Recycling Reform Rulemaking - Chapter 173-950 WAC - Comment Period #2

28 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Carton Council (Brendon Holland)

9/02/26 @ 7:51 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment regarding the August 19, 2026 Draft RRA Rules. I've attached comments from the Carton Council.

We look forward to future collaboration. As always, please feel free to reach out to us directly if you e...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Glass Packaging Institute (Avery Makrakis)

9/02/26 @ 6:30 PM
Section 173-950-120 Individual Producer Plan, Subsection (2)(g)(ii)
GPI has a concern based on the preliminary reimbursement process from Colorado that glass processors, who are an integral part of the recycling processing of commingled glass, are no...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Consumer Brands Association (Will Grassle)

9/02/26 @ 5:32 PM
Attached, please find the Consumer Brands Association's Comment Letter on the Recycling Reform Act Rulemaking Comment Period #2.
Attachments:

Comment From: Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe... (Ashley Walter)

9/02/26 @ 4:05 PM
Please see the attached comment. Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: Stoel Rives LLP (Luke Sanders)

9/02/26 @ 3:39 PM
Thank you for providing the opportunity to comment on the Draft Recycling Reform Rule, Chapter 173-950 WAC. Please see the attached uploaded document for full comment.
Attachments:

Comment From: Rod Whittaker

9/02/26 @ 2:50 PM
Comments on behalf of the Washington Refuse & Recycling Association
Attachments:

Comment From: EPS Industry Alliance (Walter Reiter)

9/02/26 @ 1:46 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: American Coatings Association (Annebelle Klein)

9/02/26 @ 1:21 PM
On behalf of the American Coatings Association (ACA), please see attached ACA's comments in response to the Recycling Reform Rulemaking - Chapter 173-950 WAC - Comment Period #2.
Attachments:

Comment From: Flexible Packaging Association (Kyla Fisher)

9/02/26 @ 1:10 PM
Please find attached comments from the FPA on the Recycling Reform Act PUblic Comment Period #2.
With appreciation,
Attachments:

Comment From: EPR Leadership Forum (Alchemy Graham)

9/02/26 @ 12:28 PM
Please see the attached for comments submitted by the EPR Leadership Forum. Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: AMERIPEN (Gregory Melkonian)

9/02/26 @ 9:44 AM
On behalf of AMERIPEN, please see the attached comment letter regarding Recycling Reform Rulemaking - Chapter 173-950 WAC - Comment Period #2. Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: Alliance for Automotive Innova... (Emily Jones)

9/02/26 @ 9:00 AM
See attached for comments from the Alliance for Automotive Innovation.
Attachments:

Comment From: American Forest & Paper Associ... (Shoshana Micon)

9/02/26 @ 7:57 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Auto Care Association (Grant MacIntyre)

9/02/26 @ 6:06 AM
Please see attached comments from the Auto Care Association.
Attachments:

Comment From: Circular Action Alliance (Julie Gilbertson)

9/01/26 @ 5:11 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: City of Vancouver Solid Waste ... (Matt Bucy)

9/01/26 @ 3:43 PM
Please see the attached letter from the City of Vancouver Solid Waste Services and Clark County Solid Waste and Recycling.
Attachments:

Comment From: BIFMA (Steven Kooy)

9/01/26 @ 3:03 PM
See file attached on behalf of BIFMA and AHFA. Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: Foodservice Packaging Institut... (Carol Patterson)

9/01/26 @ 12:01 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to provide the attached comments for your consideration.
Attachments:

Comment From: Outdoor Power Equipment Instit... (Brandon Martin)

9/01/26 @ 11:59 AM
The Outdoor Power Equipment Institute appreciates the opportunity to comment on the public comment period concerning the Recycling Reform Rulemaking (Chapter 173-950 WAC) of the Recycling Reform Act for the extended producer responsibility regulation...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Brady Industries LLC, dba Brad... (Jazmyn Craig)

9/01/26 @ 10:15 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Consumer Healthcare Products A... (Carlos Gutiérrez)

9/01/26 @ 9:27 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Kevin McGrath

8/31/26 @ 2:51 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Laura Soto

8/31/26 @ 9:26 AM

Washington Department of Ecology's rulemaking authority under this chapter is well suited to require that the plan-approval and cost-recovery-fee provisions incorporate specific measurement and reporting discipline before a plan can be approved, fram...↓
No attachments

Comment From: AdvaMed (Darbi Gottlieb)

8/27/26 @ 4:00 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Interchange 360 (LPMA) (Eric Nelson)

8/25/26 @ 8:12 AM
Regarding chapter 173-950-210 on the required metrics to be used for reporting covered materials, Interchange 360 requests rules that allow flexibility in the different measures required. Different industries may have different measures for their pa...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Melissa Jung (Melissa Jung)

8/24/26 @ 3:04 PM
Dear Department of Ecology Team,

Under section 173-950-230 "Reuse Financial Assistance Program" we suggest amending the language under bullet point #2 to read "Producer responsibility organizations must consult with the department, Advisory Council,...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Association of Washington Citi... (Shannon McClelland)

8/19/26 @ 3:43 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Stonewall Kitchen LLC (Diane Dwyer)

8/12/26 @ 4:32 AM
The Reuse Financial Assistance program is a problem. This provision looks like a money grab. There is no responsibility on the part of the organizations entitled to these monies to increase recycle efforts. Cost effectiveness is way down on the list ...↓
No attachments