Rulemaking - Clean Fuels Program Rule and Air Quality Fee Rule

1117 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Clean Fuels Alliance America (Floyd Vergara)

8/31/22 @ 9:32 PM
Clean Fuels Comments on WA Clean Fuels Standard Rule and Air Quality Fee Rule for Ecology's Consideration.
Attachments:

Comment From: Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (Erik Saganic)

8/31/22 @ 8:46 PM
Please see the attached written comment from the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. Thank you, Erik Saganic
Attachments:

Comment From: Pacific Ag Renewables (Harrison Pettit)

8/31/22 @ 8:22 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Washington Public Ports Associ... (Patsy Martin)

8/31/22 @ 8:10 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Carolyn Rodenberg

8/31/22 @ 8:10 PM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of faith, it is important to me that we take swift action to address transportation as our largest source of pollution in Washington. A strong final justice-centered Clean Fuel Standard will help me embody my call to live more lightly on Earth so that all may thrive.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue.� Please ensure the following points are reflected in the final rule:
- Explicitly incorporate Ecology's existing obligation to proactively and meaningfully consult with Native Nations, including expectations for sufficient time and information.
- Require an environmental justice review in compliance with the HEAL Act and include requirements for Ecology to track and remedy air pollution impacts.
- Hold utilities accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law.
- Strengthen initial accounting of the impact of crop-based biofuels beyond California's baseline and plan for ongoing review as science advances.

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Carolyn Rodenberg
No attachments

Comment From: Puget Sound Energy (Malcolm McCulloch)

8/31/22 @ 7:53 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: WSPA (Jim Verburg)

8/31/22 @ 7:00 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Various Aviation Entities (Eric ffitch)

8/31/22 @ 6:38 PM
Please see attached for a letter from various aviation entities regarding the proposed Clean Fuels Program rule.
Attachments:

Comment From: Port of Seattle (Eric ffitch)

8/31/22 @ 6:36 PM
Please see attached for the Port of Seattle's comments on the proposed Clean Fuels Program rule.
Attachments:
Download
Download

Comment From: Washington Policy Center (Todd Myers)

8/31/22 @ 6:15 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language. While the goal of reducing transportation-related CO2 emissions is understandable, given the state's GHG targets, the proposed rule adds nothing to the state's CO2 cap – the Clim...↓
1) The LCFS and CCA should be integrated. Reductions under the LCFS count toward the CCA targets. Similarly, any reduction in transportation-related CO2 emissions should could toward the LCFS. If CO2 reductions under the CCA are not counted in the LCFS it calls into question the goal of the LCFS. Is it about reducing transportation-related emissions, or simply subsidizing particular industries?

By integrating transportation-related emissions reductions under the CCA and LCFS, it not only encourages existing technologies, but also rewards innovation for technologies not anticipated in the rule, without having to undergo additional rulemaking which is wasteful and duplicative.

2) Washington should match the rules of other states. While some are calling for Washington's rules to be more restrictive than other states, doing so would be needlessly expensive and create a costly, niche market in Washington state that is unnecessarily out of step with other markets.

3) Accounting of environmental benefits must not double count benefits already provided by other climate policies. Because the low-carbon fuel standard duplicates the efforts of other laws, like the CCA, any accounting of its benefits – environmental or social – must only account for those provided uniquely by the rule. If air quality or other benefits would be provided by the CCA, any accounting should acknowledge that the LCFS provides no additional benefit.

4) Uncertainty should favor innovation, not restriction. Assessment of the environmental benefits and impacts of various technologies, including different biofuels, hydrogen fuels, and other fuels, is always uncertain and always changing. A restrictive approach to this uncertainty in innovation would delay the development of new technologies and drive costs up, without providing additional environmental benefit. This encouragement of new innovation should be codified in the rule to make it clear that when uncertainty exists, regulators should favor innovative approaches to reducing emissions.

Since the LCFS does not increase total CO2 emissions reductions above those already required by the CCA, it should be seen as a tool to encourage innovation. If the rule is written to be restrictive, it will end up as the worst of both worlds – doing nothing to reduce CO2 emissions while discouraging innovative approaches to reducing transportation-related GHG emissions.
We hope you will align the rule with these important goals.
No attachments

Comment From: Hydrogen Coalition (Dave Warren)

8/31/22 @ 6:05 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Witcover, Murphy, Ro of the UC... (Julie Witcover)

8/31/22 @ 5:29 PM
Please see attached comments. Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: Sustainable Aviation Technolog... (Misha Lujan)

8/31/22 @ 5:21 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: NW Energy Coalition (Annabel Drayton)

8/31/22 @ 4:06 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Biotechnology Innovation Organ... (Gene Harrington)

8/31/22 @ 3:54 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Washington Environmental Counc... (Caitlin Krenn)

8/31/22 @ 3:51 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: SkyNRG Americas (John Plaza)

8/31/22 @ 3:50 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: California Electric Transporta... (Dean Taylor)

8/31/22 @ 3:29 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: CHAdeMO Association (David Patterson)

8/31/22 @ 3:19 PM
Please see CHAdeMO Association comments attached.
Attachments:

Comment From: e-Mission Control (Elaine O'Byrne)

8/31/22 @ 3:07 PM
Please find commentary on the proposed Clean Fuels Program Rule in the document attached. Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: Washington State Department of... (Jonathan Olds)

8/31/22 @ 2:59 PM
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is pleased to submit comments regarding the Department of Ecology's filing of a CR-102 pursuant to the Clean Fuels Program. Please find WSDOT's comments in the attached letter.
Attachments:

Comment From: Climate Solutions (Leah Missik)

8/31/22 @ 2:52 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: North West Handling Systems In... (Rupesh Sansgiri)

8/31/22 @ 2:37 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Farmers Business Network (Steele Lorenz)

8/31/22 @ 2:26 PM
Farmers Business Network comments included in attachment.
Attachments:

Comment From: LanzaJet (Marianne Csaky)

8/31/22 @ 2:12 PM
See attached comments.
Attachments:

Comment From: 34 non-profits, businesses, an... (Leah Missik)

8/31/22 @ 2:10 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Noyes Law Corporation on behal... (Graham Noyes)

8/31/22 @ 2:09 PM
CleanFuture's full comment is attached. The following is a brief summary.

CleanFuture, Inc. ("CleanFuture) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed Washington Clean Fuel Standard (Chapters 173-424 WAC). CleanFuture is a leading environm...↓

Based on this experience, CleanFuture submits recommendations to the Washington Department of Ecology RE: the optimal credit generating party, providing crediting parity between biogas-to-electricity and biogas-to-biomethane, modifying some aspects of the REC provisions, expanding the Ocean Going Vessels category, and aligning the in-service dates with the statute.

If there are any problems in transmission or questions relating to this comment, please contact me. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments into this important proceeding.

Best Regards,
Graham Noyes
Attachments:

Comment From: Alaska Airlines (Scott Kennedy)

8/31/22 @ 1:39 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Marjorie Reinig

8/31/22 @ 1:31 PM
Thank you for developing the Clean Fuels Program Rule and Air Quality Fee Rule. The environment and global warming has been THE issue I'm most concerned with for 30 years. It is good to see that the rule making committee is putting some teeth into ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: POET, LLC (Janie Kilgore)

8/31/22 @ 1:30 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Joint Washington Utilities (Christine Brewer)

8/31/22 @ 1:25 PM
Attachments:
Download
Download

Comment From: Regenis LLC (Bryan Van Loo)

8/31/22 @ 1:23 PM
Please see the attached uploaded file with our comments.
Attachments:

Comment From: Electric Vehicle Charging Asso... (Natalie Nax)

8/31/22 @ 1:19 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Tacoma Power (Kyle Frankiewich)

8/31/22 @ 1:10 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Neste (Oscar Garcia)

8/31/22 @ 1:06 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Growth Energy (Chris Bliley)

8/31/22 @ 1:00 PM
Please see our attached comment. Thank you for your consideration.
Attachments:

Comment From: Alliance for Automotive Innova... (Dan Bowerson)

8/31/22 @ 12:47 PM
Please find the attached comments from the Alliance for Automotive Innovation
Attachments:

Comment From: 3Degrees (Maya Kelty)

8/31/22 @ 12:00 PM
Please find attached 3Degrees' comments in response to Proposed Rulemaking - Clean Fuels Program Rule, Chapter 173-424 WAC
Attachments:

Comment From: Phillips 66 Company (Marc Ventura)

8/31/22 @ 11:50 AM
See attached PDF file.
Attachments:

Comment From: Electrify America, LLC (Ethan Hintz)

8/31/22 @ 11:09 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Renewable Fuels Association (Kelly Davis)

8/31/22 @ 11:02 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: FirstElement Fuel (Matt Miyasato)

8/31/22 @ 10:55 AM
Please find our comments attached.
Attachments:

Comment From: The Avista Corporation (Rendall Farley)

8/31/22 @ 10:46 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Coalition for Renewable Natura... (Sam Lehr)

8/31/22 @ 10:39 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Lora Rathbone

8/31/22 @ 9:55 AM
I approve of the Dept of Ecology setting a clean fuels trajectory to be the strongest possible per the law. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034, or more if possible.
The transpor...↓

I ask that you minimize the use of biofuels, limiting to that made from waste, not crops. Emphasis should be on electrifying our transportation, especially in a state with high levels of clean electricity. (Some studies show use of biofuels has contributed to global warming with increased use of fertilizer, removal of trees in the rain forest, and so on).

Adopting high standards and joining Calif. and Oregon will allow a big impact on reducing GH Gases as well as providing the critical mass to make the transition from fossil fuels more affordable.
No attachments

Comment From: NW Natural (Mary Moerlins)

8/31/22 @ 9:51 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Rivian Automotive, LLC (Tom Van Heeke)

8/31/22 @ 9:50 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Charm Industrial, Inc. (Nora Brown)

8/31/22 @ 9:40 AM
Thank you very much for the opportunity to comment. Please see attached for Charm Industrial's comment.
Attachments:

Comment From: Valero (Deepak Garg)

8/31/22 @ 9:30 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: King County (Rachel Brombaugh)

8/31/22 @ 8:16 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Suzanne Duncan

8/31/22 @ 8:15 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of faith, it is important to me that we take swift action to address transportation as our largest source of pollution in Washington. A strong final Clean Fuel Standard will help me embody my call to live more lightly on Earth so that all may thrive.
Our future and the future of generations to come depend on our willingness to act now to fight for clean energy to meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals. Our lives depend on these actions.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue.� Please ensure the following points are reflected in the final rule:
- Explicitly incorporate Ecology's existing obligation to proactively and meaningfully consult with Native Nations, including expectations for sufficient time and information.
- Require an environmental justice review in compliance with the HEAL Act and include requirements for Ecology to track and remedy air pollution impacts.
- Hold utilities accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law.
- Strengthen initial accounting of the impact of crop-based biofuels beyond California's baseline and plan for ongoing review as science advances.

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Suzanne Duncan
No attachments

Comment From: David Ketter

8/31/22 @ 8:13 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a Zen Buddhist, it is important to me that we take swift action to address transportation as our largest source of pollution in Washington. A strong final Clean Fuel Standard will help me embody my call to recognize the interdependence of life and live more lightly on Earth so that all may thrive.� I would like to thank DOE for setting the strongest timeline possible� but ask that you strengthen clean fuel standard to prioritize the reduction of environmental health disparities.� Specifically, I ask that the Department of Ecology explicitly incorporate consultation with Native Nations, require environmental justice reviews, use best available science on biofuels lifecycle analysis, and ensure equitable utility reinvestments in communities.�

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue.� Please ensure the following points are reflected in the final rule:
- Explicitly incorporate Ecology's existing obligation to proactively and meaningfully consult with Native Nations, including expectations for sufficient time and information.
- Require an environmental justice review in compliance with the HEAL Act and include requirements for Ecology to track and remedy air pollution impacts.
- Hold utilities accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law.
- Strengthen initial accounting of the impact of crop-based biofuels beyond California's baseline and plan for ongoing review as science advances.

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Mr. David Ketter
No attachments

Comment From: Nancy Lewis

8/31/22 @ 8:11 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of faith, it is important to me that the people of Washington take swift action to address transportation as our largest source of pollution in Washington, which is degrading this beautiful planet and its human and nonhuman inhabitants.� A strong final Clean Fuel Standard will help provide cleaner air for all our neighbors, and improve health in our urban areas. We must do all in our power to meet and exceed the goals and laws we've set to cut climate pollution.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue.� Please ensure the following points are reflected in the final rule:
- Explicitly incorporate Ecology's existing obligation to proactively and meaningfully consult with Native Nations, including expectations for sufficient time and information.
- Require an environmental justice review in compliance with the HEAL Act and include requirements for Ecology to track and remedy air pollution impacts.
- Hold utilities accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law.
- Strengthen initial accounting of the impact of crop-based biofuels beyond California's baseline and plan for ongoing review as science advances.

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Nancy Lewis
No attachments

Comment From: Margaret Graham

8/31/22 @ 8:10 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of faith, it is important to me that we take swift action to address transportation as our largest source of pollution in Washington. A strong final Clean Fuel Standard will help me embody my call to live more lightly on Earth so that all may thrive.

Thank you for your carbon plan. Please keep strong standards to help reduce the environmental health disparities on people who live near busy trucking corridors and transportation hubs. By reducing the pollution burden on these people it will also reduce health care costs for treating asthma, lung disease and work days lost to illness as well as being more just and humane.

Thank you for all you have done to implement a Clean Fuel Standard that will benefit us all and contribute to a healthy economy as well.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue.� Please ensure the following points are reflected in the final rule:
- Explicitly incorporate Ecology's existing obligation to proactively and meaningfully consult with Native Nations, including expectations for sufficient time and information.
- Require an environmental justice review in compliance with the HEAL Act and include requirements for Ecology to track and remedy air pollution impacts.
- Hold utilities accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law.
- Strengthen initial accounting of the impact of crop-based biofuels beyond California's baseline and plan for ongoing review as science advances.

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Margaret Graham
No attachments

Comment From: Heidi Erdmann

8/31/22 @ 8:07 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of faith, it is important to me that we take swift action to address transportation as our largest source of pollution in Washington. A strong final Clean Fuel Standard will help me embody my call to live more lightly on Earth so that all may thrive.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue.� Please ensure the following points are reflected in the final rule:
- Explicitly incorporate Ecology's existing obligation to proactively and meaningfully consult with Native Nations, including expectations for sufficient time and information.
- Require an environmental justice review in compliance with the HEAL Act and include requirements for Ecology to track and remedy air pollution impacts.
- Hold utilities accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law.
- Strengthen initial accounting of the impact of crop-based biofuels beyond California's baseline and plan for ongoing review as science advances.

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Heidi Erdmann
No attachments

Comment From: Judy LeBlanc

8/31/22 @ 8:06 AM
Dear WA Department of Ecology,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Washington's Clean Fuel Standard. I am very supportive of the draft Clean Fuel Standard and applaud the Department of Ecology for setting our/clean fuels trajectory to be the s...↓

As a person of faith, it is important to me that we reduce our carbon footprint so that we can have a healthier planet that supports all life.
A strong final Clean Fuel Standard will greatly reduce carbon emissions from transportation, a significant contributor to C02. It is important to me that lives now and in the future are less impacted by climate change.� I have 2 grandchildren and hope that they will be able to enjoy a safe and healthy life.

Time is of the essence with our response to the climate crisis. Ambitious implementation of this law is critical for a just transition to clean energy that addresses our moral obligation to heal our climate and communities. Please ensure that the final rule maintains the strong carbon intensity standards of a 20% reduction by 2034.

In addition to the urgent need to reduce transportation pollution, I believe/how/we respond to the climate crisis is also a moral issue.� Please ensure the following points are reflected in the final rule:
- Explicitly incorporate Ecology's existing obligation to proactively and meaningfully consult with Native Nations, including expectations for sufficient time and information.
- Require an environmental justice review in compliance with the HEAL Act and include requirements for Ecology to track and remedy air pollution impacts.
- Hold utilities accountable to thoughtful and equitable reinvestments that further transportation electrification and reduce pollution in overburdened communities� as required by the law.
- Strengthen initial accounting of the impact of crop-based biofuels beyond California's baseline and plan for ongoing review as science advances.

I have faith that Washington can and will meet our greenhouse gas reduction goals through our gifts of innovation and dedication to stewardship. Thank you for putting us on that path and demonstrating our state's commitment to a clean energy future by implementing the strongest possible Clean Fuel Standard.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Judy LeBlanc
No attachments

Comment From: The Northwest Seaport Alliance (Jason Jordan)

8/31/22 @ 8:05 AM
Please see the attached comment letter that contains comments from The Northwest Seaport Alliance on the draft CFS rule.
Attachments:

Comment From: Pacific Propane Gas Associatio... (Matthew Solak)

8/31/22 @ 7:59 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: SRECTrade, Inc (Iman Nordin)

8/31/22 @ 5:42 AM
Please see the attached comment letter.
Attachments:

Comment From: Generate Capital, PBC (Suzanne Hunt)

8/31/22 @ 5:11 AM
We respectfully submit our comments in attached document.
Attachments:

Comment From: Gevo, Inc (Kent Hartwig)

8/31/22 @ 4:37 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Airlines for America (Brandon Graver)

8/31/22 @ 4:15 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Richard Johnson

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Bette Schwede

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Emily Van Alyne

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Dan Snyder

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: monica dewald

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Hilke Faber

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Marjorie Millner

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Sarah Bauman

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Janet Riordan

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: John Samaras

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Brooks Kolb

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Den Wichar

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Allow me opportunity to comment on proposed rule language for Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washington's greenhouse gas emiss...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kenneth Loehlein

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Judith Cohen

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Roger Wechsler

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Noel Barnes

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Ferm

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,As an EV owner, I put my money where my mouth is.Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transpor...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Judith Cohen

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Nancy White

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Pawiter Parhar

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Barbara Blackwood

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Bronwen Evans

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Michael Garten

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Gregory Penchoen

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Daniel Henling

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: J K

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Sky Aisling

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Curry

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: David Turnoy

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Shemayim Elohim

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Wendy Blair

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Deborah Kaye

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Edward Whitesell

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jerry Kessinger

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Greg Goodwin

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Rhomberg

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Julia Larsen

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Katarina Bailot

8/30/22 @ 11:00 PM
Dear Ms. Rachel Assink,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule language for the Clean Fuels Program, Chapter 173-424 WAC and all the work to date in developing this rule. Transportation is responsible for nearly half of Washingt...↓
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]