Rulemaking - Clean Vehicles Program and General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources

1425 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Grace Huang

10/14/22 @ 7:05 AM
I strongly support the adoption of Advanced Clean Cars II, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx Rule, and the Fleet Reporting Requirement.

Washington needs to adopt Advanced Clean Cars II to meet its climate goals according to the State Energy Strategy, whi...↓

We need to switch to clean vehicles to stop polluting our air. I don't want vehicles that spew fumes driving through the neighborhoods where I live and work and polluting my lungs, and I want everyone who drives to have access to clean vehicles. This is why Advanced Clean Cars II and its equity provisions are important. So is the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx Rule, which improves emission standards for large vehicles.

It is also important to gather more information on our transportation system so we can better address the harms it is causing–not only to the environment, but sometimes to workers through poor labor practices. This is why the Fleet Reporting Requirement is an important piece of this regulation.

Every new vehicle sold that is powered by fossil fuels is a missed opportunity. Relying on polluting vehicles hurts the climate and our health. It also makes us beholden to oil companies that bring in record profits while raising prices. We need clean options in Washington.

I strongly support this rule and thank the Department of Ecology for its hard work.

Sincerely,
No attachments

Comment From: Len Moreau

10/14/22 @ 7:05 AM
There taking away freedom of choice of what we can buy. I tow trailers and it has been proven several times that you can't even get half of the rated milage of the truck. This is a good idea for big cities. But rural communities it doesn't work very ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kristina Chin

10/14/22 @ 7:05 AM
I have a right to choose what type of vehicle I want. Not someone telling me what to buy or not buy. There needs to be more incentives for all electric vehicles new and used. A higher rebate would be much better.
No attachments

Comment From: Michele Haugen

10/14/22 @ 6:58 AM
RE: Chapter 173-423 WAC
Although I am in favor of continually working to protect our environment to the best of our abilities, I want to make sure our state is doing so in a way that protects the livelihoods and well being of our citizens. Adopting C...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Richard Edwards

10/14/22 @ 6:52 AM
I should be the only person who has any say at all in the vehicle that I buy.
No attachments

Comment From: Trish West

10/14/22 @ 6:49 AM
I am in a quandary as to why this mandate is so important now or all. I do not support this now. With all the homeless, crime, lawlessness,silly wokeness attitudes and etc. is having an EV mandate/Bill really necessary? I feel that this supposed urge...↓
Definitely disagree.
Attachments:

Comment From: Fred White

10/14/22 @ 6:47 AM
The Clean Vehicle Program is a government take-over of the peoples choice to decided for themselves how to live their lives.
As a representative for the citizens of Washington state please forgo this ridiculous policy and stop trying to follow Califor...↓
Thank you
No attachments

Comment From: Robert Croneberger

10/14/22 @ 6:44 AM
1. Defining electric vehicles as zero emissions is a lie. It takes fossil fuels (carbon emissions) to mine the raw material to manufacture the vehicles and to provide energy to charge their batteries,
2. Two thirds of Washington State is agriculture. ...↓
3. Current electric vehicles are not affordable to middle and low income classes and,
4. Electric vehicles are not reliable or safe. Electric vehicles will not properly function in hot or freezing climates. Their batteries are viable. The batteries are toxic waste (not recyclable) and tend to burst into flames
No attachments

Comment From: Larry Wright

10/14/22 @ 6:44 AM
I have two cars and would like to trade one of them in for an EV. I am totally against being mandated to buy only an EV.
No attachments

Comment From: anthony shamion

10/14/22 @ 6:37 AM
electric rigs do no work with pulling heavy items and long hauling without having to stop .. Until this technology is perfected then this is a bad choice.
No attachments

Comment From: Hailey Filipowicz

10/14/22 @ 6:36 AM
As someone who had an electric car it had its faults. We had a recall on the battery that couldn't get replaced. Where do they toss the batteries when you do need to replace them? In the ground which is worse than having a gas powered car. California...↓
No attachments

Comment From: William Fleming

10/14/22 @ 6:25 AM
This needs to be put to the Voters. If this is not done, which based on the Democrats track record here in Washington I highly doubt, then the infrastructure must first be put in place to support such unrealistic pie in the sky ideology.
No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Johnson

10/14/22 @ 6:19 AM
Stop mandating EV's. Let the people decide!
No attachments

Comment From: Steve Gordon

10/14/22 @ 6:18 AM
I oppose this mandate. As one of the largest commercial truck dealers in the state, I can tell you that the industry will not be ready on this timeline. Material sourcing, engineering, and practical real world conflicts with weight, range, and cost w...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

10/14/22 @ 6:18 AM
I'm retired and did not budget an EV purchase. and plans to remove electricity producing dams makes this unsustainable.
No attachments

Comment From: Loren Rupe

10/14/22 @ 6:17 AM
This law is ridiculous and I hope that it causes all Democrats to be tossed in the next election! You are just going to kill the auto industry in Washington as everyone will just buy their cars in Idaho or Montana! There isn't enough electricity to c...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Ashley LaPierre

10/14/22 @ 6:13 AM
I believe it is completely unreasonable to change all of our vehicles to electric by 2030. This is going to do far more harm than good to car lot owners and many people will just drive out of state to purchase a gas powered vehicle. Our energy grid c...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Andy Meyer

10/14/22 @ 6:13 AM
Electric vehicles are not the answer you are looking for. To costly for the average person. They take to many resources to produce and when you add up the carbon used to build one it takes on average 90000 miles of driving that car just to offset tha...↓
No attachments

Comment From: David Chandler

10/14/22 @ 6:11 AM
I do not support this mandate.
No attachments

Comment From: David Vigna

10/14/22 @ 6:06 AM
The proposed rule is wrong for Washington State as it is for California, and they will discover that the hard way. I am strongly against the proposed new rules and will lobby against adoption. Please allow the public freedom and preference for transp...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Catherine Phillips

10/14/22 @ 6:05 AM
At this time, we have very low emission gas powered cars that work wonderfully. We have the capacity to be energy independent if regulations for drilling from Biden's day one executive order were reversed. We need to be careful with our resources, bu...↓
Why aren't we looking into Nuclear power?!
No attachments

Comment From: Brian Schneider

10/14/22 @ 6:03 AM
Do NOT Make this mandate,it must be a choice We The People make,NOT Yours!!!!!
Remember You Work for US The People!
No attachments

Comment From: JERRY KESSELRING

10/14/22 @ 5:51 AM
There is nothing Green about EV's. This is short sighted, ill advised and going to be a bigger problem for the environment than what we are doing now. Technology and the marketplace will bring about change in a better way. Mandates don't work!
No attachments

Comment From: Rick Poyser

10/14/22 @ 5:51 AM
I am against this mandate
No attachments

Comment From: philip pollack

10/14/22 @ 5:45 AM
just another lie electric cars un affordable and dangeruos
No attachments

Comment From: Burt Kerlee

10/14/22 @ 5:35 AM
Do not want
No attachments

Comment From: Denyse Kerlee

10/14/22 @ 5:34 AM
Do not want
No attachments

Comment From: Barbara Musselman

10/14/22 @ 5:22 AM
Why do you blindly follow the worst run state in the nation? Think about transportation as a whole. You have no plan, only marching orders. Where are the charging stations? How will you transport goods, produce? How long will the batteries last when ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Nancy Briggs

10/14/22 @ 5:08 AM
This is just wrong wrowng wrong!!!! All political BS!!! What happens in cse of emergencies i.e. fires, floods & etc. & there's no where to "charge" your car???
No attachments

Comment From: Nick Gourley

10/14/22 @ 4:36 AM
This mandate is unconstitutional in an effort to control "The People". There is no sufficient infrastructure to support going full electric. Having a plan in place for a future transition to do so for the environment is desirable. Using this tacti...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Natalee PAnderson

10/14/22 @ 4:29 AM
Not everyone can afford an electric vehicle and they cause environmental damage with mining and battery waste. Our inferstructure is not set up to handle charging all those cars.
Doing so will add millions to an already overtaxed state.
No attachments

Comment From: Anthony Barba

10/14/22 @ 4:10 AM
Banning the purchase of gasoline vehicles only creates larger global problems. EV's are toxic to the environment and create 10x the pollution when compared to gas vehicles. No government should have the right to tell people how they should spend thei...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Herman Blegen

10/14/22 @ 4:10 AM
I do not support this, not enough electric grid to support all the cars, we do not need blackouts .
No attachments

Comment From: Paula Thornton

10/14/22 @ 4:08 AM
Opposition to proposed Chapter 173-423 WAC – Clean Vehicles Program, and Chapter 173-400 WAC, General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources.

There appears to be no transition plan proposed. That aside, as a resident I used to be in favor of green vehi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: paula layman

10/14/22 @ 3:58 AM
No to electric cars
No attachments

Comment From: Leah Williams

10/14/22 @ 3:42 AM
I do not support this mandate.
No attachments

Comment From: Alex Filipowicz

10/14/22 @ 3:37 AM
I do not support this. Expect over half the taxpayers in this state to relocate.
No attachments

Comment From: Jason Otava

10/14/22 @ 3:18 AM
Inslee is not the king of Washington. This is not what the people of Washington want, can afford and even power. This is nothing more than a way to further control the American people.
No attachments

Comment From: Edwin Nelson

10/14/22 @ 1:57 AM
How does Inslee plan on charging all those electric vehicles if he plans on pulling out the Snake river dams?
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

10/14/22 @ 1:08 AM
The majority of the state of Washington will not be able to comply with the mandate due to financial ability, length of commute, and power grid availability. Washington cannot just decree to follow California without increasing to a California pay ma...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Douglas Hale

10/14/22 @ 12:08 AM
We do not have the infrastructure to support a change to all electric cars by 2035. Without building larger power plants which will add to pollution and take decades to get built due to regulatory demands it just isn't feasible. How can anyone with A...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jerome Brown

10/13/22 @ 11:24 PM
I am totally opposed to a bunch of elitist know-it-all bureaucrats mandating that I must purchase an EV and cannot purchase personal transportation of my choice that fits my needs in my rural area.
No attachments

Comment From: Caulder Bradford

10/13/22 @ 10:34 PM
This is absolute lunacy. EV's will not solve any climate issues, and will instead exacerbate the problem by necessitating the mining of rare earth minerals, further taxing a strained electrical grid, and are being shown to underperform and under-live...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Betty Jo Cloninger

10/13/22 @ 10:12 PM
I can't even imagine how you would think that this is a viable American concept. What happened to people having choices? You have destroyed and moved so many people out of this state. Stop, enough tyranny let people live an honest life without mand...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Zack Zinter

10/13/22 @ 10:03 PM
Attempting to ban the purchase of gas-powered vehicles by the year 2035 is not only unconstitutional, it is based on a false economy. The processes for obtaining the materials needed to produce electric vehicles are not at all Earth-friendly. Neither...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Michael Herman

10/13/22 @ 9:45 PM
This proposal is total lunacy on the part or our Governor. First, EV are no greener than any compact gas vehicle currently on the market, and if you don't know what it takes to manufacture an EV and its battery, then you're just not doing the researc...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Elizabeth DeSpain

10/13/22 @ 9:44 PM
Who is building the power plants to support this?? Who is building all the charging stations? How will the current electrical grid support this??? It should be our choice!
No attachments

Comment From: Keith Phaff

10/13/22 @ 9:39 PM
This electric car mandate is unconstitutional and stupid and the average working person could not afford an electric vehicle the average cost is $60,000
No attachments

Comment From: Bob Walker

10/13/22 @ 9:32 PM
Why can't we be our own state? Why follow the lead of a loser like newsom. He has let California go to the dogs. The crime is out of hand the forests burn every year due to the lack of at forestry program to deal with over growth. And diseased tree...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Maureen Bernardy

10/13/22 @ 9:23 PM
Dear Sirs,
This extreme policy position is unsustainable. Remember that you are the employee, and we the people make decisions on what we want. If you leave this to the industry that has knowledge in this area, it will happen in due time. We are not r...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Peter Palmer

10/13/22 @ 9:21 PM
There is no current plan for the necessary infrastructure to allow this conversion to take place in this timeline and for evs to be practical for the majority of the motoring population. Aside from the initial cost of evs our grid is not prepared to ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Michael Johnson

10/13/22 @ 8:59 PM
Mandating that we have to go to EV is not doable for those of us who live below the poverty line. Hopefully the current governor is gone before then and this can be repealed.
No attachments

Comment From: Leslie Conard

10/13/22 @ 8:46 PM
I do not support the proposed clean vehicle program or general regulations for air pollution sources. Washington needs to back off. I don't need the state telling me what I can buy and drive.
No attachments

Comment From: Georgina Silver

10/13/22 @ 8:37 PM
To force everyone to have electric vehicles by 2035 is what a communist government would do to it's citizens. I live in the United States of America and the elected leaders are supposed to listen to the citizens and not those who line their pockets.
E...↓
Elections are always coming up so do the right thing for the everyday citizens of Washington state.
No attachments

Comment From: Forrest Strickland

10/13/22 @ 8:30 PM
Banning gas vehicles is insanity. The technology is not there in electric vehicles. Our power grid is insufficient. The pollution created making electric vehicles is worse than the problem you are trying to solve.
No attachments

Comment From: Sheryl Shattuck

10/13/22 @ 8:26 PM
I don't think this is a good ideal at all. With the amount of taxes we pay in this state we should have the choice of vehicles to drive.
Attachments:

Comment From: Barb Olson

10/13/22 @ 8:26 PM
I do not support this mandate. I have a 2021 hybrid Toyota Venza. We have chosen this, it is not the State of Washington/Gov. Inslee's choice to ram this down our throats! Not now not ever! We are not California!
No attachments

Comment From: William Berman

10/13/22 @ 8:25 PM
This is an assinine idea. It is an OBVIOUS power grab and attempt to take over a huge portion of the US economy (SOCIALISM!). Once you have effectively eliminated the gasoline and oil business, who is going to profit from selling the power to run peo...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

10/13/22 @ 8:24 PM
Making rules on this currently non-existent system is premature because the necessary number of recharging stations has not yet been determined, built, installed or tested. Nor is it known if Washington's electric power sources will be able to suppo...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Scott Waxman

10/13/22 @ 8:22 PM
NOOOO

The electrical infrastructure cannot handle it and its not feasbile. Just look at California with their brownouts and power outages. Don't hold us hostage and in our houses because we won't be able to produce enough energy to charge our cars t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Diane ehr

10/13/22 @ 8:19 PM
Gasoline vehicles are not the problem, the elitists are the problem, are they going to buy all Americans electric vehicles? I think not because they are trying to make this a socialist country!!!
No attachments

Comment From: Jeanie HertZ

10/13/22 @ 8:17 PM
This is ridiculous. We don't have the electric infrastructure to support all the electric cars you are calling for. And Washington's charging. Stations are few and far between. Besides that, what if we choose to drive to Montana!! We are not set up t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Paul Koester

10/13/22 @ 8:13 PM
I am against the proposed rulings. There are several types of power plants for automobiles arriving in the next few years that will surpass what is available now. These include more efficient gasoline, hybrid, and hydrogen. Electric Vehicles will ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Marylyn Swanson

10/13/22 @ 8:13 PM
This is an unrealistic law and an invasion on individuals rights.
No attachments

Comment From: David Steffen

10/13/22 @ 8:02 PM
This is not realistic! We don't have the electricity with our grid to make this happen.
Reality check needed!!!!
No attachments

Comment From: Tiffany Evans

10/13/22 @ 7:56 PM
I strongly OPPOSE any planned mandates to ban the purchase of all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. All Washington citizens should have the freedom to purchase gas-powered or electric vehicles. There should NEVER be a mandate on what a citizen can drive.
No attachments

Comment From: oly burnett

10/13/22 @ 7:56 PM
We live in a rural area. Electric vehicles would not meet our needs for transportation.
No attachments

Comment From: berhane sena

10/13/22 @ 7:56 PM
This is a threat to liberty and creativity in the automotive technology and science. Your huge toxic car batteries are not safe and creates filthy wealth to the the privileged few who know how to bride politicians and speculate the market. Moreover t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Steve Shives

10/13/22 @ 7:49 PM
You have no right to delegate what vehicles the public must buy.
No attachments

Comment From: Abby Bacon

10/13/22 @ 7:48 PM
Washington state SHOULD NOT adopt the California Clean Vehicle Program. The infrastructure is not established to support this program. The average electric vehicle is more expensive than the average wages in the state can afford. The power grid ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: KETTLE RIVER DEVELOPMENT & CON... (KRIS VAN ALLEN)

10/13/22 @ 7:48 PM
This is nothing but communism. We should be able to choose instead of mandating, it is all about control from the liberals that sit in their ivory towers.
No attachments

Comment From: Ray Garvey

10/13/22 @ 7:48 PM
From a scientific basis, clean diesel has drop for drop more power and fewer emissions than gas or propane. Battery power is the lowest power on the list. It merely shifts the power generation to an offsite location using a far less efficient fuel t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Charles Stiff

10/13/22 @ 7:42 PM
Newer fossil fuel vehicles are very clean burning. They last the consumer years with little maintenance. They are affordable and do not require a very expensive battery change that few can afford. Try pulling a fifth wheel trailer with an electric ve...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Erika Johnson

10/13/22 @ 7:41 PM
NOPE!
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Moberg

10/13/22 @ 7:40 PM
This will not only affect the poorest in our State, but there is insufficient power grid for the number of ev to plug in at roughly the same time. And there are some calling to remove dams, have we lost our minds? Absolutely one of the worst ideas.
No attachments

Comment From: Tanya Hurst

10/13/22 @ 7:38 PM
I do not support all electric for cars
No attachments

Comment From: Jean Gilbertson

10/13/22 @ 7:36 PM
Not ready for electric vehicles. They are NOT Green!!!

Hydrogen power is the answer with Hyundais Fuel cell vehicles.

Don't play copycat to Socialist CA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They are WRONG!!!!
No attachments

Comment From: Sandi King

10/13/22 @ 7:31 PM
I have no desire to have a electric vehicle at my age. To force people to drive one is not right.
No attachments

Comment From: Miguel Jaynes

10/13/22 @ 7:27 PM
As a free American it is my right to decide what vehicle or other things that I might decide is best for me. I don't need the government running every aspect of my life. I am a registered voter and I do vote.
No attachments

Comment From: Ryan Brumpton

10/13/22 @ 7:25 PM
This plan is totally unworkable. Similar ideology-driven laws have been disastrous in other states. The reality is EVs are still too costly and don't work for all drivers. Washington residents and businesses should be able to choose the vehicle that...↓
Stop thinking you know more about what the people of Washington need or want and come up with better ideas that are realistic.
We the people are fed up with the politicians in office.
No attachments

Comment From: George Prudden

10/13/22 @ 7:25 PM
Production of electric cars is not reliable enough to have a reliable flow of products to ban the sale of petroleum-powered cars. For many, if not most families, the cost of electric cars is far beyond their means. Requiring only electric cars to ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jusden Aumand

10/13/22 @ 7:23 PM
No on a mandate to only use electric vehicles.
No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Dumas

10/13/22 @ 7:22 PM
Please don't listen to this insane proposal! Our Government is losing its mind!
No attachments

Comment From: Jacob Deakins

10/13/22 @ 7:22 PM
The very fact that this has been proposed is asinine. There's very little infrastructure in place, it is likely not applicable and/or practical. There is no such thing as a zero emission vehicle as the energy has to come from some where. Instead of ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Michele Sackman

10/13/22 @ 7:21 PM
Washington should not be following any other state when it comes to electric vehicles. Washingtonians will buy electric vehicles if and when it makes sense for them and their families. Not because an unelected board in California says so. You are not...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Patrick Young

10/13/22 @ 7:21 PM
In order to achieve the goal of a ICE-Free state by 2035, all such vehicles must be replaced by then.
Please send me a full and complete detail how you will achieve this goal and where will you get the oil and energy to replace such a feat? I have yet...↓
NO ON Chapter 173-423 WAC and Chapter 173-400 WAC.
No attachments

Comment From: Tonya Gear

10/13/22 @ 7:19 PM
I do not support requiring electric cars only. They are no better for the environment in the long run than gas/diesel powered vehicles.It is unrealistic and unconstitutional to force citizens in a "free" country such as ours to purchase what we don't...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Charles Arnold

10/13/22 @ 7:19 PM
I DO NOT support the initiative to ban the purchase of gasoline powered vehicles by 2035. The state and nation will burn more fossil fuels to include coal to power the additional power plants to produce the electricity needed for this. Again, I DO NO...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Thomas Buinger

10/13/22 @ 7:18 PM
Let's have Washington be our own independent state without the losing Democrats in California telling us how to live.
No attachments

Comment From: Kenneth Beckman

10/13/22 @ 7:18 PM
Your following California's lead on electric only after 2035 is not attainable. You will not have the infrastructure to support the numbers. You are living in lolly land thinking it will, or you'll tax us to death! These are not green cars. Look at t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Rick Pratt

10/13/22 @ 7:18 PM
Please stop this ridiculous idea. Electric vehicles will never be right for everyone! The west coast has had rolling blackouts during periods of hi electricity consumption for years. We have nowhere near the generating capacity we need now, we certai...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Nichole Emrey

10/13/22 @ 7:17 PM
Uhh didnt you all lawmakers see that CA governor recently told EV owners not to charge their cars because of the power grid and having rolling blackouts. My friend had an EV drove from FL to D.C. every month and he only could drive 2.5 hours and had ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Michael Heinisch

10/13/22 @ 7:17 PM
Stop pushing us to be like California, we don't want their policies or politics. For those of us who live in apartments or rent condos, we don't and will not have the infrastructure to charge vehicles if our only options are to purchase an electric ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Dr. Rodrigo Murataya

10/13/22 @ 7:13 PM
I do not support eliminating the sale of all gas cars by 2035. It seems to me that it is premature to impose that kind of requirement so quick. Let's get the electric vehicles here first and make sure they provide the service we need. After this,...↓

It's like getting a job first before quitting the old one.

Dr. Rodrigo Murataya
509-728-3914
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Millbauer

10/13/22 @ 7:13 PM
Mandating EV's by 2035 is irresponsible and a hardship for too many. It's un American
No attachments

Comment From: JOHN FOX

10/13/22 @ 7:11 PM
Absolutely do not approve this. We clearly don't need a ridiculous law like this until we have the infrastructure needed to support it.
You people are sooo out of touch it's embarrassing. I worked over 25 years for an automotive mfg co. They will all ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: James Engle

10/13/22 @ 7:11 PM
This is an unrealistic expectation at this time, particularly when we are in recession and money is very tight. Our income is only Social Security at this time and an electric vehicle is totally unrealistic from a cost perspective. I must believe tha...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Richard Fogle

10/13/22 @ 7:09 PM
Mandating EV sales without either the infrastructure to support them, or the EV's themselves have similar capabilities to their fossil fueled counterparts is irresponsible at best, possibly criminal. I do hereby oppose any such mandate and urge you ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: JoLynn Winsberg

10/13/22 @ 7:08 PM
Use ur head. Pull it out of ur ass FIRST. DO NOT TELL ME WHAT VEHICLE I AM GOING TO DRIVE. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? Fuck you and FUCK UR ELECTRIC CAR FUCKING BULLSHIT. FUCK THE FUCK OFF.
No attachments

Comment From: Julie Stuht

10/13/22 @ 7:07 PM
As a taxpayer I want you to ban the mandate to own electric vehicles by 2035. It is unrealistic and causes an economic disaster. You can't force people to buy vehicles they can't afford. There are other issues involved with forcing this upon citizens...↓
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]