Rulemaking - Clean Fuels Program Rule and Air Quality Fee Rule

1117 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Amara Oden

8/17/22 @ 4:00 PM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of faith, addressing our transportation pollution to co-create a more just and sustainable future is an important part of my call to live more lightly on Earth so that all may thrive.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue. It is imperative that utilities are held accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law./

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Rev. Amara Oden
No attachments

Comment From: William Sterr

8/17/22 @ 3:58 PM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

Our state ,along with neighboring states and the entire world, is clearly suffering due to climate degradation. It is too late to reverse that trend in the short term, and things will definitely get worse. However, we can still affect the long term and eventually reverse the damage we have caused.

Part of that response must be the adoption of clean fuels.

Despite some efforts at improvement, the US is still the greatest atmospheric polluter, per person, on the planet. Those who would like to prevent change point to China as the greatest polluter, and other developing nations as not being responsible enough, but we were, are, and probably will remain the worst polluter. One can always find excuses for not doing what must be done.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue. It is imperative that utilities are held accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law./

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Mr. William Sterr
No attachments

Comment From: Lorraine Johnson

8/17/22 @ 3:56 PM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of faith, addressing our transportation pollution to co-create a more just and sustainable future is an important part of my call to live more lightly on Earth so that all may thrive. Please act to make it as safe as possible for all of us to live and be.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue. It is imperative that utilities are held accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law./

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Ms. Lorraine Johnson
No attachments

Comment From: Richard Johnson

8/17/22 @ 3:54 PM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of faith, addressing our transportation pollution to co-create a more just and sustainable future is an important part of my call to live more lightly on Earth so that all may thrive.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue. It is imperative that utilities are held accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law./

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Mr Richard Johnson
No attachments

Comment From: Deirdre Gabbay

8/17/22 @ 3:52 PM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of faith, addressing our transportation pollution to co-create a more just and sustainable future is an important part of my call to live more lightly on Earth so that all may thrive.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue. It is imperative that utilities are held accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law./

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Deirdre Gabbay
No attachments

Comment From: Tika Bordelon

8/17/22 @ 3:49 PM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of non faith, addressing our transportation pollution to co-create a more just and sustainable future is an important part of my call to live more lightly on Earth so that all may thrive.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue. It is imperative that utilities are held accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law./

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Dr Tika Bordelon
No attachments

Comment From: WA Forest Protection Associati... (Jason Spadaro)

8/12/22 @ 2:21 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Colin Gregg

8/11/22 @ 12:28 PM
Clean Fuels Program Rule changes proposed are only going to exacerbate an already egregious fuels market and harm four key groups: Truckers, farmers, the impoverished, and the middle class. Most of the costs will be passed onto the consumers. The tri...↓

We have enough rules and regulations to minimize the greenhouse impacts in our state. We have enough taxes to fund clean energy programs (what was State of WA revenue the past few years???) but those funds are mismanaged as it is. Robbing the people of the State of WA to mismanage more money will not solve the problem, only create more.
No attachments

Comment From: Cynthia Jones

8/08/22 @ 1:15 PM
I support the Clean Fuel Standard. We need to be using every tool we have to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. No one action by itself will be the silver bullet. Instead, we need a portfolio of tools, each of which will work as part of the whole. The ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kate Lunceford

8/08/22 @ 7:19 AM
I applaud WA State's intention to set a high standard for clean fuel. I am concerned that carbon credits could be related to support for biomass fuel and "renewable" natural gas. Biomass

Biomass projects can be sustainable, but many biomass projects a...↓

Renewable Natural Gas

It is good to contain waste methane and put it to use, particularly in a closed system such as the waste digester described in the seminar last night. Where the problem arises is that RNG is being touted as a replacement for natural gas, which is simply not possible. There are not and will never be enough RNG sources to provide that level of supply. The other major problem is that existing pipelines are leaking a lot of methane. Instead of increasing the use of pipelines, they need to be safely removed. See this article for more information. https://www.sightline.org/2021/03/09/the-four-fatal-flaws-of-renewable-natural-gas/#:~:text=RNG has four fatal flaws,natural gas—not even close.
No attachments

Comment From: Clifford Wentworth

8/01/22 @ 5:24 PM
Just do it! We are way past time to start addressing the climate crisis. I fully support this new Clean Fuels Program Rule, Chapter 173-424 WAC, and changing an existing rule, Air Quality Fee Rule, Chapter 173-455 WAC.
No attachments

Comment From: David Robison

7/31/22 @ 7:49 AM
We Washingtonians are seeing the effects of climate change pretty much every day. From wildfires and wildfire smoke, to disrupted agriculture, to loss of snowpack, to massive floods, to further threats to endangered species like our beloved resident ...↓

My family strongly supports the Clean Fuels Program Rule and Air Quality Fee Rule, for our collective benefit and that of our grandchildren.

Thank you,
David Robison & family
No attachments

Comment From: Jessica A Lisovsky

7/24/22 @ 9:28 AM
I support this Clean Fuel Standard rule. This is a climate emergency and we need to start acting accordingly. We must do even more!
No attachments

Comment From: Deborah Boyd

7/19/22 @ 8:47 AM
I agree with this proposal. We need to do whatever we can to help the environment If we don't take care of our home it cannot take care of us. I have 2 children in their late 20's and I want all of us to do whatever we can to protect the future for...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Judy Hallisey

7/18/22 @ 6:55 PM
I support the Clean Fuels Standard. We need to do more to reduce carbon emissions to combat climate change, at a faster pace. The time period for fossil fuel industry to comply should be sooner than proposed; these industries have had ample time alr...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Andrew Stevens

7/18/22 @ 2:42 PM
Why are we making things more expensive when market forces are already demanding cleaner emissions from the device using the fuel? You already failed with Ethanol in our gasoline, and this will simply make gas more expensive for a negligible benefit...↓

You also risk damaging our motorcycles and small engines that were never designed to run with higher ethanol content.

Dept of Ecology should be concentrating on the electric future instead of looking back at the 1980s.
No attachments

Comment From: SUSAN ALLEN

7/18/22 @ 2:26 PM
I am against the clean fuels and program rule. We do not need more legislation regarding clean air and climate change. Rather we need less legislation and taxation to ensure that farmers and truckers can transport food affordably and efficiently and ...↓
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]