Formal Public Comment Period -- Draft 2026 Sand and Gravel General Permit

41 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Nathan Land

10/10/25 @ 11:43 PM
Enclosed my comments regarding the SGGP draft
Attachments:

Comment From: Dickson Company (Paul Dickson)

10/10/25 @ 11:37 PM
Part of my sand and gravel business is the clean disposal of hydro excavated soils and gravel in a pond that some would refer to as a Vactor pond because of the vacuum trucks the material comes in. Since we don't accept any waste materials such stree...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Nirpaul Kang

10/10/25 @ 11:23 PM
Please see the attached document outlining our concerns.
Attachments:

Comment From: Heida Diefenderfer

10/10/25 @ 10:07 PM
Please see the attached file containing my comments on the Draft 2026 Sand and Gravel General Permit for the Formal Public Comment Period.
Attachments:

Comment From: National Ready-mixed Concrete ... (Tiffany Reed-Villarreal)

10/10/25 @ 9:24 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Mike King (Mike King)

10/10/25 @ 8:33 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: CalPortland Company (Annie Livengood)

10/10/25 @ 7:00 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Kemp Garcia (Kemp Garcia)

10/10/25 @ 5:44 PM
While we are not a sand and gravel operation or a construction we work closely with all of them. Our worry of damage prevention to underground utilities should be considered.
Attachments:

Comment From: American Concrete Pipe Associa... (Corey Fraser)

10/10/25 @ 5:38 PM
Concerns Regarding S3.D.3.a. & S3.D.3.b.

An essential principle in drafting permit conditions is that they must be grounded in sound scientific data.
The current draft permit falls short of this standard concerning these provisions.
It introduces br...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Nicci Grimm

10/10/25 @ 5:37 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: CRH Americas Materials (Garrett Sullivan)

10/10/25 @ 4:47 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Shane Latimer

10/10/25 @ 3:55 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Michael Dunning

10/10/25 @ 3:41 PM
Please see PDF of WACA comments attached.
Attachments:
Download
Download

Comment From: Roy Novosel

10/10/25 @ 3:39 PM
See File Uploaded for Comcast Comments
Attachments:

Comment From: WQ TEST Anonymous

10/10/25 @ 3:33 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Jeff Rash

10/10/25 @ 3:19 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Coleman Hoyt

10/10/25 @ 2:26 PM
I am submitting the attached comments on behalf of Heidelberg Materials Northern Operations.
Attachments:

Comment From: Stefanie Stockwell

10/10/25 @ 2:08 PM
Please see attachment for Community for a Healthy Bay's comments.
Attachments:

Comment From: Amanda Neice

10/10/25 @ 1:11 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments for Ecology's consideration on the Draft 2026 Sand and Gravel General Permit. Please find comments submitted on behalf of Lakeside Industries, Inc. in the attached file.

Sincerely,
Amanda Neice, PE
Attachments:

Comment From: Riley Helean

10/10/25 @ 12:54 PM
Kindly see the attached.
Attachments:

Comment From: David Gent

10/10/25 @ 12:47 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Ryan Ransavage

10/10/25 @ 11:25 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Matt Howland

10/10/25 @ 9:58 AM
Dear Department of Ecology,

Ryatt Construction strongly supports the comments submitted by Northwest Cascade, Inc. regarding the Draft 2026 Sand and Gravel General Permit. We echo the technical and regulatory concerns they have raised and join in th...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Rian Skov

10/10/25 @ 9:03 AM
Thank you for taking my comments on the sand and gravel general permit. I work in the Surface Mine Reclamation program with the Washington Geological Survey. After reviewing the document in detail, I have the following comments:

Document page 71, In...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Mike Pellitteri

10/09/25 @ 7:30 PM
Please see the attached letter for our concerns regarding the proposed changes to the Sand and Gravel General Permit.
Attachments:

Comment From: Tom Sheard

10/09/25 @ 4:51 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Gary Merlino

10/09/25 @ 3:17 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Chase Looker

10/09/25 @ 2:57 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Thomas Halford

10/09/25 @ 2:30 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Barret Pace

10/09/25 @ 2:12 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Clint Myers

10/09/25 @ 1:36 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Josh Helm

10/09/25 @ 11:48 AM
HCON Inc has submitted a letter for consideration in lieu of making a full statement in this comment box. Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: Thomas Howell

10/09/25 @ 11:19 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Tim Knutson

10/08/25 @ 11:33 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Jerry VanderWood

10/06/25 @ 3:02 PM
On behalf of the Associated General Contractors (AGC) of Washington, representing hundreds of contractors and industry partners statewide, we appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the Draft 2026 Sand & Gravel General Permit (SGGP).

Our m...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

10/03/25 @ 12:11 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Kevin Hansen

9/22/25 @ 10:25 AM
Please see attached comments.
Attachments:

Comment From: Isha Alexander

9/16/25 @ 1:20 PM
I question whether BMPs for concrete in relation to the high water mark of surface water (>100 feet) and groundwater (>10 feet) is adequate given Thurston County flooding concerns and given the under review "Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan" Have the BMP...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Bonnie Blessing

9/05/25 @ 8:38 PM
Special condition S6.A is somewhat strong because it says to not disturb wetlands and riparian zones. This is important because there are examples from Snoqualmie Pass where they built a gravel pit in a wetland. Gold Creek is purportedly being siphon...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Dara Osborne

9/04/25 @ 8:39 AM
As a municipality, we have several sand and gravel permittees within our city limits. One of our permittees was audited back in 2019 and several noncompliance issues were noted in their report. As of 9/4/25 these issues have not been implemented or r...↓
No attachments

Comment From: John Hancock

8/07/25 @ 7:53 AM
PFAS in groundwater from AFFF at Fairchild Air Force Base and Spokane International Airport is now a fast-moving and huge controversy on our West Plains. Fairchild is a CRCLA Site, which in its 40 square mile PFAS plume merits a heightened scrutiny ...↓
Attachments:
Download
Download
Download