Cruise ship MOU proposed amendments comment period

1747 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Allison Yetiker

3/13/21 @ 6:29 AM
Please deny cruise ships the allowance for further dumping of toxic waste. In high traffic inlets like Puget Sound, the build up of scrubber dumping is compounding and has serious implications on endangered species like killer whales. Our seas and se...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Tracey Peterson

3/13/21 @ 6:28 AM
Animals were here before us they have a right to have their natural habitats protected
No attachments

Comment From: Michael Raymond

3/13/21 @ 6:26 AM
Although scrubbers have been touted by the cruise industry as a solution for treating toxic ship engine exhaust, in reality, all it does is convert air pollution into water pollution and dump this fossil fuel combustion wastewater straight into the o...↓
Point #1: Ban scrubbers. There is a yawning loophole that allows cruise ships to burn one of the dirtiest fossil fuels on earth - heavy fuel oil - by 'scrubbing' the exhaust and discharge the toxin-laden wastewater directly into the ocean. That's why I support amendment #2 to ban scrubbers.

Point #2: This is a huge opportunity for the cruise sector to show that they are committed to changing their polluting ways by agreeing to end the dumping of all scrubber wastes in Puget Sound. Please approve amendment #2 and ban scrubbers.

Point #3: Marine ecosystem needs a healthy home to survive. The COVID-19 pandemic has been an ongoing tragedy on a global scale, but the resulting cessation of cruise vessel traffic in the Puget Sound has been a welcome reprieve from the water pollution these ships create. That's why scrubber dumping cannot return to the Sound. I support amendment #2.
No attachments

Comment From: Lisa Rosenkoetter

3/13/21 @ 6:24 AM
There is a yawning loophole that allows cruise ships to burn one of the dirtiest fossil fuels on earth - heavy fuel oil - by 'scrubbing' the exhaust and discharge the toxin-laden wastewater directly into the ocean. That's why I support amendment #2 t...↓
This is a huge opportunity for the cruise sector to show that they are committed to changing their polluting ways by agreeing to end the dumping of all scrubber wastes in Puget Sound. Please approve amendment #2 and ban scrubbers. Marine ecosystem needs a healthy home to survive. The COVID-19 pandemic has been an ongoing tragedy on a global scale, but the resulting cessation of cruise vessel traffic in the Puget Sound has been a welcome reprieve from the water pollution these ships create. That's why scrubber dumping cannot return to the Sound. I support amendment #2.
Whales play a vital role in the marine ecosystem where they help provide at least half of the oxygen you breathe, combat climate change, and sustain fish stocks. Phytoplankton absorbs carbon from the atmosphere – hundreds of thousands of tons each year.
Unlike plants on land, phytoplankton cannot root into the ocean bottom to retrieve the nutrients they need. Where do they get it? Research shows that whales bring it to them! Because whales can't "poop" under pressure, they take their bathroom breaks at the ocean's surface and by doing so, supply phytoplankton with life giving nutrients like iron, nitrogen and phosphorus. Whales are the ocean's gardeners, tending the forest of phytoplankton on which we all depend. And because whales migrate, they re-distribute nutrients across latitudes. This process is called the "Whale Pump". Please protect our beloved whale friends and all marine life, as they are key to our survival. Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Ingvoldstad

3/13/21 @ 6:24 AM
I live in a city that now has small cruisers coming in and I have cruised myself at least 4 times. However I value the ocean and lake life more than my ability to cruise. We must find a way to change to biodegradable wastes and not to destroy the bi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Eric Anonymous

3/13/21 @ 6:23 AM
Please ban scrubbers by voting for amendment 2. Protect puget sound
No attachments

Comment From: Helen Fisher

3/13/21 @ 6:23 AM
My husband and I enjoyed cruises as one of our favorite vacations however when we found out how environmentally destructive they are and how much they lie to the public. So we will stop going until they change the way they do business and become env...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Joan Budd

3/13/21 @ 6:22 AM
I support Amendment #2 to ban scrubbers. We must protect Puget Sound, and all of our ocean waters.
No attachments

Comment From: Theresa DeLuca

3/13/21 @ 6:22 AM
PLEASE Protect Puget Sound and endangered orcas from fossil fuel dumping scrubbers.
No attachments

Comment From: Joanne Kaplan

3/13/21 @ 6:22 AM
We must do better and come up with a solution that solves the problem and doesn't hurt the environment. Our oceans need to be protected from all pollution. The whales and all sea life depend on it!
No attachments

Comment From: Geoffrey Saign

3/13/21 @ 6:21 AM
Why are we even debating this? BAN SCRUBBERS NOW. This is an archaic method to turn air pollution into water pollution--it's a game, not science, not a solution! It threatens salmon and orcas. My God, when will you people get real with the planet's t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Crystal Wilson

3/13/21 @ 6:20 AM
This is a huge opportunity for the cruise sector to show that they are committed to changing their polluting ways by agreeing to end the dumping of all scrubber wastes in Puget Sound. Please approve amendment #2 and ban scrubbers.
No attachments

Comment From: Don mackenzie

3/13/21 @ 6:19 AM
Keep the Sound clean, protect our wildlife, both marine and terrestrial
No attachments

Comment From: Dirk Reed

3/13/21 @ 6:19 AM
Point #1: Ban scrubbers. There is a yawning loophole that allows cruise ships to burn one of the dirtiest fossil fuels on earth - heavy fuel oil - by 'scrubbing' the exhaust and discharge the toxin-laden wastewater directly into the ocean. That's why...↓

Point #2: This is a huge opportunity for the cruise sector to show that they are committed to changing their polluting ways by agreeing to end the dumping of all scrubber wastes in Puget Sound. Please approve amendment #2 and ban scrubbers.

Point #3: Marine ecosystem needs a healthy home to survive. The COVID-19 pandemic has been an ongoing tragedy on a global scale, but the resulting cessation of cruise vessel traffic in the Puget Sound has been a welcome reprieve from the water pollution these ships create. That's why scrubber dumping cannot return to the Sound. I support amendment #2.
No attachments

Comment From: Pamela Joan Olsen

3/13/21 @ 6:19 AM
We do not need anymore pollution in our pristine waters. We are killing humans and marine life with so much cruise ship waste.
No attachments

Comment From: Lucy Flanagan

3/13/21 @ 6:18 AM
You do not want to be held responsible for tge extinction of tge orca.
No attachments

Comment From: La Vaughn Standridge

3/13/21 @ 6:17 AM
Please ban fossil fuel scrubber waste dumping.
No attachments

Comment From: Audrey Kukwa

3/13/21 @ 6:16 AM
All waste needs to be pumped into an on-land sewage container and disposed correctly from there. Once you kill the ocean, all life on land will perish.
No attachments

Comment From: JL Angell

3/13/21 @ 6:16 AM
Please choose Amendment 2 and ban scrubbers.
No attachments

Comment From: Brian Close

3/13/21 @ 6:15 AM
...
No attachments

Comment From: robin pappas

3/13/21 @ 6:14 AM
Please protect orcas in the puget sound area by not dumping trash there
No attachments

Comment From: Richard Thoma

3/13/21 @ 6:14 AM
Ban scrubbers is only a first small step in the right direction. However it is not enough. Not only cruise ships pollute but also cargo ships. The biggest 20 cargo ships pollute more than 50 million cars. The same applies to cruise ships and they pol...↓
The action should be to transform these polluters and run on hydrogen. That would be a great step to curb pollution and reduce carbon dioxide emissions

No attachments

Comment From: Ronald and Deidre Brow

3/13/21 @ 6:13 AM
please protect Orcas and the Puget Sound.
No attachments

Comment From: Jane Doe

3/13/21 @ 6:13 AM
Less cruise ships would be better for our planet and would reduce the pollution in our oceans. No cruise ships would be even better
No attachments

Comment From: Lynn Flanagan

3/13/21 @ 6:12 AM
Please approve amendment # 2 and ban scrubbers.
No attachments

Comment From: Minivere Reznew

3/13/21 @ 6:12 AM
Save the animal life and the environment.
No attachments

Comment From: Frances Urban

3/13/21 @ 6:10 AM
Protect the natural population of the seas. They were here first.
No attachments

Comment From: Jacqueline Mills

3/13/21 @ 6:10 AM
Ban scrubbers. There is a yawning loophole that allows cruise ships to burn one of the dirtiest fossil fuels on earth - heavy fuel oil - by 'scrubbing' the exhaust and discharge the toxin-laden wastewater directly into the ocean. That's why I support...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Rick Koselke

3/13/21 @ 6:08 AM
Proposed amendments to the
Cruise Ship Memorandum of Understanding
Public comment period: Feb. 17 to March 19, 2021
The Department of Ecology, Port of Seattle, and Northwest Cruise Ship Association negotiated a MOU in
2004 to establish voluntary actions ...↓
ships operating in Washington waters. The waters subject to the MOU include the Puget Sound and the
Strait of Juan de Fuca south of the international boundary with Canada; and along Washington's Pacific
Coast extending for three miles seaward. The original Memorandum was signed on April 20, 2004.
The current MOU as written has an amendment process every three years; at which time proposed
amendments from MOU parties as well as from the public are requested and reviewed. The most
recent call for proposed amendments ended on December 18th
. After the close of the proposed
amendment request, the MOU parties have 45 days to review the proposed amendments to verify they
meet the requirements for further review and then put the proposed amendments out for a 30-day
public comment period.
In the most recent review of the proposed amendments, the MOU parties have agreed that two
amendment proposals meet the MOU's requirements for consideration. Ecology is opening a 30 day
public comment period beginning February 17th to review the proposed amendments. The proposed
amendments have not yet been adopted by the MOU parties. Adoption of the proposed amendments
and final language of any amendments to the MOU will be determined by the MOU parties after the
public comment period has ended.
The two proposed MOU amendments are listed below. Please use the ecomments form to comment on
the proposed amendment.
Proposed MOU amendments:
1) Institute a ban on the discharge of exhaust gas scrubber washwater from all scrubber types,
including bleed off or sludges, in MOU waters.
This proposed MOU amendment met the criteria as it was specific to the MOU waters and was
accompanied by scientific data to support the amendment. However, if adopted, some of the
wording of this amendment is likely to change to conform with regulations under the MARPOL
treaty regarding exhaust gas scrubber washwater.
2) Ecology proposes to incorporate the Vessel Sewage No Discharge Zone (NDZ) for Puget Sound
into the MOU to reflect the Washington state NDZ regulation. Chapter 173-228 Washington
Administrative Code (WAC), adopted on April 9, 2018, and effective May 10, 2018. Additional
information is available online at https://ecology.wa.gov/Water-Shorelines/Puget-Sound/Nodischarge-zone. As written, the MOU allows for treated sewage (blackwater) discharges after
advanced wastewater treatment that are now not allowed by the NDZ regulation. To be
consistent with the regulation and to prevent vessel sewage discharges in MOU waters, all
allowances of the sewage discharges in MOU waters should be prohibited. This would not affect
graywater discharge in the MOU.
No attachments

Comment From: LJ Orszulak

3/13/21 @ 6:08 AM
Please do not allow scrubbers in Puget Sound.

Thank you,
LJ Orszulak
No attachments

Comment From: Jeffrey Blackman

3/13/21 @ 6:08 AM
I lived in Tacoma for two years in the 1970s.

The continued pouring of filth into the Sound's waters must stop.

Please protect the creatures that live in these waters.
No attachments

Comment From: Denis Dettling Kalthofer

3/13/21 @ 6:08 AM
Please don't allow cruise ships to dump waste near shores or orca habitat.
No attachments

Comment From: Victor Tweed

3/13/21 @ 6:06 AM
Sewage from cruise ships must be processed and not just dumped. Anywhere!
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

3/10/21 @ 12:58 PM
I support the amendments proposed. No scrubbers.
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Doe

3/03/21 @ 6:22 PM
Test comment
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Doe

3/03/21 @ 6:20 PM
Test comment
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Doe

3/03/21 @ 10:37 AM
Test comment
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Doe

3/03/21 @ 10:31 AM
Test comment
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Doe

3/03/21 @ 10:31 AM
Test comment
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Doe

3/03/21 @ 10:25 AM
Test comment
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Doe

3/03/21 @ 10:24 AM
Test comment
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Doe

3/03/21 @ 10:00 AM
Test comment
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

3/02/21 @ 11:06 PM
No scrubbers. Please ban this terrible thing.
No attachments

Comment From: Jay Cheroske

3/01/21 @ 3:36 PM
Cruise ships dumping scrubber effluent into Puget Sound should be banned.
No attachments

Comment From: Jay Cheroske

3/01/21 @ 3:00 PM
Cruise ships dumping scrubber effluent into Puget Sound should be banned.
No attachments

Comment From: Anne Miller

2/23/21 @ 9:25 AM
Why are cruise ships being allowed to dump wastewater anywhere close to Puget Sound given that Puget Sound is already polluted? This should not be allowed!
Ideally, cruise ships should be prohibited from docking in Seattle.
If they unfortunately are al...↓
Cruise ships are an outdated technology. CRUISE SHIPS ARE BAD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND A VECTOR FOR DISEASE. The Department of Ecology should do the responsible thing and move towards limiting and eventually banning polluting cruise ships in Puget Sound and WA waters.
No attachments

Comment From: Greg Stinson

2/21/21 @ 8:10 PM
Cruise ships should definitely not be able to dump wastewater anywhere close to Puget Sound. Puget Sound is polluted as it is.
Ideally, a study should be made to prohibit cruise ships from docking in Seattle.
At the least, they should be required to t...↓
Cruise ships foul the air and foul the view.

No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]