Rulemaking - Informal Public Comment Period for Chapter 173-424 WAC, Clean Fuels Program Rule

147 Results

Sort:

Comment From: EV automakers et al. (Jack Barrow)

3/10/22 @ 11:08 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Pacific Merchant Shipping Asso... (Thomas Jelenic)

3/04/22 @ 11:59 AM
Comment Letter Attached.
Attachments:

Comment From: Cory Bullis

2/25/22 @ 9:45 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Charm Industrial (Peter Reinhardt)

2/15/22 @ 12:43 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: 3Degrees (Maya Kelty)

2/11/22 @ 4:54 PM
Please find 3Degrees' comments attached.
Attachments:

Comment From: WSPA (Jim Verburg)

2/10/22 @ 4:20 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: RPMG (Jon Costantino)

1/27/22 @ 6:41 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Clean Fuels Alliance America (... (Floyd Vergara)

1/27/22 @ 4:37 PM
Just a quick question and apologies if I missed a discussion covering this at an earlier workshop. For the scope of the CFS regulation, have you considered allowing non-deficit generating fuels used in marine and rail applications to generate opt-in ...↓

Allowing marine and rail fuels to be credit generators will send a strong signal to those sectors to voluntarily switch to cleaner, lower carbon fuels, thereby facilitating Washington's efforts to achieve its carbon reduction targets. While reducing GHGs upwards of 80% or more, lower carbon diesel replacements like biodiesel and renewable diesel can also significantly reduce particulate matter (PM) emissions 50% or more, which is critical to improving the health of local communities surrounding or downwind of marine and rail facilities in the state. Those GHG and PM benefits are immediate upon switching to lower carbon liquid diesel replacements, which is an important consideration for states working on long-term decarbonization strategies like electrification, especially in the most difficult to decarbonize sectors like heavy duty on/offroad, marine, and rail applications.

I will submit more comments on the proposals involving lifecycle assessments and CI scoring calculations when those topics are covered at the March workshop, but I wanted to get the above question to you for your consideration before then (if you haven't already considered it).

Floyd Vergara
No attachments

Comment From: Smart Charging Technologies (MAN ALTAHER)

1/27/22 @ 4:07 PM
Will the ruling incorporate other types of electric vehicles, e.g. airport electric vehicles (belt loaders, baggage tractors, aircraft Tow Tractors), agriculture electric tractors?
No attachments

Comment From: Conner Whaley

1/27/22 @ 3:58 PM
The rule regarding an EER change for older model year forklifts, is arbitrary as LCFS and CFP regulation don't point to a major breakthrough in efficiency to justify such a change in credit generation. We suggest Dept. of Ecology only implement this ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: King County (King County Executive Dow Constantine)

1/27/22 @ 12:24 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: 21 Acres Center for Local Food... (Robin Crowder)

1/26/22 @ 12:54 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Ryan Mello

1/26/22 @ 12:05 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Airlines for America (A4A) (Ira Dassa)

1/24/22 @ 11:42 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Amanda Doxtater

1/24/22 @ 10:47 AM
I urge you to ensure that the rule require a 20% reduction in carbon intensity of fuels be achieved by the earliest date allowed in the law�2034. We have no time to waste on addressing fuel emissions. Thank you for your consideration.
No attachments

Comment From: Jared Howe

1/24/22 @ 9:29 AM
I urge you to ensure that the rule require a 20% reduction in carbon intensity of fuels be achieved by the earliest date allowed in the law�2034. We have no time to waste on addressing fuel emissions. Thank you for your consideration.
No attachments

Comment From: Carbon Removal Buyers and Deve... (Annie Gilleo)

1/21/22 @ 3:24 PM
Please see the attached comments jointly submitted by Stripe, 44.01, Running Tide, SeaChange Inc., The Future Forest Company, Heirloom, Mission Zero, CarbonBuilt, Charm Industrial, and CarbonCure
Attachments:

Comment From: Steve Taylor

1/18/22 @ 4:15 PM
Cowlitz Public Utility District No. 1 (Cowlitz PUD) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the rulemaking efforts underway to implement the Clean Fuels Program (Chapters 173-424 WAC and 173-455 WAC). Cowlitz PUD supports the comments submitted by...↓

Cowlitz PUD recommends that Ecology adopt Oregon's approach to credit allocation where electric utilities (as the fuel supplier) receive the base and incremental residential EV charging credits rather than electric vehicle manufacturers. Multi-family properties should be considered residential charging with the credits being allocated to electric utilities as per California's program.

Credits generated from non-residential EV charging should designate the charging station owners as the recipients, or provide them a right of first refusal. If station owners decline, then the electric utility should be the next entity in line.

Electric utilities' Carbon Intensity should be based on their specific generation fuel mix, and consistent with the existing methods used by Washington State for emissions reporting. Ecology should consult with the Department of Commerce to adequately develop and assess the approach.

Cowlitz PUD thanks the Department for its level of engagement with stakeholders during this rulemaking process. We look forward to seeing further drafts of the rule language and will provide additional comments at that time.

Steve Taylor
Director of Regulatory and Regional Affairs
Cowlitz PUD
360-270-0191
staylor@cowlitzpud.org
No attachments

Comment From: Amazon (Charles Knutson)

1/18/22 @ 2:39 PM
Debebe and Abbey,

On behalf of Amazon, thank you for the opportunity to offer comments on the ongoing rulemaking to implement Washington's Clean Fuels Program. Amazon was a proud supporter of the legislation to enact a clean fuels program (CFP) in ord...↓

In 2019, Amazon co-founded The Climate Pledge, a commitment to be net-zero carbon by 2040�10 years ahead of the Paris Agreement. Since then, more than 200 major companies have joined us in this pledge. We also established a "Shipment Zero" goal to make all Amazon shipments net-zero carbon, with 50% of shipments net zero carbon by 2030. In support of this goal, Amazon ordered 100,000 new electric delivery vehicles from Rivian, a U.S. electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer, which we are already beginning to deploy. We are also expanding our use of electric cargo bikes in U.S. cities. In July 2020, Amazon Air secured up to six million gallons of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), and we are prioritizing sustainability by bringing SAF into our North American air operations.

Based on our experience with the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard program, we would like to respectfully submit the following comments and ideas as you develop the Washington state CFP.

1. Allow Virtual PPAs or RECs to Green the Power Supply of Process Energy. While the California program allows virtual power purchase agreements (PPAs) or renewable energy certificates (RECs) to green the power supply for various end use cases, it does not allow similar book-and-claim methods to be used for process energy. "Process energy", in the context of hydrogen, is energy that is used to compress or liquify gaseous hydrogen. Recognizing virtual PPAs or RECS for "process energy" would enable hydrogen development, decrease the carbon intensity of liquid or compressed green hydrogen and increase its competitive value.

2. Define Additional Pathways. Some emerging use cases for battery-powered electric-vehicle-charging use electricity not supplied from the power grid, but supplied from fuel cells or other on-site power generators consuming low carbon intensity (CI) hydrogen or other renewable fuels. We are currently working through the process of recognizing various pathways for hydrogen in the California program, and we support defining those pathways up front in the Washington program.

3. Recognize On-site Stationary Power Generation. We support capacity crediting for infrastructure which can motivate construction in preparation for future demand. On-site hydrogen, battery storage, and other renewable power generation can also be used to displace diesel and natural gas for non-transportation uses like buildings. Crediting equipment fully or partially for these benefits reduces the overall cost of this beneficial infrastructure and further promotes its deployment.

4. Adopt Simple Reporting Tools and Templates. To accelerate Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) adoption and increase participation in the CFP, we favor a simple reporting process and exemption for ZEV fuel transactions from the third-party verification requirements.

5. New Crediting Opportunities. Like California, we encourage you to include flexibility to add Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) values for crediting new zero emission vehicles and equipment. In addition to on-road vehicles, we encourage the Department to follow the California rule in recognizing off-road mobile vehicles, including forklifts that operate in warehouses.

6. Credit Generation Prioritization. We believe hydrogen forklift owners should be given priority, not the operator. We encourage you to allow designated entities under 'priority two' for hydrogen fueling, like in California. We also request that clarity is provided when some categories list two or more different entities in order to avoid conflicting claims or possible stranded unclaimed credits.

7. Carbon Intensity Reductions. We support requiring the maximum allowable percentage reductions in carbon intensity (CI) through 2028 in your rulemaking. This will send the necessary signal to promote development and deployment of low carbon fuels in Washington.

8. Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF). We encourage you to promote SAF deployment by allowing book-and-claim accounting for SAF credit generation.

9. Renewable Natural Gas. We recommend using a reasonable standard for land-use change considerations and the ability to generate credits from the use of Renewable Natural Gas (RNG).

10. Electric Vehicles and Utilities. EV manufacturers should be able to pass along credit value to customers. Electric utilities should have a simple process to pass-through credit value to customers and should, to the extent possible, set aside a portion of CFP revenue spending on medium duty/heavy duty vehicles, grid capacity upgrades, and partnerships with fleets.

We welcome the opportunity to discuss these ideas with you in greater depth. We would like to participate in any stakeholder advisory groups, and we look forward to continued collaboration to achieve our shared goals to drive climate progress and economic growth.
No attachments

Comment From: ev.energy (Joseph Vellone)

1/12/22 @ 12:24 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Carbon Engineering (Elise Lepine)

1/07/22 @ 10:55 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: ChargePoint (Evan Neyland)

1/06/22 @ 4:24 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: 3Degrees (Maya Kelty)

1/05/22 @ 3:20 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Jessica Spiegel

12/23/21 @ 4:13 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: NW Energy Coalition (Annabel Drayton)

12/22/21 @ 7:04 PM
NW Energy Coalition's initial comments regarding the Clean Fuels Program Rule.
Attachments:

Comment From: Indigo Agriculture (Robert Parkhurst)

12/14/21 @ 5:25 PM
See attached comments from Indigo Agriculture regarding Washington Department of Ecology's development of a Clean Fuels Program.
Attachments:

Comment From: Seattle City Light (Mendy Droke)

12/09/21 @ 4:41 PM
December 9, 2021

Washington Department of Ecology
300 Desmond Dr. SE
Lacey, WA 98503

Via Public Comment Form @ecology.wa.gov

The City of Seattle, its municipally owned utility, Seattle City Light (SCL) and the Office of Sustainability and Environment (OSE...↓

Seattle strongly supports a robust CFP that reduces GHG emissions, provides investments in underserved communities, and encourages the expansion of TE. The City of Seattle has adopted a citywide TE Blueprint to electrify transportation as well as an utility investment strategy with input from communities across the city and service territory. We feel strongly that we can provide valuable insight into the CFP rulemaking process to best ensure that the program works across the state.

Our comments focus on a few key components:

EV Credits
Electric utilities have a strong history and commitment in providing services to all customers, including those in underserved communities. Electric Vehicle Service Providers (EVSP's) and Electric Vehicle (EV) manufacturers are not required by law to reinvest revenues in Washington State projects that reduce GHG or reinvest in underserved communities and we do not believe they will do so.

Capacity-based crediting pathways should be developed for DCFC's.

The program should begin in January 2023 to begin to reduce GHG and access new federal funding programs

Residential Electric Vehicle Charging

Base and incremental credits for EV charging should go to the utility, who is the fuel supplier and not shared with electric vehicle manufacturers, like the Oregon program.

Multifamily properties should be considered residential charging, and utilities should receive the credits from charging like California's program.

Residential charging stations should not be required to be separately metered to generate credits. Most home charging is not separately metered, and this would require the purchase of costly equipment that is not necessary to fuel the vehicle. This is an equity issue where only wealthier homeowners can afford this equipment, further disincentivizing low-income EV usage.

Non-Residential Electric Vehicle Charging

The station owners should receive the first right of refusal for credits. If station owners decline credit ownership, then utilities should be the credit owners.

The non-residential charging section lists two distinct entities (i.e.,- station owners and EVSPs) as being eligible to generate credits. This lack of clear delineation creates confusion and uncertainty related to who is legally authorized as the credit-generating entity. In all cases, only one entity should be clearly designated, with other entities in succession if the first entity chooses not to participate.

Carbon Intensity (CI)

The Carbon Intensity (CI) for electric utilities should be based on their unique mix of generation resources.

The methods and equations used to develop each utility's CI score should be based on and consistent with existing methods used by the state for other emissions reporting. We recommend Department of Ecology collaborate with the Department of Commerce to adequately assess and develop this approach.

Fixed Guideway Systems

Transit operators should retain all credits from charging transit buses, regardless of the method of charging (overhead lines vs. Electric Vehicle Service Equipment).


Thank you again for the opportunity to provide comment and please feel free to reach out if you have any questions.

Mendy Droke
State Government Relations
Seattle City Light
mendy.droke@seattle.gov
(206)316-0907
No attachments

Comment From: North West Handling Systems, I... (Rupesh Sansgiri)

11/24/21 @ 11:51 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Molecule LLC (Timothy Zenk)

11/22/21 @ 3:59 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Insight Strategic Partners (Matt Steuerwalt)

11/22/21 @ 1:04 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: e-Mission Control (Todd Trauman)

11/19/21 @ 4:14 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Multiple organizations (Leah Missik)

11/17/21 @ 1:41 PM
Please see the attached comments jointly submitted by Audubon Washington, Climate Reality Project Washington State Coalition, Climate Solutions, Coltura, FMS Global Strategies, Fuse Washington, NW Energy Coalition, RAIN Incubator, Seattle Metropolita...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Snohomish County PUD (Clark McIsaac)

11/15/21 @ 11:08 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Harrison Pettit

11/15/21 @ 4:33 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Farmers Business Network/Grada... (Brian Bonlender)

11/15/21 @ 8:40 AM
Please find attached comments from Farmer's Business Network/Gradable regarding inclusion of simplified on-farm carbon accounting. On-farm carbon accounting is an inevitable development for clean fuels program and it will be easier in the long run fo...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: WSPA (Jessica Spiegel)

11/12/21 @ 6:09 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Forth (Rhett Lawrence)

11/12/21 @ 4:58 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Renewable Energy Group (Kent Hartwig)

11/12/21 @ 9:48 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: ACT Commodities (Elise Miller)

11/10/21 @ 9:16 AM
CFPR Stakeholder Meeting Comments - ACT Commodities
Attachments:

Comment From: Puget Sound Energy (Cassie Bordelon)

11/08/21 @ 3:31 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: ChargePoint (Evan Neyland)

11/08/21 @ 9:27 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Climate Solutions (Leah Missik)

11/05/21 @ 11:21 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Coltura (Matthew Metz)

11/04/21 @ 1:55 PM
Please see attached letter.
Attachments:

Comment From: Charm Industrial, Inc. (Peter Reinhardt)

11/03/21 @ 11:13 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: NW Alliance for Clean Transpor... (Alex Schay)

11/02/21 @ 2:32 PM
As a starting point, the NW Alliance for Clean Transportation believes that Washington's Clean Fuels Program (CFP) should be technology agnostic, and based entirely on a defensible Carbon Intensity (CI) score for each fuel. To generate value for prod...↓
No attachments

Comment From: bp America Inc. (Mark Bunch)

11/02/21 @ 7:16 AM
Please find bp's comments relating to the 10/6/21 DOE presentation in the attached file (bp WA DOE LCFS comm...-21 FINAL.pdf). Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: FlexCharging (Brian Grunkemeyer)

10/07/21 @ 10:12 PM
FlexCharging is an electric vehicle Demand Flexibility aggregator, shifting EV charging to the best time of day to minimize costs and carbon emissions.

The key point: the carbon intensity of the electric grid varies substantially throughout the day, a...↓

We suggest that the state allow a very data-centric approach for determining carbon intensity of all uses of electricity. This affects two things: emissions-intensive trade-exposed industries, and the generation of credits for EV charging.

Specifically, we work with WattTime to consume a marginal CO2 emissions forecast for each utility balancing authority in North America (and beyond). WattTime provides this data at a 5 minute granularity. While data from utilities or from markets should be more authoritative, WattTime sets the standard for a robust methodology for calculating carbon intensity for electricity. Marrying this data with usage data provides very good carbon intensity data, and provides our best mechanism for optimizing to reduce emissions.

For a Clean Fuels Program, it's possible to collect very fine-grained data from electric vehicles on when they charge using vehicle telematics, or data from charging stations. Vehicle telematics are the most interesting for utilities since they can get the full lifecycle data of an EV, showing all locations where it charges (work, public, DC fast chargers, in addition to home).

FlexCharging's business is using vehicle telematics to shift charging to minimize costs and optimize around a marginal CO2 emissions forecast. We believe this provides substantial environmental value & cost savings for utilities. This level of data should be recognized for generating Clean Fuels Program credits, and we believe our marginal CO2 emissions data should be recognized by the state for determining the carbon intensity of any credits generated.

We'd be happy to discuss this in more detail.
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]