Port Angeles Rayonier Mill 2025 Comment Period

386 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Paul Pickett

8/11/25 @ 1:10 PM

Marian and Casey,


My comments on the Rayonier Mill cleanup in Port Angeles are attached. 


There are many reasons to do a complete cleanup at this site. I hope a full analysis is completed and the desires of the community are respected. Please require R...


Thank you,


Paul Pickett

Port Angeles, WA

360-359-3435


“What you do makes a difference, and you have to decide what kind of difference you want to make.” 

- Dr. Jane Goodall

Attachments:

Comment From: Carole Scholl

8/11/25 @ 1:09 PM
I'm a resident of Port Angeles and very supportive of our tourism business. Let's finish this clean up and enhance our waterfront. So, I am writing to support Level 5 cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles. Level 5 cleanup is the ON...
No attachments

Comment From: Bradley Collins

8/11/25 @ 12:36 PM

I object to the WA Dept of Ecology proposed draft Interim Action Plan for many reasons as follows:


1)  An Interim Action Plan is not a Final Remedial Action Plan required by Washington law under the Model Toxics Control Act.


2)  The proposed final clea...


3)  The Rayonier Mill cleanup site is culturally, historically, and environmentally important to the greater Port Angeles community and must be cleaned up to the highest safety standards for unrestricted land uses.


4)  This siete was a significant Klallam village, a major portion of the City of Port Angeles tax base, and an environmentally sensitive area due to the Olympic Discovery Trail (a major public recreation use), Ennis Creek (a salmon rearing stream), and Port Angeles Harbor shoreline.  The 10 acre hazardous waste dump covered by a 2 foot protective cap bordered by the Tail, Creek, and Shoreline is the absolute worst placement for a perpetual hazardous waste dump.


5)  After many years of study and evaluation of cleanup options (28 years since the Rayonier Mill closed down in 1997), Ecology proposes a Level 3 cleanup as the final cleanup action instead of a Level 5 clean up as required by MCTA - an abject failure for which the Department of Ecology is ashamed.


6)  Most agency and general public comments oppose this the retention of hazardous waste in place limiting how the land in the capped area can be used for any other purpose than protecting the public from the contamination from being released again - these opposing agency and public comments demand a Level 5 cleanup.


My perspective in making these comments is from my nearly 50 years as a professional urban planner, including 26 years as a SEPA Responsible Official for the Cities of Tukwila, Port Angeles, Arlington, and Sultan.


The Rayonier Mill hazardous waste site cleanup has been the most inept environmental protection effort by public officials that I have witnessed firsthand since 1997.


Bradley J. Collins FAICP

August 11, 2025

No attachments

Comment From: Brenda Carpenter

8/11/25 @ 12:28 PM
I support Option 5. I want the clean up of all toxic waste and complete remediation. For 30 years our community has dealt with the continued contamination of our harbor. Please don't let us down.
No attachments

Comment From: Wayne Kicklighter

8/11/25 @ 12:26 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: John Marrs

8/11/25 @ 12:25 PM
At age 84, I have long observed the Rayonier Mill site, having ben a landowner and resident for 45 years. We ive at Lake Sutherland in and since 2017 winters in a town condo that overlooks the former mill site. That skeleton dock reminds us over and ...
No attachments

Comment From: Debi Maloney

8/11/25 @ 12:13 PM

Dear Marion Abbett 


The Rayonier Pulp Mill property site has been in stasis for too many years.

It is time the Dept of Ecology step up and require that Rayonier fulfill its obligations to restore and protect this land for the future betterment of Port ...

Continuing to ignore the necessity of a cleanup by trying to hide the issue under concrete and behind a fence is gross mismanagement of obligations by both Rayoiner and Washington State. 

It is time to end the game playing and restore the health of the ecosystem and protect the people and ocean environment from further delay tactics.


I support the decision of the Port Angeles City Council to implement Option 5 for restoration and so should the Department of Ecology.


Sincerely

Debi Maloney

No attachments

Comment From: Marie Marrs

8/11/25 @ 11:44 AM
As a Sr. Citizen, at age 82, I have long observed the Rayonier Mill site. I was born and raised here, but after living all over the country over the years, my husband and I chose to move "back home," after retirement, to the beautiful Olympic Penins...
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/11/25 @ 11:27 AM
Subject: Please Choose Alternative SL5 for a Permanent Cleanup of the Rayonier Mill Site

Marian Abbett, Site Manager Washington Department of Ecology ...
No attachments

Comment From: Edward Schmid

8/11/25 @ 11:05 AM
Please pursue the highest level of de-contamination possible, removing ALL toxins from the site.
Ed schmid
No attachments

Comment From: Sara Cendejas-Zarelli

8/11/25 @ 11:01 AM
I strongly agree with the City of Port Angeles's support of the permanent cleanup of the Rayonier Mill Site and favor Alternative Five as opposed to Ecology's option #3. I feel strongly that leaving the site with remaining toxins would allow Rayonier...
No attachments

Comment From: Jo Brodahl

8/11/25 @ 10:51 AM
Option 5 should be the only choice. This situation has been unresolved for way too many years and simply trying to cover it up is not an acceptable solution. It's time to be responsible and do a complete, not half assed, clean-up! According to the...
No attachments

Comment From: Candice Hopson

8/11/25 @ 10:49 AM
I strongly support the level 5 option for cleanup, which will remove all environmental toxins.
Thank you,
Candice Hopson
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/11/25 @ 10:39 AM
Please perform a complete and permanent clean up of the Rayonier Mill. We need our homeland to be as safe and clean as possible for the generations to come and for our non-human brethren. Thank you for taking this matter seriously.
No attachments

Comment From: Patrick Kale

8/11/25 @ 10:26 AM

I support the permanent solution of Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound which will greatly l...

No attachments

Comment From: Kathleen Laney

8/11/25 @ 10:01 AM
The solution purposed for Alternative SL former Rayonier site with contaminated soils by capping it in place is completely unacceptable. This proposal dooms the land and neighborhood with a toxic dump site that will limit the land's development and p...
No attachments

Comment From: Jo Monahan

8/11/25 @ 10:00 AM
As a Port Angeles resident, I strongly urge the complete cleanup of the toxic Rayonier Mill site. Corporations must be held accountable for the impact of their business and harms of that business whether current or closed. Our watershed and bioregi...
No attachments

Comment From: Anni Lanigan

8/11/25 @ 9:46 AM
Toxic waste doesn't care a lick about being covered over. The only forward-thinking, environmentally safe solution for our growing region is to clean it up. As taxpayers and citizens whose grandchildren may decide to live here, we ask you to not only...
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/11/25 @ 9:40 AM

I support the permanent solution of Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.


Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound is unacceptable. Thi...

No attachments

Comment From: Katherine Duff

8/11/25 @ 9:10 AM
I became involved in the cleanup of the Rayonier Mill site when they shut down and attempted to dispose of their toxic (dioxins, mercury, etc) facilities at the Mt Pleasant Landfill - to a height of about 60 feet. The contents of the sludge that was ...
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Jacoby

8/11/25 @ 8:48 AM

I have been following the issue of the contamination left behind by Rayonier for decades!  The current proposal described in SL-3 is totally unacceptable and a slap in the face to the residents of Port Angeles.  SL-5 is the only responsible way forwa...


Respectfully,

Mary Jacoby

318 West 6th Street

Port Angeles, WA 98362

No attachments

Comment From: Jen Squires

8/11/25 @ 8:26 AM
This is criminal! I fully support the permanent solution of Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped m...
No attachments

Comment From: John Huffstetler

8/11/25 @ 8:23 AM
In the current proposal, there is no current cost analysis of the threat of sea-level rise and/or tsunami on the planned soil cap. What happens if sea level rises above the cap? What happens if a tsunami big enough crashes in the cap? Your own docume...
No attachments

Comment From: John Gussman

8/11/25 @ 8:21 AM

I wanted to let you know I fully upport the Port Angeles City Council decision - Option 5

We need to factor in to its cleanup cost analysis impacts to fish, wildlife, the environment and human health. All contaminated soils should be removed, and remo...

This cleanup is so very important and Dept. of Ecology should do the right thing and fix all the damage that humans have done. If we can easily break it we should be able to fix it. thanks, John Gussman

No attachments

Comment From: Rhonda Curry

8/11/25 @ 8:03 AM
I submit the following as my position, please:
• Support the Port Angeles City Council decision supporting Option 5.
• Tell Ecology to factor into its cleanup cost analysis all impacts to fish, wildlife, the environment and human health.
• Support a...
No attachments

Comment From: Summer Evert

8/11/25 @ 7:53 AM
The mill site MUST be COMPLETELY and Thoroughly cleaned. Anything less than absolutely clean is a huge disservice to our community. Every single ine if us relies in preservation of our environment in one way or another, whether it is employment in th...
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/11/25 @ 7:43 AM
Please do a full and permanent cleanup of the Rayonier Mill site. Throwing gravel over it is not sufficient, nor should that be an option as it does not solve the issue. Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Terri DiMartino

8/11/25 @ 7:31 AM

Dear Mr. Sixkiller,

I am a granddaughter of a World War II Army veteran and University of Washington graduate. My grandfather fought aboard to protect our American freedoms. I am writing you because I believe Rayonier Industries has created a toxic me...


I know you have many priorities, but would consider making the Port Angeles Rayonier Industries toxic property your number one? The current and future generations citizens of Port Angeles, the salmon and Salish Sea desperately need your leadership to correct this mess. I have been aware of this environmental problem since the 1980's.


Any help you can lend to my requests would be greatly appreciated.


Thank you for your time and considering my plea for help.



Respectfully,

Terri DiMartino

Sequim, Washington 

No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/11/25 @ 6:25 AM
Option 3 is not enough. A complete clean up is needed of the space. Capping it is a band aid that will only cover a tiny portion of the wound. Take responsibility for your work and clean up the mess ou made.
No attachments

Comment From: Bradley Williams

8/11/25 @ 6:13 AM
I support the permanent solution of Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound which will greatly l...
No attachments

Comment From: Anna Schorr

8/10/25 @ 8:09 PM
PLEASE CLEAN UP THIS SITE- it is a sore on our community - it is blighted property and it is not fair to the future generations or the current to leave this contaminated site fence off still haunted by our ancestors mistake.

Additionally this locati...
No attachments

Comment From: Frank Mcalpin Jr

8/10/25 @ 8:08 PM

     Please have the proper cleanup done and not just bury it. Thanks much.

No attachments

Comment From: Caroline Walls

8/10/25 @ 8:04 PM
I support SL-5 and so should you! It is the only alternative that puts the people and environment of Port Angeles first! We deserve a full clean-up. Anything less than the full clean up in SL-5 is letting Rayonier off easily at the expense of our co...
No attachments

Comment From: Patrice Bahnsen

8/10/25 @ 7:59 PM
My husband Thomas Pierce and I both believe and support option 5, total cleanup. We live in a magnificent area and should be rid of the toxic soil and not wait for some disaster that could cause even more issues.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/10/25 @ 7:24 PM
Hello, I am a concerned member of Greater Clallam County and frequently recreate with my family and children at the Port Angeles Waterfront, rivers, watersheds and Discovery Trail areas.

Leaving contamination in place under a cap, as proposed in Alt...
No attachments

Comment From: Lauren Churchill

8/10/25 @ 6:55 PM
I am writing to express my opinion that the level 5 clean up of the Rayonier Mill site must proceed as planned. In fact it is the only plan that should be followed for the reasons that it is the only way the site can actually be cleaned up in perpetu...
No attachments

Comment From: Megan Christison

8/10/25 @ 6:53 PM
Dear Washington Department of Ecology,

I am writing as a concerned resident and community member to urge you to select Alternative SL-5 for the cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles.

Leaving contamination in place under a cap, as...
No attachments

Comment From: Matt Perry

8/10/25 @ 6:12 PM
I want to see the full clean up of the site and not just putting a cap on it forever. Rayonier came here, extracted our resources then left us with a huge mess. It's on them to clean it up. They have the money.

The citizens of this town deserve t...
No attachments

Comment From: Isabel Esquivel

8/10/25 @ 5:59 PM
Option 5 MUST be chosen for cleaning up the Rayonier Mill site. Leaving a toxic dump for to hurt us and future generations is absolutely unacceptable. I live just outside of the city and frequently use the Olympic Discovery Trail with my children. Do...
No attachments

Comment From: Lucy Copass

8/10/25 @ 5:44 PM
I am writing in regard to the Final Plan issued by the Department of Ecology in regard to clean-up of the former Rayonier mill site in and near the Port Angeles harbor.

I respect the time and effort DOE staff put into development and evaluation of a...
No attachments

Comment From: Kelly Manning

8/10/25 @ 5:30 PM
As a concerned resident of Port Angeles I strongly urge the selection of Alternative SL-5 for the cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site. This option represents a permanent and comprehensive solution that aligns with the City of Port Angeles' Compr...
No attachments

Comment From: Shelly Anonymous

8/10/25 @ 5:17 PM

I support the permanent solution of Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound which will greatly l...

No attachments

Comment From: Teri Dobson

8/10/25 @ 4:25 PM
Please move forward to adopt SL5, not SL3.

SL3 proposes covering and fencing off the area for 30 years!

Development under those conditions would be legally and physically constrained and would hinder our Shoreline Master Plan.

This is a highly val...
No attachments

Comment From: Cheryl Crane

8/10/25 @ 4:22 PM
As a resident of Port Angeles, I live with my family less than a mile from the old Rayonier mill site. This community has waited long enough for the company to remediate the site to allow anything less than a full clean up. I support the city council...
No attachments

Comment From: Howard Sprouse

8/10/25 @ 4:18 PM
The Remediators Incorporated along with project partners within Washington State and across the USA and Canada are recognized experts in cutting edge remediation technology that is capable of treating every aspect of the pollution within the areas ef...
Attachments:

Comment From: Goodness Tea Farm (Shaelee evans)

8/10/25 @ 4:06 PM
I support the City of Port Angeles and agree with their recommendation for option 5. This area needs to be fully cleaned up.

Leaving a large mound of contaminants to be monitored is taxing generations ahead with surveying this pollution problem and...
No attachments

Comment From: first street haven, inc (KRISTIN ULSUND)

8/10/25 @ 3:52 PM
With regard to the mitigation of the hazardous waste at the old Rayonier mill site in Port Angeles, I think it's of vital importance to commit to Option 5 (complete removal of waste away from the site). As a local business owner in a town where touri...
No attachments

Comment From: Thomas Lewis

8/10/25 @ 3:50 PM
The selection of SL-3 is a tacit acceptance of too many unknown costs and potential adverse outcomes. It is a mitigation that pushes a true solution down the road, leaving the citizens and economy of Port Angeles in the lurch.

SL-5 provides the onl...
No attachments

Comment From: Brian Grad

8/10/25 @ 3:49 PM
I support and urge action for a full clean-up of Port Angeles Harbor. Plans to cap the contaminated soils will not provide the confidence that reclamation will be successful. Only the removal of all identified contaminant sources can allow for the re...
No attachments

Comment From: Cruise Planners (Kim Reynolds)

8/10/25 @ 3:36 PM
I urge the Washington Department of Ecology to select Alternative SL-5 for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles. SL-5 offers a permanent cleanup that supports the City's Comprehensive Plan and allows for future development.
Alternative SL-3 ...
No attachments

Comment From: Kim Reynolds

8/10/25 @ 3:35 PM

Dear Ms. Abbett

I urge the Washington Department of Ecology to select Alternative SL-5 for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles. SL-5 offers a permanent cleanup that supports the City’s Comprehensive Plan and allows for future development.

Alt...

Independent analysis shows SL-3’s costs are underestimated and SL-5’s are overstated. The proposed 10-year cleanup is far too long—Port Angeles and the Olympic Peninsula have already waited nearly 30 years. It’s time for a lasting solution and accountability. Select SL-5 and require Rayonier to meet an accelerated, reasonable schedule.

Thank You

Kim Reynolds

No attachments

Comment From: KRISTIN ULSUND

8/10/25 @ 3:24 PM
Regarding the clean-up of the old Rayonier site in Port Angeles, Option 5 (complete removal of hazardous materials off-site) is the ONLY acceptable option! Our community should not be saddled with Rayonier's dangerous materials any longer. We deserve...
No attachments

Comment From: Claire Hudson

8/10/25 @ 3:22 PM
I am writing as a concerned citizen and a member of the Port Angeles community to express my strong support for Alternative SL5 for the cleanup of the former Rayonier mill site. This is a critical issue for the long-term health of our community and t...
No attachments

Comment From: Andrea Campbell

8/10/25 @ 3:01 PM

I support the permanent solution of Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.  Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound which will greatly ...

No attachments

Comment From: William Campbell

8/10/25 @ 2:49 PM
I support the permanent solution of Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound which will greatly ...
No attachments

Comment From: Rachel Vine

8/10/25 @ 2:36 PM
I am writing in support of a full clean up of the Rayonier Mill Site. The company benefitted from the usage of this land for many years, extracted a profit, and then left behind a poisonous problem for the community to deal with. The site leaks toxin...
No attachments

Comment From: Debra Schouten

8/10/25 @ 2:15 PM
I am writing as a concerned citizen and a member of the Port Angeles community to express my strong support for Alternative SL5 for the cleanup of the former Rayonier mill site. This is a critical issue for the long-term health of our community and t...
No attachments

Comment From: Jeanette Mahlow

8/10/25 @ 1:36 PM

I support the permanent solution of Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound which will greatly l...

Thank you 

Jeanette MAHLOW 

Port Angeles resident 


Kindness Matters  

No attachments

Comment From: Judy Perry

8/10/25 @ 1:35 PM

Rayonier Mill site should have been declared a super fund years ago.

SL5 is the only solution.  Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound which will greatly limit future development, is totally unacceptabl...

Judy Perry

No attachments

Comment From: Arnold Schouten

8/10/25 @ 1:20 PM
I am writing as a concerned citizen and a member of the Port Angeles community to express my strong support for Alternative SL5 for the cleanup of the former Rayonier mill site. This is a critical issue for the long-term health of our community and t...
No attachments

Comment From: Michele Scouten

8/10/25 @ 1:17 PM
I am writing as a concerned citizen and a member of the Port Angeles community to express my strong support for Alternative SL5 for the cleanup of the former Rayonier mill site. This is a critical issue for the long-term health of our community and t...
No attachments

Comment From: Stefanie Carroll

8/10/25 @ 1:12 PM
Please consider SL5 as the only option for our community. Our waterfront deserves to be a destination for locals and tourists, and a source of recrea5and revenue. Don't sell us short!
No attachments

Comment From: Steven Bair

8/10/25 @ 1:06 PM
I have read and reviewed the Interim Action Plan (February 2025) and strongly disagree with the conclusion that Soil Alternative SL-3 should be selected based on cost-benefit ratios. The only alternative consistent with the goal of long-term safety a...
No attachments

Comment From: Paul Pickett

8/10/25 @ 1:06 PM
My comments are in the attached document.
Attachments:

Comment From: Jordan Van Voast

8/10/25 @ 12:55 PM
Subject: Please Choose Alternative SL5 for a Permanent Cleanup of the Rayonier Mill Site

Marian Abbett, Site Manager Washington Department of Ecology ...
No attachments

Comment From: Ingrid Carmean

8/10/25 @ 12:55 PM
Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.
No attachments

Comment From: Jesse Anderson

8/10/25 @ 12:54 PM

Hello,  I would like to write to you in support of a permanent solution for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound w...


Sincerely,


Jesse Anderson

Port Angeles, WA

No attachments

Comment From: Barbara Nabors

8/10/25 @ 12:50 PM
I urge the Washington Department of Ecology to select Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment. This alternative provides a permanent solution and aligns with the City of Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan for future development of this area...
No attachments

Comment From: Victor Ward

8/10/25 @ 12:37 PM
I support the permanent solution of Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound which will greatly ...
No attachments

Comment From: Walt Boyes

8/10/25 @ 12:37 PM
The only cleanup method the entire Port Angeles community supports is to do 100% remediation and remove ALL of the toxic material on the site, remove the creosote soaked piles, and repair the damage to Ennis Creek. The Rayonier Mill Site is located i...
No attachments

Comment From: Elaine Bailey

8/10/25 @ 12:32 PM

The only solution is SL 5!  Why should Port Angeles be forever a toxic waste site? Covering a huge area with soil etc. with SL 3 creates a hazard that will continue forever.  but the chances of climate change water rising and or the Cascadia event pu...

Thank you for making our life safer

Elaine Bailey

No attachments

Comment From: Ryan Driscoll

8/10/25 @ 12:16 PM
I am writing to support Level 5 cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA

Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.
No attachments

Comment From: ELIZABETH URAGA

8/10/25 @ 12:06 PM
I support the permanent solution of Alternative SL5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill Site in Port Angeles WA. Proposed Alternative SL3 which leaves contaminated soil on site forever limits future development. It is not a...
No attachments

Comment From: Anna Manildi

8/10/25 @ 11:41 AM

Please respect the citizens of Clallam County and Port Angeles and do the maximum to clean up the contaminants left behind. That means Level 5, 100% clean up.


Thank you,

Anna Manildi

No attachments

Comment From: Lois Danks

8/10/25 @ 11:30 AM

I firmly support the permanent solution of Alternative SL-5 for contaminated soil and sediment at the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Proposed Alternative SL-3, leaving contaminated soil in place forever in a capped mound which will gr...


I’ve lived in Port Angeles for 42 years and remember the closing of the mill and the promises to clean up the site! These promises were delayed and stalled and never kept! Those responsible for the pollution MUST be held accountable for the harm to our waterfront. The area is part of a city plan to increase to livability of our town and make more of the waterfront accessible to all of us.


We put up with years of air pollution and water pollution and now it must be cleaned!!!

Sincerely,

Lois F. W. Danks

1621 South F Street

Port Angeles, WA 98363

360-808-3196

No attachments

Comment From: Amy McIntyre

8/10/25 @ 11:27 AM
Subject: Please Choose Alternative SL5 for a Permanent Cleanup of the Rayonier Mill Site

Marian Abbett, Site Manager Washington Department of Ecology ...
No attachments

Comment From: Ellen Gartside

8/10/25 @ 10:31 AM
Regarding the Rayonier Mill project, I am submitting questions rather than comments.

1. How were the boundaries of study area determined?

2. Was there sampling done outside of the study area that shows contaminants are below clean up levels outside...
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Minton

8/10/25 @ 10:14 AM

I support clean up of the former Rayonier mill site cleaned up to Level 5 — the only level that would have ALL contaminants taken to an appropriate landfill such as one in eastern Oregon.  


Thank you for your work and effort toward this goal.

Mary W Mi...

2442 Lower Elwha Rd, Port Angeles, WA 98363

No attachments

Comment From: Janice Bartron

8/10/25 @ 9:25 AM
I am writing to support Level 5 cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA

I support Level 5 cleanup as the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Lewis

8/10/25 @ 8:46 AM
Through the unanimous support of City Council, the City is advocating for Cleanup Alternative Five, which supports a complete and permanent cleanup of the Rayonier Mill Site.

I agree that nothing short of a permanent and complete remediation for the...
No attachments

Comment From: Paula Doherty

8/10/25 @ 8:04 AM
I am writing to support Level 5 cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA

Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.
No attachments

Comment From: Kenneth Reandeau

8/10/25 @ 5:31 AM
Greetings DOE of Washington State. I am a lifetime resident of Port Angeles. I would prefer the option that provides the most removal of contaminated materials from the Rayonier site.
No attachments

Comment From: Gayle Brauner

8/09/25 @ 9:54 PM
Each time I see wildlife in the Port Angeles harbor, I wonder how damaged they will be. People catching crabs, what are they ingesting? To allow this corporation to continually pollute the harbor over the last decades has been a travesty, and neglige...
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/09/25 @ 7:49 PM
Are you people kidding me??
We've been waiting HOW LONG??
If this were a Seattle site, or an Olympia site, would you still even be only DISCUSSING this?!
What is wrong with you? What is wrong with our system? How could anything take SO MANY years t...
No attachments

Comment From: Laurie Force

8/09/25 @ 7:26 PM
Any action (or inaction) other than total cleanup of the Rayonier site is unacceptable.
No attachments

Comment From: Ron Good

8/09/25 @ 6:26 PM

Hello Washington state Department of Ecology,


I am writing regarding the proposed clean-up plan for the Rayonier site in Port Angeles.


Any clean-up plan for the site must be comprehensive in order to take into account long-term protection of aquatic li...


For these reasons, I am supporting alternative SL-5 as the best alternative because it provides for a permanent and long-term solution to the problems, unlike SL-3 which is inadequate to address all of the above long-term and connected issues.


Thank you for taking my concerns into your decision-making process.


Ron Good

151 Gehrke Road

Port Angeles, WA 98362

No attachments

Comment From: Nils Andermo

8/09/25 @ 6:19 PM
While I believe that several of the benefit scores are much too high for SL3 and too low for SL5, my comments will focus on what I see as completely missing benefit criteria, and the related costs.

Usability of land:
Where is the benefit criteria f...
No attachments

Comment From: John Popinski

8/09/25 @ 5:18 PM
I am writing to support Level 5 cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA

Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.

Anything less is a co...
No attachments

Comment From: Bret Stastny

8/09/25 @ 5:06 PM
I want a full and complete clean up and not just a surface clean up, restore the land to how it was before it was polluted.
No attachments

Comment From: Erika Lindholm

8/09/25 @ 3:46 PM
Please accept my attached letter regarding the Rayonier site proposed Interim Action Plan and Consent Decree. I am in favor of Option 5.
Attachments:

Comment From: Georgia Peet

8/09/25 @ 2:40 PM
I have lived in Port Angeles for 5 years. I have a Masters in Environmental Biology from Ohio State University and was shocked to find that the toxins from the Rayonier Mill site were not completely mitigated within 10 years of the closure of the Ray...
No attachments

Comment From: Dioselin Gonzalez

8/09/25 @ 2:23 PM
Like many other residents of Port Angeles, I believe Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA. Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Babra Akmal

8/09/25 @ 1:15 PM
To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing to advocate for a Level 5 cleanup of the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA, which is the best option to ensure a total cleanup of all contaminants in this area.

Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Alexandra Reinwald

8/09/25 @ 1:10 PM
Re: Draft Interim Action Plan.
I do not believe that the proposed cleanup plan SL3 goes far enough.I am in support of cleanup alternate plan SL5.
No attachments

Comment From: Connor Fredrickson

8/09/25 @ 12:35 PM
Clean it once, and clean it thoroughly. Consider Cleanup Alternative 5 so this space can be toxin free and enjoyed by the community for years to come. Don't just cover up past mistakes, fix them.
No attachments

Comment From: Tom Harper

8/09/25 @ 12:08 PM
Level 5 cleanup is the ONLY option that the Dept. of Ecology should consider for the former Rayonier Mill site in Port Angeles, WA.
No attachments

Comment From: Dianna Chiabotti

8/09/25 @ 10:33 AM
I strongly encourage the Washington Department of Ecology to select only option 5. I completely agree with our city manager, Nathan West. Allowing for an option that is less thorough is harmful to our children and our local climate/ecology. Our child...
No attachments

Comment From: Carmen Germain

8/09/25 @ 10:19 AM
Public and environmental health for our town and surrounding watershed must be a priority. I support clean-up to Level Five. The future, even given the best science, is unpredictable. The political will and/or the economic situation may have chang...
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/09/25 @ 9:59 AM
It is critical for the site to be cleaned up to Level Five for these reasons: cleaning up the toxins will be more expensive in the future and more prohibitive; the harbor is in the tsunami zone and susceptible for consequences should an earthquake o...
No attachments

Comment From: Sandra Matyus

8/09/25 @ 9:29 AM
RAMP operated during a time when long term negative environment impacts weren't considered, profits were the priority. Now 28 years later after RAMP has closed and left behind the damage they are still trying to do the least possible for the most fin...
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]