Rulemaking- Chapter 173-423 WAC Clean Vehicles Program Rulemaking: Comment Period

53 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Sheri Call

8/13/26 @ 10:00 PM
RE: The Washington Trucking Associations hereby submits the attached comments relating to the proposal that the Washington Department of Ecology has made to revise Washington's Clean Vehicles Program (Chapter 173-423 WAC).

INDUSTRY CHALLENGES
Washin...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Landon Bosisio

8/13/26 @ 9:55 PM
The attached letter is submitted on behalf of the four undersigned utilities: Avista, Seattle City Light, Snohomish County PUD, and Tacoma Power.
Attachments:

Comment From: Sophie Ellinghouse

8/13/26 @ 5:38 PM
Attached are the Western States Petroleum Association's comments regarding Chapter 173-423 WAC Clean Vehicles Program Rulemaking.
Attachments:

Comment From: Colleen Easler

8/13/26 @ 5:37 PM
Comments submitted on behalf of the WA Clean Transportation Coalition.
Attachments:

Comment From: Travis Nelson

8/13/26 @ 3:04 PM
The Washington Public Utility Districts Association (WPUDA) appreciates the opportunity to provide formal comments regarding the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423 WAC, as noticed in WSR-26-14-026. WPUDA represents 27 public utility districts in W...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: K Cropp

8/13/26 @ 10:22 AM
Washington should not mandate a near-total transition to zero-emission vehicles by 2035 before at a minimum, the state has demonstrated that the necessary infrastructure and technology are practical for all Washington residents.

EVs can be an excell...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Timothy French

8/13/26 @ 10:04 AM
The Truck and Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA) hereby submits the attached comments relating to the proposal that the Washington Department of Ecology has made to revise Washington's Clean Vehicles Program (Chapter 173-423 WAC).
Attachments:

Comment From: Carrie Nyssen

8/13/26 @ 8:27 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Ronda Larson Kramer

8/12/26 @ 6:53 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule.

I support these amendments because they provide Washington with a practical contingency plan while litigation over recen...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/12/26 @ 5:00 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule. I appreciate Washington state's vehicle emission standards because keeping Washington's air clean is critically important...↓
No attachments

Comment From: DeAnna Martin

8/12/26 @ 3:29 PM
Please contact Peter Heffernan Peter.Heffernan@kingcounty.gov and/or Carrie Lee carrie.lee@kingcounty.gov for questions regarding submitted comments
Attachments:

Comment From: Stacie Charlebois

8/11/26 @ 9:52 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Kristin Mastellar

8/11/26 @ 3:41 PM
Good afternoon,
 
Attached are comments from the Mason County PUD No. 1 Board of Commissioners regarding the Clean Vehicle Fuels Program.
 
Thank you for the opportunity to submit,
 
Kristin
Attachments:

Comment From: William Phillips

8/11/26 @ 3:32 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Caroline Sévilla

8/11/26 @ 11:22 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Steven Andrychowski

8/11/26 @ 7:43 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Janis Hadley

8/11/26 @ 4:55 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/10/26 @ 9:37 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule. I appreciate Washington state's vehicle emission standards because I know they help reduce carbon emissions, protect clea...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Amorah Ross

8/10/26 @ 7:49 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule. I appreciate Washington state's vehicle emission standards because I know they help reduce carbon emissions, protect clea...↓
No attachments

Comment From: D. Anonymous

8/09/26 @ 6:37 PM
Department of Ecology:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule. I appreciate Washington state's vehicle emission standards because I know they help reduce carbon...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Meridee Kortan

8/09/26 @ 3:52 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule. I appreciate Washington state's vehicle emission standards because I know they help reduce carbon emissions, protect clea...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Melinda Mueller

8/09/26 @ 3:50 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule.

I STRONGLY support these changes. My reasons are as follows:

I am a frequent contributor of public comments in respons...↓
No attachments

Comment From: John Altshuler

8/09/26 @ 12:53 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule. I appreciate Washington state's vehicle emission standards because I know they help reduce carbon emissions, protect clea...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/09/26 @ 12:52 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule. I appreciate Washington state's vehicle emission standards because I know they help reduce carbon emissions, protect clea...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Joe Greenheron

8/09/26 @ 12:01 PM
I appreciate the opportunity to offer comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423 governing Washington's Clean Vehicles Program. I firmly endorse the state's commitment to rigorous vehicle emission standards, which are vital for curbing carb...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Morales

8/09/26 @ 10:48 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

8/09/26 @ 9:54 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule. I appreciate Washington state's vehicle emission standards because I know they help reduce carbon emissions, protect clea...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Olah Kaplan

8/09/26 @ 9:37 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Kate Butt

8/09/26 @ 7:41 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washington's Clean Vehicles Program rule. I appreciate Washington state's vehicle emission standards because I know they help reduce carbon emissions, protect clea...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Carrie Nyssen

8/05/26 @ 1:48 PM
Thank you and good afternoon. My name is Carrie Neeson,
C-A-R-R-I-E-N-Y-S-S-E-N, and I'm the Senior Director of Advocacy for the
American Lung Association in Washington. The Lung Association works to save
lives by improving lung health and preventing...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Travis Nelson

8/04/26 @ 10:07 AM
This is Travis Nelson with the Washington State PUD Association. Last name
spelled N-E-L-S-O-N. And I am here to represent the Washington State Public
Utility Districts. In the interests of the requirements for electric service
vehicles for our bucke...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Sonia Hitchcock

8/04/26 @ 10:05 AM
Hi, my name is Sonia, um, last name is Hitchcock, that's
H-I-T-C-H-C-O-C-K, um, and I'm here as a staff member at Washington
Conservation Action. Um, with the recent federal actions creating this
unprecedented uncertainty about California's authority...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Ryan Roeder

8/04/26 @ 10:03 AM
Hi there, this is Ryan Roeder with Grant County PUD. I wanted to just kind of add
on to Mr. Nelson's testimony that he just put out there, We were one of
the utilities that was affected by the not being able to register a vehicle,
so I have first-ha...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

8/04/26 @ 9:58 AM
This is
Don Steinke in Clark County, Vancouver, Washington. And I urge you to move
forward with your planning. Make it better as you see fit.
And I support the proposed fleet reporting requirement. I urge people to do to use
Google to find out what t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Tim French

8/04/26 @ 9:56 AM
My name is Tim French. I'm speaking on behalf of
the Truck and Engine Manufacturers Association or EMA. EMA has commented on the
DOE's earlier rulemakings to opt into CARB emission standards, and we will be
submitting written comments before the Aug...↓
No attachments

Comment From: William Alexander

8/03/26 @ 11:53 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Matt Harris

8/03/26 @ 11:50 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Maggie Blair

7/29/26 @ 9:38 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Vanessa Jamison

7/29/26 @ 5:59 AM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Patrice Wallace

7/28/26 @ 9:22 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Russell Weisz

7/28/26 @ 8:23 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Stephanie Hemness

7/28/26 @ 5:10 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Jacob Squirrel

7/28/26 @ 4:32 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Stacie Charlebois

7/28/26 @ 4:29 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Don Steinke

7/28/26 @ 4:20 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Charles Lauzon

7/28/26 @ 3:50 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Steven Andrychowski

7/28/26 @ 2:56 PM
hank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a backs...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Liana Lang

7/28/26 @ 2:55 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Caroline Sévilla

7/28/26 @ 2:51 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Lori Danielson

7/28/26 @ 2:51 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Dianna MacLeod

7/28/26 @ 2:49 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Vicky McCarley

7/27/26 @ 3:28 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to publicly comment on and support the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) allows Washingt...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments

Comment From: Jamie Shields

7/27/26 @ 3:28 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to Chapter 173-423, Washingtons Clean Vehicles Program rule.

Adopting amendments to Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) and Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) will allow Washington to have a back...↓

The expanded fleet reporting requirements proposed will further support Washingtons continued movement forward on transportation. Ultimately, stronger vehicle emission standards and better fleet reporting will protect public health, resulting in fewer hospital visits and deaths each year, and fewer community members put at risk for cancer, asthma, heart disease, and other devastating ailments.

While adopting these older standards establishes a degree of protection if federal actions limit enforcement, Washingtons current Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Low-NOx omnibus standards offer far greater protections for Washingtonians. Stricter requirements for tailpipe emissions and requirements for zero-emission vehicle sales ensure greater progress on air pollution reduction and our greenhouse gas emissions limits, advancing both climate and public health goals. If the ongoing litigation succeeds in proving the illegality of recent federal actions, the current, more protective standards should be reinstated as quickly as possible.

Thank you for your consideration, and for your work to establish standards that protect Washingtons environmental and public health.
No attachments