Cooke Aquaculture Pacific NPDES permit applications to raise steelhead

609 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

6/02/20 @ 7:05 AM
Steelhead Trout could be an opportunity for employment in the state of Washington. It would also allow for further food security.
No attachments

Comment From: Erik Marks

6/02/20 @ 6:35 AM

Dear DOE:

I am writing to express my opposition to the application by Cooke Aquaculture to change the species in its net pens.

The new proposed species is the Steelhead, which is native to the northwest. The prior species, the Atlantic Salmon, was not...↓

To treat the pending application as minor or insignificant is not reasonable. Significant analysis and study must be invested before the possible threats arising from a change in species can be understood. This analysis and study is made possible only through the full EIS process.

CONCLUSION: I urge you to rescind the MDNS and proceed with a full EIS examination of the proposed change in species.

No attachments

Comment From: Donald McGee

6/02/20 @ 5:14 AM
Aquaculture has been a very responsible and vital partner of the community. It traditionally provides employment for many in mostly rural areas. It provides critical commerce and spin offs making communities vibrant wherever they exist. Cooke's has b...↓
Please consider and support there application.
Respectfully,
Don McGee
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Douglas

6/02/20 @ 4:53 AM
I think it is great that this will allow the U.S. to produce more of their own seafood. It is so important that both the U.S. and Canada are able to produce sustainable seafood products within their countries. The local jobs and economic activity res...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Greg Lambert

6/02/20 @ 4:21 AM
I fully support the request from Cooke Aquaculture Pacific to transition to an all female sterile stock of Steelhead Trout.
From a native/non-native perspective, this Washington State based strain is the same strain that is already grown in Washington...↓

From a food safety view, 90% of US consumed fish is imported creating an enormous negative trade deficit for the country. Growing nutritious and safe seafood in our backyard is a no brainer that should be encouraged and not demonized. Aquaculture grown seafood has among the lowest carbon footprints of all protein sources, and requires the smallest quantities of freshwater and feed inputs to produce a kg of consumable product. One must realize that wild/capture based fisheries are already maxed out and harvested numbers will not grow beyond today's numbers while the demand for protein and seafood in particular will only increase. This increased demand can only be met by aquaculture for if not, the pressure on wild stocks will only increase and result in further damage to recovery efforts of both fish and mammalian species.

From a discharge perspective and the primary point on if this modification will be approved or not, this move should also be applauded, in addition to having better feed conversion ratios, steelhead grow faster than Atlantic Salmon and are harvested at a smaller size which results in a smaller quantity of feed used. Lower quantities of inputs will result in lower quantities of outputs.

Finally, this move by Cooke Pacific would allow them to continue to employ Washingtonians in a time where good jobs such as these are harder and harder to find and keep. I trust the Department of Ecology will do their homework and weed out the false information/scare tactics used by groups and individuals who are opposed to this permit change and ultimately approve this common sense approach being used by Cooke. Cooke is only trying to comply with the Legislature's wishes and grow species which are Native to the Pacific Northwest and Washington specifically and i can't think of a more native stock than these Washington based sterile Steelhead.

Keep the jobs and keep the pressure off of wild strains, approve this permit alteration!

No attachments

Comment From: Bruce Dobson

6/02/20 @ 4:21 AM
My comments:
Switching species does NOT reduce the rampant daily pollution and water quality risks posed by open water net pen aquaculture. Ecology should not limit the scope of their review to risks associated with a change of species.

Decades of expe...↓

Regardng fish Effluent:

Open water net pens routinely disperse large volumes of feed into public waters within the boundaries of the net pens. Some portion of the feed may not be consumed by penned fish, and thus makes its way into, and have an impact upon, the surrounding marine environment. The high-energy tidal zones in which net pens are located may drive broad dispersal of unconsumed feed and other dietary supplements, including medicines. This dispersal of feed into public waters represents a continuous and constant act of chumming, and attracts native fish species as well as other wildlife (see #8). Divers near net pens have observed large schools of fish swimming in and out of the pens, and reports from British Columbia on bycatch and incidental take of wild species during harvest operations indicate that many native species enter the pens, likely because of the food attraction.

Small fish species, such as baitfish species and outmigrating and rearing wild salmon and trout (including ESA-listed Chinook and steelhead), may be attracted by net pen feed to the point where they physically enter a net pen facility and are vulnerable to predation from farmed Atlantic salmon in the pens.

The constant dispersal of feed may also cause disruptions in the natural migratory patterns of wild fish, as the pens provide a constant and unnatural food source that may cause wild salmon or trout to occupy a single location for a longer period of time than is typical, and deter rearing or migrating wild ifsh from developing key feeding strategies which are critical to their early growth and development. This constant source food is also likely to draw native species (including ESA-listed Chinook and steelhead) from their protective shallow nearshore habitats to net pens.

Additionally, feeding and harvesting steelhead from the net pens attracts wildlife to the vicinity of the pens, including birds, sea lions, orcas, seals, and other fish. Cooke's NPDES permits need to consider this additional biomass and waste from these attracted species when setting limits for phosphorous, nitrogen, and other discharge.

Aside from water quality concerns, this attraction increases the chances that orcas and other marine mammals will be harassed, and that endangered wild fish will be accidentally harvested, injured, or preyed upon.

Regarding fish Waste:

No matter the species, there is no mechanism to capture waste from open water net pen aquaculture. Fish waste, excess food, dead fish, and tissue sloughed off of live fish, all flow from net pens into surrounding waters. This nutrient imbalance in the vicinity of pens can be harmful to some wild species, and can cause unhealthy growth of other species, including algal blooms. Additional climate change impacts suggest die-offs from algal blooms could be more frequent. Read about an example in BC's Clayquoet Bay.

Unlike highly-regulated land-based agriculture and production where animal manure is collected and composted, waste (feces, urine, medicines, and uneaten feed) from open water is discharged directly into public water. The most prominent organic nutrient waste involved are phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). Based on calculations made by Wild Fish Conservancy using a bioenergetics program and data provided by Cooke in their monthly NPDES reports, the estimated amount of untreated N discharged by Atlantic salmon net pens in Puget Sound on a daily basis is roughly equivalent to the amount of N discharged in waste treated by the city of Tacoma. For the same comparison with regards to P, the amount of discharge is roughly equivalent to the cities of Port Angeles, Everett, Bellingham, and Tacoma combined.

The attraction of wildlife including birds, sea lions, orcas, seals, and other fish (described in 5a) concentrates animal waste near the pens, further increasingly levels of phosphorous and nitrogen.

Currently, Ecology only considers the impacts of the nutrients and chemicals discharged on the environment directly below or in close vicinity to the pens. As part of risk assessment and monitoring, Ecology should utilize the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's Salish Sea Model, a predictive ocean-modeling tool developed by the federal government for coastal estuarine research, restoration planning, water-quality management, and climate change response. This tool could analyze how discharge and pollution from net pens travels through the dynamic, tidal marine environment, therefore allow Ecology to better evaluate the risk the pollution poses and the geographic range the pollution would impact.

Regarding amplification and Discharge of Viruses, Parasites, and Diseases:

Rearing concentrated populations in what are effectively aquatic animal feedlots, face greater risk of disease, parasitic, and viral amplification than wild fish populations. When outbreaks break out in net pens, the disease-causing organisms are rapidly amplified in number and discharged to the surrounding aquatic environment in large numbers. Because wild steelhead and other species of concern (i.e. coho salmon, ESA-listed Chinook salmon and bull trout and as required by WAC 197-11-080) swim in close proximity to the pens, there is likely to be a spread of disease from infected farmed fish to these endangered wild populations.

In 2017, a B.C. study documented a strong correlational connection between disease prevalence in net pens and disease transfer to wild fish populations (Morton et al., 2017). Recent research in British Columbia found novel viruses in endangered salmon, and found evidence that these novel viral infections may originate from farmed salmon and trout (Mordecai et al., 2019).

Such pathogens fall within the definition of pollutants, and the NPDES permit review should ensure that Cooke's plans will eliminate the risk of these pollutants harming the integrity of the Sound ecosystem and the biological integrity of its wild species.

Net pens chronically discharge particles of decaying fish flesh that are often consumed by native fish and birds. These particles may be contaminated with pathogens, parasites, pharmaceuticals or chemicals that may be ingested by native fishes, including wild steelhead, salmon, and other trout. Studies have shown that these particles are potential vectors for pathogens. While Cooke now is required to recover dead fish and transport them upland for disposal, there is currently no mandate that those mortalities be submitted to the state for testing before disposal.

Regarding discharge of antibiotics and medical effluent:

In order to treat specific diseases of fungal occurrences or to prevent infection, chemicals and pharmaceuticals are often applied by the industry to the fish, water, or feed in the net pens. Among the potential and likely harmful impacts to designated uses of surrounding water is the use of these chemical or pharmaceuticals for treating infections, parasites or diseases such as "yellow mouth" where the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires a 30 day waiting period before treated fish may be approved for human consumption. Native fishes in the immediate vicinity of the treated pens may also be exposed to or consume the very same chemicals and pharmaceutical treatments (including fish that may enter the pens attracted by the presence of feed and fish odors). These fish may then be caught in recreational or commercial fisheries and unknowingly be consumed by the public within FDA's required 30 day waiting period. This risk to the public and to wild fish must be addressed in the NPDES review.

The SEPA checklist submitted by Cooke Aquaculture and included in this record refers to the use of unspecified probiotic supplements. These unspecified introduced microbes are likely to colonize the microbiome of native fish and the environment near net pens. Given the growing scientific appreciation of the role of the microbiome in health and development of fish and other animals and plants, these supplements should be detailed, and a plan for monitoring surrounding areas and fish populations for colonization or excess growth of these bacteria should be required. This monitoring should also test for growth of antibiotic resistance in nearby areas.

It should also examine new data on antibiotic resistance in protected marine mammals (research discussed in this recent report from High Country News). These risks were discussed in the SEPA comments submitted by the Our Sound, Our Salmon coalition in 2019, and comments to the previous Atlantic salmon NPDES review.

Regardng the change in species poses new and different risks:

The change in species poses new and different risks, in addition to the harms open water net pen aquaculture has caused for decades. Some policies which may have been permitted for Atlantic salmon under the pre-2017 status quo when, pose additional risks with the proposal to introduce a highly-domesticated and partially-sterile form of steelhead. The differences in this circumstance were considered as far back as 1990, when the last comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement was drafted. The prior permitting for these pens and their operations all addressed risks associated with a non-native species. In dealing with biologically-altered, domesticated steelhead and Puget Sound's federally-listed steelhead population, different risks apply, and standards laid out in the 1990 EIS have not been met for these purposes.

For example:

The "a minimum distance of separation between farms and river mouths" has never been considered and adopted in state policy, as section 5.7.2.2 of the 1990 EIS would require for aquaculture involving native fish (and as is required in many other nations). Since escapes, and their risks to threatened steelhead and rainbow trout, constitute pollution and are within the scope of Ecology's review, this guidance and an analysis of the proximity of pens to steelhead spawning rivers should be included in Ecology's review of these NPDES permits. In addition, the assessment of risks from pollution (including diseases) should account for the migration corridors in areas like Rich Passage, which may concentrate wild salmon near the pens.

The behavioral response of wild steelhead to a large aggregation of wild steelhead may be different than it was to Atlantic salmon. If wild schools are attracted to the captive domesticated steelhead in pens, the pollution from the pens may do greater harm to hatchery-reared steelhead and to threatened wild Puget Sound steelhead.

Despite treatment to render the fish infertile (triploid), many fish in the pens will be capable of reproducing. When a net pen collapses, it will release more fertile female steelhead than exist in many endangered wild steelhead runs. When an escape happens, it will be nearly impossible to manage a recovery effort that removes farmed steelhead and does no harm to endangered wild steelhead and bull trout, endangered and threatened salmon, endangered southern resident killer whales, and other protected wildlife in Puget Sound.

The escape of steelhead from any of the Puget Sound aquaculture facilities, whether from small scale leakage or catastrophic facility failure, will pose risks to native salmon, steelhead, and rainbow trout rearing in nearshore marine habitats and rivers due to competition for food and foraging space. This will be particularly true in the case of Cooke's proposed triploid (treatment to render the fish infertile) steelhead because as noted in Cooke's materials, triploid fish have appetites that are likely to be considerably greater than wild juvenile salmon and steelhead due to the faster inherent growth rate of these triploid fish. This means escapees may outcompete wild steelhead, or indeed predate upon them.

Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Hugh Mitchell

6/02/20 @ 4:15 AM
This requested switch is whether Atlantic salmon waste and impact is different from Rainbow trout - pure and simple. Unfortunately, anti aquaculture ideology is behind many of the comments that are against the permit modification (see attached). Thes...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Anna zacher

6/02/20 @ 4:14 AM
I support the permits of raising these fish.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

6/02/20 @ 4:12 AM
Excellent economic opportunity for the state of Washington! This can be a locally grown nutritious product to be proud of!
No attachments

Comment From: Amanda Cashman

6/02/20 @ 4:02 AM
I am writing in support of Cooke Aquaculture's request for permit. I strongly believe that farm raised fish plays an important role in keeping citizens fed without the environmental damage that wild caught fish poses.

Sustainable fish farming has majo...↓

To begin with, fish farming provides an alternative that may reduce pressures on wild fish stocks. Fish are a major source of protein in many parts of the world, and the result has been massive damage to wild fisheries and ecosystems. But fish farming is a growing alternative.

In 2012, fish farming produced ninety million tons of fish at a value of $144 billion, and the amount continues to rise, with China as the largest producer. The World Bank projects that farmed fish could provide an increased role in providing protein to the also-increased world mid-century population. For that reasons, a substantial expansion of sustainable aquaculture (primarily of herbivorous fish) could reduce pressure on wild stocks and could potentially also reduce demand for other forms of animal protein such as beef.

In terms of the United States, the food-guideline advisory group found that expanding aquaculture can provide sufficient seafood to comply with dietary guidelines. The advisory group called for sustainable productivity gains while maintaining the high nutrition level of wild seafood. In addition, they concluded, "farm-raised fin-fish (e.g., salmon and trout) is more sustainable than terrestrial animal production (e.g., beef and pork) in terms of GHG emissions and land/water use."

Environmentally, there's no free lunch. People need protein, and the main sources are (1) meat and other products from farm animals, (2) soybeans and other legumes, and (3) fish. None of these sources is free of environmental risks. But fish are a healthier and potentially more sustainable source than farm animals, and farmed fish may have fewer environmental costs than wild ones.

Not only does allowing Cooke to raise steelhead make environmental sense, it makes economic sense as well. Allowing the operation to continue provides job security in an uncertain economy. Now, more than ever it is important to allow operations to continue, especially operations that provide a sustainable food source. This operation has been in business and a part of our local economy for many years. If this permit is not approved many people will lose their jobs and livelihood.

No attachments

Comment From: Chris Miller

6/02/20 @ 3:38 AM
We need to keep farm raised steelhead in our state and country there is no reason to shut down Cooke from raising these fish and keeping our wild steelhead thriving.
No attachments

Comment From: Gary McLean

6/02/20 @ 3:27 AM
The idea of raising all-female triploid Steelhead trout in Cooke Aquaculture's Washington State net pens makes tremendous sense on multiple levels. The fact that the species is native to the region and will be sterile provides for minimal environmen...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Hermsen

6/02/20 @ 3:26 AM
I believe to make America great again that we must first produce our own seafood any product and keep it close to home. Get American back to American made items.
No attachments

Comment From: Stephanie Milbury

6/02/20 @ 3:13 AM
What cook aquaculture is doing is amazing and I think it be amazing to expand in the fish industry. They are amazing people to work with very polite and always positive
No attachments

Comment From: Kelley Bright

6/02/20 @ 3:11 AM
Dear DOE,
I am writing in support of the Cooke Aquaculture plan to raise Steelhead in net pens in the Salish Sea. In this day of trying to buy food that is raised locally, it is frustrating to see so much fish brought in from other countries. It is ...↓
Respectfully submitted,
Kelley Bright
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

6/02/20 @ 3:05 AM
Steelhead farming is good for the economy, safe for the environment, and helps to provide healthy protein options at a time when global demand for same outpaces wild supply.
No attachments

Comment From: Judy Noddin

6/02/20 @ 3:03 AM
I support ocean aquaculture growth. Both wild and farmed seafood is essential to meet the global demand for healthy and sustainable seafood products. During this pandemic we need the jobs that produce this seafood and the seafood industry need thes...↓

Judy Noddin
No attachments

Comment From: William Cook

6/02/20 @ 3:02 AM
Raising fish in the Puget Sound is a great way to preserve the nature fish runs. Less fish will be needed from wild caught. My career has depended on aquaculture for over 30 years. I have been a part of making aquaculture a safe and renewable source ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: RL&J Ventures Inc (Elaine Reddick)

6/02/20 @ 2:59 AM
I think this is a wonderful idea and should be granted. As we have realized with the Pandemic lately whatever steps need to be done so that when times are tough we will always be able to feed our families.
No attachments

Comment From: Craig Lithgow

6/02/20 @ 2:59 AM
I am employed in commercial salmon aquaculture in coastal Maine. The growth of aquaculture here has provided many alternative jobs for coastal families as traditional fisheries such as sardines and ground fish have declined. It is one industry help...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jack Field

6/02/20 @ 2:59 AM
I support the approval of Cooke's permit to raise steelhead. I think the permit is science based and should be approved. Cooke will provide needed jobs with the approval of this permit. This permit represents a great deal of work from both DOE and...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Don Huizenga

6/02/20 @ 2:58 AM
As a business owner that supplies Cooke Aquaculture with a supply chain I strongly support them and their very good employees we deal with, awesome people.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

6/02/20 @ 2:57 AM
My family and I are in strong support of Cooke Aquaculture Pacific's plan to raise non-reproductive triploid steelhead trout in Washington State. This will stimulate local economies, provide jobs, and improve domestic food security.
No attachments

Comment From: Don Huizenga

6/02/20 @ 2:54 AM
I strongly support Cooke Aquacultures Permit Alteration. Great Company.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

6/02/20 @ 2:50 AM
My family and I believe that local jobs and locally produced food in the communities where the fish are grown is very important.
No attachments

Comment From: Nick Smith

6/02/20 @ 2:46 AM
Permitting Cooke Aquaculture Pacific to rear triploid Steelhead Trout would seem a very sensible approach in this case.
Having worked with triploid trout in the UK in the early years of my career in aquaculture, I would wholeheartedly support this as ...↓

Local coastal economies can be stimulated, jobs secured, and domestic food security improved. All this with no risk of any potential escapees reproducing at all as they would be incapable of maturation due to their triploid status.
I personally can't see why permission would not be granted for such a positive proposal.

No attachments

Comment From: Karen Martin

6/02/20 @ 2:40 AM
I fully support Cooke Aquaculture's plan to raise non-reproductive triploid steelhead trout in Washington State. This is an excellent solution to provide sustainable seafood products while protecting wild fish stock. Aquaculture strengthens domestic ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Marcia Malarz

6/02/20 @ 2:27 AM
We need to keep seafood production in the United States and quit sending everything to China. Keep jobs in America and in wa state. Thanks
No attachments

Comment From: Gordon King

6/02/20 @ 2:18 AM
I write in support of the Cooke Aquaculture's Net Pen Proposal to raise Steelhead in Washington State.
I have a Bachelor of Science degree in Biology and have been involved in Aquaculture for 40 years farming several different species in the marine en...↓
We have a problem in the North West with the health of our marine resource which has serious impacts on the well being of many marine species including native salmonids. Because of this it is important we direct our resources for creating change to focus on issues that really have an impact. These areas of concern need to be identified with objective science not by lay members of the public who have a strong emotional feeling with little scientific understanding. We only need to look to Oregon and Northern California with no marine finfish aquaculture industry but a seriously depleted marine resource and many endangered salmonid stocks to understand laying these problems at the foot of the net pen industry in Washington State is a convenient distraction not backed by unbiased evidence.
Using net pens to raise Steelhead is an efficient way to produce high quality farmed fish with minor impact to the marine resource and all environmental concerns can be monitored and controled with the many regulations already available to government agencies.

No attachments

Comment From: Katrina Best

6/02/20 @ 2:10 AM
This would allow locally produced food and create jobs for the state. Very positive move!

No attachments

Comment From: Lloyd Purdy

6/02/20 @ 2:10 AM
I support the proposal by Cooke Aquaculture to grow farm trout in Washington state .
I am a retired fish farmer with 30 years experience in Canada , Maine USA , and in Chile . My experience is that fish farming in general , and for this project in pa...↓

It is in everyone's best interests for North American Communities to become more self sufficient in seafood.
No attachments

Comment From: Lorraine Harris

6/02/20 @ 2:09 AM
I fully support the new permit, which would allow Cooke Aquaculture to raise steelhead trout in their net pens. This would allow Cooke Aquaculture Pacific to continue in providing healthy and sustainable seafood products to the West coast.
No attachments

Comment From: Carrie Bosien

6/02/20 @ 2:09 AM
I believe that locally produced food and local jobs in the community is very important especially during this difficult time

No attachments

Comment From: Justin Case

6/02/20 @ 2:07 AM
To whom this concerns

I am in strong support of Cooke Aquaculture Pacific NPDES permit applications to raise steelhead I live and work in the areas that these fish are raised we see nothing but a great company with high standards of farming and care f...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Geoff McB

6/02/20 @ 2:06 AM
This modification will allow for the continued production of a valuable food source to support domestic food security while maintaining much needed employment.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

6/02/20 @ 1:58 AM
Aquaculture brings several benefits to rural coastal communities, namely stable jobs, access to food, etc. With Cooke switching their cultured species to rainbow trout, and the fact that the rainbow trout are triploid fish, the risk of affecting wild...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Ted Weaire

6/02/20 @ 1:57 AM
I fully support the efforts of the farming industry supply a healthy sustainable food source to all points of the globe.
No attachments

Comment From: Jill Van Hulle

6/02/20 @ 1:51 AM
I'm writing to support Cooke Aquaculture's creative efforts to continue their mission to grow delicious, sustainable fish in Washington while preserving jobs. Steelhead are a great option for this operation. Farmed Fish are a healthy, affordable so...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Troy MacNeill

6/02/20 @ 1:49 AM
This is a great opportunity to produce local seafood as 90% of the seafood consumed in the US is imported. Supports local jobs and local economic activity, especially during this challenging global pandemic.
No attachments

Comment From: Todd MacArthur

6/02/20 @ 1:44 AM
Hello,

To state my bias: I am professionally involved in the aquaculture industry. I am also passionate about sustainably producing food in a way that contributes positively to the health of our planet and our species.
With an undergraduate Degree in E...↓
Simply put; If wild fisheries were to meet entire global demand for seafood the ocean populations would be decimated. All agricultural enterprises have impacts on their environment. Agriculture is by its nature an unnatural activity. The environmental impact of Aquaculture per calorie produced is a fraction of those produced in beef, pork, or even almonds.
Aquaculture operators care for their livestock directly in the environment where their activities have the greatest impact. This means that any fouling in the ocean affects their bottom line. This is unlike land based agricultural practices which have created a dead zone the size of Massachusetts in the Gulf of Mexico with no repercussions on the productivity of those operators and no reparations to the industries and wildlife destroyed.
To be clear I do support Wild Fisheries, Land Based Agriculture, and of course Aquaculture. To deny any of these industries the opportunity to develop increasingly sustainable practices seems short sighted and emotionally driven.
Please also consider that for the people who work within this industry, and those industries which support aquaculture: Your decision impacts our ability to put food on our family's plates, as well as our customers.

Thank you to the State of Washington Department of Ecology for considering my comment.
Todd MacArthur.

No attachments

Comment From: Malcolm Marwick

6/02/20 @ 1:40 AM
It is important to have food security, supply from local sources provides employment and control over the environmental impact.
Raising sterile fish poses no risk to the local habitat and is also native to the region.
No attachments

Comment From: ANDREW SLOAF

6/02/20 @ 1:38 AM
I'm very in favor of the proposed changes to the business plan that Cooke Aquaculture is pursuing. It is completely in keeping with the current laws of the state of Washington.
In the United States, Seafood is second only to oil imports in a trade de...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Meagan Anonymous

6/02/20 @ 1:37 AM
This is a great solution to be sustainable in our own efforts to be food secure, and to raise native fish of Washington. With these fish being tripled, they can not ever reproduce, and will not hurt any native population or the genetics specific to e...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Evan Brown

6/02/20 @ 1:34 AM
aquaculture can help prevent the extinction of a species
No attachments

Comment From: Yanchang Huang

6/02/20 @ 1:33 AM
Support to produce food in North America. A good solution to keep employment opportunities for the locals while providing healthy and sustainable seafood products to customers.
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Matthews

6/02/20 @ 1:31 AM
I believe that Cooke Aquaculture's plan to raise non-reproductive triploid steelhead trout is a viable solution to help provide sustainable seafood products for West Coast consumers without danger of impact to wild fish stock. Local food sources are...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Tait

6/02/20 @ 1:30 AM
Sustainable fin fish aquaculture should be supported. It will reduce imports from outside USA and it secures valuable employment in rural areas and supports rural economies.
No attachments

Comment From: Myrna Pierce

6/02/20 @ 1:28 AM
Excellent family owned company who goes above and beyond to help communities and the people who live there.I fully support the modification to the permit which would allow Cooke Aquaculture to raise steel head in their net pens
No attachments

Comment From: Justin White

6/02/20 @ 1:26 AM
Farmed fish is the way to a sustainable future, please proceed with this.
No attachments

Comment From: Jon Steeves

6/02/20 @ 1:26 AM
I support aquaculture whole heartedly in all its forms. It is more sustainable than any other farm raised animal protein and is the only we can hope to keep our world fed. The US is woefully behind the curve when it comes to aquaculture and needs to ...↓
90% of seafood is imported, many of which from asian countries with very little quality control. It's time the US become a major player in the aquaculture space and cooke and washington state can be a great example for the rest of the country.
No attachments

Comment From: Matt Roach

6/02/20 @ 1:23 AM
Given the threat to protein supply that has occurred during the current COVID-19 pandemic, investing in a sustainable food source such as farmed fish, makes very good sense. The health benefits of fish are well documented and here is an opportunity ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Schyf

6/02/20 @ 1:22 AM
I believe very strongly that aquaculture is the most sustainable way to provide healthy seafood for people in North America. I read as much as I can on the subject and feel very confident that this is the best way forward. I also believe that Canad...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kim Making

6/02/20 @ 1:22 AM
Great to see the industry moving forward thinking of sustainability as well as the environmental aspect of Aquaculture!
I fully support the modification to the permit which would allow Cooke Aquaculture to raise
steelhead in their net pens.
Good luck in...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

6/02/20 @ 1:20 AM
The U.S. imports over 90% of the seafood it consumes. If 90% of the beef, chicken, wheat, corn or soybeans consumed in the U.S. came from foreign imports - food security would not exist. There is no reason the U.S. and Washington State could not be p...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Shelley Berdan

6/02/20 @ 1:17 AM
In such troubling and uncertain times, we need to keep companies working to produce food sources locally and keep jobs in our communities. Salmon is an important ingredient for a healthy diet and holds the potential to keep people employed.
No attachments

Comment From: Christa Parent

6/02/20 @ 1:16 AM
Cooke Aquaculture is a great family based company that helps every community it is associated with and even ones that it is not. Please allow them to raise steelhead trout in your state.

No attachments

Comment From: Matt Acker

6/02/20 @ 1:16 AM
Great to see the industry moving forward thinking of sustainability as well as the environmental aspect of Aquaculture!
Good luck in the future and can't wait to hear more great news like this!!
No attachments

Comment From: Mat Gauthier

6/02/20 @ 1:13 AM
Aquaculture is the most sustainable form of seafood. Especially when it's done with native species. It's an essential source of protein for our future.
No attachments

Comment From: Dexter Brown

6/02/20 @ 12:52 AM
Deny this permit unequivocally - all Puget Sound salmon are endangered, and commercial pen inevitable escapement could render our fish extinct in a matter of a few years. This company will always do the least to protect our waters and their past hist...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Robert Bright

6/01/20 @ 11:44 PM
My family relies on sustainable seafood as an alternative to beef. I applaud cooke aquacultures willingness to switch to steelhead which I find more flavorful than Atlantic salmon. I appreciate the local source of quality seafood produced by American...↓

I have been involved in commercial fishing supply business since 1980.

It is my opinion that small commercial fishing boats containing three to nine fishermen are some of the most wasteful and polluting ways to harvest seafood between the human waste the fuel diesel and incredibly inefficiency of a swarm of boats in a marina or in a harbor or in a passage trapping fish makes no sense economically or environmentally.
I support a scientific and careful harvest of a sustainable resource like steelhead.
Yesterday the news from American seafoods where something like 70% of their crew has coved virus after just a month after taking every precaution is another reason why we do not need to send people into danger on fishing factory trawlers at this time.
Eighty-six crew members of an American Seafoods trawler have tested positive for COVID-19, according to a press release from the seafood company Sunday night. Nine tests are still outstanding.

The American Dynasty � a 272-foot trawler whose home port is Seattle, WA � had previously reported one crew member tested positive and was admitted to the hospital on Friday, May 29, for treatment. As a result, the company decided to test the entire crew, and on May 30 an additional 85 crew members were confirmed positive.

The factory trawler was most recently in Bellingham, WA, and has returned to the Port of Seattle where it is currently under lockdown. All crew members are being quarantined and monitored by medical personnel, the press release said
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Skatrud

6/01/20 @ 9:47 PM
These comments are for the proposed species change of Cooke Aquaculture Pacific from salmon to steelhead. I oppose this change for the following reasons: 1) I am aware of no other pen raising of steelhead in the Washington waters and know there will...↓
Thanks for your consideration.
No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Amos

6/01/20 @ 1:13 PM
I directed the Fish Health Program for the State of Washington from 1986 until 2000 when I was loaned to NOAA Fisheries, Washington DC, where I was the National Aquatic Animal Health Coordinator. My work was involved in national and international aqu...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Randy Hodgin

6/01/20 @ 1:12 PM
With the United States demand for seafood continuing to grow we need to allow Cooke Aquaculture to receive this permit to raise sterile Steelhead trout. Our own wild stocks will never be able to support the demand for salmon and trout. The sterile st...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Randy Hodgin

6/01/20 @ 1:11 PM
With the United States demand for seafood continuing to grow we need to allow Cooke Aquaculture to receive this permit to raise sterile Steelhead trout. Our own wild stocks will never be able to support the demand for salmon and trout. The sterile st...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Mike Buzard

6/01/20 @ 12:37 PM
Although I am not employed by Cooke Aquaculture Pacific I have seen the many good things they have done for the citizens and economic well-being of Washington. It is time to look at the science that supports this industry. In the infamous words of ou...↓
Please read carefully the negative comments about our industry and carefully read through them to see the bias and uninformed opinions they contain.
No attachments

Comment From: Tom Glaspie

6/01/20 @ 12:31 PM
I support the decision to have Cooke transition to raising all-female triploid Steelhead in their Washington marine net pens. The Puget Sound is the perfect place to raise these fish! Steelhead are a native fish to Washington State, and are currently...↓
Please approve this transition.

I support Cooke,

Thank you,

Tom Glaspie

No attachments

Comment From: Shaun Hubbard

6/01/20 @ 11:54 AM
As a resident of the San Juan Islands, as an advocate for wild fish and their habitat, as a lifelong Washingtonian who has seen the disappearance of so many of our natural resources, I am greatly concerned about the switcheroo that Cooke Aquaculture ...↓

The risks of water pollution from a net pen are there no matter what is in that pen. This NPDES review should re-examine existing data on effluents from industrial products, medicines, feed, fish waste, and dead and rotting fish to assess whether the current plans eliminate all of those risks.

Cooke's new fish of choice are not 100% infertile fish and they are considered a pollutant. What preventions are in place to ensure that there are NO escapes? An "escape response plan" is too little too late.

No permitting or leases should be authorized until the Court decides on the legal challenge to WDFW's decision to issue an MDNS, stifling the SEPA review process. And no permitting or leases should be authorized until all local, state, federal and tribal governments weigh in.

Washington's 2018 law, HB 2957, banning Atlantic salmon net pens set a new standard of safety to our environment. Can Cooke hold to those standards? The law dictates that Cooke needs to prove that their proposed new operations "eliminate...escapement and to eliminate negative impacts to water quality and native fish, shellfish, and wildlife."

Thank you for this opportunity and for your consideration of my comments.

No attachments

Comment From: Jan Phelps

6/01/20 @ 8:35 AM
Citizens want native salmon protected. Once undone that can never go back. Also, my understanding is that pollution from this fish farm is a problem. Help us keep the Puget Sound clean. Fish farming needs to move to the interior somewhere.
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Crampton

6/01/20 @ 8:32 AM
I myself am fully occupied at this time with outdoor work related to salmon and Pacific NW watersheds, have irregular internet access, and don't remember if I made a comment to this particular stage of the Cooke Aquaculture proposals. Better twice t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Greg Abel

6/01/20 @ 4:19 AM
I support this permit application. Both the State and the Public would benefit. There is no risk to other species as these fish are sterile and can't reproduce. Fish are vital to our diet and our health. To insure there are adequate supplies of o...↓
No attachments

Comment From: National Fisheries Institute (Gavin Gibbons)

6/01/20 @ 3:48 AM
Aquaculture is an important global industry that should be recognized as a fast-growing sector with the potential to create jobs here and improve this country's access to nutritious, affordable food. While half of all the seafood we eat in this count...↓

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says, "aquaculture in the United States contributes to seafood supply, supports commercial fisheries, restores habitat and at-risk species, and maintains economic activity in coastal communities and at working waterfronts in every coastal state."

Sustainable aquaculture growth can benefit not only economic and environmental health but public health as well. The U.S. Dietary Guidelines recommend Americas eat at least two to three servings of seafood per week but we eat, on average, just one. A Harvard University study shows low seafood intake is responsible for 84,000 preventable deaths a year in this country. Positive nutrition outcomes coupled with economic and environmental benefits make aquaculture an important aspect of our food security.

Aquaculture is known as one of the most research-intensive, environmentally responsible and commercially sustainable industries in the world. Aquaculture is a science-based business and relies on veterinarians, biologists and feed specialists for advice and oversight on everyday farming practices. Cooke Aquaculture Pacific operations are also BAP (Best Aquaculture Practices) certified ensuring that every step in the aquaculture production chain from feed manufacturing to hatcheries to farming to harvesting to processing is done responsibly.

The Coller Fairr Protein Index, which ranks protein producers on material environmental, social and governance issues against the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, ranks aquaculture at the top for sustainability. Fish and shellfish farmed in the ocean are a top food choice for those who want a healthy option while reducing their environmental impact.

The National Fisheries Institute is the largest seafood trade association in the country and represents producers of seafood, wild and farmed; as well as importers, exporters, distributors and foodservice establishments that serve seafood. We believe the application by Cooke Aquaculture Pacific to raise rainbow trout will benefit the people of the state of Washington with needed jobs and the nation as a whole.

Gavin Gibbons
Vice President, Communications
National Fisheries Institute
No attachments

Comment From: Sallie Rose Madrone

6/01/20 @ 3:46 AM
Please DO NOT continue with your project for highly domesticated, partially sterile steelhead pens!!! This would lead to the annihilation of wild steelhead and more contamination of the water.

Thank you!

Sincerely,
Sallie Rose Madrone
No attachments

Comment From: John Ficalora

6/01/20 @ 2:27 AM
I read and agree with the Our Sound, Our Salmon (OSOS) position.

Ecology's NPDES permit review should not begin until there has been thorough consultation with local, state, federal, and tribal governments. Many tribal nations submitted comments to th...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Marsha Abel

6/01/20 @ 2:10 AM
I am in favor of Cooke Aquaculture being able to raise all-female triploid steelhead in their net pens. I have long been a supporter of farmed fish as both a healthy and a sustainable way to bring seafood/fish to the public. Over the years Cooke ha...↓
I fully support the modification to the permit which would allow Cooke Aquaculture to raise steelhead in their net pens.
Sincerely,
Marsha Abel
No attachments

Comment From: ART PETERSON

6/01/20 @ 1:18 AM
I am totally opposed to Cooke Aquaculture's request for a NPDES permit modification to raise steelhead.
In addition I am opposed to any further use of Puget Sound waters and other Washington State marine waters for net production of fish. As an 80 y...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Bob Vadas, Jr.

5/31/20 @ 7:35 AM
Given the state of net-pen disrepair in the North Sound that led to the massive escape of Atlantic salmon, as well as the downplaying & deals that Cooke Aquaculture tried to pull on the subject, they've worn out their welcome in WA. That's why the st...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Cynthia Kaul

5/31/20 @ 4:17 AM

Ecology should not authorize Cooke's modified NPDES permits until the ongoing lawsuit challenging the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) environmental review process and determination is complete.
There is substantial new information that was not c...↓
Washington's landmark 2018 law, HB2957, created a new and stricter regulatory regime for marine net pen aquaculture.
Switching species does not reduce the rampant daily pollution and water quality risks posed by open water net pen aquaculture. Ecology should not limit the scope of their review to risks associated with a change of species.
The change in species poses new and different risks.
Escape prevention and the adequacy of Cooke's escape prevention and escape response plans must be carefully considered in this permit process.
Ecology should not issue NPDES permits until Cooke has initiated and received agreement from all local, state, federal, and tribal governments.

No attachments

Comment From: Brian O'Dell

5/30/20 @ 11:03 PM
The Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) decision to issue a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) granted Cooke key permits and ended the environmental review process under SEPA. This decision is currently being legally challenged in...↓

The SEPA determination issued in January, 2020 (Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS), requires Cooke to prepare and submit a plan for marking steelhead (clipping the adipose fin) in ways that will distinguish fish from their pens from hatchery-raised fish swimming freely in Puget Sound. That plan is not part of this record, and review of the NPDES permit application should await that filing.

The MDNS also requires Cooke to submit a plan for a "no-recovery response" to escapes. That plan is not part of the escape plan submitted in Cooke's application, and it is impossible to assess the adequacy of Cooke's pollution prevention plan until that plan is included in the application.

During the emergency response to the Orchard Rocks partial sinking, Cooke told DNR that they planned to replace some existing net pens in Puget Sound. If indeed that plan is under way, the NPDES review should include engineering data on the new pen structures in order to assess the adequacy of those pens for Puget Sound's dynamic conditions, and the escape risk and other risks the new pens might pose to Puget Sound.

The SEPA review led by the Washington Department of Fish and Wlidlife which produced the MDNS, is currently being appealed (see #1). Given the potential for a Court ruling requiring additional environmental review under SEPA and this new information described above, Ecology should delay drafting any NPDES permit until the evidentiary record and ruling can be incorporated.

Following the 2017 Cypress Island net pen collapse, Wild Fish Conservancy sued Cooke Aquaculture under the Clean Water Act (CWA). That suit resulted in rulings that the company had violated the terms of its permits, including by failing to conduct required inspections of net pen moorings and anchors, to accurately monitor and report the number of fish escaping from pens, to develop operational plans that include necessary procedures for inspecting cages, storing chemicals, disposing of harvest blood, and to track the number of fish in its cages and lost to predation. Cooke's history of CWA violations is important to consider in this process, if nothing else to ensure that the permits are drafted to ensure that violations are detected before catastrophe ensues.

Incidents like the partial sinking of the Orchard Rocks pen in October, 2019 demonstrate that the risks of additional escapes are very real, given the state of the existing pen structures. The response to that incident was conducted by several Washington State agencies, including Ecology, and the records from that incident and state agencies' documentation of Cooke's inadequate emergency response should be included in this record to ensure that emergency plans incorporate lessons learned, and acknowledge the degraded state of the surviving pens as identified by state inspectors and Cooke's own contractors.

In 2018, Washington's passed a law, HB 2957, banning Atlantic salmon net pens on the grounds that the practice placed too great a risk on the ecosystem, created a new and stricter regulatory regime for marine net pen aquaculture.

As such, it is not sufficient to say that conditions of the current NPDES application are similar to those of past permits. HB 2957's new standards require re-examining past decisions to hold Cooke Aquaculture to that higher standard of eliminating these risks.

In reviewing Cooke's submissions and other materials submitted through this public process, the standard of review should be specifically on whether the policies in place achieve the state's goal to "eliminate...escapement and to eliminate negative impacts to water quality and native fish, shellfish, and wildlife."

Decades of experience shows real effects on water quality in a plume around the net pens, which the terms of Cooke's current permit application does not eliminate. This NPDES review should re-examine existing data on effluents from industrial products, medicines, feed, fish waste, and dead and rotting fish to assess whether the current plans eliminate all of those risks.

Open water net pens routinely disperse large volumes of feed into public waters within the boundaries of the net pens. Some portion of the feed may not be consumed by penned fish, and thus makes its way into, and have an impact upon, the surrounding marine environment. The high-energy tidal zones in which net pens are located may drive broad dispersal of unconsumed feed and other dietary supplements, including medicines. This dispersal of feed into public waters represents a continuous and constant act of chumming, and attracts native fish species as well as other wildlife (see #8). Divers near net pens have observed large schools of fish swimming in and out of the pens, and reports from British Columbia on bycatch and incidental take of wild species during harvest operations indicate that many native species enter the pens, likely because of the food attraction.

Small fish species, such as baitfish species and outmigrating and rearing wild salmon and trout (including ESA-listed Chinook and steelhead), may be attracted by net pen feed to the point where they physically enter a net pen facility and are vulnerable to predation from farmed Atlantic salmon in the pens.

The constant dispersal of feed may also cause disruptions in the natural migratory patterns of wild fish, as the pens provide a constant and unnatural food source that may cause wild salmon or trout to occupy a single location for a longer period of time than is typical, and deter rearing or migrating wild ifsh from developing key feeding strategies which are critical to their early growth and development. This constant source food is also likely to draw native species (including ESA-listed Chinook and steelhead) from their protective shallow nearshore habitats to net pens.

Additionally, feeding and harvesting steelhead from the net pens attracts wildlife to the vicinity of the pens, including birds, sea lions, orcas, seals, and other fish. Cooke's NPDES permits need to consider this additional biomass and waste from these attracted species when setting limits for phosphorous, nitrogen, and other discharge.

Aside from water quality concerns, this attraction increases the chances that orcas and other marine mammals will be harassed, and that endangered wild fish will be accidentally harvested, injured, or preyed upon.

No matter the species, there is no mechanism to capture waste from open water net pen aquaculture. Fish waste, excess food, dead fish, and tissue sloughed off of live fish, all flow from net pens into surrounding waters. This nutrient imbalance in the vicinity of pens can be harmful to some wild species, and can cause unhealthy growth of other species, including algal blooms. Additional climate change impacts suggest die-offs from algal blooms could be more frequent. Read about an example in BC's Clayquoet Bay.

Unlike highly-regulated land-based agriculture and production where animal manure is collected and composted, waste (feces, urine, medicines, and uneaten feed) from open water is discharged directly into public water. The most prominent organic nutrient waste involved are phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). Based on calculations made by Wild Fish Conservancy using a bioenergetics program and data provided by Cooke in their monthly NPDES reports, the estimated amount of untreated N discharged by Atlantic salmon net pens in Puget Sound on a daily basis is roughly equivalent to the amount of N discharged in waste treated by the city of Tacoma. For the same comparison with regards to P, the amount of discharge is roughly equivalent to the cities of Port Angeles, Everett, Bellingham, and Tacoma combined.

The attraction of wildlife including birds, sea lions, orcas, seals, and other fish (described in 5a) concentrates animal waste near the pens, further increasingly levels of phosphorous and nitrogen.

Currently, Ecology only considers the impacts of the nutrients and chemicals discharged on the environment directly below or in close vicinity to the pens. As part of risk assessment and monitoring, Ecology should utilize the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's Salish Sea Model, a predictive ocean-modeling tool developed by the federal government for coastal estuarine research, restoration planning, water-quality management, and climate change response. This tool could analyze how discharge and pollution from net pens travels through the dynamic, tidal marine environment, therefore allow Ecology to better evaluate the risk the pollution poses and the geographic range the pollution would impact.

Rearing concentrated populations in what are effectively aquatic animal feedlots, face greater risk of disease, parasitic, and viral amplification than wild fish populations. When outbreaks break out in net pens, the disease-causing organisms are rapidly amplified in number and discharged to the surrounding aquatic environment in large numbers. Because wild steelhead and other species of concern (i.e. coho salmon, ESA-listed Chinook salmon and bull trout and as required by WAC 197-11-080) swim in close proximity to the pens, there is likely to be a spread of disease from infected farmed fish to these endangered wild populations.

In 2017, a B.C. study documented a strong correlational connection between disease prevalence in net pens and disease transfer to wild fish populations (Morton et al., 2017). Recent research in British Columbia found novel viruses in endangered salmon, and found evidence that these novel viral infections may originate from farmed salmon and trout (Mordecai et al., 2019).

Such pathogens fall within the definition of pollutants, and the NPDES permit review should ensure that Cooke's plans will eliminate the risk of these pollutants harming the integrity of the Sound ecosystem and the biological integrity of its wild species.

Net pens chronically discharge particles of decaying fish flesh that are often consumed by native fish and birds. These particles may be contaminated with pathogens, parasites, pharmaceuticals or chemicals that may be ingested by native fishes, including wild steelhead, salmon, and other trout. Studies have shown that these particles are potential vectors for pathogens. While Cooke now is required to recover dead fish and transport them upland for disposal, there is currently no mandate that those mortalities be submitted to the state for testing before disposal.

In order to treat specific diseases of fungal occurrences or to prevent infection, chemicals and pharmaceuticals are often applied by the industry to the fish, water, or feed in the net pens. Among the potential and likely harmful impacts to designated uses of surrounding water is the use of these chemical or pharmaceuticals for treating infections, parasites or diseases such as "yellow mouth" where the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires a 30 day waiting period before treated fish may be approved for human consumption. Native fishes in the immediate vicinity of the treated pens may also be exposed to or consume the very same chemicals and pharmaceutical treatments (including fish that may enter the pens attracted by the presence of feed and fish odors). These fish may then be caught in recreational or commercial fisheries and unknowingly be consumed by the public within FDA's required 30 day waiting period. This risk to the public and to wild fish must be addressed in the NPDES review.

The SEPA checklist submitted by Cooke Aquaculture and included in this record refers to the use of unspecified probiotic supplements. These unspecified introduced microbes are likely to colonize the microbiome of native fish and the environment near net pens. Given the growing scientific appreciation of the role of the microbiome in health and development of fish and other animals and plants, these supplements should be detailed, and a plan for monitoring surrounding areas and fish populations for colonization or excess growth of these bacteria should be required. This monitoring should also test for growth of antibiotic resistance in nearby areas.

It should also examine new data on antibiotic resistance in protected marine mammals (research discussed in this recent report from High Country News). These risks were discussed in the SEPA comments submitted by the Our Sound, Our Salmon coalition in 2019, and comments to the previous Atlantic salmon NPDES review.

he change in species poses new and different risks, in addition to the harms open water net pen aquaculture has caused for decades. Some policies which may have been permitted for Atlantic salmon under the pre-2017 status quo when, pose additional risks with the proposal to introduce a highly-domesticated and partially-sterile form of steelhead. The differences in this circumstance were considered as far back as 1990, when the last comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement was drafted. The prior permitting for these pens and their operations all addressed risks associated with a non-native species. In dealing with biologically-altered, domesticated steelhead and Puget Sound's federally-listed steelhead population, different risks apply, and standards laid out in the 1990 EIS have not been met for these purposes.

The steelhead Cooke proposes using in their net pens are highly-domesticated, biologically-altered to be partially-sterile, and genetically dissimilar to wild stocks. Similar to nonnative farmed Atlantic salmon, these fish are considered and regulated as a pollutant under the Clean Water Act if they escape into public waters.

Escape prevention and the adequacy of Cooke's escape prevention and escape response plans must be carefully considered in this permit process. The determination from the SEPA review process requires Cooke to develop a "no-recovery" option to be added to their escape response plan, which is not included in these NPDES application materials. The NPDES review must be based on their full escape plan, not this incomplete record. The SEPA determination also required Cooke to develop a plan for marking their domesticated stock (clipping the fins) to distinguish them from free-swimming wild and hatchery steelhead. That marking plan is not included in these NPDES materials, but is an important aspect of escape recovery.

Despite treatment to render the fish infertile, many fish in the pens will be capable of reproducing. When a net pen collapses, it will release more fertile female steelhead than exist in many endangered wild steelhead runs. When an escape happens, it will be nearly impossible to manage a recovery effort that removes farmed steelhead and does no harm to endangered wild steelhead and bull trout, endangered and threatened salmon, endangered southern resident killer whales, and other protected wildlife in Puget Sound.

Tribal governments have already requested government to government consultation with the State over Cooke's NPDES permit application, and at least seven tribal governments submitted comments during the SEPA process expressing concerns over Cooke's proposal and requesting the Department of Fish and Wildlife withdraw their SEPA determination that ended the environmental review process and require a comprehensive environmental impact statement.

In addition, many counties and municipalities have established new rules since the net pens were installed, which would prohibit the construction of new net pens in their waters. While the existing pens are grandfathered in, these communities and nations should have a full and open opportunity to air their concerns and ensure that the continued operation of net pens in Puget Sound honors the concerns and needs of these communities.
No attachments

Comment From: Brian O'Dell

5/30/20 @ 10:59 PM
The Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) decision to issue a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) granted Cooke key permits and ended the environmental review process under SEPA. This decision is currently being legally challenged in...↓

The SEPA determination issued in January, 2020 (Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS), requires Cooke to prepare and submit a plan for marking steelhead (clipping the adipose fin) in ways that will distinguish fish from their pens from hatchery-raised fish swimming freely in Puget Sound. That plan is not part of this record, and review of the NPDES permit application should await that filing.

The MDNS also requires Cooke to submit a plan for a "no-recovery response" to escapes. That plan is not part of the escape plan submitted in Cooke's application, and it is impossible to assess the adequacy of Cooke's pollution prevention plan until that plan is included in the application.

During the emergency response to the Orchard Rocks partial sinking, Cooke told DNR that they planned to replace some existing net pens in Puget Sound. If indeed that plan is under way, the NPDES review should include engineering data on the new pen structures in order to assess the adequacy of those pens for Puget Sound's dynamic conditions, and the escape risk and other risks the new pens might pose to Puget Sound.

The SEPA review led by the Washington Department of Fish and Wlidlife which produced the MDNS, is currently being appealed (see #1). Given the potential for a Court ruling requiring additional environmental review under SEPA and this new information described above, Ecology should delay drafting any NPDES permit until the evidentiary record and ruling can be incorporated.

Following the 2017 Cypress Island net pen collapse, Wild Fish Conservancy sued Cooke Aquaculture under the Clean Water Act (CWA). That suit resulted in rulings that the company had violated the terms of its permits, including by failing to conduct required inspections of net pen moorings and anchors, to accurately monitor and report the number of fish escaping from pens, to develop operational plans that include necessary procedures for inspecting cages, storing chemicals, disposing of harvest blood, and to track the number of fish in its cages and lost to predation. Cooke's history of CWA violations is important to consider in this process, if nothing else to ensure that the permits are drafted to ensure that violations are detected before catastrophe ensues.

Incidents like the partial sinking of the Orchard Rocks pen in October, 2019 demonstrate that the risks of additional escapes are very real, given the state of the existing pen structures. The response to that incident was conducted by several Washington State agencies, including Ecology, and the records from that incident and state agencies' documentation of Cooke's inadequate emergency response should be included in this record to ensure that emergency plans incorporate lessons learned, and acknowledge the degraded state of the surviving pens as identified by state inspectors and Cooke's own contractors.

In 2018, Washington's passed a law, HB 2957, banning Atlantic salmon net pens on the grounds that the practice placed too great a risk on the ecosystem, created a new and stricter regulatory regime for marine net pen aquaculture.

As such, it is not sufficient to say that conditions of the current NPDES application are similar to those of past permits. HB 2957's new standards require re-examining past decisions to hold Cooke Aquaculture to that higher standard of eliminating these risks.

In reviewing Cooke's submissions and other materials submitted through this public process, the standard of review should be specifically on whether the policies in place achieve the state's goal to "eliminate...escapement and to eliminate negative impacts to water quality and native fish, shellfish, and wildlife."

Decades of experience shows real effects on water quality in a plume around the net pens, which the terms of Cooke's current permit application does not eliminate. This NPDES review should re-examine existing data on effluents from industrial products, medicines, feed, fish waste, and dead and rotting fish to assess whether the current plans eliminate all of those risks.

Open water net pens routinely disperse large volumes of feed into public waters within the boundaries of the net pens. Some portion of the feed may not be consumed by penned fish, and thus makes its way into, and have an impact upon, the surrounding marine environment. The high-energy tidal zones in which net pens are located may drive broad dispersal of unconsumed feed and other dietary supplements, including medicines. This dispersal of feed into public waters represents a continuous and constant act of chumming, and attracts native fish species as well as other wildlife (see #8). Divers near net pens have observed large schools of fish swimming in and out of the pens, and reports from British Columbia on bycatch and incidental take of wild species during harvest operations indicate that many native species enter the pens, likely because of the food attraction.

Small fish species, such as baitfish species and outmigrating and rearing wild salmon and trout (including ESA-listed Chinook and steelhead), may be attracted by net pen feed to the point where they physically enter a net pen facility and are vulnerable to predation from farmed Atlantic salmon in the pens.

The constant dispersal of feed may also cause disruptions in the natural migratory patterns of wild fish, as the pens provide a constant and unnatural food source that may cause wild salmon or trout to occupy a single location for a longer period of time than is typical, and deter rearing or migrating wild ifsh from developing key feeding strategies which are critical to their early growth and development. This constant source food is also likely to draw native species (including ESA-listed Chinook and steelhead) from their protective shallow nearshore habitats to net pens.

Additionally, feeding and harvesting steelhead from the net pens attracts wildlife to the vicinity of the pens, including birds, sea lions, orcas, seals, and other fish. Cooke's NPDES permits need to consider this additional biomass and waste from these attracted species when setting limits for phosphorous, nitrogen, and other discharge.

Aside from water quality concerns, this attraction increases the chances that orcas and other marine mammals will be harassed, and that endangered wild fish will be accidentally harvested, injured, or preyed upon.

No matter the species, there is no mechanism to capture waste from open water net pen aquaculture. Fish waste, excess food, dead fish, and tissue sloughed off of live fish, all flow from net pens into surrounding waters. This nutrient imbalance in the vicinity of pens can be harmful to some wild species, and can cause unhealthy growth of other species, including algal blooms. Additional climate change impacts suggest die-offs from algal blooms could be more frequent. Read about an example in BC's Clayquoet Bay.

Unlike highly-regulated land-based agriculture and production where animal manure is collected and composted, waste (feces, urine, medicines, and uneaten feed) from open water is discharged directly into public water. The most prominent organic nutrient waste involved are phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). Based on calculations made by Wild Fish Conservancy using a bioenergetics program and data provided by Cooke in their monthly NPDES reports, the estimated amount of untreated N discharged by Atlantic salmon net pens in Puget Sound on a daily basis is roughly equivalent to the amount of N discharged in waste treated by the city of Tacoma. For the same comparison with regards to P, the amount of discharge is roughly equivalent to the cities of Port Angeles, Everett, Bellingham, and Tacoma combined.

The attraction of wildlife including birds, sea lions, orcas, seals, and other fish (described in 5a) concentrates animal waste near the pens, further increasingly levels of phosphorous and nitrogen.

Currently, Ecology only considers the impacts of the nutrients and chemicals discharged on the environment directly below or in close vicinity to the pens. As part of risk assessment and monitoring, Ecology should utilize the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's Salish Sea Model, a predictive ocean-modeling tool developed by the federal government for coastal estuarine research, restoration planning, water-quality management, and climate change response. This tool could analyze how discharge and pollution from net pens travels through the dynamic, tidal marine environment, therefore allow Ecology to better evaluate the risk the pollution poses and the geographic range the pollution would impact.

Rearing concentrated populations in what are effectively aquatic animal feedlots, face greater risk of disease, parasitic, and viral amplification than wild fish populations. When outbreaks break out in net pens, the disease-causing organisms are rapidly amplified in number and discharged to the surrounding aquatic environment in large numbers. Because wild steelhead and other species of concern (i.e. coho salmon, ESA-listed Chinook salmon and bull trout and as required by WAC 197-11-080) swim in close proximity to the pens, there is likely to be a spread of disease from infected farmed fish to these endangered wild populations.

In 2017, a B.C. study documented a strong correlational connection between disease prevalence in net pens and disease transfer to wild fish populations (Morton et al., 2017). Recent research in British Columbia found novel viruses in endangered salmon, and found evidence that these novel viral infections may originate from farmed salmon and trout (Mordecai et al., 2019).

Such pathogens fall within the definition of pollutants, and the NPDES permit review should ensure that Cooke's plans will eliminate the risk of these pollutants harming the integrity of the Sound ecosystem and the biological integrity of its wild species.

Net pens chronically discharge particles of decaying fish flesh that are often consumed by native fish and birds. These particles may be contaminated with pathogens, parasites, pharmaceuticals or chemicals that may be ingested by native fishes, including wild steelhead, salmon, and other trout. Studies have shown that these particles are potential vectors for pathogens. While Cooke now is required to recover dead fish and transport them upland for disposal, there is currently no mandate that those mortalities be submitted to the state for testing before disposal.

In order to treat specific diseases of fungal occurrences or to prevent infection, chemicals and pharmaceuticals are often applied by the industry to the fish, water, or feed in the net pens. Among the potential and likely harmful impacts to designated uses of surrounding water is the use of these chemical or pharmaceuticals for treating infections, parasites or diseases such as "yellow mouth" where the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires a 30 day waiting period before treated fish may be approved for human consumption. Native fishes in the immediate vicinity of the treated pens may also be exposed to or consume the very same chemicals and pharmaceutical treatments (including fish that may enter the pens attracted by the presence of feed and fish odors). These fish may then be caught in recreational or commercial fisheries and unknowingly be consumed by the public within FDA's required 30 day waiting period. This risk to the public and to wild fish must be addressed in the NPDES review.

The SEPA checklist submitted by Cooke Aquaculture and included in this record refers to the use of unspecified probiotic supplements. These unspecified introduced microbes are likely to colonize the microbiome of native fish and the environment near net pens. Given the growing scientific appreciation of the role of the microbiome in health and development of fish and other animals and plants, these supplements should be detailed, and a plan for monitoring surrounding areas and fish populations for colonization or excess growth of these bacteria should be required. This monitoring should also test for growth of antibiotic resistance in nearby areas.

It should also examine new data on antibiotic resistance in protected marine mammals (research discussed in this recent report from High Country News). These risks were discussed in the SEPA comments submitted by the Our Sound, Our Salmon coalition in 2019, and comments to the previous Atlantic salmon NPDES review.

he change in species poses new and different risks, in addition to the harms open water net pen aquaculture has caused for decades. Some policies which may have been permitted for Atlantic salmon under the pre-2017 status quo when, pose additional risks with the proposal to introduce a highly-domesticated and partially-sterile form of steelhead. The differences in this circumstance were considered as far back as 1990, when the last comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement was drafted. The prior permitting for these pens and their operations all addressed risks associated with a non-native species. In dealing with biologically-altered, domesticated steelhead and Puget Sound's federally-listed steelhead population, different risks apply, and standards laid out in the 1990 EIS have not been met for these purposes.

The steelhead Cooke proposes using in their net pens are highly-domesticated, biologically-altered to be partially-sterile, and genetically dissimilar to wild stocks. Similar to nonnative farmed Atlantic salmon, these fish are considered and regulated as a pollutant under the Clean Water Act if they escape into public waters.

Escape prevention and the adequacy of Cooke's escape prevention and escape response plans must be carefully considered in this permit process. The determination from the SEPA review process requires Cooke to develop a "no-recovery" option to be added to their escape response plan, which is not included in these NPDES application materials. The NPDES review must be based on their full escape plan, not this incomplete record. The SEPA determination also required Cooke to develop a plan for marking their domesticated stock (clipping the fins) to distinguish them from free-swimming wild and hatchery steelhead. That marking plan is not included in these NPDES materials, but is an important aspect of escape recovery.

Despite treatment to render the fish infertile, many fish in the pens will be capable of reproducing. When a net pen collapses, it will release more fertile female steelhead than exist in many endangered wild steelhead runs. When an escape happens, it will be nearly impossible to manage a recovery effort that removes farmed steelhead and does no harm to endangered wild steelhead and bull trout, endangered and threatened salmon, endangered southern resident killer whales, and other protected wildlife in Puget Sound.

Tribal governments have already requested government to government consultation with the State over Cooke's NPDES permit application, and at least seven tribal governments submitted comments during the SEPA process expressing concerns over Cooke's proposal and requesting the Department of Fish and Wildlife withdraw their SEPA determination that ended the environmental review process and require a comprehensive environmental impact statement.

In addition, many counties and municipalities have established new rules since the net pens were installed, which would prohibit the construction of new net pens in their waters. While the existing pens are grandfathered in, these communities and nations should have a full and open opportunity to air their concerns and ensure that the continued operation of net pens in Puget Sound honors the concerns and needs of these communities.
No attachments

Comment From: Helen Bots

5/30/20 @ 1:34 PM
Cooke Aquaculture has shown in the past that it can't be trusted to operate a fish farm in a safe
way. These fish farms pose a serious risk to Wild Salmon, which are already in serious decline,
especially Chinook Salmon. If Cooke wants to produce Farme...↓
in an enclosed containment system. Please for the sake of Wild Salmon and the SRKW's do not
permit this application!
No attachments

Comment From: Shirley Hoh

5/30/20 @ 3:55 AM
Ecology should not authorize Cooke's modified NPDES permits until the ongoing lawsuit challenging the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) environmental review process and determination is complete.
There is substantial new information that was not c...↓
Ensuring compliance of rules set by NPDES permits is crucial.
Washington's landmark 2018 law, HB2957, created a new and stricter regulatory regime for marine net pen aquaculture.
Switching species does not reduce the rampant daily pollution and water quality risks posed by open water net pen aquaculture. Ecology should not limit the scope of their review to risks associated with a change of species.
The change in species poses new and different risks.
Escape prevention and the adequacy of Cooke's escape prevention and escape response plans must be carefully considered in this permit process.
Ecology should not issue NPDES permits until Cooke has initiated and received agreement from all local, state, federal, and tribal governments.
No attachments

Comment From: Martine Felts

5/29/20 @ 1:24 PM
I live in Anacortes, after the fiasco farm hatchery here I can't believe you are even considering letting this company just do it again. Please, Please, Please do not let them do this.
No attachments

Comment From: Chris Pennington

5/29/20 @ 12:57 PM
I support cook agriculture raising sterile tripod trout
No attachments

Comment From: Christy Rodgers

5/29/20 @ 10:38 AM
Please ensure the serious pollution and water quality risks posed
by this industry are fully considered by the Dept of Ecology during this permitting process. Please ensure that you get answers to the following questions:

Do Cooke's application and the...↓

How is the expansion and continuation of open water net pen aquaculture likely to have a "significant adverse impact on water quality or human health"?

Is there additional information Cooke Aquaculture needs to provide or that Ecology needs to consider?

Thank you for your commitment to protecting Puget Sound.
No attachments

Comment From: Maddox Lightning

5/29/20 @ 7:59 AM
To whom it may concern,
I am Maddox Lightning, I grew up on and around this land. It has come to my attention that there is to be considered, a space for the voice of the people regarding the request by Cooke for a species change regarding their choic...↓
It is my opinion that Ecology should not authorize Cooke's modified NPDES permits. There is substantial new information that was not considered during the SEPA process, that to be fully considered, must be delved into deeper before taking action to approve of Cooke's request. When in doubt. Don't. Any damages done due to ignorance are no less irreversible because of it. Considering important situational factors such as the current lawsuit which is challenging the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and the environmental review process is vital to ensuring he most stable, ethical determination can be reached. I believe Ecology should wait until these proceedings have reached a conclusion, before making one of their own. That way they can stand solidly behind the facts and current law. Other considerations include Washington's landmark 2018 law, HB2957, which has implemented a stricter regulatory regime for marine net pen aquaculture; that is pertinent to viewing Cooke's request with all the possible information. As this decision is one that could potentially have negative, reaching impacts on local flora and fauna, which are potentially irreversible, I feel all should be done to ensure the safety of all involved before determining if any further movement is made towards aproveing Cooke's request.
Additionally, ensuring the compliance of all rules set by NPDES permits is crucial here! Switching the specific species of fish harbored does not reduce the water quality risks and day to day pollution that occurs with the implementation of open water net pen aquaculture. I believe it is crucial that Ecology reconsider all water quality risks associated with this choice, and due to the current proceedings, this industry as a whole, and not simply narrow their attention to the harm plausible by a change of species by Cooke. The potential for imbalance here is daunting. The use of medicinal materials on the fish farmed in open water poses a threat to local fish and wildlife downstream. They too can I jest these materials, or seeking food dispensed, enter pens, and upon catching, be then available to potential patrons of the industry. As well as fish entering the nets, there is the potential of escape. And for the fish that remain in the pen, though separated, can still transmit disease as well as viruses and parasites to the indigenous fish which are necessary to the ecological balance of the area. Even when absolutely healthy, the waste of these farmed fish cannot be filtered from the water, and threatens daily pollution to the area. This includes any material from the fish, skin, and byproducts as well as diseased fish which can contribute to ecosystem disrupting changes such as always blooms. As well, the rights and opinions of those who call this area home are practical and necessary to a good moral standing in this. The change Cooke proposes will come with more than a change in specials. There will be unforeseen effects. Though we are wise and with many tools at our disposal, thinking every possibility is out of the realm of reality. Bringing in new fish will likely pose new risks, risks we won't have a solid gauge for until it is tried, in which case, the damage caused might be irreversible. It is my opinion that Ecology should not issue NPDES permits until Cooke has initiated and received agreement from all local, state, federal, and tribal governments.
I am thankful for this time of reaching out, to hear the voices that are listening. We care of what you choose, as it directly affects our lives and livelihoods, as well as our cultures and traditions. And perhaps the most important, affects the future. It is our choice to choose from awareness. To choose for those yet to come. To honor and protect this earth. And that is worth more than any dollar. That is priceless.
Sincerely,
Maddox Lightning~
No attachments

Comment From: Maddox Lightning

5/29/20 @ 7:58 AM
To whom it may concern,
I am Maddox Lightning, I grew up on and around this land. It has come to my attention that there is to be considered, a space for the voice of the people regarding the request by Cooke for a species change regarding their choic...↓
It is my opinion that Ecology should not authorize Cooke's modified NPDES permits. There is substantial new information that was not considered during the SEPA process, that to be fully considered, must be delved into deeper before taking action to approve of Cooke's request. When in doubt. Don't. Any damages done due to ignorance are no less irreversible because of it. Considering important situational factors such as the current lawsuit which is challenging the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and the environmental review process is vital to ensuring he most stable, ethical determination can be reached. I believe Ecology should wait until these proceedings have reached a conclusion, before making one of their own. That way they can stand solidly behind the facts and current law. Other considerations include Washington's landmark 2018 law, HB2957, which has implemented a stricter regulatory regime for marine net pen aquaculture; that is pertinent to viewing Cooke's request with all the possible information. As this decision is one that could potentially have negative, reaching impacts on local flora and fauna, which are potentially irreversible, I feel all should be done to ensure the safety of all involved before determining if any further movement is made towards aproveing Cooke's request.
Additionally, ensuring the compliance of all rules set by NPDES permits is crucial here! Switching the specific species of fish harbored does not reduce the water quality risks and day to day pollution that occurs with the implementation of open water net pen aquaculture. I believe it is crucial that Ecology reconsider all water quality risks associated with this choice, and due to the current proceedings, this industry as a whole, and not simply narrow their attention to the harm plausible by a change of species by Cooke. The potential for imbalance here is daunting. The use of medicinal materials on the fish farmed in open water poses a threat to local fish and wildlife downstream. They too can I jest these materials, or seeking food dispensed, enter pens, and upon catching, be then available to potential patrons of the industry. As well as fish entering the nets, there is the potential of escape. And for the fish that remain in the pen, though separated, can still transmit disease as well as viruses and parasites to the indigenous fish which are necessary to the ecological balance of the area. Even when absolutely healthy, the waste of these farmed fish cannot be filtered from the water, and threatens daily pollution to the area. This includes any material from the fish, skin, and byproducts as well as diseased fish which can contribute to ecosystem disrupting changes such as always blooms. As well, the rights and opinions of those who call this area home are practical and necessary to a good moral standing in this. The change Cooke proposes will come with more than a change in specials. There will be unforeseen effects. Though we are wise and with many tools at our disposal, thinking every possibility is out of the realm of reality. Bringing in new fish will likely pose new risks, risks we won't have a solid gauge for until it is tried, in which case, the damage caused might be irreversible. It is my opinion that Ecology should not issue NPDES permits until Cooke has initiated and received agreement from all local, state, federal, and tribal governments.
I am thankful for this time of reaching out, to hear the voices that are listening. We care of what you choose, as it directly affects our lives and livelihoods, as well as our cultures and traditions. And perhaps the most important, affects the future. It is our choice to choose from awareness. To choose for those yet to come. To honor and protect this earth. And that is worth more than any dollar. That is priceless.
Sincerely,
Maddox Lightning~
No attachments

Comment From: Louise Abbott

5/29/20 @ 6:57 AM
Please do not approve the recent application submitted by Cooke Aquaculture Pacific. Their track record clearly shows that their operations have caused substantial pollution of the waters of the Salish Sea as well as risks to water quality of the en...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Anita Shelton

5/29/20 @ 5:52 AM
Do not allow Cooke Aquaculture to modify their permit to raise steelhead. It causes too much pollution!
No attachments

Comment From: Charlene Arnold

5/29/20 @ 4:04 AM
This application in the review process should be denied bases on companies very poor history of healthy practices. The Sound is a vulnerable environment to play at what if.
No attachments

Comment From: Caryn Graves

5/29/20 @ 3:47 AM
Ecology should not authorize Cooke's modified NPDES permits until the ongoing lawsuit challenging the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) environmental review process and determination is complete (for there is substantial new information that was ...↓

Switching species does NOT reduce the rampant daily pollution and water quality risks posed by open water net pen aquaculture. Ecology should reconsider all water quality risks associated with this industry and not limit the scope of their review to risks associated with a change of species.
No attachments

Comment From: joe lumsden

5/29/20 @ 3:38 AM
I believe it is not in the best interest of our resources to allow fish farming in our inland sea. Please do not allow this.
Joe Lumsden
No attachments

Comment From: Andrew Stevenson

5/29/20 @ 2:55 AM
Are you guys NUTS!? Changing species does in NO WAY modify or decrease the risks and negative impacts net pen aquaculture has on our waters! The citizens of Washington have already weighed in on these issues, and the result was a ban instituted by th...↓

C'mon you turkeys, man up and DO YOUR JOB! You're an embarrassment to the state and traitors to your title "Department of Ecology". This kind of pandering to commercial interests is exactly WHY your organization was formed and it's functions removed from the "Dept of Natural Resources" (another laughable title). You've lost my support and advocacy. Better NO dept than one that masquerades as a protector, while collaborating with the polluters to increase the damage. The citizens you purport to support and defend see right through your lies, and despise you!
No attachments

Comment From: Kris Knickrehm

5/29/20 @ 2:45 AM
we need to clean the Puget Sound, not contaminate it further with fish farming.
No attachments

Comment From: D Selig

5/29/20 @ 2:34 AM
As a medical professional of 30 years, I am concerned about Cooke Aquaculture having fish pens for steelhead in Puget Sound. The effluence of antibiotics and other pollutants will adversely affect the health of native fish, our water quality and the...↓

No attachments

Comment From: Sheryl Clough

5/29/20 @ 2:11 AM
We cannot afford any relaxation of water quality standards in Pacific Northwest waters. The orca and salmon populations are already strained to breaking points. Additionally, there is the risk of "farm fish" escaping their pens and spreading disease ...↓

Please deny these applications by Cooke to degrade our precious, and irreplaceable, ecosystem. Thank you for your consideration.
No attachments

Comment From: Vicki Halbakken

5/29/20 @ 1:58 AM
I am writing because I'm concerned about Cooke Aquaculture expansion in the Salish sea. The Salish is a fragile ecosystem and we should be doing everything we can to protect it! Expansion will only add stress to an already stressed situation. I am co...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Victoria Forsberg

5/29/20 @ 1:10 AM
As an inhabitant of the Puget Sound region, I am deeply concerned about the Cooke aquaculture permit. There are essential details and plans that have been left out of the application, and the complete application should be approved by all the local ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Sandra Brouillette-Jobe

5/29/20 @ 1:06 AM
Raising farmed fish of any kind in the waters of Puget Sound must not be permitted. We have already seen the destruction that raising farmed salmon does to our natural wild species. This must not be allowed to happen again.
No attachments

Comment From: Brita Fordice

5/29/20 @ 1:01 AM
Washington State has allowed fish farms to ruin our waters for far too long already. As one of only a couple of states to continue to allow net pens, it is a direct contradiction to the eco friendly state that we are.

Cooke Aquaculture has a horrific...↓
Our Puget Sound is too fragile to allow fish farming to continue. We can do everything possible to attempt to save our waters, however it is all for not if we allow Cooke to continue to pollute. We might as well shoot our remaining resident orcas if we're going to allow this to go on....

https://www.mainepublic.org/post/cooke-aquaculture-pay-state-150000-resolve-multiple-violations

https://bangordailynews.com/2013/04/27/business/cooke-aquaculture-to-pay-490k-after-illegal-pesticides-kill-lobsters-in-canada/

https://www.intrafish.com/salmon/troubled-cooke-aquaculture-salmon-farming-subsidiary-loses-more-fish/2"813641

https://www.intrafish.com/news/video-see-the-undercover-footage-that-has-cookes-maine-farmed-salmon-operations-in-trouble/2"684589

No attachments

Comment From: Beverly Rose

5/29/20 @ 12:55 AM
To Dept of Ecology,
Please act correctly on behalf of all of us to make sure the Puget Sound remains ecologically viable. Any action on the part of any corporation to "muddy the waters" must be stopped. Thank you.
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]