Rulemaking - Clean Vehicles Program and General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources

1425 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Michael Lampi

10/18/22 @ 12:22 PM
ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make affordable and economical EVs more available to all. It will save drivers billions o...↓

We want 100% Clean Cars by 2030!
No attachments

Comment From: Katherine Woolverton

10/18/22 @ 12:15 PM
I support updating the proposed changes to Chapter 173-423 WAC – Clean Vehicles Program, and Chapter 173-400 WAC, General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources. We need to move vehicles off of fossil fuels as fast as possible to avoid the most catast...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Dykstra

10/18/22 @ 12:14 PM
The gas engine ban is unrealistic and would severely impact the rural community I live in. I also would like to add that the environmental impact from mining lithium is detrimental to the air and soil on which it is extracted. I am 100% against going...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Colin May

10/18/22 @ 12:11 PM
Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation

ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make affordable and economical EVs ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Billy Kemp

10/18/22 @ 11:53 AM
Subject: Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation

ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make affordable and econo...↓

This regulation is very achievable by all car manufactures and state governments. The inflationary Reduction Act has provided the necessary groundwork to move the US to an emission free auto industry by 2035 and removing all ties to OPEC.
No attachments

Comment From: kathy schroeder

10/18/22 @ 11:49 AM
Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars and this has to be a priority if we want our children and grandchildren to enjoy clean air. By committing Washington state...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Truck & Engine Manufacturers A... (Timothy French)

10/18/22 @ 11:44 AM
The Truck and Engine Manufacturers Association hereby submits its comments regarding the Department of Ecology's proposed adoption of regulatory amendments to implement Washington's opt-in to the California Air Resources Board's Omnibus Low-NOx Regul...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Rosemary Sweeney

10/18/22 @ 11:15 AM
WAC 173-400 and WAC 173-423-WAC will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, they will help make electric vehicles more affordable and available to all. Under...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Julie Stone

10/18/22 @ 11:06 AM
ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make affordable and economical EVs more available to all. It will save drivers billions o...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Glen Young

10/18/22 @ 11:04 AM
We need a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. The ACC II will help make affordable and economical EVs more available to all, saving EV drivers billions of dollars on fuel and maintenance. Committing Washington state to a g...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Phil Evans

10/18/22 @ 11:02 AM
Hello,

I'm writing to ask you to please approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation.

ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will ...↓

Thank you,
Phil Evans
Seattle
No attachments

Comment From: Michael Romero

10/18/22 @ 11:01 AM
Good job ban all gas vehicles sooner..
No attachments

Comment From: Bruce Benton

10/18/22 @ 10:56 AM
ACC II is critical in supporting the transition to EVs in San Juan County. Vehicle emissions threaten to destroy our fragile Island environment. They are causing ocean acidification which is destroying Western Washington's shellfish industry, one of ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: w williams

10/18/22 @ 10:50 AM
By committing WA to be fossil-fuel-free for our automobiles, ACC II will help make EVs more available and economical to all. It will save state drivers and taxpayers billions of dollars on fuel and maintenance, while lessening the air, water, and cli...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Bruce Rathbone

10/18/22 @ 10:47 AM
ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make affordable and economical EVs more available to all. It will save drivers billions o...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Brian Allen

10/18/22 @ 10:45 AM
Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation

ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make affordable and economical EVs ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Anita Shelton

10/18/22 @ 10:33 AM
Approve the Advanced Clean Cars III legislation! Climate change is rapidly accelerating. We need to transition to Electric Cars asap!
No attachments

Comment From: elyette weinstein

10/18/22 @ 10:26 AM
Subject: Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation

My husband and I are senior citizens susceptible to unhealthy air. As you know, given global warming, the air has been unhealthy in Olympia and other communities in our state. Many senio...↓

Please take the steps noted in this comment so that we can make some progress toward a healthier environment.

ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make affordable and economical EVs more available to all. It will save drivers billions of dollars on fuel and maintenance. It will diminish the air, water, and climate pollution that disproportionately impacts communities of color and low-income communities. We want 100% Clean Cars by 2030!
No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Wildermuth

10/18/22 @ 10:24 AM
Please approve the the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation
This rule will help us get to the emissions-free transportation future that is key to getting carbon emissions down and saving us all from the worsening effects of climate change. It wi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Bill Wozniak

10/18/22 @ 10:24 AM
My wife and I are totally against being forced to change to EV's.
No attachments

Comment From: Clif Swiggett

10/18/22 @ 10:23 AM
Subject: Please Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation

Washington State needs to help accelerate the transition to a net zero future. ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By com...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Deborah Colombi

10/18/22 @ 10:16 AM
This proposal is not realistic. It will be extremely punitive for businesses and families alike. We need to protect the environment but not at the complete destruction of families and the businesses that employ them.
No attachments

Comment From: Peter Bryn

10/18/22 @ 10:12 AM
Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation

Society needs to accelerate its move to zero emissions as soon as possible. The first step in this process is with governments, to create the economic incentives, regulations, mandates, etc. that ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Geoff Browning

10/18/22 @ 10:12 AM
Dear Mr. Adam Saul,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopting Advanced Clean Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washing...↓

These rules are critical to reduce air pollution, improve public health, protect frontline communities, and increase access to the benefits of electricity as a transportation fuel. Over four million people in Washington live or work near transportation corridors that are exposed to harmful, high levels of diesel emissions, especially communities of color and low-income communities. Exposure to toxic tailpipe pollution such as NOx, Particulate Matter (PM), and Ozone is linked to higher rates of premature death, cancer, heart disease, and breathing problems like asthma in kids and adults.

On top of the climate benefits, adopting ACCII allows zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) to be more accessible and affordable for consumers and saves them money in fuel and maintenance with the typical cost of electricity for charging an EV equivalent to $1 per gallon of gasoline.

In addition to ACCII, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule and the fleet reporting requirement together, will help Washington experience statewide health benefits and identify trucking operations that would provide the greatest relief in air pollution exposure to overburdened communities.

I am counting on Ecology to lead the transition into an all-electric future and by doing so, ensure an equitable and just transportation future for Washington!

I strongly support the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule and thank Ecology for its hard work.

Sincerely,

Geoff Browning
No attachments

Comment From: Sarah Fischer

10/18/22 @ 10:10 AM
Washington citizens support moving beyond gasoline as fast as possible. ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make affordable a...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Amy Anonymous

10/18/22 @ 10:05 AM
I support including the Advanced Clean Cars II and low-NOx Omnibus rules in Chapter 173-423 WAC. ACC II will accelerate a quick, smooth, and efficient transition to clean electric cars in Washington. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future,...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Mr. Shelley Dahlgren, PhD

10/18/22 @ 9:59 AM
Subject: Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation


I have my second EV since 2011. This one goes 220 miles on a charge. This cars have been great for my retirement since I have no scheduled maintenance and recharge at home.

ACC II will ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Brian Duncan

10/18/22 @ 9:59 AM
I support the clean cars by 2030 goal, and 2035 legal deadline, and intervening deadlines for progress toward the goal. Let's build the infrastructure asap for the necessary, and desirable transition!
Let's follow through!
Thanks.
Brian in Seattle
No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Gallagher

10/18/22 @ 9:56 AM
Please Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation

The Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) regulation will help accelerate a quick, smooth, and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC ...↓

Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Hopkins

10/18/22 @ 9:55 AM
Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation

ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make affordable and economical EVs ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: David Dunbar

10/18/22 @ 9:54 AM
I fully support the measures to transition to EVs. As the Limiting Greehouse Gas Emissions Act found, to prevent the worst consequences of global warming we must make precarious reductions in ghg emissions and do so as soon as possible. It will be ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: TYLER FOLSOM

10/18/22 @ 9:51 AM
This is totally the right way to go. I have been driving electric in the city since 2015. I appreciate that I am essentially paying $1 a gallon instead of $6 and am not contributing to climate change. I look forward to replacing my second car (hybrid...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Charles Halpern

10/18/22 @ 9:49 AM
Subject: Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation
ACC II promotes a quick, efficient, and critically important transition to from gas- to electric-powoered cars. By committing WA to a gas-free future, ACC II will make EVs more affordabl...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Toniann Reading

10/18/22 @ 9:42 AM
Subject: Approve the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation

ACC II will help accelerate a quick, smooth and efficient transition to clean DESPERATELY NEEDED electric cars. By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make a...↓
Toniann Reading, Sultan, WA
No attachments

Comment From: Michael Ruby

10/18/22 @ 9:39 AM
The Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Regulation will help accelerate an efficient transition to clean electric vehicles. ACC II will help make affordable and economical EVs more available to all. It will save drivers money on fuel and maintenance. It ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

10/18/22 @ 9:17 AM
You are stomping on our rights by shoving these insane mandates down our throats. A mandate is unconstitutional!
No attachments

Comment From: Sarah Dalrymple

10/18/22 @ 8:36 AM
The EV and gas engine ban is unrealistic and unfair to rural communities and working families.
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Vanderburg

10/18/22 @ 8:23 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopting Advanced Clean Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washington. I could list a...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Todd Anderson

10/18/22 @ 7:16 AM
My wife and I are not interested in purchasing a EV nor will we be interested by the proposed dates. As a Washington resident I don't think it's fair to force the sale of EV's for people that either are not interested or can afford or it just doesn'...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kelly Haugh

10/18/22 @ 6:20 AM
Mandating zero-emission vehicles and banning gasoline powered vehicles would be extremely detrimental to our state. Many are already moving out of WA due to legislation and regulation mandates. This transition to EVs should be a gradual ramp-up by CH...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Margaret-Mary Morgan

10/18/22 @ 3:45 AM
I understand the need to have less gas powered vehicles however, I am not in favor of 100% ban on gas powered vehicles.
1. As of right now if we wanted to take a long trip in an electric car how often would we have to stop to recharge? and how long ...↓
2. What if there is a power outage? A big wind storm could knock power out for several days. How would we recharge? Public charging station - that would have a huge line?
I take care of my aging mother - I can not risk not having a vehicle that is not charged.

I feel this is a bill that is being shoved down our throats because it is our governors beliefs to be "green". Again, I am all for trying to be green but at this banning gas powered vehicles is not a good option.
No attachments

Comment From: Wayne Olsen

10/18/22 @ 1:30 AM
Dear Adam Saul,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology adopting Advanced Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washington.

I strongly suppo...↓

The most important reason to transition rapidly to all-electric highway transportation is carbon emission reduction. As a 30-year retired Naval oceanographer and meteorologist, followed by 9 years at Pierce College teaching these subjects, including climate change, I am convinced by the overwhelming scientific evidence that the world, meaning ALL of us, must take every opportunity we can to reduce our carbon emissions as rapidly as possible. The Paris Climate Accord international goals, our national goals, and State goals of 50% reduction of emissions by 2030 and at least net-zero emissions by 2050 must be achieved if we have ANY chance of saving the world as we know it for our descendants. These goals cannot be met without near-elimination of fossil fuel use in highway transportation.

As a new EV owner, I know that transitioning to EVs makes financial sense for the consumer as well. Other than the battery, it now costs car-makers much less to make an EV than an internal combustion engine (ICE) car. Thus, as competition among carmakers heats up, prices will come down within a few years and EVs ultimately will be less costly to buy than ICE cars. EVs have fewer moving parts to break, no routine oil changes, no tailpipe to emit NOx, and no catalytic converter to have stolen. I never go to gas stations anymore, and I normally charge my car in my garage overnight. I get about 4 miles per kwhr, which equates to about 105 miles compared to the normal cost of a gallon of gas. And I can get a full recharge at a fast level 3 station in about 18 minutes. Once our nation transitions to EVs, we will be less vulnerable to rapid gas price fluctuations and inflation caused by international events such as Russia vs Ukraine.

I applaud Ecology's efforts to lead the transition into an all-electric future and by doing so, ensure an equitable and just transportation future for Washington. Thank you!

Sincerely,

Wayne L. Olsen
Captain, USN (Retired)
No attachments

Comment From: Phyllis Volin

10/17/22 @ 11:54 PM
I have uploaded a word document containing my comments. If there is a problem reading my comments, call me at 253-735-1426.
Attachments:

Comment From: Ken Dull

10/17/22 @ 11:52 PM
Dear Adam Saul,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopting Advanced Clean Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washington....↓

These rules are critical to reduce air pollution, improve public health, protect frontline communities, and increase access to the benefits of electricity as a transportation fuel. Over four million people in Washington live or work near transportation corridors that are exposed to harmful, high levels of diesel emissions, especially communities of color and low-income communities. Exposure to toxic tailpipe pollution such as NOx, Particulate Matter (PM), and Ozone is linked to higher rates of premature death, cancer, heart disease, and breathing problems like asthma in kids and adults.

On top of the climate benefits, adopting ACCII allows zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) to be more accessible and affordable for consumers and saves them money in fuel and maintenance with the typical cost of electricity for charging an EV equivalent to $1 per gallon of gasoline.

In addition to ACCII, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule and the fleet reporting requirement together, will help Washington experience statewide health benefits and identify trucking operations that would provide the greatest relief in air pollution exposure to overburdened communities.

I am counting on Ecology to lead the transition into an all-electric future and by doing so, ensure an equitable and just transportation future for Washington!

I strongly support the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule and thank Ecology for its hard work.

Sincerely,

Ken Dull
No attachments

Comment From: Andrea Menin

10/17/22 @ 11:50 PM
Dear Adam Saul,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopting Advanced Clean Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washington....↓

These rules are critical to reduce air pollution, improve public health, protect frontline communities, and increase access to the benefits of electricity as a transportation fuel. Over four million people in Washington live or work near transportation corridors that are exposed to harmful, high levels of diesel emissions, especially communities of color and low-income communities. Exposure to toxic tailpipe pollution such as NOx, Particulate Matter (PM), and Ozone is linked to higher rates of premature death, cancer, heart disease, and breathing problems like asthma in kids and adults.

On top of the climate benefits, adopting ACCII allows zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) to be more accessible and affordable for consumers and saves them money in fuel and maintenance with the typical cost of electricity for charging an EV equivalent to $1 per gallon of gasoline.

In addition to ACCII, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule and the fleet reporting requirement together, will help Washington experience statewide health benefits and identify trucking operations that would provide the greatest relief in air pollution exposure to overburdened communities.

I am counting on Ecology to lead the transition into an all-electric future and by doing so, ensure an equitable and just transportation future for Washington!

I strongly support the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule and thank Ecology for its hard work.

Sincerely,

Andrea Menin
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Qualley

10/17/22 @ 8:51 PM
There is no possibility that I would ever be able to afford an electric car. I am retired and enjoying my retirement without having to worry about getting an electric and all that goes with it. I hope there will be no laws made in Washington that wi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kenneth Joy

10/17/22 @ 8:49 PM
These effects of these changes is wide reaching and perhaps not enough thought has gone into predicting "unforseen" consequences. Local business owners will completely struggle to meet their customers' needs. Painters, roofers, well drillers, farmers...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Esther Kronenberg

10/17/22 @ 7:22 PM
The world is quickly moving away from the use of fossil fuels as the disastrous effects of climate change become increasingly obvious, and our national security increasingly perilous.
The economic costs to consumers of fossil fuel use will also become...↓

I think Washington should be a leader in the new economy that is coming into existence, like it or not. We need to protect the public health, grow a sustainable economy and soften the worst effects of climate change.

That's why I urge you to adopt the strong version of the California motor vehicle standards under consideration to move our transition to electric vehicles forward, help preserve the climate for our descendants, and make it safer and pleasanter to live and breathe.

Thank you
No attachments

Comment From: Lorren Cooper

10/17/22 @ 6:57 PM
How do you think the power grid is going to handle all these EV's ?? Look what happened in California this summer. How are people on fixed income going to pay to have a charging system installed in their garage ?? How about low income people? Who's g...↓
This is about as STUPID as Inslee's new gas tax next year. Or as STUPID as Inslee wanting to breach the damn on the lower Snake River.
No attachments

Comment From: Patrick Husting

10/17/22 @ 6:25 PM
I understand the need you want to move to electric, but I think you also know that there is not enough rare-earth minerals to replace all vehicles in Washington state, let a lone the entire United States. Producing batteries is much more toxic than ...↓

If you switch to a hybrid model, then you can produce 3x as many vehicles than you could with electric at a much lower cost for everyone.
No attachments

Comment From: Jo Estes

10/17/22 @ 5:56 PM
I do not support the EV MANDATE. It is discriminatory legislation and will have disastrous consequences. Don't do it.
No attachments

Comment From: Kristin Lynett

10/17/22 @ 5:46 PM
Please adopt the rules as proposed. Manufacturers have enough time to implement them. Washingtonians want these vehicles, and these rules will enable more choices faster than industry would provide on their own.
No attachments

Comment From: Ballard Ambulance (SCOTT BALLARD)

10/17/22 @ 5:23 PM
As the owner of an ambulance services that is now in it's 56th year, we currently don't see this as being possible with current technology. Our ambulances are often times running hours & hours at a time and there is simply no way to stop & charge the...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kurt Erlanson

10/17/22 @ 5:06 PM
I support the rule(s) which would mandate a transition from motor vehicles powered by internal combustion engines to electric powered motor vehicles by 2035.
Since 2014, I have been depending on electric vehicles for most of my transportation needs. ...↓
Of course, the real issue here is climate change. There is no way that our planet can avoid the worst consequences of climate change unless we all cease the burning of fossil fuels. The use of fossil fuels for transportation is the biggest single source of greenhouse gases for us in the USA!!
No attachments

Comment From: Albert Kegley

10/17/22 @ 5:01 PM
I feel the State of Washington don't have the electrical grid to support EV vehicles. The EV mandate and gas engine ban are unrealistic and it will cost billions to implement. It will unfairly penalize businesses, and people that live and work in rur...↓
Thank you for your consideration. Albert Kegley
No attachments

Comment From: D Trimble

10/17/22 @ 4:26 PM
This is a very significant action. It should not be processed by an agency as rule making. It should be legislated and voted on as a bill. There is no urgency argument as these bans don't take place for years. Please stop this undemocratic process an...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Coltura (MATTHEW METZ)

10/17/22 @ 4:01 PM
We submit the following comments in addition to those made in the letter we co-signed with Climate Solutions, NWEC, WEC, WPSR, NRDC, Sierra Club and others.

ACC II is a crucial step towards a gasoline free future. By joining with California and other ...↓

By committing the state to a gasoline-free future, ACC II will help make affordable and economical EVs more available to all. It will save drivers billions of dollars on fuel and maintenance. It will diminish the air, water, and climate pollution that disproportionately impacts communities of color and low-income communities, causing elevated rates of asthma, cancers and pathogens such as COVID. It will also benefit these communities by keeping the dollars that we now spend on imported oil right here in Washington, to be used on economic improvement, clean mobility programs and job creation.

Fueling with electricity costs less than one-fourth as much as gasoline. EV sticker prices are forecast to be lower than those of comparable gas cars by the mid-2020s.

The transition to electric vehicles is essential to meeting state climate change targets, and will substantially lower gasoline and oil released from motor vehicles and gas stations into Puget Sound and other waterways, thereby reducing a significant threat to orca, salmon and other marine life.

Washingtonians strongly support an all EV future. That is why by a 59-35 margin, Washingtonians support 100% EVs by 2030. The Washington legislature passed a 2030 goal for 100% electrification twice.

Let's do ACC II, and then move even faster to 100% electrification by 2030. It's what the climate and the people of Washington demand.

Matthew Metz
Co-Executive Director
No attachments

Comment From: Greg Tudor

10/17/22 @ 3:51 PM
I strongly support this rulemaking to phase in electric vehicles over time. I only wish we could make it happen faster. Our family has had two plug-in cars since 2018, a battery EV and a plug-in hybrid which we mostly drive locally. Charging the cars...↓

This weekend has been disturbingly hot and smoky--it's clear to me that climate change is happening now, shifting our seasons and endangering our health. We need to stop burning fossil fuels in every way possible, and transportation is the biggest source of climate changing pollution in Washington State. I also appreciate the Department's work to reduce truck pollution--our house is located just two blocks from I-5 and I know the diesel fumes and soot are in the air because our porch railings get covered with black grit. Please help clean up pollution from trucks by adopting the heavy-duty omnibus rule.

Thank you for your work to help clean up Washington's air and protect our kids from the worst possible impacts of climate change.
No attachments

Comment From: Steve Fisher

10/17/22 @ 3:29 PM
I am a strong proponent of electric vehicles and I support the Department of Ecology adopting Advanced Clean Clean Cars II.

I am a 4 year Tesla owner and my car odometer just hit 40,000 miles. That is a lot of gas not burned and not poisoning our air...↓

I know my Tesla Model 3 (currently priced at $47,000, not including taxes) is not affordable for most, but that is not the point. US legacy automakers don't want to go bankrupt. Affordable cars will be made, not because of regulations, but because of the demand from consumers. Once someone has driven an electric car, they will never want to go back (most people anyway).

I am a frequent visitor to Chelan County where my electricity cost is under $0.03 per kilowatt hour (KWh), which about 1/3 the cost I pay Puget Sound Energy (between $0.09 and $0.11 per KWh). During my last visit to Chelan at the end of September, I spent $2.00 to fill up my car for the 190 mile return drive to Bellevue. After spending $2.00 to fill up your "tank" with electricity, there is no going back to gasoline. It's game over. Eastern Washington EV owners will be the envy of us "on the coast."

Thank you to everyone at Ecology for supporting the inevitable future of electric vehicles. Please don't let naysayers stand in the way of the future. They actually don't know what they are missing (yet).

Very Truly Yours,

Steve Fisher
No attachments

Comment From: Elena Rumiantseva

10/17/22 @ 3:19 PM
Dear Mr. Adam Saul,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopting Advanced Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washington.
Th...↓
On top of the climate benefits, adopting ACCII allows zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) to be more accessible and affordable for consumers and saves them money in fuel and maintenance with the typical cost of electricity for charging an EV equivalent to $1 per gallon of gasoline.
In addition to ACCII, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule and the fleet reporting requirement will help Washington experience statewide health benefits and identify trucking operations that would provide the greatest relief in air pollution exposure to overburdened communities.
I am counting on Ecology to lead the transition into an all-electric future and by doing so, ensure an equitable and just transportation future for Washington! I strongly support the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule and thank Ecology for its hard work.
Sincerely, Elena Rumiantseva 3807 West Lake Sammamish Pkwy NE Redmond, WA 98052
No attachments

Comment From: James Mulcare

10/17/22 @ 3:18 PM
Dear Mr. Adam Saul,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopting Advanced Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washington.
Th...↓
On top of the climate benefits, adopting ACCII allows zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) to be more accessible and affordable for consumers and saves them money in fuel and maintenance with the typical cost of electricity for charging an EV equivalent to $1 per gallon of gasoline.
In addition to ACCII, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule and the fleet reporting requirement will help Washington experience statewide health benefits and identify trucking operations that would provide the greatest relief in air pollution exposure to overburdened communities.
I am counting on Ecology to lead the transition into an all-electric future and by doing so, ensure an equitable and just transportation future for Washington!
I strongly support the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule and thank Ecology for its hard work. Sincerely, James Mulcare1110 Benjamin St Clarkston, WA 99403
No attachments

Comment From: CE Nickerson

10/17/22 @ 2:59 PM
I didn't vote for my state to be ruled by the governor of California. If Gov Inslee can't do his job he needs to resign and let some one take over that can,
No attachments

Comment From: Christensen Inc (Tony Christensen)

10/17/22 @ 1:23 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Michael Burley

10/17/22 @ 12:14 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Matt Luensmann

10/17/22 @ 12:13 PM
No thanks to this. It's not good for the economy or the average person. Definitely reconsider following California into the black pit.
No attachments

Comment From: Michael A Ciuffo

10/17/22 @ 11:53 AM
Dear Adam Saul,

The Clean Cars II and Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rules are critical for reducing emissions and improving the health of millions of Washingtonians who live, work, or play near major transportation corridors. In addition to the obvious g...↓

I also see vehicle electrification as a great boon for lower income families. They require lower maintenance, and for those able to charge at home, it is much easier to budget around a steady electricity cost than wildly fluctuating gasoline prices. I see many highly efficient gasoline vehicles (Prius, etc) around my neighborhood, and I think their owners would switch to EVs quickly if it weren't for the steep purchase price. I think the incentive and rebate portions of the ACCII will help greatly in this regard.

I strongly support the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule and thank Ecology for its hard work.

Sincerely,

Michael Ciuffo
No attachments

Comment From: Kasey Frix

10/17/22 @ 11:35 AM
Securing energy independence for our state and country is more important than regulations that will negatively impact working people.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

10/17/22 @ 11:04 AM
Why are hybrid vehicles not incentivized or included? They seem like the more reasonable option, smaller battery and minerals, half the emissions of an ICE, no need for charging stations. Ecology should consider agency request legislation to include ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Daniel Wright

10/17/22 @ 10:35 AM
I do not support higher gas prices as a result of a carbon tax. I consider it an infringement on my rights as a US citizen to purchase any goods and services from the marketplace to acquire a gas powered automobile or any attempt by Washington State...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Gettman's Rod Inc.

10/17/22 @ 10:18 AM
Electric cars are not affordable and will kill huge industries attached to petrol cars
No attachments

Comment From: Dan Gettman

10/17/22 @ 10:13 AM
Electric cars are a political sham
No attachments

Comment From: D Prince

10/17/22 @ 10:09 AM
I am against this rule. Look at CA that already is asking people not to charge their electric cars because the system can't handle it. We are not ready for this and need lots more time. It is also not environmentally friendly since you are not able t...↓
They are still to expensive, not able to drive far, have to find places to recharge.
No attachments

Comment From: Washington State Potato Commis... (Matt Harris)

10/17/22 @ 8:50 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Ron Tanzi

10/17/22 @ 8:07 AM
As a 7 year owner and user of an EV, I completely support the rule changes to Chapter 173-423 WAC – Clean Vehicles Program, and Chapter 173-400 WAC, General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources. But I am also disappointed that there is not more dedi...↓
Thank you for receiving comments.
Ron Tanzi
5509 5th Ave NE
Seattle, WA 98105
rtomtanzi@gmail.com
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Graff

10/17/22 @ 7:53 AM
I'm against making gas powered engines illegal. EV's are very expensive. We have two in our garage with chargers that are expensive to install. Lovely cars but are not good for everything a vehicle is needed. Average wage earners will not be able ...↓
This does not add up to a positive environment reason for imposing EV on every one.
Vote against the requirements to force EV on everyone.
No attachments

Comment From: David Glick

10/17/22 @ 7:38 AM
Dear Adam Saul,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopting Advanced Clean Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washington....↓
These rules are critical to reduce air pollution, improve public health, protect frontline communities, and increase access to the benefits of electricity as a transportation fuel. Over four million people in Washington live or work near transportation corridors that are exposed to harmful, high levels of diesel emissions, especially communities of color and low-income communities. Exposure to toxic tailpipe pollution such as NOx, Particulate Matter (PM), and Ozone is linked to higher rates of premature death, cancer, heart disease, and breathing problems like asthma in kids and adults.
On top of the climate benefits, adopting ACCII allows zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) to be more accessible and affordable for consumers and saves them money in fuel and maintenance with the typical cost of electricity for charging an EV equivalent to $1 per gallon of gasoline.
In addition to ACCII, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule and the fleet reporting requirement together, will help Washington experience statewide health benefits and identify trucking operations that would provide the greatest relief in air pollution exposure to overburdened communities.
I am counting on Ecology to lead the transition into an all-electric future and by doing so, ensure an equitable and just transportation future for Washington!
I strongly support the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule and thank Ecology for its hard work.
Sincerely,
Dave Glick
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Miller

10/17/22 @ 7:18 AM
Regarding Chapter 173-423 WAC – Clean Vehicles Program, and Chapter 173-400 WAC, General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources.

Hello
I fully support all efforts to make automobile use have as little environmental impact as possible. I also want to ma...↓

As a recent (non-Tesla) purchaser of an EV, I realize that there are inconveniences and steep learning curves that one encounters initially on obtaining an EV. I urge Ecology to make the transition to EV use as painless and fun as possible, which can be done with the input of people, like me, who have made the transition.

Thanks for listening.
No attachments

Comment From: Debbie Birkland

10/17/22 @ 6:56 AM
Mandating electric vehicles is not what is needed by the people of Washington. The infrastructure can not handle the requirements of such a mandate. The cost of EV vehicles is more than most Washingtonians can afford. Mandates are not the best way ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Shelan Aldridge

10/17/22 @ 6:45 AM
Creating a mandate to require electric vehicles without the proper infrastructure in place first is short-sighted. Furthermore, the cost of electric vehicles makes them inaccessible for many residents of Washington whose incomes fall below the median...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Joyce Connolly

10/16/22 @ 7:41 PM
Hello,
I am writing to explain why I do not support this mandatory conversion to all EV vehicles in the state of Washington by 2035. First of all, this state nor the rest of the USA have a power grid that is updated to be able to sustain everyone cha...↓

Sincerely,
Joyce Connolly
Bremerton, WA
No attachments

Comment From: Tom Moorman

10/16/22 @ 7:32 PM
mDear Adam Saul,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopting Advanced Clean Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washington...↓
These rules are critical to reduce air pollution, improve public health, protect frontline communities, and increase access to the benefits of electricity as a transportation fuel. Over four million people in Washington live or work near transportation corridors that are exposed to harmful, high levels of diesel emissions, especially communities of color and low-income communities. Exposure to toxic tailpipe pollution such as NOx, Particulate Matter (PM), and Ozone is linked to higher rates of premature death, cancer, heart disease, and breathing problems like asthma in kids and adults.
On top of the climate benefits, adopting ACCII allows zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) to be more accessible and affordable for consumers and saves them money in fuel and maintenance with the typical cost of electricity for charging an EV equivalent to $1 per gallon of gasoline.
In addition to ACCII, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule and the fleet reporting requirement together, will help Washington experience statewide health benefits and identify trucking operations that would provide the greatest relief in air pollution exposure to overburdened communities.
I am counting on Ecology to lead the transition into an all-electric future and by doing so, ensure an equitable and just transportation future for Washington!
I strongly support the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule and thank Ecology for its hard work.
Sincerely,
Tom Moorman
No attachments

Comment From: Grant Alford

10/16/22 @ 5:54 PM
My Name is Grant Alford, and I am a professional automotive technician, diagnostician, and prior certified emissions specialist by the department of ecology in Washington State. I believe I have some credibility to my opinions as I fixed the cars tha...↓

I understand there is much in the way of improvements being made to these electric passenger vehicles everyday, but I don't think we can assume they are as flawless as they're being portrayed. The law of conservation should be enough for people to consider: if we have already produced usable vehicles - we are not being carbon neutral by junking them and continuing to pollute more by creating new cars to replace them. Not to mention the materials used to produce electric vehicles are much less safe and reusable than what we have with hybrid or gasoline powered vehicles. I don't think I even need to talk about the fact our grid is barely powered from renewable energy sources.

Ultimately I am very doubtful the State is making a decision that is truly in the best interest of it's own citizens. It's feels to me that if a state really did care about the topics of pollution and emissions, that they wouldn't have made decisions such as eliminating something as important as a clean air emissions program.

We as a state - let alone a country, cannot fully convert to electric vehicles at the rate we are going. One example from the model state of California: Just in the last year during heat waves. The officials asked the residents and encouraged them to not use their air conditioners at their normal capacity for the sake of the grid. Well if that's the current state of our model: we will quickly see the ramifications of this on our grid if the majority of people are forced to own electric vehicles.

Unfortunately I am not convinced the state of Washington is actually interested in hearing legitimate evidence that shows how detrimental mass electric vehicles like this would be. It does appear however, this would be an incredible opportunity for the state to acquire more money from it's residents and perhaps the federal government.

In Virginia among other states, registered low emissions vehicles such as hybrids have access to HOV lanes, which in turn can significantly cut down on idle emissions of vehicles sitting in traffic. Similarly when renewing your tabs, you are basically given an automatic tax credit which incentivizes people to purchase these types of vehicles. Well for such a "green state" our version of those laws/policies do not even compare. The best we have is bizarre time restraints and model year restrictions for tax credits on the same types of cars here in WA. I've also spoken to several individuals with newer electric and hybrid vehicles who reported paying several hundreds of dollars in tab fees every year.

So really, what sort of incentive is there as an individual to own a new or electric car in this state other than lawful force or social stigma?

I really think the state needs to bring some objective professionals into the thought process for policies like this; because It feels as though blatant evidence is being ignored. There is so many other contributing factors that need to be addressed in Washington State before making such a short sighted decision. It is certainly starting to feel more like a corporate business here instead of a home. I hope the people who have power in this process will make a decision that isn't arbitrary, and only benefits a select number of individuals.

-Grant Alford
No attachments

Comment From: Sandra Shultz

10/16/22 @ 5:27 PM
No. This is unrealistic and doesn't help at all. These batteries pollute the environment when discarded. The materials to make them are imported from enemy countries and extremely expensive. And last but not least, it will create more harmful emissio...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Patricia Nicholson

10/16/22 @ 2:43 PM
Dear Adam Saul,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopting Advanced Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washington.

These ...↓

On top of the climate benefits, adopting ACCII allows zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) to be more accessible and affordable for consumers, and saves them money in fuel and maintenance with the typical cost of electricity for charging an EV equivalent to $1 per gallon of gasoline.

In addition to ACCII, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule and the fleet reporting requirement together, will help Washington experience statewide health benefits and identify trucking operations that would provide the greatest relief in air pollution exposure to overburdened communities.

I am counting on Ecology to lead the transition into an all-electric future and by doing so, ensure an equitable and just transportation future for Washington!

I strongly support the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule and thank Ecology for its hard work.

Sincerely,

Patricia Nicholson
No attachments

Comment From: Nancy Johnson

10/16/22 @ 2:08 PM
Dear Adam Saul,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule. I strongly support the adoption of Advanced Clean Cars II, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx Rule, and the Fleet Reporting Requirement.

Please adopt Adva...↓

As a retired RN, I am very concerned about the health burden of auto emissions on already marginalized communities. This is why Advanced Clean Cars II and its equity provisions are important. So is the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx Rule, which improves emission standards for large vehicles.

It is also important to gather more information on our transportation system so we can better address the harms it is causing–not only to the environment, but sometimes to workers through poor labor practices. This is why the Fleet Reporting Requirement is an important piece of this regulation.

Every new vehicle sold that is powered by fossil fuels is a missed opportunity. Relying on polluting vehicles hurts the climate and our health. It also makes us beholden to oil companies that bring in record profits while raising prices. We need clean options in Washington.

I strongly support this rule and thank the Department of Ecology for its hard work.

Sincerely,

[Name]
No attachments

Comment From: Clark Nicholson

10/16/22 @ 2:04 PM
Dear Adam Saul,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) adopting Advanced Clean Clean Cars II (ACCII), the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule, and the fleet reporting requirement this year in Washington....↓

These rules are critical to reduce air pollution, improve public health, protect frontline communities, and increase access to the benefits of electricity as a transportation fuel. Over four million people in Washington live or work near transportation corridors that are exposed to harmful, high levels of diesel emissions, especially communities of color and low-income communities. Exposure to toxic tailpipe pollution such as NOx, Particulate Matter (PM), and Ozone is linked to higher rates of premature death, cancer, heart disease, and breathing problems like asthma in kids and adults.

On top of the climate benefits, adopting ACCII allows zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) to be more accessible and affordable for consumers and saves them money in fuel and maintenance with the typical cost of electricity for charging an EV equivalent to $1 per gallon of gasoline.

In addition to ACCII, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx rule and the fleet reporting requirement together, will help Washington experience statewide health benefits and identify trucking operations that would provide the greatest relief in air pollution exposure to overburdened communities.

I am counting on Ecology to lead the transition into an all-electric future and by doing so, ensure an equitable and just transportation future for Washington!

I strongly support the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule and thank Ecology for its hard work.

Sincerely,
Clark Nicholson
No attachments

Comment From: Michael Siptroth

10/16/22 @ 11:16 AM
WA State needs as strong Clean Energy Rules as possible! We also need more help getting clean energy from the sun and wind= help average home owners secure clean energy!
No attachments

Comment From: Patrick Trythall

10/16/22 @ 10:53 AM
I do not agree and will not comply with any current or future mandates regulating what type of vehicle I buy or use as decided by political injunctions made in California, or any political faction, without evidential proof of viable and prosperous ou...↓

California also made it against the law for doctors to speak out against politicians. Where is the science in that? Politicians are not doctors and regularly sellout to corporate interests.

https://nypost.com/2022/10/10/california-makes-it-illegal-for-doctors-to-disagree-with-politicians/amp/

We cannot have politicians deciding our fate without a full understanding of the implications/harms their choices could cause.

Do not support this initiative/proposal as it will harm every Washingtonian of their inalienable rights granted by God, and destroy prosperities American/Washingtonian civilians should instead enjoy.
You are not God, and never will be. You can be voted out, and the existence of EMV & DD5.5 will soon be destroyed BECAUSE OF BAD REGULATIONS AND POLICIES GOING AGAINST THE GRAIN OF WHAT IS BEST FOR AMERICANS.
We don't pay you to suppress us from prosperous lifestyles... but we do pay you to enhance it. So please, do you job or you will be voted out after November, if not in November.
No attachments

Comment From: Stephen Whybark

10/16/22 @ 8:40 AM
Electric cars can't be recycled. Is already doing more damage to the world than everyone is paying attention to. Unless your rich no one can afford an electric car either.
No attachments

Comment From: darrin gerlach

10/16/22 @ 8:04 AM
im with what every 1 else had to say in there comment
No attachments

Comment From: Nancy Henley

10/16/22 @ 7:16 AM
I am against any legislation that prohibits personal freedom. Requiring electric cars only will devastate our economy. Electric cars are much more expensive that gas cars and most Washingtonians cannot afford to buy an electric car. I have also se...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Pamela Crumpacker

10/16/22 @ 6:34 AM
I am retired and the State is asking me to go into debt and purchase an expensive car that I am not able to afford or the cost to maintain.
Plus, what is the State going to do with all the gas vehicles? I just purchased a brand new car that will last ...↓
I am so against most of our States polices and I do not believe that our government in the State of Washington represents the majority of the people that live here.
No attachments

Comment From: CheraDee Bacon

10/15/22 @ 9:08 PM
Rule proposal notice
Ecology is proposing changes to 2 rules:
Chapter 173-423 WAC, Clean Vehicles Program. We are expanding the adoption of California motor vehicle emission standards to include the Advanced Clean Cars II and the Low NOx Omnibus Rules ...↓
Chapter 173-400 WAC, General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources. We are updating the adoption date of federal rules and making associated changes in five sections, including retaining the current definition of "project emissions accounting" in the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program.
No attachments

Comment From: Anton Luru

10/15/22 @ 7:38 PM
Do not and will not support WA following in the footsteps of CA.
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Kephart

10/15/22 @ 7:00 PM
The EV mandate and gas engine ban are unrealistic and unfair, will cost billions to implement and will unfairly penalize rural communities and working families. No to the EV Mandate!
No attachments

Comment From: Cynthia Freyer

10/15/22 @ 6:14 PM
I support incentivizing individuals to buy electric vehicles but I do not support the mandate to phase out all sales of new vehicles if gas-powered. I am a senior living in rural SE Washington state. I am on a fixed income. I live where a vehicle ...↓

And now I must deal with the decline in auto repair shops for gas-powered vehicles, how to pay for an extremely expensive EV, how to pay the higher insurance for an EV and -- for a senior -- learning the nuances of driving and caring for one. That doesn't include the cost to install a charge station at my home.

It's not a question of whether I can afford an EV. There is no question. I cannot. Period. End of story. Period!

So what will happen to all the other people who are in my shoes? I realize your incomes are so high that you cannot relate to my situation. Please use your imagination. Please.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

10/15/22 @ 5:47 PM
My wife and I sold our last gas car in 2009. We have saved a ton of money on fuel and maintenance since then - and the fuel money we have spent has stayed in-state. And the cars are more fun to drive than the gas cars we used to drive.

Most consumers ...↓

The three biggest downsides right now are charging infrastructure, cost, and availability. These rule changes will signal automakers to make changes that directly affect the latter two, and indirectly the first.

The largest one is simply related to volume. Most automakers are still releasing EVs in ~100k volumes. The cars could be $9,000 cheaper if they were in ~1M volumes instead. They are afraid to make that commitment given uncertain consumer demand...but these rule changes will give them confidence to proceed.
No attachments

Comment From: Don O'Neal

10/15/22 @ 5:21 PM
Please do not make it a law that we have to buy EV's. I would love to have one but just can't afford one and I don't ever see myself being able to purchase a vehicle at that price point. I have a 13 year old vehicle and with the economy it's hard eno...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Derek Benedict

10/15/22 @ 4:00 PM
Dear Adam Saul,

"If you build it, they will come" is a famous line from "Field of Dreams". And if we build an infrastructure for EVs, people will convert to renewable energy vehicles.

So I thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Clean...↓

Washington needs to adopt Advanced Clean Cars II to meet its climate goals according to the State Energy Strategy, which says that basically all new passenger vehicle sales must be zero emissions in 2035 and beyond to affordably decarbonize our economy. We already see the impacts of the climate crisis today with record-breaking heatwaves and more frequent smoke events.

We need to switch to clean vehicles to stop polluting our air. I don't want vehicles that spew fumes driving through my neighborhood and polluting my lungs, and I want everyone who drives to have access to clean vehicles. This is why Advanced Clean Cars II and its equity provisions are important. So is the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx Rule, which improves emission standards for large vehicles.

It is also important to gather more information on our transportation system so we can better address the harms it is causing–not only to the environment, but sometimes to workers through poor labor practices. This is why the Fleet Reporting Requirement is an important piece of this regulation.

Every new vehicle sold that is powered by fossil fuels is a missed opportunity. Relying on polluting vehicles hurts the climate and our health. It also makes us beholden to oil companies that bring in record profits while raising prices. We need clean options in Washington.

I strongly support this rule and thank the Department of Ecology for its hard work.

Sincerely,

Derek Benedict
No attachments

Comment From: Virgene Link-New

10/15/22 @ 3:12 PM
Dear Adam Saul,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Clean Vehicles Program rule. I strongly support the adoption of Advanced Clean Cars II, the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx Rule, and the Fleet Reporting Requirement.

Washington needs ...↓

We need to switch to clean vehicles to stop polluting our air. I don't want vehicles that spew fumes driving through my neighborhood and polluting my lungs, and I want everyone who drives to have access to clean vehicles. This is why Advanced Clean Cars II and its equity provisions are important. So is the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Low NOx Rule, which improves emission standards for large vehicles.

It is also important to gather more information on our transportation system so we can better address the harms it is causing–not only to the environment, but sometimes to workers through poor labor practices. This is why the Fleet Reporting Requirement is an important piece of this regulation.

Every new vehicle sold that is powered by fossil fuels is a missed opportunity. Relying on polluting vehicles hurts the climate and our health. It also makes us beholden to oil companies that bring in record profits while raising prices. We need clean options in Washington.

I strongly support this rule and thank the Department of Ecology for its hard work.

Sincerely,
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]