Improving Air Quality in Overburdened Communities Initiative

456 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Nance Nicholls

11/09/22 @ 7:11 PM
Dear Ms. Erin Torrone, Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the proposed process to identify overburdened communities highly impacted by air pollution. The Climate Commitment Act’s directive to improve air quality in overburdene...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jane Leavitt

11/09/22 @ 7:07 PM
Dear Ms. Erin Torrone, Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the proposed process to identify overburdened communities highly impacted by air pollution. The Climate Commitment Act’s directive to improve air quality in overburdene...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Marquam Krantz

11/09/22 @ 7:06 PM
Dear Ms. Erin Torrone, Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the proposed process to identify overburdened communities highly impacted by air pollution. The Climate Commitment Act’s directive to improve air quality in overburdene...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Grace Padelford

11/09/22 @ 6:55 PM
Dear Ms. Erin Torrone, Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the proposed process to identify overburdened communities highly impacted by air pollution. The Climate Commitment Act’s directive to improve air quality in overburdene...↓
No attachments

Comment From: JOHN LAMBERT

11/09/22 @ 6:48 PM
Dear Ms. Erin Torrone, Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the proposed process to identify overburdened communities highly impacted by air pollution. The Climate Commitment Act’s directive to improve air quality in overburdene...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Michael Garten

11/09/22 @ 6:45 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the proposed process to identify overburdened communities highly impacted by air pollution. The Climate Commitment Act’s directive to improve air quality in overburdened communities is critic...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Heidi Shuler

11/09/22 @ 6:44 PM
Dear Ms. Erin Torrone, Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the proposed process to identify overburdened communities highly impacted by air pollution. The Climate Commitment Act’s directive to improve air quality in overburdene...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kelly Keefer

11/09/22 @ 6:33 PM
Dear Ms. Erin Torrone, Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the proposed process to identify overburdened communities highly impacted by air pollution. The Climate Commitment Act’s directive to improve air quality in overburdene...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Rebecca Sellers

11/09/22 @ 6:18 PM
Dear Ms. Erin Torrone, Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the proposed process to identify overburdened communities highly impacted by air pollution. The Climate Commitment Act’s directive to improve air quality in overburdene...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Stacy Oaks

11/09/22 @ 12:31 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. I am an organizer with 350 Tacoma so while I live in Tulalip my comments will be focused on Tacoma. I support Tacoma & Tulalip being listed as overburdened communities.

I suggest adding an additional criteria ...↓

The rest of my comments are regarding ideas that should be considered as possible solutions. I know we are not at that phase yet, but historically, by the time these kinds of things reach public comment phase many plans and decisions have already been made. So I will put these ideas to you now in hopes that they make it into early parts of the solutions discussion.

1) Lead SEPA Agency: For overburdened communities, the Dept of Ecology must hold the responsibility of being lead SEPA agency for heavy industrial, fossil fuel, or toxic facilities going through a permit process. This is important because cities like Tacoma do not have staff qualified to do such processes in a good way. There is also often a large conflict of interest when the city, county or Port wants a facility and are then put in charge of determining its impact on the environment & public health. Tacoma publicly boasts about how quick & easy it is for industry to get permits approved. The Tacoma LNG of Puget Sound Energy is a prime example of this conflict of interest and lack of ability. The mayor recruited the project. Attempts by the public and Puyallup Tribe to get a health assessment & safety modeling of an explosion were ignored. Tarika Powell of Sightline testified in court that it was "the worst SEPA" she had ever seen, with it not even clear exactly what type of facility was being permitted. The Attorney General commented that some of the scenarios in the PSCAA permit were "fictional" & it was allowed to move forward using outdated methane data, cherrypicked leakage rates and unenforceable restrictions like all the gas coming from an area in B.C. for the life of the lease. Nobody was looking out for the people of Tacoma or the treaty rights of the Puyallup Tribe which should legally be above local & state laws/permit regulations.

2) Health Assessments: These should be mandated for projects in overburdened communities. The cost should be footed by the company seeking the permit, but done by impartial parties.

3) Cumulative Air Assessments: These should be mandatory in overburdened communities when new or expansion permits are filed. Sacrifice zones like the Port of Tacoma should not keep permitting additional sources of air pollution if the cumulative levels for nearby residences are already unhealthy.

4)Notification about permit processes: The notification areas should be wider to include the areas that will likely receive the air pollution when wind and other factors are considered, not just a certain amount of feet from the facility. The Port of Tacoma often only has businesses within the notification area even though nearby communities feel the effects. Perhaps there could be a way for overburdened communities to sign up for emailed notifications about projects to avoid the cost and environmental impact of printed notices if the area was wider. These notifications should come out in the top 3-5 languages spoken in the overburdened community. The cost of translation services should be borne by the company applying for the permit.

5)Mitigation Efforts: Mitigation should be done in the overburdened community impacted by a project, not somewhere else. There should be a public comment period for the proposed mitigation plans & the feedback should be given some sort of power, not just be a box that is checked off.

6)Support: There should be access for overburdened communities to ask for advice, clarification and support during permit processes. The David & Goliath fight of a well-funded company vs already overburdened communities needs to be leveled out somehow.

7)Traffic Pollution: For communities overburdened by air pollution largely due to vehicle traffic, solutions should be created to proactively upscale public transportation options, electric freight trucks, rail transport of goods & people.

Thank you again for this opportunity.
Attachments:

Comment From: Diane Dick

11/09/22 @ 11:37 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on designating communities overburdened by air pollution. Please designate the Longview-Kelso area as an overburdened community. My complete comments with documentation, PDF 19 pp, are attached.
Attachments:

Comment From: Stacey Valenzuela

11/09/22 @ 9:53 AM
When you drive, bike, walk,or boat in Kenmore by the lake, north side, the natural beauty can cause envy of those that live in our city. However as much as we love to live here, we know our health, air, waterways, and land need to be tested and clean...↓
We have stationary cement and asphalt plant, as well as the 522 highway, that was put within feet (close proximity). We know that contamination and emissions varies with terrain, winds, weather conversion zones, due to which neighborhood residents are more impacted by illness.We know the "Emissions are not just Steam".
Many neighborhoods, in the emissions path have neighbors with cancer, our health impact map rates confirm this, Kenmore at a 9 of 10. Our area asthma rate is over 61%. Doctors from Harbor View, nurses from WA University wrote emails sounding alarms as early as 2016.
We see the dark opacity, we smell the stench of the sulfur dioxide, and our residents are affected by the high air pollution, as is our trees, waterways, salmon, soils, and wildlife, yet our resident concerns have been overlooked.
Annually, when the wildfires cause unhealthy air quality, via the air quality maps, I alert neighbors to close the windows as many have suffered many illnesses, and are in the emission path as well as within 1/8 mile of the highway. Soon the response was that, we're already awaken, coughing and smelling the odor, followed by a video, the sky thick with wildfire smoke with dark grey emissions bellowing from the asphalt plant stack in heavy production. Industry, our biggest polluter, should observe burn bans not make air quality worse.
Our County list our community as 66% cost burdened, and mostly seniors, veterans, and disabled with many low income families. Most can not afford air purifiers. Many struggle to buy prescriptions which include inhalers. Some, even using air purifiers, still report grit and ash on their window sills or bedding, as well as in their mouth.
We desperately need support and funding for best science manual testing and possible identifying if calibration to PSCAA N.O.C., and stationary plant best practice changes, will improve protecting the residents in our community and the air we breathe.
This plant somehow, was approved and has been operating grandfathered, just prior to adoption of 1973 standards for clean air. We requested that, the EPA 2020 request of manual testing, rather than use of AP42 calculations, due to material and equipment variables, they confirmed findings of unhealthy air contamination in asphalt emissions p, be adopted by PSCAA, and all asphalt plants.
We would greatly appreciate your assistance and request that DOE consider complete outsourced testing to compile scientific data, and continually periodically test, for levels of pm2.5, chemicals dioxides, VOC, PAH, in our city of, Kenmore by the Lake, as well as others surrounding cities, like Redmond, that have stationary asphalt plants, cement plants, with highways.
We hope to be included in this project, and would appreciate consideration of our city of Kenmore, as we need improvement in our ambient air quality, that will also improve our health, waterways, etc, in our overburdened community.
We can "Be the Change"
No attachments

Comment From: John Tester

11/09/22 @ 4:22 AM
body content
No attachments

Comment From: John Tester

11/09/22 @ 3:54 AM
body content
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

11/09/22 @ 3:53 AM
jas;dfkj;adf
No attachments

Comment From: Liisa Wale

11/06/22 @ 6:40 AM
Hello -

It is my understanding that the Department of Ecology is beginning to look into placing air monitors in "overburdened communities". After looking at the maps and hearing from others I feel that the threholds for who is overburdened are too na...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Irene Svete

11/02/22 @ 4:46 PM
As someone who lives next to Interstate 5 in the Seattle urban corridor, I'm deeply concerned about how the state will implement the Improving Air Quality in Overburdened Communities Initiative.

I (like many of my neighbors along the base of Capitol H...↓

The area along Interstate 5 needs expanded and upgraded monitoring and robust targets for improvement so the agency can move forward on developing mitigation for people living in these areas. Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

11/02/22 @ 4:13 PM
While testing the air quality for pollution is useful, what would be especially helpful to Tacoma residents is to also test for putrid and noxious industrial odors. Tacoma's Eastside receives an unequal amount of rotting animal carcass and burning me...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Andrew Austin

11/02/22 @ 1:14 PM
The animal rending plant smells across Tacoma a public health disgrace and scar on our community. Also the burning plastic smells are very bad. Please force these problematic businesses in the Port of Tacoma to clean up their act.
No attachments

Comment From: Morgan Alexander

11/02/22 @ 10:29 AM
While testing the air quality for pollution is helpful, what would be more helpful to Tacoma residents is to also test for putrid and noxious industrial odors. Tacoma's Eastside receives an unequal amount of rotting animal carcass and burning metal/p...↓
No attachments

Comment From: James Wallace

11/01/22 @ 8:36 PM
Dear CCA - thanks for hearing my comments this evening. I'd like to collaborate on monitoring, reducing PM2.5 sources and creating smoke-ready communities with our partners in North Central WA. I've attached my presentation from this evening.
Jim Wall...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Craig Mills

11/01/22 @ 3:45 PM
My wife and I moved to Washington two years ago to escape the ever increasing heat and air pollution in the Phoenix area. As an avid cyclist and hiker, I found it increasingly difficult to exercise outdoors due to the increasing levels of ozone, part...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Danna Dal Porto

10/31/22 @ 9:32 PM
Thank you for providing this opportunity to speak to the concentration of air polluting industry in my community, Quincy. This is an example of Environmental Injustice for this low income, minority community to have 421 locomotive sized engines in ou...↓
On page 16 of 42, Ecology tells us "the risks from these emergency engines is somewhat offset by:...Lower population density in areas immediately surrounding data centers." I want to point out that the newest Ecology permitted engines in Quincy are in the Columbia Microsoft data center and it is about a football field away from Mt.View Elementary School.
I complained that Ecology is applying different standards to inform the public about emissions. The historic standard emission maps clearly identify the landmarks in the community. The newest Columbia emission maps show the public no identifiable features to assess the emissions. The application of a different standard robs the public of benchmarks for understanding emissions. I was given several reasons for the map changes but I do not find them acceptable.
If Ecology continues to over-burden this community, at least we should be properly informed.
The companies that are installing these dangerous diesel engines are among the wealthiest in the world. The data center life cycle is decades. For these engines to be permitted without emission controls is unjust and should be illegal. Putting the residents of this hard-working city at risk should be illegal. Thank you for considering my comments.
No attachments

Comment From: FOGH (Friends of Grays Harbor) (Arthur Grunbaum)

10/30/22 @ 5:30 PM
Please see attached file
Attachments:

Comment From: Laura Gibbons

10/30/22 @ 10:22 AM
Thank you for doing such a thorough examination of this issue. In general I think your methodology is excellent. However I find it hard to believe the area around SEATAC airport is not highlighted in your draft map. Is that because of a lack of monit...↓
No attachments

Comment From: UC Davis Policy Institute for ... (Colin Murphy)

10/26/22 @ 10:44 AM
To the Washington Dept. of Ecology team,

I am the deputy director of the UC Davis Policy Institute for Energy, Environment and the Economy. Earlier this year, my colleagues and I released a study that highlights the expected air quality benefits from ...↓

While this study did not examine Washington State, the similarities in program design between the CFP and Washington's LCFS would lead us to expect that it would deliver significant improvements in air quality in Washington as well. Followup research based on the Oregon project has found that in addition to a broad improvement in air quality, the CFP expansion would reduce disparities in air pollutant exposure across both racial and income-based demographic groups. In short, the program is expected to reduce the impact felt by overburdened communities in Oregon; we would expect similar effects in Washington as well.

We would be happy to discuss this work with WA stakeholders and community groups. Let us know if a deeper conversation would be helpful and if so, I would be happy to set one up with my colleagues.

Thank you,

Colin Murphy Ph.D.
Deputy Director - UC Davis Policy Institute for Energy, Environment, and the Economy.
No attachments

Comment From: Columbia River Keeper (Daniel Sears)

10/26/22 @ 1:00 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Michelle Mood

10/25/22 @ 6:40 PM
I am writing to support the continued focus on South Tacoma as an overburdened community. South Tacoma (west of I-5 and south of 16 -- NOT the "south sound" and NOT the "south end") is a level 10 on your map, and has some of the worst environmental j...↓
No attachments

Comment From: UC Davis Policy Institute for ... (Colin Murphy)

10/25/22 @ 12:46 PM
To the Washington Dept. of Ecology team,

I am the deputy director of the UC Davis Policy Institute for Energy, Environment and the Economy. Earlier this year, my colleagues and I released a study that highlights the expected air quality benefits from ...↓

While this study did not examine Washington State, the similarities in program design between the CFP and Washington's LCFS would lead us to expect that it would deliver significant improvements in air quality in Washington as well. Followup research based on the Oregon project has found that in addition to a broad improvement in air quality, the CFP expansion would reduce disparities in air pollutant exposure across both racial and income-based demographic groups. In short, the program is expected to reduce the impact felt by overburdened communities in Oregon; we would expect similar effects in Washington as well.

We would be happy to discuss this work with WA stakeholders and community groups. Let us know if a deeper conversation would be helpful and if so, I would be happy to set one up with my colleagues.

Thank you,

Colin Murphy Ph.D.
Deputy Director - UC Davis Policy Institute for Energy, Environment, and the Economy.
No attachments

Comment From: UC Davis Policy Institute for ... (Colin Murphy)

10/25/22 @ 12:37 PM
To the Washington Dept. of Ecology team,

I am the deputy director of the UC Davis Policy Institute for Energy, Environment and the Economy. Earlier this year, my colleagues and I released a study that highlights the expected air quality benefits from ...↓

While this study did not examine Washington State, the similarities in program design between the CFP and Washington's LCFS would lead us to expect that it would deliver significant improvements in air quality in Washington as well. Followup research based on the Oregon project has found that in addition to a broad improvement in air quality, the CFP expansion would reduce disparities in air pollutant exposure across both racial and income-based demographic groups. In short, the program is expected to reduce the impact felt by overburdened communities in Oregon; we would expect similar effects in Washington as well.

We would be happy to discuss this work with WA stakeholders and community groups. Let us know if a deeper conversation would be helpful and if so, I would be happy to set one up with my colleagues.

Thank you,

Colin Murphy Ph.D.
Deputy Director - UC Davis Policy Institute for Energy, Environment, and the Economy.
No attachments

Comment From: Oak Rankin

10/24/22 @ 1:16 PM
In the wake of the deadly 2014 Oso Slide, Glacier Peak Institute was formed to connect youth, ecosystems and community in the Darrington area. Prior to the slide, our poverty had risen by 50%, special education rates have tripled, and schools have be...↓
For the past 2 months, we have been shutting down our outdoor youth programs due to the decrease in air quality due to wild fire smoke, at times this exceeds 500. This is the only reason we stop programs. The town of Darrington has been consistently in the top 10 worse AIQI scores in the world. As environmental regulations have changed over the last 30 years, our poverty has risen and the salmon populations continue to decline. Whether it is the recreation, timber, or restoration economy, these have all moved to our urban areas. I am concerned that as the "air quality" measures come into effect, they will also be forced onto disenfranchised rural communities, with the projects paying contractors, nonprofits, and government agencies from urban areas to do the work in our poor area. There will not be an equal ask of the "whole" of the society for air quality. If the Dep. of Ecology does decide to move this forward, we ask that they consider impacts on marginalized communities. Where as the smoke and air pollution impacts our urban neighbors as well (albeit less AQI than us), the loss of life in our community has been more heavily impacted by the loss to the timber economy, and the lack of the region to invest in the community.
No attachments

Comment From: Heidi Stephens

10/20/22 @ 9:53 AM
PS ~

In follow-up to my prior submitted comments, regarding South Tacoma:

The South Tacoma neighborhood would be especially ideal for your focus, not only for all the reasons mentioned previously, but also because the community had already submitted a ...↓

Please connect with me/my neighborhood council (board@southtacoma.us) as a community to eventually be part of implementing this commitment plan ~ thank you!
No attachments

Comment From: Monica Zazueta

10/20/22 @ 1:00 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Isaac Olson

10/19/22 @ 7:05 PM
I greatly appreciate the work that is being done to investigate the injustice in air pollution in Washington. However, I do think it prudent to ensure data sources are as up to date as possible and complete as possible when basing such important poli...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Birgit Grimlund

10/19/22 @ 6:52 PM
Please use whatever authority you have to both provide all communities in Washington with air quality data. But even more important, support efforts to make public transportation easier, support using renewable energy sources less for expensive for i...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kaylin Datwyler

10/19/22 @ 6:19 PM
The air quality in my town is harming individuals in my community disproportionately.
No attachments

Comment From: Alivia Sansale

10/19/22 @ 6:19 PM
The air quality in my town is unnecessarily harming individuals disproportionately and needs more attention
No attachments

Comment From: Heidi Stephens

10/19/22 @ 4:00 PM
Please include the neighborhood called "South Tacoma" as a focus of an overburdened community, already very impacted by poor air quality -- this is not to mean the entire South Sound area -nor- the "South End" neighborhood of the city, but specifical...↓

This historic neighborhood has been abused by city for decades, home to a superfund site left by early railroad shops and now still zoned Heavy Industrial right down the middle of our residential/recreational/schools and business districts, home to people of all ages and some of the most vulnerable (young children, elderly and health-compromised).

In addition to the polluting businesses, this neighborhood is near to I-5 and in the flight path to JBLM -- so we're getting contaminants from both toxic industry and transportation (diesel truck and other traffic emissions) as well as low-flying military cargo planes.

Per the county health department and WA state's own health inequity maps, this community has some of the highest illness and mortality rates (from many respiratory ailments and other degenerative diseases, linked to air pollution), and is one of the most diverse in ethnicity/minorities as well as lowest-income neighborhoods in the city.

Per the qualifying indicators, South Tacoma meets two "Community Indicators" and about five-to-seven "Air Pollution Indicators" within the Commitment Act summary.

The South Tacoma neighborhood already has high particulate matter (with exceedances of AQS for PM2.r and other values) and needs better monitoring of this and other air pollutants. This neighborhood has less than 9% tree canopy, so needs more natural vegetation to help counteract the air pollution.

At the same time, this area is also in danger of more more damaging development/traffic, such as mega-warehouses, airports and other large-scale impervious paving which will further take green space/trees while bringing even more air pollution.

So, please include "South Tacoma" in your focus as an "overburdened community", and I'm hopeful the state will then be moving into actual solutions for this commitment plan soon.

Thank you,
Heidi Stephens
No attachments

Comment From: Heidi Cody

10/19/22 @ 10:02 AM
I testified at the 10/18 hearing and am submitting this written version of my testimony. Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: Jean M. Avery

10/19/22 @ 7:09 AM
It's another day indoors due to unhealthy air quality in Vancouver. Sadly, our evergreen state is burning, and air pollution is negatively affecting quality of life in our area. (See the dark purple zones on the health disparities map.) Please use y...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Derek Benedict

10/18/22 @ 6:03 PM
All Washingtonians deserve to breathe clean and fresh air, regardless of where they live or how wealthy they are, or what race or religion the are.
No attachments

Comment From: Hal Beecher

10/18/22 @ 5:14 PM
I understand that Seattle's International District and adjacent areas of Seattle are particularly adversely affected by air quality as a result of severe congestion and exhaust emissions on I-5 near Convention Center and I-90 junction, and to what ex...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Cathryn Chudy

10/18/22 @ 3:47 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Improving Air Quality in Overburdened Communities Initiative. I attended the October 18th online meeting and gave the attached comments.
Attachments:

Comment From: Eric Burr

10/18/22 @ 3:11 PM
Traffic reduction with mass transit will most improve urban air. Bigger budgets for DNR and USFS would help most with wildfire smoke.
No attachments

Comment From: Jean Mendoza

10/18/22 @ 12:57 PM
Dear Ecology, Please see the attached comments from the Friends of Toppenish Creek. Thank you for reading.
Attachments:

Comment From: Janet Lehwalder

10/18/22 @ 11:31 AM
Cleaning up the mess we have made in the air (not to mention the rest of our habitat) is the most valuable thing we can do. I depend on and support the people who have made this their area of expertise and concern to figure out how to do that. Than...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Shelley Simcox

10/18/22 @ 11:24 AM
Prohibit wood-stove burning especially in neighborhoods regardless of apparent rural (or quasi-rural/suburban) status. We have put up with unhealthy air from wildfire smoke in our area for weeks, the worst ever. Now we get to look forward to experi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Holly Krake

10/18/22 @ 10:03 AM
In an ecologically fire-adapted landscape, regulations and guidance that limit wildfire smoke (PM 2.5) in the short term can have the unintended outcome of actually increasing long-term, generational exposure and risk from wildfire smoke in overburde...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Heidi Stevens

10/18/22 @ 1:00 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Catherine Chudy

10/18/22 @ 1:00 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Heidi Cody

10/18/22 @ 1:00 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: priscilla martinez

10/13/22 @ 8:14 PM
We need to take better care of what is left of our environment, for wildlife, marine life, plant life, and people.
No attachments

Comment From: Jean Mendoza

10/01/22 @ 2:13 PM
Dear WA Ecology,
Please see the attached letter that documents major health disparities in delivery of public health services across Washington State.
Thank you.
Jean Mendoza
Attachments:

Comment From: Jean Mendoza

9/30/22 @ 7:32 AM
Dear WA Ecology,
Please see the attached comments from Friends of Toppenish Creek.
Thank you.
Jean Mendoza
Attachments:

Comment From: Scott Cave

9/29/22 @ 12:19 PM
I and others concerned about air quality on Rocky Top in Yakima participated on Ecology's Air Quality Listening Session on March 24th and 1) have not received any summary or information about the sessions, and 2) were not notified of tonight's sessio...↓
No attachments

Comment From: KATHLEEN POZARYCKI

9/22/22 @ 8:42 AM
Dear Department of Ecology: There are two locations where pulp mill emissions continue to affect local communities significantly. One of these is the tiny community of Port Hadlock. Port Hadlock has roughly 1/2 the median income of bigger cities like...↓
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]