Weyerhaeuser Everett Mill E Public Review Documents

Submitted By

6 Results

Search Type

Sort:

Sort Results By

Comment From: Kathleen Sears

7/21/20 @ 2:53 PM

I am writing to express my concern that the toxins remaining on Mill Site E and the Uplands area in Everett pose a significant risk to human health and must remain a top priority for study and cleanup. Arsenic, lead, and other toxins at Mill Site E e...↓

I am also concerned that Covid-19 will result in a budget shortfall that may delay or derail some projects. I urge Ecology to ensure that the environmentally critical Mill E site remain a high priority and that testing and monitoring continue as currently scheduled.

No attachments

Comment From: Julie Martinson

7/21/20 @ 9:05 AM

This is a high priority project, where arsenic and lead are still in the ground after the earlier clean-up, and either leaking or subject to leakage into the river. These will affect tribal and sports fishing, shellfish, water contamination and recr...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Bill Trueit

7/17/20 @ 8:53 AM

Support and encourage continued testing for contaminants at this site. Responsible parties have an obligation to repair damage to the environment, especially when it poses a risk to human health.

No attachments

Comment From: Cynthia Jones

7/17/20 @ 2:45 AM

I am writing to express my concern about the Weyerhaeuser Everett Mill E clean up. This site is on the Snohomish River, just around the bend from Puget Sound. It is important that toxic materials not be leached from this site into the Snohomish River...↓

Cynthia Jones

No attachments

Comment From: Malcolm Cumming

7/16/20 @ 12:01 PM

It is absolutely necessary that monitoring of soil and ground water for residual lead and arsenic continue and be given high priority. The Snohomish River empties into Puget Sound and carries any and all contaminants quickly into those waters.