deny this project. Thank you

No attachments

Comment From: R.C. Olson

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Yes. Hello, this is [inaudible] Olsen. I'm a civil engineer and a certified construction manager living in Bellevue, Washington. I work all over the state. I look at any potential construction project as potential revenue for myself or people like me...↓

I'm very much opposed to this project. It is not something we should be looking for jobs as a justification for it. I think we know that clean energy projects have much in the way of jobs potential and that's where we should be focusing. I thank the Department of Ecology for doing this analysis and providing the opportunity for public comment and urge you to reject this project's permit application. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: MaryAlice Wallis

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hi, this is MaryAlice Wallis. I've been a resident of Longview, Washington since 1972. My husband and I have raised our family of four in Longview. We love our community. It was founded by Robert A. Long a person with a grand vision for development a...↓

I'm in full support of the Northwest Innovation Works. I appreciate the review done by the Department of Ecology. Those who continue to ignore the science behind this project are only fooling themselves. In addition to global greenhouse gas reductions, Northwest Innovation Works will mitigate for 100% of its in-state emissions, even those not directly tied to its facility 100%. This will create investments in renewable natural gas development, saving and improving forest lands and practices, and driving other innovative greenhouse gas reducing technologies and opportunities locally, regionally, and globally.

What further excites me about Northwest Innovation Works is not only will this project helped to employ 1,000 workers during construction and 200 into the operation of the facility upon the completion of construction, it will also generate $30 million to $40 million in new state and local taxes. The investment of Northwest Innovation Project provides a much-needed boost to our struggling Cowlitz economy. Please, please, issue permits for this project to proceed. Please listen to the folks that reside in this community

No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Tempest

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Thank you for the opportunity to speak today on this important and complex topic. My name is Kevin Tempest and I work as the R&D scientist for the Low Carbon Prosperity Institute.

The rapidly dwindling greenhouse gas budget demands resource alloca...↓

Across a wide range of assumptions such as methane leakage, global warming potentials, and methanol end uses, 47 different scenarios forecast a very likely range of 2 million to 9 million net emissions avoided per year and an extremely likely range of 0.25 million to 12 million net avoided emissions per year. That is before consideration of in-state emissions mitigation that is much more ambitious than Ecology's own clean air rule. While Kalama Methanol is likely to remain lower-emitting than prevailing alternatives, confidence diminishes further out in time.

In a sector that Governor Inslee's ambitious evergreen plan found is the costliest to decarbonize, demand for methanol and plastics is forecast to continue to grow through at least mid-century, even under low carbon scenarios that maximize recycling in the circular economy, such as those from the energy transitions commission, and the International Energy Agency. Longer-term prioritization of carbon capture and finite biogas resources are the clear leading candidates to drive emissions towards zero. Combined, these technologies are actually carbon negative. This facility can and should be ready to adapt to these technologies and trends in order to minimize the risk of becoming a net-emission source and increasing the odds of compatibility with the net-zero emissions future.

Thank you for your time.

No attachments

Comment From: Jennifer DeCent

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

My name is Jennifer Dissent and I live here in Collins County in Ariel. I'm a business agent for Laborers International Union of North America, local 335. In my now 15 year career as a laborer, I've had the opportunity to work on environmental crews....↓

A carbon reduction project dedicated to the fight against climate change benefiting our community every step of the way. Thank you for this opportunity to make this comment. I want to end on this note, Washington state can and should set the highest standards and lead other States, our nation and other nations. Please approve this project as a great example to drive those high standards.

No attachments

Comment From: Eileen Fromer

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hi. My name is Eileen Fromer, I live in Portland. I'm passionate about the climate crisis and about stopping greenhouse gas emissions. I believe that the department of ecology has an opportunity through its analysis and these hearings to do the right...↓

The under estimated methane leakage from natural gas extraction, transmission along the pipe route and the refinery, and after the methanol leaves the refinery, what then, first it was just going to be used to make plastics, as if plastics are not already an environmental disaster, but at least the methanol wouldn't be burned for fuel. Then they changed their story. So 40% might be burned as fuel yielding 2 million tons of carbon pollution each year, and there's no guarantee that all the methanol won't be burned. We are in a climate crisis, the wildfires are here along with the drought, storms, floods, and displaced people all over the world. It's time to say no, enough is enough. Washington and the department of ecology must live up to their claim and be a leader in addressing the climate crisis.

No attachments

Comment From: Norm Cimon

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Yes. So, I'd like to, first of all, point out out that the static market analysis is not very useful. These markets are changing so quickly that a dynamic analysis is really where you want to go. In other words, this is going to be changing ver...↓

What I mean by that is that you can do a probabilistic analysis, that's what people do, and actually get some idea of how much additional methane will be coming out, given that a lot of these wells are simply going to be abandoned. This project, as far as I can tell is not one that is designed to do anything that will benefit the environment. Looking at, and someone said, the two negatives, it's not the way to go.

Right now, Melrose, I think it's Malden, Washington has gone. We've lost any number of towns here in Oregon. The mantra I live by is that short term self-interest is greed, long-term self-interest is morality. I would ask you do, essentially the work of some serious long-term interests and make a moral decision. Make sure that this project does not go forward, we're losing too much at this point. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Luke Henkel

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Thank you so much for the chance to speak and share. I'm Luke Henkel and I work closely with Earth Ministry and on the Care for Creation team at St. James cathedral. I'm living in Seattle, Washington but very invested in opposition to this project. I...↓

Having lived in the Pacific Northwest for much of my adult life, I know what a green area we are, how likely we are to be known all over the world as this progressive place. I've heard a lot of science during this hearing but I just want to take a step back and talk simply. We've heard all of these facts, we've heard all of this data on both sides of the argument of whether or not we'll have this facility and for me, it's just convenient excuse to hide the fact that this is wrong.

We heard from Maddie Smith, who's part of Earth Ministry and she's wanting to say this is a moral reckoning. We're faced this year, 2020 as she said, if nothing else has taught us this year from all the crises we faced, we have the chance now to really pay attention to what all of these crises are teaching us and learn from them. Get it right, learn how to work together, learn how to say no to the things that we know are wrong. Forget all the data, forget all this slides that we're going through and just pay attention to what the indigenous leaders are telling us, to what the simple facts are and they are, this cannot go forward. If we want to have any chance of getting ahead in 2021 and beyond. Thank you so much.

No attachments

Comment From: Carrie Parks

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hi, my name is Carrie Parks. I'm a longtime resident of Vancouver and I love our natural surroundings in this area. I want to talk to the methanol supporters and tell you to wake up and smell the smoke-filled air. Do you want to destroy the livabilit...↓

California is making its buses fully electric by 2040 and putting through 300,000 zero-emission trucks on the road by 2035. Portland is building generators that will make electricity by bobbing up and down in the ocean. Spokane is building an electric sports car and battery factory that will create up to 3,000 jobs. I'd like to direct you all to www.drawdown.org which has a lot of ideas on climate solutions. One is putting small turbines in the river whose blades turn as the water flows past naturally capturing the energy. Such a system could reduce carbon emissions by 1 to 3 gigatons of CO2.

Just retrofitting existing buildings could provide lots of good construction jobs while improving people's lives. Retrofits could cut energy use by 40% and avert tons of greenhouse gas emissions. You could do all of those things here in Kalama instead of a dirty industry.

Since ecology is comparing the effects of carbon emissions from the methanol plant to that from burning coal, it should also include an analysis of emissions from the methanol plant in comparison to sustainable alternatives like these. Look for better cleaner technology and longer-lasting jobs instead of turning your beautiful town into a dirty industrial center. Deny the permit.

No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Good morning. I'm Don Stanky, retired physics teacher. We are being given false choices, either choose this project or choose whatever the market decides. Our colleagues around the world will fight those other projects. They stopped 15 LNG export ter...↓

Our climate system cannot afford either one of those choices. We are close to the point at which global warming will not stop until temperatures have risen five degrees celsius, which would be the end of civilization as we know it. Toyota proposed the Prius in 1988 and it was a good idea at the time, but even a Prius factory built in Kalama today would not be compliant with policy in China now. China told the automakers go all-electric or go home.

China leads the world in wind, solar, and battery-electric buses. They have 400,000 battery-electric buses, and we have what? 400? China's signed the Paris Climate accords. Even if all the speculation in the EIS actually happened, this project would not comply with that agreement. You should not approve a project unless you know all the facts. Don't guess at the methane leaks in the pipeline measure then.

The home base, where the pipeline airplane is in the Pearson airport in Vancouver, attached methane sensors to those plants. Five days ago, Bloomberg reported that gas companies are abandoning their wealth, leaving them to leak forever. Just one of them in California could have emitted 30 tons of methane, and there are millions more like that. Include those facts--

No attachments

Comment From: Cathryn Chudy

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hi, my name is Cathryn Chudy, and I'm a longtime resident of Vancouver, Washington. For more than 30 years I have worked with suicidal children from all over Washington and Oregon. One thing these kids have in common is that they do not see a future ...↓

There is a struggle going on here between adults who are fighting for a safe and healthy future for their children and grandchildren and adults who are pursuing an outcome that puts that healthy and safe future at risk for no reason other than the pursuit of short term fossil fuel profits at the expense of the long term welfare of our state and our region. We are blessed here in Washington that many of our elected representatives recognize the risks that our children face going forward if fossil fuel businesses usual is allowed to continue unrestrained.

That is why Washington has set aggressive climate goals that limit gas emissions in order to protect us from the harm we are already suffering because of the climate crisis we are in. We are at a crossroads in determining how we will all move forward in achieving Washington's greenhouse gas reduction goals. On one side is the fossil fuel industry trying to persuade us that fracked gas to methanol, to plastic and fuel in China is somehow a pathway to a speculative lower carbon future.

The company that is cleverly attempting to greenwash this pursuit of profits at our expense wants us to ignore the reality that tons of greenhouse gas pollution each year will be dumped into Washington for the next 40 years and it'll magically go away with the voluntary promise to mitigate what is really non-mitigatable. On the other side are the multitudes of we the public, who are showing up and reminding you that speculation is not fact. That voluntary mitigation of polluting greenhouse gases is not good enough ground to stand on when it comes to the health and safety of our environment and the future of our children. The only path to meeting our state's climate goals and ensuring a safe and healthy future for generations to come is to deny this proposal and the shorelines permit. Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Matthew Hepner

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

Hello, my name is Matthew Hefner. I'm the executive director of the Certified Electrical Workers of Washington, and the legislative and Policy Director for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. I want to start by saying thank you to Ec...↓

I'd like to thank NWAW and the environmental stakeholders for creating cutting edge PIS precedent that will resonate throughout the country on mitigation. I'm in support of this project the IBEW, we backed 100% Clean Energy Act. We were the first union to be involved with that, we're the first union to support the low carbon fuel standard, and testify in the legislature as such. It is because we differently support responsible and inclusive environmental policy that we support this project.

If we are serious about transitioning to a clean energy future, that also means clean manufacturing. All things cannon will be used in clean energy products, and a clean energy future products for EBs, for wind turbines. This is a crucial project to get to a clean energy future. Thank you, and please support this project.

No attachments

Comment From: Cowlitz Indian Tribe (Celene Cloquet)

9/22/20 @ 3:00 AM

My name is Celine Cloquet. I'm an elected council member of the Cowlitz Indian Tribe. The proposed Kalama methanol manufacturing and marine export facility lies within our homeland. The Cowlitz tribal council has determined that this project is incon...↓

Our comments until now have focused generally on localized impacts. For the GHG emission review, we have attempted to take a broad view from many perspectives. The tribe considers the recent firestorms, flooding events, and other severe weather outbreaks demonstrate a clear link between global conditions and local impacts. The SSEIS does little to persuade us that this is a green project. While this project may move forward, its contribution to global emissions is still significant. Whether this project brings more vehicles to the road or more shampoo bottles that is supporting throwaway consumer culture, which is undermining our climate stability. We ask that the Department of Ecology review the project's impacts and findings relative to greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation carefully, thoroughly, and with an eye to the seventh generation.

In closing, the tribal council has concluded that the project's objective to produce methanol is not consistent without our belief that our actions are critical to our planet's warming trend. Thank you

No attachments

Comment From: Mary Anne deVry

9/22/20 @ 2:58 AM

Dear WA Department of Ecology,

As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for both the well-being of communities and the environment.

Inherent in this moral imperative is investing in a livable future that is safe for all to thrive. All maj...↓

Building the world's largest fracked gas-to-methanol plant in Washington does not align with my personal values of stewardship and justice, nor does it support our state's commitment to reducing climate pollution. Please reject Northwest Innovation Work's proposed methanol refinery in Kalama and deny its Shorelines Permit.

The second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kalama methanol refinery clearly shows that this project is dirty, dangerous, and unwise. If built, our state will be locked into decades of additional climate pollution, even though we know it is past time to pursue a truly low-carbon future. Speculating that this project may displace other fossil fuels is not adequate justification for the known pollution that will harm our communities and climate.

Northwest Innovation Works has demonstrated that they are deceptive and will seek profit over people's wellbeing. They cannot be trusted to mitigate the impacts of this fracked gas refinery. The fact that the project has needed three reviews, with outspoken community opposition during each, shows that there is something wrong with it at its core. As Governor Inslee stated, we cannot support such fracked gas projects in good conscience.

You have a moral responsibility to protect public health and reduce our region's climate pollution. Please do what is right and deny this project. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Mrs. Mary Anne deVry

6549 California Ave SW Apt 4 Seattle, WA 98136-1858

maryannedevry@gmail.com

No attachments

Comment From: Kristin Edmark

9/22/20 @ 2:57 AM

Comment: Formal Comments on Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility Draft Second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, September 2020

RE: Upstream emissions from fracking

Date: September 19, 2020

Respectfully submitted by: Kristin Edmark,...↓

7611 NE 296th Way

Battle Ground, WA 98604 kristinedmark@hotmail.com; (360) 666-1285

To: Washington State Department of Ecology c/o Rich Doeges

Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Thank you for requiring the SEIS be redone. Thank you for the changes made.

Please add emissions from the fracking process to the upstream emissions. My main reason for being strongly opposed to the Kalama methanol refinery is that is encourages enormous fossil fuel extraction and fracking during a climate crisis. Thank you for including methane pipe leakage in your analysis. It is also necessary to include realistic emission figures dealing with the fracking/ extraction process itself. According to "High Country News" Colorado is facing large expenses attempting to cap "orphaned" wells.( http://hcn.org Jan 16,2018 "Orphaned" oil and gas wells are on the rise) Large oil and gas companies usually sell their rights to smaller companies when wells become less profitable. Often these smaller companies walk away rather than attempting to cap wells as is required. Bloomberg has also reported on the growing problem of uncapped wells which continue to emit methane. (http://www.bloomberg.com/new/features/2020-09-17/abandoned-wells-are-left-to-spew-methane-for-eternity?) The entire process of extraction including uncapped wells is a consequence of the Kalama methanol refinery creating a demand for the product.

As you know, the demand created by the methanol refinery will likely necessitate an additional north-south pipeline which will make it easier for additional large fossil fuel projects like that proposed at Port Westward, Oregon to be built.

Our world has run out of time to prevent enough change in our atmosphere to prevent continued climate disasters. The science is clear. I was struck by the globe exhibit as OMSI in Portland, OR showing world sources of greenhouse gasses. The exhibit points to northern USA/Canada as a major world emitter. It is just wrong and shameful for us to be doing this to the world. It is wrong for us to ignore/omit the upstream consequence of drilling/fracking created by the demand for gas by the Kalama methanol refinery.

Please include the full consequence of the drilling process including abandoned wells in the upstream emission Please deny the shoreline substantial development and conditional use permit on the basis of unacceptable greenhouse gas emissions.

No attachments

Comment From: JoAnne Baker

9/22/20 @ 2:27 AM

NO TO THE METHONOL PLANT IN KALAMA WASHINGTON!!!

Yes we need family wage jobs, but not at the expense of our environment. Our natural resources are being depleted to send methonol to China to make plastic. OUR WORLD IS DROWING IN PLASTIC AND WE DON'...↓

No attachments

Comment From: John Flynn

9/22/20 @ 2:21 AM

Department of Ecology

In 2008 the Washington State legislature established limits for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Washington State. Those requirements can be found in Revised Code of Washington RCW 70.235.020. In its 2019 update Ecology recom...↓

1) By 2020, reduce overall emissions of greenhouse gases in the state to 1990 levels.

2) By 2035, reduce overall emissions of greenhouse gases in the state to 25 percent below 1990 levels.

3) By 2050, the state will do its part to reach global climate stabilization levels by reducing overall emissions to 50 percent below 1990 levels.

The Department of Ecology issued its "Washington State Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory:1990-2015 Report to the Legislature" in December 2018, Publication 18-02-043. The key findings of this report to the legislature were:

1) Washingtons 2015 total greenhouse gas emissions were 97.4 Million Metric Tons.

2) Washingtons 2015 total greenhouse gas emissions were 7.4 Million Metric Tons higher than the 1990 baseline of 90.0 Million Metric Tons.

3) Washingtons greenhouse gas emissions increased by about 6.1 percent from 2012 to 2015.

Today, Department of Ecology is considering whether to grant or deny a permit for the construction and operation of a fracked gas to methanol refinery in Kalama, WA, by a foreign owned company, that would add 4.6 Million Metric Tons of greenhouse gases per year to this matrix. We know that in 2015 we were 7.4 MMT over the 1990 baseline of 90MMT. By adding an additional 4.6 MMT that would equate to 12.0 MMT more than the 1990 baseline.

In order to meet the legislative mandate of reducing greenhouse gas emissions the Department of Ecology has no alternative but to deny the permits for this refinery.

Thank you.

No attachments

Comment From: Art Hanson

9/22/20 @ 2:10 AM

Thank you for your work to protect Washingtons environment and acknowledgement that previous environmental analysis of Northwest Innovation Works (NWIW) Methanol refinery proposal in Kalama, Washington have been inaccurate and inadequate.

This new Dra...↓

Despite these marginal improvements, the evaluation of potential mitigation and displacement contained in this analysis is misleading and concerning in its reliance on speculative and unenforceable assumptions. One can simply look to the impacts of this pandemic to see evidence of incredible uncertainty and volatility in energy market dynamics. It is dangerous to presume this analysis can accurately predict global fuel markets, technology developments, consumer behavior, or regulations for the coming four decades. Furthermore, the SEIS provides too little detail on the actual mitigation that would be accomplished within the voluntary mitigation framework, nor does this mitigation address the full impacts of NWIWs emissions that will occur overseas. The mitigation framework is too vague for Ecology to conclude that this projects impacts will be mitigated, and the urgency of climate change demands that mitigation should be the last option (after all other impacts are reduced) in order to address unavoidable impacts, not simply to maintain the status quo as we continue to build out the fossil fuel industry.

Even with all of its flaws, this analysis confirms that NWIWs proposed facility would become one of the greatest sources of climate pollution in Washington. It is simply unacceptable for Washington to build an unequivocally and enormously polluting facility based on speculative analysis and a faint hope of theoretical emission reductions. Ecology should dismiss the speculative basis that this project could displace even more polluting facilities, and instead should base its permitting decision on what is reasonably foreseeable and indeed, assured, about this project--that it would cause millions of tons of greenhouse gas pollution each year, for 40 years, and is profoundly inconsistent with achieving Washingtons climate goals.

The evidence in this draft SEIS demonstrates that Washington should deny NWIWs proposal to build and operate this dangerous methanol refinery in Kalama. We cannot keep building fossil fuel export infrastructure and expect to address the dangers of climate change.

I strongly urge you to keep communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet goals for reducing climate pollution.

However, you MUST do MUCH more. We MUST keep ALL climate-changing fossil fuels IN THE GROUND! We MUST achieve 100% clean, renewable energy by 2030.

No attachments

Comment From: Dolores Kueffler

9/22/20 @ 1:04 AM

To whom it may concern:

I am extremely concerned about climate change and the way that the burning of fossil fuels is changing our environment. This summer's extreme weather conditions have been a dire warning. The plan to build this Kalama manufactur...↓

I recently made the decision to close my fused glass business largely because of my ethical dilemma of how much fossil fuels it takes to make and design glass. It's one thing on a personal level that I have control over.

I believe this plant goes against the goals of Washington State to reduce greenhouse gases rather than adding to them.

I oppose the permitting of this plant because it will be a huge source of greenhouse gas emissions. The argument that those countries using this fuel would use dirtier sources doesn't hold water. We don't know what they'll do. What we do know is that this methanol plant, if built, will spew millions of tons of emissions a year. It would also have negative impacts upstream in extraction and transportation. It's a step in the wrong direction for our state and world in a time of global crisis.

No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

9/22/20 @ 12:42 AM

I'm Don Steinke, retired physics teacher. We are being given false choices. Choose this project or choose whatever the market decides.

Our colleagues around the world will fight those other projects. They stopped 15 LNG export terminals in British Co...↓

Our climate system cannot afford either one of the choices. We are close to the point at which global warming will not stop until temperatures have risen 5 degrees Celsius, which would be the end of civilization as we know it.

Toyota proposed the Prius in 1988, and it was a good idea at the time, but even a Prius factory built in Kalama today would not be compliant with policy in China. China told the automakers "go all-electric or go home".

China leads the world in wind, solar, and battery electric buses. They have 400,000 battery electric buses and we have about 400.

China signed the Paris Climate Accords. Even if all the speculation in the EIS actually happened, this project would not comply with that agreement.

You should not approve a project unless you know all the facts.

Don't guess at the methane leaks in the pipeline. Measure them. The home-base for the Pipeline Air-Plane is at the Pearson Airport in Vancouver. Attach methane sniffers to them.

Five days ago, Bloomberg reported that Gas companies are abandoning their wells, leaving them to leak methane forever.

Just one of them in California could have emitted 30 tons of methane and there are millions more like it. Include those facts in your EIS.

No attachments

Comment From: Laura Johanson

9/22/20 @ 12:38 AM

No, no, a thousand times no. Backward thinking, major environmental and social affects at the fracking source, more ghg, more disproportionate affects on low-income people here, more plastic and more ghg at its destination. This is not in line with W...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Courtney Brace

9/21/20 @ 9:21 PM

We are absolutely against the proposed methanol plant in Kalama. The benefit does not outweigh the (many) risks and the benefit of local jobs may be minimal at best.

No attachments

Comment From: Lois Roepcke

9/21/20 @ 9:10 PM

This new Dra...↓

Please keep our communities safe and keep Washington and Oregon on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution.

No attachments

Comment From: Marleen Neus

9/21/20 @ 8:38 PM

This new Dra...↓

Please keep our communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution.

No attachments

Comment From: Evan Beattie

9/21/20 @ 8:09 PM

This new Dra...↓

Please keep our communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution.

No attachments

Comment From: STACIE CHARLEBOIS

9/21/20 @ 5:29 PM

This new Dra...↓

Please keep our communities safe and keep Washington on track to meet our goals for reducing climate pollution.

No attachments

Comment From: Marian Fish

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Do I understand correctly that the ghg emissions charts you’re explaining so carefully tonight are crediting NWI for not using coal? Thanks

Marian Fish

No attachments

Comment From: Kristin Edmark

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Charles Joy

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Daniel and Diane Roberts

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Gary Lindstrom

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Attachments:

Download

Comment From: Charles Raymond

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Evelyn kochanowski

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Troy Dillard

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Zenk, Jeff

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

FW: Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility Public Hearing

No attachments

Comment From: Ann Skinner

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: john neighbor

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: john neighbor

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Zenk, Jeff

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

FW: I thought this was supposed to be audio and video.

No attachments

Comment From: jody bleyle

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: April Matzenbacher

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Zenk, Jeff

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

FW: Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility

No attachments

Comment From: Fiona McLary

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: April Matzenbacher

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Kristen Sartor

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Rachel Quesenberry

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Victoria Clark

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Aaron Quitta

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Dylan Wilson

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Caterina Jardini

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Joan Roberts

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Zenk, Jeff

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

FW: Kalama Manufacturing and Marine Export Facility

No attachments

Comment From: Mikhaila Bishop

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Alicia Liang

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Jacob Carlson

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Isabel Homsi

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Jonah Lee

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Zenk, Jeff

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

FW: Methanol Plant Permitting

No attachments

Comment From: Cheryl Erb

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Kimber Anderson

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Jessica Norberg

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Joshua Spector

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Elizabeth Perkins

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Mr. Pepper

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: William Adriance

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Sam Richins

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Allison Brinkhorst

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Hannah Phillips

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Beth Hatfield

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Ben Stevenson

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don’t allow the world’s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Will Golding

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Lou Orr

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Skyler Mcvaugh

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Robert Lapsley

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Kent Gale

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Randall Strutz

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Paula Hooser

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Jan Hughes

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Aslaug Haraldsdottir

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Pete Paget

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Kim Rice

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Noreen Fujitasacco

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Casey Defoer

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Barbara Blackwood

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

Comment From: Pamela Borso

9/21/20 @ 5:00 PM

Don?t allow the world?s largest fracked gas-to-methanol refinery to harm our climate and Kalama!

No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]