Port Angeles Rayonier Mill 2025 Comment Period

386 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Ann Wigger

8/09/25 @ 9:18 AM

To Ms. Abbett,


I am writing to support Level 5 cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles. It is the only option for such an environmentally sensitive area.


Thank you,

Ann Wigger

Port Angeles, WA

No attachments

Comment From: Dr. Tom Peet

8/09/25 @ 9:12 AM
I am a resident of East Port Angeles and I have attended a number of informational sessions on the cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site since my wife and I moved here from Ohio 5 years ago.

I was appalled to learn that this situation has been al...
No attachments

Comment From: League of Women Voters of Clal... (Bonnie Bless-Boenish)

8/09/25 @ 8:32 AM

Attached is the comment from the League of Women Voters of Clallam County.

Thank you,

Bonnie



--



Bonnie Bless-Boenish

Attachments:

Comment From: Justin Horn

8/09/25 @ 8:18 AM
Living in Port Angeles my entire life, it has always been disappointing to see massive chunks of land that could be utilized to the benefit of all just sit idle. The old Rainier mill site is no different. I believe all measures should be taken to ful...
No attachments

Comment From: Ken Williams

8/09/25 @ 8:14 AM
Cleaning up a hazardous waste site does not mean cleaning only a portion. Do the job right, clean it up completely as in option 5. The Mill contaminated the entire site and should be required to clean the entire site even if taxpayer help is needed....
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/09/25 @ 8:11 AM
Rayonier needs to take complete responsibility for a full and permanent clean up of their superfund site on the Port Angeles waterfront. Option 5, FULL CLEAN UP is the only option that is fiscally responsible, culturally respectful and appropriate fo...
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Campbell

8/09/25 @ 8:03 AM
Please choose Option 5 to remedy the toxic Rayonier site in Port Angeles. The only right & just way forward, after these many decades of inaction, is to rid this shoreline area of toxic material once & for all. Any other choice involves the future un...
No attachments

Comment From: Janet Atkinson

8/09/25 @ 7:23 AM
Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.
No attachments

Comment From: Deborah Fredson

8/09/25 @ 7:14 AM
The former Rayonier Mill in Port Angeles needs a complete clean-up using option 5. It is the ONLY option good enough for our town!
No attachments

Comment From: John Cambalik

8/09/25 @ 6:59 AM
As a frequent visitor of Port Angeles, user of the Olympic Discovery Trail, and Clallam County resident, I am writing to support Level 5 cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the P...
No attachments

Comment From: Janelle Perry

8/09/25 @ 6:31 AM
I believe a Level 5 cleanup is the only acceptable option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.
No attachments

Comment From: Kristin Halberg

8/09/25 @ 5:43 AM
Mill site in Port Angeles, WA

Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.

No attachments

Comment From: Samuel Woods

8/09/25 @ 5:35 AM
ITT operated their mill causing pollution in Port Angeles harbor at a profit for many years. They shut down this Mill and have spent the time since using various techniques to avoid cleaning up their mess. They even hired some Port Angeles good old b...
No attachments

Comment From: Marilyn Santiago

8/09/25 @ 4:53 AM
Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.
No attachments

Comment From: David Fox

8/09/25 @ 12:07 AM
Hello, I'm a retired RN, with a degree in global health and tropical medicine. Our home is blessed with beautiful nature with a glaring exception; the former Rayonier mill site. We've been looking at it surrounded by fencing for decades and nothing's...
No attachments

Comment From: Katherine Jellicoe Pressley

8/08/25 @ 11:23 PM
As a lifelong student and proponent of sustainable environmental practices and as a transplanted Canadian familiar with Love Canal, the Great Lakes, I am requesting a complete, timely, and high-quality cleanup of the Rayonier Mill Site, urging the Wa...
No attachments

Comment From: Ellen Menshew

8/08/25 @ 11:17 PM
I have lived in this community for 35 years. My husband has lived in Port Angeles for 55 years and grew up just a block west of the Rayonier Mill.

It has been almost thirty years since the Rayonier Mill was razed in Port Angeles, WA. In the years ...
No attachments

Comment From: Gretchen MacMichael

8/08/25 @ 10:46 PM
Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.
You are the Dept. of Ecology, not the Dept. of semi-ecology. Do the right thing. LEVEL 5
No attachments

Comment From: Christine Davis

8/08/25 @ 10:41 PM
I am writing to support Level 5 cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.

Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Hamilton

8/08/25 @ 9:53 PM
I am submitting the attached letter summarizing a thematic analysis of all unique public comments posted to the Department of Ecology's portal through August 8, 2025, regarding the Rayonier Mill site cleanup.

This analysis, conducted using Braun and...
Attachments:

Comment From: Friends of Ennis Creek (Jim and Robbie Mantooth)

8/08/25 @ 9:04 PM

We would like more information about why the cleanup process has been allowed to go on so long. In the meantime the salmonid population in Ennis Creek continues to decrease.


Thank you for helping us and others understand.

Jim and Robbie Mantooth

Co-foun...

No attachments

Comment From: Michael Barley

8/08/25 @ 8:59 PM

Dear Site Manager Mariam Abbot,



I live in Port Angeles and regularly take walks on the trail along the bay. At the July 8th public meeting I was very disappointed to learn that the clean up plan was for a partial clean up only. I want to encourage the...


Sincerely, 


Michael Barley

No attachments

Comment From: Victor Brakauskas

8/08/25 @ 7:18 PM
There is no moral case for choosing a clean up option that priortizes greater company profits over the duty to clean up contaminants in the community that will be affecting our children and grand-children.

'Capping' waste is merely a stop-gap soluti...
Attachments:

Comment From: Juliet Jonak

8/08/25 @ 6:55 PM
It is shocking that cleanup will have take over four decades with this proposal, and "clean up" isn't even the correct term when it's solely being packaged up for a future Port Angeles to deal with down the line.

Rayonier caused this problem and rea...
No attachments

Comment From: SAMUEL BUEHNER

8/08/25 @ 5:48 PM
I agree with the City of Port Angeles in all their reasoning that Cleanup Alternative Five (SL-5) is the appropriate remedy. It will provide for permanent cleanup on the site.
No attachments

Comment From: North Olympic Group of the WA ... (Robert Sextro)

8/08/25 @ 5:41 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Pamela Wilder

8/08/25 @ 3:56 PM
I attended the EPA presentation at Field Hall and it seems Option 3 is a done deal. You put your numbers through the hopper and out came the answer, which we now have to accept. If this is the case, 1) there is no point asking for public feedback and...
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/08/25 @ 3:48 PM
I want complete and thorough clean up of the site. All contaminated materials not just toxic. We live near the site. I don't want to have any issues with this ever in the future. Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: John Huffstetler

8/08/25 @ 3:35 PM
Concerning the Port Angeles Rayonier Mill interim action plan, the document states in Tables 5-4 through 5-6 (pages 78-80) that alternatives SL-5, G-3, and S-5 scored highest by your own objective criteria. Only when costs are considered does the pla...
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/08/25 @ 3:25 PM
After reviewing the options it is clear that option 5 is the best way to proceed. While the financial cost may be higher than others, the living cost of other options is higher. The burden of responsibility has been placed on the here and now to best...
No attachments

Comment From: Ania Pendergrass Pendergrass

8/08/25 @ 2:45 PM
I absolutely and strongly feel that the clean up should be: SL5. I would urge the city of PA to vote for THE FULL SL5 clean up of Rayonier site.
Respectfully, Ania
No attachments

Comment From: Matt Sperr

8/08/25 @ 2:34 PM
SL5 is permanent and allows property reuse. I request that SL5 be the preferred and permanent solution to this long-delayed toxic cleanup. Make them clean up their mess. If this was your backyard would you want hazardous waste covered up?
No attachments

Comment From: Chrissy (Chrissy Kelly )

8/08/25 @ 2:27 PM
Our licensed childcare center, Comfort and Cozy Learning Center has sat above the site for over 25 years. We serve 36 families daily ages 1-5yrs old. We have seen the constant deterioration of the property and deal with its current habitats daily. M...
No attachments

Comment From: Scott Harksell

8/08/25 @ 2:14 PM
Having been a resident of Port Angeles for the nearly 10 years we often walk the trail along the waterfront. The former Rayonier site is located in what could be a beautiful site. With continued work along all of Washington's waterfront site this i...
No attachments

Comment From: Robert Sextro

8/08/25 @ 1:06 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Maxwell ( Brown)

8/08/25 @ 11:48 AM
Hello,
I am a local Port Angelian, business owner, and concerned citizen.

I have reviewed all of the relevant documents and have concluded that OPTION 5 TOTAL CLEAN UP is what is necessary for our community.

Thank you for reading this comment and p...
No attachments

Comment From: Pamela Ehtee

8/08/25 @ 10:36 AM

Please hold Rayonier responsible to clean their site to a level 5 at Ennis Creek so that future restoration and development can be free of concern for the environmental effects of days past.

No attachments

Comment From: Kim Luker

8/08/25 @ 9:56 AM
It is astonishing to me that in the 25 years I've lived in this community, we are still here debating how to clean up the Rayonier site. I would like each member of the Department of Ecology team to remember that they are not beholden to make this pr...
No attachments

Comment From: Tammy Hueter

8/08/25 @ 6:57 AM
I have recently become aware that Rayonier is responsible for the hiring of consultants who estimate the costs of preferred solutions and is overseen by the Department of Ecology (also known as the DOE).
I believe DOE to be negligent in their oversig...
No attachments

Comment From: Polly Zhang

8/07/25 @ 10:25 PM
When I first visited Port Angeles in the spring of 2023, I had seen a short documentary film about Ennis Creek and hoped to see it with my own eyes. For the typical tourist, it is not easy to find any part of the creek. Since then, I have spent much ...
No attachments

Comment From: Wes Mantooth

8/07/25 @ 10:19 PM
I believe strongly that Ecology must require the Rayonier corporation to address the environmental impact of its past use of this site using the highest level of remediation, SL5. Rayonier has the financial means to carry out this remediation, which ...
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/07/25 @ 9:37 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. I feel it is important to hold corporations accountable for contamination from previous and current operations. My expectations are that WADOE restore as much of the affected site to unrestricted use levels a...
No attachments

Comment From: Alexis Sorensen

8/07/25 @ 8:42 PM
Rainer parent corporation MzUST due complete clean up of their site in Port Angeles!! They have profited for decades from this site. The residents and decedents of our town should not have to clean up their pollutants and mess. They need to step up a...
No attachments

Comment From: Peter Darragh

8/07/25 @ 7:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to strongly oppose the Washington Department of Ecology’s proposed “cleanup” plan for the former Rayonier mill site in Port Angeles. The current plan—to pile up toxic waste over 10 acres along the Discovery Trail, ...

This is not cleanup. It is containment, and it leaves future generations to deal with a hazardous legacy. The toxins at this site threaten our community’s health, our environment, and our economy. Simply capping and fencing the waste will not prevent long-term contamination of the soil, groundwater, or marine waters of Port Angeles Harbor.

The Rayonier company is a profitable corporation and has the financial capacity to fund a complete cleanup. The Department of Ecology’s claim that it cannot require full removal due to a “cost-benefit” provision in state law (RCW) is unacceptable. Public health, environmental integrity, and the future of this beautiful waterfront area must outweigh short-term cost calculations.

The Discovery Trail is a beloved public asset, drawing visitors from around the region and beyond. Placing a fenced toxic waste site directly alongside it will harm tourism, diminish our community’s reputation, and send a message that industry can pollute without full accountability.

I urge the Department of Ecology to reject the current plan and require a full removal of contaminated materials from the site. We have one chance to restore this waterfront properly. Let’s not settle for a temporary, unsafe, and unsightly solution that compromises our community’s future.

Respectfully

Peter Darragh

No attachments

Comment From: Nina Sarmiento

8/07/25 @ 7:06 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Annie Caskey

8/07/25 @ 5:30 PM
I believe that the company that polluted the area needs to pay for the entire cleanup. What kind of world do we leave our children when we leave it only semi-safe? What kind of example do we set, to say that the poor corporation can't afford to take ...
Attachments:

Comment From: City of Port Angeles (Nathan West)

8/07/25 @ 5:18 PM
Please see attached.
Attachments:

Comment From: 123 West Design Collective (Kyle Zimmerman)

8/07/25 @ 4:56 PM
On behalf of 123 West Design Collective, a Port Angeles-based engineering and design firm, I urge you to adopt Option SL 5, the full removal and off site disposal of all contaminated materials remaining at the former Rayonier Mill site.

The Interim ...
No attachments

Comment From: The Hubbub, LLC (Roxanne Greeson)

8/07/25 @ 4:56 PM
August 7, 2025

Re: Rayonier Mill Cleanup – Support for Option SL‑5 (Full Removal)

Dear Department of Ecology Team,

At The Hub, we are committed to creativity, community, and building a future that honors both people and place. We are writing to st...
Attachments:

Comment From: Tara Demers

8/07/25 @ 3:30 PM
Dear DOE,

Please select Option 5 regarding the Rayonier Mill cleanup in Port Angeles, WA. There needs to be a FULL cleanup, not a partial one. ALL contaminated soils and sediments need to be removed, and whatever the cost is, Rayonier is liable fo...
No attachments

Comment From: Armand Petri

8/07/25 @ 2:57 PM
I have recently become aware that Rayonier is responsible for the hiring of consultants who estimate the costs of preferred solutions and is overseen by the Department of Ecology (also known as the DOE).
I believe DOE to be negligent in their oversig...
No attachments

Comment From: Tammy Dziadek

8/07/25 @ 11:58 AM
The former Rayonier mill site in Port Angeles needs a complete level 5 cleanup. As a long-time Port Angeles resident, I regularly ride bicycle in this area, and I also frequently kayak there. Many Clallam County residents, and, indeed, many visitors ...
No attachments

Comment From: Joan Beldin

8/07/25 @ 11:22 AM

From: Joanie Beldin <joanibldn@gmail.com>

Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 11:22 AM

To: Abbett, Marian L. (ECY) <MABB461@ECY.WA.GOV>

Cc: Sixkiller, Casey (ECY) <csix461@ECY.WA.GOV>

Subject: Port Angeles Rayonier Mill Public Comment



Dear Site Manager Mariam Ab...


I thank you for this opportunity to comment on the proposed options for the clean-up of the Rayonier Mill site. 


I live in Port Angeles and regularly take the walkway that passes the chain link fence guarding the Rayonier Mill site. This is a popular walkway used by visitors from all over the country and the world. Not only is this site offensive to what is otherwise a scenic part of our town, but more importantly, it has been left as an area contaminated for decades from industrial pollution, once considered a Superfund site until that label was removed, not because it wasn’t deserving of it, but due to city embarrassment. This site is a blight on our community.


DOE now has the opportunity to demand that the owner of this polluted site clean up the mess that it created. Rayonier is responsible for the contamination it left in the wake of its closure and they should be fully responsible for cleaning it up to its fullest extent.


I attended the July 8th public meeting put on by DOE. I was dismayed to hear this agency say that in spite of the fact that the majority of the local comments it receives and in spite of the stance of the Port Angeles city council demanding a full and complete cleanup, Rayonier cannot be required to do a full clean-up. Of course, Rayonier will never volunteer to do so. Rayonier can easily afford the costs of a complete clean-up. I was very disappointed to hear DOE stand behind Rayonier rather than the people of this state who DOE should be most responsible for.


I am making the following requests:


-- Follow the Port Angeles City Council recommendation and select Option 5 calling for a complete cleanup.



-- Remove all contaminated soils and sediments. Option 3 does not factor in the inevitable event of an earthquake or unknown impacts of climate change. There are no guarantees with a cover up in the long term. It makes no sense to do a partial job that may bring contaminants back to the surface and will need to be redone later at a greater cost not only in the monetary sense, but in cost to the environment and human health.


-- The current site must be restored to its natural state, prior to the building of the Rayonier Mill. Prioritize the needs of our fish in this decision. Ennis Creek, whose waters run into this site, is our last best chance for a salmon creek in this city. No fish have been seen swimming up this creek for several years. In order to provide for their habitat needs, the following steps need to be followed:

          - Recreate an estuary to replace brackish water of a salt marsh Rayonier paved to create a parking lot. Salmonids need a mixture of fresh and saltwater to make physical adaptations as they leave the freshwater. Provide for a more naturally flowing stream such as is essential for a salmon stream and remove all pollutants entirely.


             It is not unusual to see Southern Resident Orcas swimming in the waters near Port Angeles. These whales feed almost solely on salmon. It is well known that these whales are in danger of extinction due to the steep decline of salmon in the Strait and Sound. Creating a salmon stream in Ennis Creek will provide these whales with one more source of life saving salmon.


-- Oppose any rebuilding on this site. Returning it to its natural state, it will attract wildlife and will become part of the wildlife corridor connecting natural areas east and west of the site.


By choosing the option for a full and complete cleanup, DOE has the opportunity to change this site from one of a blight to an area of pride and an enhancement to our community.


Rayonier created this highly polluted and contaminated site. It must take responsibility and cover all costs. DOE must do right for the community of Port Angeles by holding them to this responsibility. 


Thank you for your consideration.


Sincerely,


Joan Beldin 

Port Angeles

No attachments

Comment From: Rebecca Winn

8/07/25 @ 10:13 AM
Hello,
My name is Rebecca Winn and I am a resident of Port Angeles, Washington. I belong to a running group that uses the Discovery Trail along the waterfront on a weekly basis. I think about the contamination at Ryonier Mill often because of how fr...
No attachments

Comment From: David Birmingham

8/07/25 @ 8:34 AM
I feel that the Mill Site must be completely cleaned of all contaminants so that no possibility of continued contamination of Ennis Creek and the harbor exists.
Thank You,
David Birmingham
No attachments

Comment From: David Birmingham

8/07/25 @ 8:26 AM

From: David Birmingham <dab@wavecable.com>

Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 8:26 AM

To: Abbett, Marian L. (ECY) <MABB461@ECY.WA.GOV>

Subject: Port Angeles Rayonier Mill Site

 


As a citizen of Port Angeles I am urging a complete clean up of all toxins from th...


Thank You,


David Birmingham

dab@wavecable.com

No attachments

Comment From: Peter Stedman

8/07/25 @ 8:23 AM
I have recently become aware that Rayonier is responsible for the hiring of consultants who estimate the costs of preferred solutions and is overseen by the Department of Ecology (also known as the DOE).
I believe DOE to be negligent in their oversig...
No attachments

Comment From: Vaughnetta Barton

8/07/25 @ 7:34 AM

From: Vaughnetta J Barton <vajbarton@comcast.net>

Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 7:34 AM

To: Abbett, Marian L. (ECY) <MABB461@ECY.WA.GOV>

Cc: KDexter@cityofpa.us; NCarr@cityofpa.us

Subject: Rayonier Mill SL-5 Cleanup



Dear Ms. Abbett,


As a follow-up to rene...


It is my understanding that the Department of Ecology is unsure how to move forward with public officials’ requests—made on behalf of voters, taxpayers, and visitors—and has proposed a SL-3 cleanup.


As a follow-up to this message and following the public comment period, it would be valuable to know the Department of Ecology’s timeline for a SL-5 cleanup at the Rayonier site.


Given the Department of Ecology’s purpose statement, “We are proud to protect, preserve, & enhance Washington's environment for current and future generations”, citizens need the Department to Ecology to hold Rayonier accountable for a SL-5 cleanup.


Respectfully,


Mrs. V.J. Barton

Port Angeles, WA

vajbarton@comcast.net


Nothing can stop the power of a committed and determined people to make a difference in our society.  -Congressman John R. Lewis (1940-2020)

No attachments

Comment From: Friends of Ennis Creek (Jim Mantooth)

8/06/25 @ 9:52 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Friends of Ennis Creek (Robbie Mantooth)

8/06/25 @ 9:46 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Catherine Ford

8/06/25 @ 8:00 PM
I wish to express concerns regarding the current cost-benefit analysis and selection of SL3 as the preferred cleanup solution overseen by the Department of Ecology (DOE) and consultants hired by Rayonier.

It appears that DOE's oversight of the cost ...
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Hamilton

8/06/25 @ 6:13 PM
I strongly support SL-5 for the Rayonier Mill cleanup. Only full removal of contamination will protect our environment, public health, and future waterfront use. The City Council, Tribe, and many residents agree—SL-5 is the right path forward. Please...
No attachments

Comment From: John DiMarchi

8/06/25 @ 2:12 PM
We support a "full" cleanup of the Rayonier mill site. We support removal of all contaminated material. We do not support burying/covering contaminated material and leaving it onsite. For the long-term we support the complete removal of waste to avoi...
No attachments

Comment From: Marie Murata

8/06/25 @ 1:53 PM

From: Marie Murata <mlynne12@gmail.com>

Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 1:53 PM

To: Sixkiller, Casey (ECY) <csix461@ECY.WA.GOV>

Subject: Rayonier Mill Site



I am advocating for a complete clean up of the former Rayonier Mill site.


Marie L. Murata

916-217-435...

1011 Walker Street

Port Angeles, WA 98363

No attachments

Comment From: Marie Murata

8/06/25 @ 1:51 PM
I am advocating for a complete clean up of the former Rayonier Mill site.
No attachments

Comment From: Cheyenne Tuller

8/06/25 @ 11:06 AM
For the benefit of Rayonier, future generations, and the restoration of the estuary and creek, the cleanup should be permanent. The proposed SL3 clean up is based on faulty, exaggerated information from consultants hired by the mill industry. SL5 is ...
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Rivard

8/06/25 @ 10:55 AM
I have studied the Rayonier Mill cleanup issue and attended the City Council meeting where they voted in favor of Option 5 cleanup plan, which I also favor. I lived 14 years 3 blocks from GasWorks Park, and recall when the City of Seattle put up si...
No attachments

Comment From: Peter Barton

8/06/25 @ 12:00 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Olympic Environmental Council ... (Darlene Schanfald)

8/05/25 @ 9:53 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: David Mattern

8/05/25 @ 6:27 PM

From: David Mattern <dmattern@avvanta.com>


Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 6:27 PM


To: Abbett, Marian L. (ECY) <MABB461@ECY.WA.GOV>


Cc: nwest@cityofpa.us


Subject: Comments on Port Angeles Rayonier Mill Site cleanup




Attached are my comments on the Port Angele...

Site. Thank you for your consideration.



David Mattern


Certified Environmental Professional, Emeritus


dmattern@avvanta.com


206-300-1798

Attachments:

Comment From: North Olympic Land Trust (Tom Sanford)

8/05/25 @ 2:37 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Janine Blaeloch

8/05/25 @ 2:10 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Jennifer and Claudia Catastini

8/05/25 @ 12:40 PM
The proposed clean up plan, while following regulations that Dept of Ecology must consider, is not a complete solution.
We believe our community is looking for a real, final solution.
One that is respectful of generations which will follow us and the...
No attachments

Comment From: William Fitzsimmons

8/05/25 @ 10:48 AM
There is the opportunity now to require a multi billion dollar corporation to stop padding their bottom line at the expense of the environment and the local population who call PORT ANGELES home. It is probably the only chance we have at restoring an...
No attachments

Comment From: William Fitzsimmons

8/05/25 @ 10:46 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Voices for Health & Healing (Timothy Wheeler)

8/05/25 @ 10:06 AM
The members of my organization, Voices for Health & Healing, are unanimous that Rayonier should be compelled to obey the law and remove ALL the toxic chemicals they deposited in Port Angeles Harbor. This corporation reaped tens of millions in profits...
No attachments

Comment From: Anna Markee (Anna Markee)

8/04/25 @ 3:49 PM
I was born and raised in Tacoma and am well acquainted with the impacts of a pulp mill. In my work creating ecological landscapes, I regularly deal with the challenges of gardening in contaminated soil. Washington state Residents from Port Angeles to...
No attachments

Comment From: Olivia Vito

8/04/25 @ 12:31 PM
Rayonier has a responsibility to remove their toxic debris to an appropriate off site facility. Covering in place is not a viable option when this site is so close to the main population areas of Port Angeles; the largest town on the Olympic Peninsul...
No attachments

Comment From: Muriel Main

8/04/25 @ 11:40 AM
This beautiful site has been useless for so many years. A full cleanup is needed so, in future years, we can all benefit from it's unique beauty and location.
No attachments

Comment From: Eleana Pawl

8/04/25 @ 11:07 AM
Last week, the west coast of the United States was under a tsunami threat following the earthquake in Kamchatka. I live in Seattle, and thought of my friends in Port Angeles.

This week I heard from friends in Port Angeles that "DOE proposes to pile ...
No attachments

Comment From: Alda Siebrands

8/04/25 @ 9:53 AM
There is never a successful dump contaminated material, seal, cover-up, and fence-off operation that leaves doesn't leave the public to readdress the same issue decades later. The contaminants won't be gone - just governmentally sanctioned by hiding ...
No attachments

Comment From: Ethan Wesley

8/04/25 @ 3:17 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Kathryn Taylor

8/03/25 @ 8:04 PM
We need a permanent solution which is removal of the toxic material from the Rayonier Mill site. This is the only viable solution.
No attachments

Comment From: James Wesley

8/03/25 @ 6:46 PM
I can't think of a more broadly based local issue that has triggered the overwhelming and unanimous public response Ecology is receiving on implementation of SL5 for eliminating the ongoing environmental, economic, and health risk damage emanating fr...
No attachments

Comment From: Kathy Wesley

8/03/25 @ 3:57 PM
The unanimous voices for SL5 have been received by the Washington State Dept of Ecology from the Port Angeles City Council, the Clallam County Board of Commissioners, the Port Angeles Business Assn., the North Olympic Peninsula tribes, and countless...
No attachments

Comment From: John Kendall

8/03/25 @ 2:00 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Michele Vail

8/03/25 @ 12:44 PM
There needs to be a higher level of 'cleanup' than I see in the plan documents. Mother Nature is great at restoration but needs to have a better place to start it's remediation!
No attachments

Comment From: Wendy Rae Johnson

8/03/25 @ 12:41 PM
I have recently become aware that Rayonier is responsible for the hiring of consultants who estimate the costs of preferred solutions and is overseen by the Department of Ecology (also known as the DOE).
I believe DOE to be negligent in their oversig...
No attachments

Comment From: Judith Morris

8/03/25 @ 11:00 AM

From: Judith Morris <kudu1028@gmail.com>

Sent: Sunday, August 3, 2025 11:00 AM

To: Sixkiller, Casey (ECY) <csix461@ECY.WA.GOV>

Subject: Rayonier cleanup



This is an easy choice.  Please count me as favoring the full clean up - option 5.   I’ve watched Rayo...

No attachments

Comment From: Ronald RICHARDS

8/02/25 @ 9:53 PM
I am shocked that after almost three decades of mostly Democratic controlled administrations in Washington State that Rayonier has been held, and is being held, to such low standards in the cleanup of the old Rayonier mill site. It is mind boggling ...
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Hanan

8/02/25 @ 3:17 PM
A Call for Complete Remediation at the Former Rayonier Mill Site
To the Washington State Department of Ecology
The future of the former Rayonier mill site in Port Angeles demands nothing less than a comprehensive and permanent environmental cleanup. ...
No attachments

Comment From: Kay Campbell

8/02/25 @ 10:01 AM
Thank you in advance for reading all comments.

I do not live in Port Angeles or the state of Washington, but over the past nearly twenty-five years, Port Angeles has become my adopted hometown -- my father, Bob Campbell, was the operations manager a...
No attachments

Comment From: Lauren B

8/02/25 @ 8:45 AM
Rayonier Mill has left our community with a huge ecological mess. I'm confident that we were all taught at a young age to clean up after ourselves and leave places better than when we first found it. This company has more than enough funds and should...
No attachments

Comment From: Ann Hartnett

8/02/25 @ 8:36 AM
As a Port Angeles resident and someone who regularly swims and hikes in and along the Elwha, I demand that Rainier be held accountable to completely clean up their mess under option 5 of the options presented during the special meeting at city hall.
No attachments

Comment From: Lawrence Lang

8/02/25 @ 6:48 AM
I moved to Port Angeles in Feb 1980. I can remember the brown haze that spread out over town, clearly coming from the Rayonier mill. I remember the health threats that were part of what lead to closing the mill. I remember families who were affected....
No attachments

Comment From: James Manteith

8/01/25 @ 11:48 PM
As a Port Angeles native, I'm shocked that any consideration has been given to plans that compromise both the community's and nature's access to vitally important spaces and habitats. Please commit to Level 5 cleanup, holding Rayonier accountable for...
No attachments

Comment From: Port Angeles Business Associat... (Kelly Johnson)

8/01/25 @ 11:28 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Joanne LaBaw

7/31/25 @ 8:12 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Joanne LaBaw

7/31/25 @ 8:10 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Wendy Feltham

7/31/25 @ 8:00 PM
Attachments:

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]